NC State University. NC State University. Factor s that decrease ability for cow to cool off humidity wind speed respira=on rate sweat gland ac=vity

Similar documents
Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake

Overview. Initial Research. Overview. Initial Research. Initial Research. Adapting Angus Cattle to Subtropical Climates 10/28/2015

Mark McCully Nov. 4, 2014

Measuring Cow Efficiency in the Herd. Ryon S. Walker Livestock Consultant Noble Research Institute

Got Milk? An Economic Look at Cow Size and Milk. July 13 th, 2015

Pregnancy Rates. Jack C. Whittier Colorado State University. !I am not an economist and I do not. ! Biology and interactions

MATCHING FORAGES WITH LIVESTOCK NEEDS

Forage Systems for Pasture Finishing Beef

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Heifer Management. by Brian Freking Beef Progress Report-1

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

Evaluation of production efficiencies among primiparous suckler cows of diverse genotype at pasture

PERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS. D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland

Relationship of Cow Size, Requirements, and Production Issues. Dr. Matt Hersom UF/IFAS Department of Animal Sciences

Gateway to Profit Part 2

EPDs and Reasonable Expectations in Commercial Crossbred Operations

Using EPDs in a Commercial Herd

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

TALL FESCUE GRAZING RESEARCH 1

The Economics of Replacing Endophyte Infected Fescue with Novel Endophyte Fescue on Cow-Calf and Beef Stocker Operations

Selecting and Sourcing Replacement Heifers

Effects of Prepartum Dried Distillers Supplementation on the Performance of Fescue Grazed Fall-Calving Cows and Subsequent Steer Feedlot Performance

REPLACEMENT HEIFER DEVELOPMENT & NUTRITION

Forages are the foundations

Jane Parish Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Mississippi State University

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Forage Systems for Dairy Grazing. Robert Kallenbach University of Missouri

10/16/13

2

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

The Value of Improving the Performance of your Cow-Calf Operation

Beef Integrated Reproductive Management Grayson County Project

COW HERD REPLACEMENT. John Dhuyvetter NCREC NDSU Extension

A Discussion Where We Have Been Where We Are Where We Are Going

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

Pasture Management Strategies to Reduce Fescue Toxicity. Sarah Kenyon Agronomy Specialist

OSU CowCulator. A Tool for Evaluating Beef Cow Diets. Instructions for Use 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences. Introduction BEEF108

Dealing With Drought Keith VanderVelde UW Extension Marquette County

WATER, HEAT STRESS, AND DROUGHT

Stockpiled Bermudagrass Protocol 300 Day Grazing Emphasis Program

We are in the bull business

Understanding and Utilizing EPDs to Select Bulls

Selecting the Right Replacement. Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UDDER SHAPE, UDDER CAPACITY, COW LONGEVITY AND CALF WEIGHTS ~

Ma# Spangler Sept. 8, 2016

Beef Bulls. Performance of Progeny. High and Low Per forming. Sired by JAN U N IV ERSI T Y STATION EXPERIMENT AGRICULTU RAL A U BUR N

STRATEGIES FOR TIGHT BUDGETS AND MINIMAL RISK Grazing Management Strategies to Improve Efficiency and Reduce Risk

Research in Beef Cattle''6"#""' Nutrition and Management

Selecting the Right Genetics (Matching Cows to your Environment) David W. Schafer Arizona Beef Day July 29, 2009

Mike Davis, The Ohio State University 6/19/14

Beef Cattle Management Update

Common $ense Heifer Management

Forage-Livestock Research Progress Report

The profitability of increasing efficiency in the herd Brian Cumming. bcagriculture.com.au

Production Measures for Cow Herd Performance

Impact of Selection for Improved Feed Efficiency. Phillip Lancaster UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center

Rotation Grazing Demonstrations With Beef Cows on HEL - Adams County Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Project

seeblue An Equal Opportunity University

EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS

2/15/2016 TURTLE ROCK ANGUS Jeff & Lisa Liston Lovilia, IA c: Efficiency for Feed, Functi

Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves

Beef Cattle Research Update

BREEDING YEARLING HEIFERS

Outline. Heifers selection. Selection. Maternal Traits. Range Beef Cow Symposium, Dec. 3-5, /5/13. rangebeefcow.com 1

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Fall Calving in North Dakota By Brian Kreft

2018 Virginia State Feed Association & Nutritional Management Cow College 02/14/18

FIRST-CALF. PERFORmnncE. foreign X domestic. hybrid heifers PUBLICATION C212 P1537. (1977 print) c.3

Forage Production for Cow- Calf Operations

GENETIC IMPROVEMENT FOR FORAGE USE GENETIC IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPLES FOR THE COWHERD 1/2/2014. Qualifications. Matt Spangler University of Nebraska

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Focus. Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1

Section 5: Production Management

Mississippi Beef Cattle Management Calendar

IMPACT OF SEED STOCK SELECTION ON THE ECONOMICS OF A COW-CALF OPERATION

Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

2013 Georgia Grazing School:

B eef Cattle Management Update

Changes In Growth Performance Of Steers And Nutritive Value Of Wheat Pasture From Fall/Winter Grazing To Graze-Out

Use of Linear and Non-linear Growth Curves to Describe Body Weight Changes of Young Angus Bulls and Heifers

Traits and Tools for Retention and Replacement of Females

Cattle Temporal and Spatial Distribution in Midwestern Pastures Using Global Positioning (A Progress Report)

Choices in Breeding Programs to Fit Your Environment

A NEW GENETIC PREDICTION FOR COW MAINTENANCE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS

Dairy Reproduction Benchmarks. J.W. Smith, W.D. Gilson, L.O. Ely and W.M. Graves Animal and Dairy Science Department

Jesse D. Savell University of Florida

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue. John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech

Local Genetic Adaptation in Beef Cattle Jared Decker Assistant Professor Beef Genetics Specialist Computational Genomics

Overview. About Me. Why Confinement? Types of Confinements. Spacing Needs. Facility and Ventilation Concerns. Final Thoughts

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Beef Cattle Handbook

AGE OF COW AND AGE OF DAM EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION OF HEREFORD COWS 1. ABSTRACt"

Genetic Parameters and Their Use in Swine Breeding

Selection and Development of Heifers

Intensified cow/calf production in the Southern Great Plains Adam McGee, Jarrod Cole, Corbit Baylif, Miles Redden, Courtney Spencer, David Lalman,

56% 64% of farms are owned by the same family for 3 generations

Transcription:

K.A. Gray 1, T. Smith 2, C. Maltecca 1, P. Overton 1, J.A. Parish 2, and J.P. Cassady 1 1 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA 2 Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS Reduced Concep=on Rates Milk Produc=on Feed Intake Weight Gains Death Past Health Problems Respiratory disease CaHle in Confinement Less air movement More radiant heat due to concrete or compact dirt Less Shade Heavy CaHle (> 1000 lb) Dark Hided cahle Slobbering High respiratory rate (pan=ng) Decreased mobility Decreased appe=te Poorer general health Factor s that decrease ability for cow to cool off humidity wind speed respira=on rate sweat gland ac=vity Humidity water from sweat or even sweat vapor gets trapped between hair follicles energy in thermoregula=on respira=on rate Sweat Results in Heat Stress 1

6/4/11 Hair Coat type Hair Coat type Hair Coat Shedding Hair Coat type Hair Coat Shedding Kentucky Fescue 31 White Clover Forage type Red Clover Coastal Bermuda Big Bluestem 2

