CMMI FOR SERVICES, THE PREFERRED CONSTELLATION WITHIN THE SOFTWARE TESTING FUNCTION OF A SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION

Similar documents
CMMI for Services Quick Reference

Patricia A Eglin David Consulting Group

CMMI-SVC V1.3 CMMI for Services Version 1.3 Quick Reference Guide

Strategies for Transitioning to CMMI-SVC

Bill Smith, CEO Leading Edge Process Consultants LLC

This resource is associated with the following paper: Assessing the maturity of software testing services using CMMI-SVC: an industrial case study

Applying CMMI-SVC Process Areas to CMMI-DEV Projects

CMMI for Services (CMMI -SVC) Process Areas

CMMI for Acquisition Quick Reference

CMMI Version 1.2. Model Changes

DORNERWORKS QUALITY SYSTEM

Lesson Learned from Cross Constellations and Multi Models Process Improvement Initiatives

This chapter illustrates the evolutionary differences between

CMMI SM Model Measurement and Analysis

CMMI-DEV V1.3 CMMI for Development Version 1.3 Quick Reference Guide

CMMI V2.0 MODEL AT-A-GLANCE. Including the following views: Development Services Supplier Management. CMMI V2.0 outline BOOKLET FOR print.

USAF Software Technology Support Center (STSC) STSC SPI Help Desk COM , DSN

Using CMMI for Services for IT Excellence QUEST 2009 Conference Talk

8. CMMI Standards and Certifications

Applied CMMI-SVC: Identifying Service Systems and Improving Service System Capability

Getting from Here (SW-CMM) to There (CMMI) in a Large Organization

Getting from Here (SW-CMM) to There (CMMI) in a Large Organization

How to Assure your Subcontractors Quality with Cross Constellations and Multi Models Inspiration Continues Process Improvement Initiatives

How to Develop Highly Useable CMMI Documentation

Engineering. CMMI for Development V.1.2 Module 3. M03/Engineering/v1.2

CMMI GLOSSARY A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

A Global Overview of The Structure

What s New in V1.3. Judah Mogilensky Process Enhancement Partners, Inc.

Leveraging Your Service Quality Using ITIL V3, ISO and CMMI-SVC. Monday Half-Day Tutorial

Applying CMMI-SVC to Process Management. Allen Eagles Lynn Penn Dorna Witkowski

7. Model based software architecture

Evolutionary Differences Between CMM for Software and the CMMI

CERT Resilience Management Model, Version 1.2

Work Plan and IV&V Methodology

Project Management Process Groups. PMP Study Group Based on the PMBOK Guide 4 th Edition

PART THREE: Work Plan and IV&V Methodology (RFP 5.3.3)

PRES The Effects of Software Process Maturity on Software Development Effort

WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY Information Technology - Independent Verification and Validation RFP No IVV-B

UPGRADE CONSIDERATIONS Appian Platform

SOFTWARE SYSTEM ENGINEERING: A TUTORIAL

How mature is my test organization: STDM, an assessment tool

CMMI-SVC: A Cost-Effective Approach to Early Use

Rational Software White Paper TP 174

Marilyn Ginsberg-Finner Northrop Grumman Corporation

Chapter 6. Software Quality Management & Estimation

The Issue of Performance Why Do you need a Maturity Level 5. Achieving the Organizational Business Objectives Through Optimized Operational Processes

ISACA Systems Implementation Assurance February 2009

A Real-Life Example of Appraising and Interpreting CMMI Services Maturity Level 2

TOPIC DESCRIPTION SUPPLEMENT for the SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SURVEY DESCRIPTION

Risk assessment checklist - Acquire and implement

What Functional Groups Are Included in the CMMI -SE/SW/IPPD/SS Model?

Maturing Measurement Capability The CMMI SM Measurement Thread and Recognized Industry Guidance - Standards

One if by Land, Two if by Sea

A GeoTalent White Paper Key Steps for Implementing a Talent Management System

CMMI for Technical Staff

1 Management Responsibility 1 Management Responsibility 1.1 General 1.1 General

The Explicit Relationship Between CMMI and Project Risks

Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan

AUTOMATED DEFECT PREVENTION: BEST PRACTICES IN SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT

The Rational Unified Process and the Capability Maturity Model Integrated Systems/Software Engineering

Using Pilots to Assess the Value and Approach of CMMI Implementation

Project Quality Management

Six Sigma Black Belt Week 3. Six Sigma Black Belt Week 3. Six Sigma Black Belt Week 3. Project Management. Chapter 3-4