1960 First Hair Coat shedding study published Australia Hereford, Shorthorn, Zebu, Bri=sh/Zebu Cross 7 point scoring system Heritablility - 0.63 Half- sib model Repeatability 0.6 Gene=c Correla=on with calf growth (- 0.577) (Turner and Schleger, 1960) 2006 Colorado State University - (Williams et al., 2006) Replacement Limousin Sires for Brazilian Herds 5 point scoring system Heritablility - 0.33 Concluded that Selec=on for Hair coat shedding in US would increase growth in Brazil h 2 = 0.38 (Jenkinson et al., 1975) Slick calves vs. Full coat calves No difference in weaning weight Faster post- weaning growth Assess the amount of varia=on in coat shedding of Angus cows Determine coat shedding rela=onship with pounds of calf weaned and BCS. (Olsen et al.,2003) Descrip=on of Data Registered Angus Cows Age of Cows Diet LocaOon CollecOon of Data Scores n = 532 (904 obs) 3-13 yrs NCSU - Endophyte infected fescue pasture MSU - Mixed warm- season grasses, annual ryegrass, and non- toxic endophyte- infected tall fescue at UPRS, MSU (3 locaoons) once per month over 2 years 1 (slick) - 5 (full winter coat) Scale Hair coat score = 5 3

6/4/11 Hair coat score = 4 Hair coat score = 3 Hair coat score = 2 Hair coat score = 1 30 Procedure First month with a score of 3 or less was recorded. Model (Adj. 205 d wt) Fixed Month Shed (March July) Year (2007 2009) Loca=on (4 levels) Sex of Calf (Bull or Heifer) 20 15 10 5 0 March April May June July 272 ± 3.0 kg 270 ± 2.8 kg 263 ± 3.5 kg 258 ± 3.4 kg 246 ± 4.3 kg First Month with a Shedding Score of 3 or less (MFS) and Avg. Adj. 205d Wt Random Percentage 25 Sire of Calf 4

March April 1.9 3.06 0.54 March May 8.5 4.14 0.04 March June 13.7 4.28 0.01 March July 25.7 5.1 0.01 April May 6.6 3.51 0.06 April June 11.8 3.68 0.01 April July 23.9 4.63 0.01 May June 5.2 3.21 0.10 May July 17.3 4.25 0.01 June - July 12.1 3.99 0.01 March April 1.9 3.06 0.54 March May 8.5 4.14 0.04 March June 13.7 4.28 0.01 March July 25.7 5.1 0.01 April May 6.6 3.51 0.06 April June 11.8 3.68 0.01 April July 23.9 4.63 0.01 May June 5.2 3.21 0.10 May July 17.3 4.25 0.01 June - July 12.1 3.99 0.01 5

Cows seperated into two groups MFS = March, April, or May MFS = June and July n=373 n=334 Es=mate SE P value March - May June - July 24.4 lbs 2.8 <.0001 205 d wt Shed 205 d wt 0.27 Shed - 0.58 0.35 Heritability on diagonal Gene=c Correla=on below diagonal Shedding Scores Score in May (in Southeast) Selec=ng for shedding in Southeast could increase calf weight Repeatability 0.65 Possible Explana=ons Prolac=n concentra=ons Mammary development Hair regression Diet Endophyte Infected Tall Fescue Ambient Temperature Genotype x Environment? Need to test in non- fescue Need to test in different weather MT, ND, AZ and Midwest states Other Produc=ve traits of interest Longevity Gesta=on Length Puberty 6

Genotype x Environment? Need to test in non- fescue Need to test in different weather MT, ND, AZ and Midwest states A project is currently underway to collect data on > 5000 Angus cows. Data collected over the last two weeks Other Produc=ve traits of interest Longevity Gesta=on Length Puberty State Number of Cows Missouri 1600 Texas 2200 Virgina 900 North Carolina 300 South Carolina 400 Mississippi 240 State Iowa 200 Tennesse 330 Alabama 125 Kentucky 125 Total 6420 Number of Cows North Carolina State University Kent Gray, Ph.D. student Peggy Overton, technician Kayla Fleetwood, MS student Mississippi State University Trent Smith, Ph.D. Jane Parish, Ph.D. Cooperators Mr. and Mrs. Jack Evans EE Ranch, Winona, MS Mr. Mike Howell Southern Shine Pastures, Okolona, MS American Angus Associa=on Mississippi Angus Associa=on Mississippi BCIA Mississippi Agricultural Research Service North Carolina Agricultural Research Service North Carolina CaHlemen s Associa=on 7