Work Plan and IV&V Methodology

CMMI and FPA. the link and benefit of using FPA when rolling out CMMI. Christine Green IFPUG - Certified Function Point Specialist EDS

Contrasting CMMI and the PMBOK. Systems Engineering Conference October 2005

MTAT Software Engineering Management

The Continuous Representation:

USING PILOTS TO ASSESS THE VALUE AND APPROACH OF CMMI IMPLEMENTATION. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)

The Top Thrill Dragster

Darshan Institute of Engineering & Technology for Diploma Studies Rajkot Unit-1

Software Engineering

D ENABLE. Dimension 4 competence title and generic description level 1 level 2 level 3 level 4 level 5 knowledge skills

An Overview of the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework

Aerospace Advanced Product Quality Planning (Aerospace APQP) Introduction. Date: April Section 7.2

FMEP: Facilities Management Evaluation Program

Program Lifecycle Methodology Version 1.7

LSST Verification & Validation Process & MBSE Methodology

WORKFORCE CENTRAL APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION To become a WorkSource Pierce Partner Affiliate Site

EVERYTHING CAN BE IMPROVED.

Highlights of CMMI and SCAMPI 1.2 Changes

Using CMMI. Type of Work. IT solution development Software development IT solution integration IT solution deployment

A Measurement Approach Integrating ISO 15939, CMMI and the ISBSG

Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems

PROJECT INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT. 1 Powered by POeT Solvers LImited

Project Management CSC 310 Spring 2018 Howard Rosenthal

Systems Engineers provide a Key Contribution and Role in System Integration and Test

Milestones & Benchmarks

Benchmarking Functional Verification by Mike Bartley and Mike Benjamin, Test and Verification Solutions

Software technology 3. Process improvement models. BSc Course Dr. Katalin Balla

Integrated Class C Process Appraisals (ICPA)

HR Excellence. Confederation of Indian Industry

Introduction of RUP - The Rational Unified Process

What We ll Cover. What is the SDLC? Component 8 Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems

Maximizing The Value Of Your Smart Grid Investment

Desk Audit of. Based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines FTA-IT

Configuration Management

Software Processes. Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1

STATEMENT OF WORK SMALL SPACECRAFT PROTOTYPING ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT & INTEGRATION (SSPEDI) Space Solutions (SpS)

Transcription:

CMMI FOR SERVICES, THE PREFERRED CONSTELLATION WITHIN THE SOFTWARE TESTING FUNCTION OF A SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION NAME: Nestor K. Ovalle, PhD TITLE: Leadership & Corporate Change Consultant; CMMI for Development and CMMI for Services Instructor ORGANIZATION: N.K. Ovalle

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

PURPOSE Examine how the CMMI for Services model was used in the implementation of a new software testing function within a software engineering organization Examine the implementation of five service specific process areas within the software testing service: Strategic Service Management, Service System Development, Service System Transition, Service Delivery, Capacity and Availability Management

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

BACKGROUND - 1 Software testing service system (a new software testing facility) was a new functional unit within a software engineering organization responsible for business and operational software development The new software testing facility focused on automated functional and performance/load testing

BACKGROUND - 2 Why was CMMI for Services considered CMMI for Development was already being used by the software development staff of the software engineering organization Expectations for having a mature software testing facility were high Initial plan to implement best practices from a few process areas of CMMI for Services model Strategic service management, service system development, service system transition, service delivery, capacity and availability management

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

Strategic Service Management (STSM) Why Strategic Service Management? We wanted to ensure that we planned, defined, and revised the new software testing service system s standard services in a systematic manner

Strategic Service Management (STSM) The purpose of Strategic Service Management (STSM) is to establish and maintain standard services in concert with strategic needs and plans. SG 1 Strategic needs and plans for standard services are established and maintained. SP 1.1 Gather and analyze data about the strategic needs and capabilities of the organization. SP 1.2 Establish and maintain plans for standard services...

Strategic Service Management (STSM) STSM SP1.1 Identified need to place more emphasis on potential patterns of risk in the deployment of the new testing service STSM SP1.2 Planned and provided software testing as a standard service Re-assessed existing capabilities and needs Reviewed standard services with relevant stakeholders

Strategic Service Management (STSM) SG 2 A set of standard services is established and maintained. SP 2.1 Establish and maintain properties of the organization s set of standard services and service levels. SP 2.2 Establish and maintain descriptions of the organization s defined standard services.

Strategic Service Management (STSM) STSM SP2.2 Service descriptions were developed and placed on a web site for use by stakeholders Web site access to descriptions allowed for ongoing review and feedback by stakeholders

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

Service System Development (SSD) Why Service System Development We wanted to ensure we adequately planned and addressed the development of the new software testing service system (the software testing facility)

Service System Development (SSD) The purpose of Service System Development (SSD) is to analyze, design, develop, integrate, verify, and validate service systems, including service system components, to satisfy existing or anticipated service agreements. SG 1 Stakeholder needs, expectations, constraints, and interfaces are collected, analyzed, and transformed into validated service system requirements. SP 1.1 Collect and transform stakeholder needs, expectations, constraints, and interfaces into stakeholder requirements. SP 1.2 Refine and elaborate stakeholder requirements to develop service system requirements. SP 1.3 Analyze and validate requirements, and define required service system functionality and quality attributes.

Service System Development (SSD) SSD SG1 Supported use of a more formal approach to developing the stakeholder requirements Used face-to-face meetings used to solicit and refine stakeholders needs and requirements (SP1.1) Institutionalized the practice of developing operational concepts and scenarios to provide better visualization and detailed specification of the software testing system requirements (SP1.3)

Service System Development (SSD) SG 2 Service system components are selected, designed, implemented, and integrated. SP 2.1 Select service system solutions from alternative solutions. SP 2.2 Develop designs for the service system and service system components. SP 2.3 Manage internal and external interface definitions, designs, and changes for service systems. SP 2.4 Implement the service system design. SP 2.5 Assemble and integrate implemented service system components into a verifiable service system...

Service System Development (SSD) SSD SG2 Facilitated the design and development of the new software testing service system Criteria were established to select the solution for building the testing facility (SP2.1) Descriptions of roles, responsibilities and skills of testing staff were developed (SP2.2) Facility design completed and well documented (SP2.4 and SP 2.5)

Service System Development (SSD) SG 3 Selected service system components and services are verified and validated to ensure correct service delivery. SP 3.1 Establish and maintain an approach and an environment for verification and validation. SP 3.2 Perform peer reviews on selected service system components. SP 3.3 Verify selected service system components against their specified requirements. SP 3.4 Validate the service system to ensure that it is suitable for use in the intended delivery environment and meets stakeholder expectations.

Service System Development (SSD) SSD SG3 Supported the validation and verification of the new automated software testing service system The automated software testing tools were verified and validated in a controlled testing environment Peer reviews were used to assess implementation of the structured testing designs staff would perform (SP3.2) CONTINUED ON NEXT SLIDE

Service System Development (SSD) CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS SLIDE SSD SG3 Supported validation and verification of the new automated software testing service system Stakeholders used to review verification and validation effort to help insure testing environment reflected real-world environment in which software would operate Periodic formal inspections by third-party software quality assurance personnel conducted of testing procedures and of training for testing staff (SP3.3 and SP3.4)

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

Service System Transition (SST) Why Service System Transition We wanted to ensure we adequately addressed the ability to deploy the new software testing standard service (software testing facility), while continuing to provide ongoing software testing without any disruptions

Service System Transition (SST) The purpose of Service System Transition (SST) is to deploy new or significantly changed service system components while managing their effect on ongoing service delivery. SG 1 Preparation for service system transition is conducted. SP 1.1 Analyze the functionality, quality attributes, and compatibility of the current and future service systems to minimize impact on service delivery. SP 1.2 Establish and maintain plans for specific transitions of the service system. SP 1.3 Prepare relevant stakeholders for changes in services and service systems...

Service System Transition (SST) SST SG1 Supported the planning and communication with the stakeholders who were involved in the activities from Strategic Service Management and Service System Development Software testing staff worked with stakeholders to develop and obtain buy-in on the transition plan (SP1.1 and SP1.2) Prepared stakeholders for the changes to deployment of test services was a major focus (SP1.3)

Service System Transition (SST) SG 2 The service system is deployed to the delivery environment. SP 2.1 Systematically deploy service system components into the delivery environment based on transition planning. SP 2.2 Assess the impacts of the transition on stakeholders and service delivery, and take appropriate corrective action.

Service System Transition (SST) SST SP2.1 Reinforced need to place all testing service components (the test facility configuration, testing tools, and support documentation) under configuration control SST SP2.1 Reemphasized the importance of continued validation of the testing service system in the delivery environment. Stakeholders continued to be involved to insure the system operates according to their expectations

Service System Transition (SST) SST SP 2.2 Assisted with assessing the impact of transition and taking corrective actions Post-deployment reviews were held with stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of the new testing service

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

Service Delivery (SD) Why Service Delivery We wanted to ensure we adequately addressed the development of the service agreement and the delivery of the services for the new software testing standard service

Service Delivery (SD) The purpose of Service Delivery (SD) is to deliver services in accordance with service agreements. SG 1 Service agreements are established and maintained. SP 1.1 Analyze existing service agreements and service data to prepare for expected new agreements. SP 1.2 Establish and maintain the service agreement...

SD (SG1) used to develop Service Agreement The service agreement described Scope and objectives of the software testing work Specific types of software testing to be conducted Roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders, including the customers, the service providers, the funding organization Resources required for testing (staffing, facility, software, hardware) and who would be responsible for providing these resources CONTINUED ON NEXT SLIDE

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS SLIDE SD (SG1) used to develop Service Agreement The service agreement described Availability of the software testing services Identifiable costs and commitments to funding by the stakeholders Expected milestones and schedule How the service(s) were to be evaluated and acceptance determined

Service Delivery (SD) SG2 Preparation for service delivery is conducted. SP 2.1 Establish and maintain the approach to be used for service delivery and service system operations SP 2.2 Confirm the readiness of the service system to enable the delivery of services. SP 2.3 Establish and maintain a request management system for processing and tracking request information..

SD (SG2) used to prepare for implementation of service delivery SD SP2.1 Used to identify the time and resource requirements for testing service delivery SD SP2.2 Used to confirm readiness for service of the testing facility

Service Delivery (SD) SG 3 Services are delivered in accordance with service agreements. SP 3.1 Receive and process service requests in accordance with service agreements. SP 3.2 Operate the service system to deliver services in accordance with service agreements. SP 3.3 Maintain the service system to ensure the continuation of service delivery.

SD (SG3) used to insure services are delivered in accordance with the service agreements SD SP3.1 Used to help testing facility receive and process the requests for testing Subpractice 8 especially useful in helping review the software testing request status and confirm the testing results with relevant stakeholders

SD (SG3) used to insure services are delivered in accordance with the service agreements SD SP3.2 Used to operate the software testing service system in accordance with the service agreement Subpractice 5 especially useful in managing and controlling operationally-oriented quality attributes for the testing service. In particular, two quality attributes were carefully managed - the security of the facility and the reliability of the testing service

SD (SG3) used to insure services are delivered in accordance with the service agreements SD SP3.3 Used to maintain the testing service system to insure the continuation of service delivery Software testing places special emphasis on maintenance Preventive maintenance of the testing hardware and software Adaptive maintenance of the testing facility hardware and software to accommodate the different types of software we must be prepared to test

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

Capacity and Availability Management (CAM) Why Capacity and Availability Management We wanted to ensure we had the resources we needed (staff, software, hardware, network support) in the software testing service system and that the resources were available when needed

Capacity and Availability Management (CAM) The purpose of Capacity and Availability Management (CAM) is to ensure effective service system performance and ensure that resources are provided and used effectively to support service requirements. SG 1 Preparation for capacity and availability management is conducted. SP 1.1 Establish and maintain a strategy for capacity and availability management. SP 1.2 Select measures and analytic techniques to be used in managing the capacity and availability of the service system. SP 1.3 Establish and maintain service system representations to support capacity and availability management...

CAM (SG1) used to establish and maintain a strategy (we especially focused on having measures) for managing capacity and availability Developed capacity and availability measures for managing CAM, including: Percentage the software testing facility was available within agreed hours Downtime of the testing facility or parts of the facility Use of critical software testing resources

Capacity and Availability Management (CAM) SG 2 Capacity and availability are monitored and analyzed to manage resources and demand. SP 2.1 Monitor and analyze capacity against thresholds. SP 2.2 Monitor and analyze availability against targets. SP2.3 Report capacity and availability management data to relevant stakeholders.

CAM (SG2) used to monitor and analyze demand for resources SD SP2.1 Monitored capacity - in particular, we monitored the use of software testing resources (hardware and software) to determine normal use SD SP2.2 Monitored availability - in particular, we monitored the reliability (mean time between failure) of the software test equipment and maintainability (time to repair failed equipment)

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Purpose Background of the Software Testing Organization Implementing CMMI for Services Strategic Service Management Service System Development Service System Transition Service Delivery Capacity and Availability Management Summary

SUMMARY Today, we Examined how the CMMI for Services model was used in the implementation of a new software testing function within a software engineering organization Examined five service specific process areas and how they were used within the software testing service: Strategic Service Management, Service System Development, Service System Transition, Service Delivery, Capacity and Availability Management Are There Any Questions?

SUMMARY THANK YOU! CONTACT INFORMATION Nestor K. Ovalle, PhD Email: nkovalle2d@gmail.com Phone: 505-670-4929