Danube Facts and Figures. Germany (July 2007)

Similar documents
Danube Facts and Figures. The Czech Republic (July 2007)

Classification of Heavily Modified Water bodies and Derivation of the Ecological Potential in the German federal state of Bavaria

Legal Basis of Water Management in Austria

Water quality and Climate Change The case of Lake Ammersee, Bavaria

The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Austria: Status as of March Hellmut Fleckseder / Wolfgang Stalzer

Morava River Basin - Slovakia

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT CITY OF MANNHEIM

11 Water. Context. These micropollutants can have an adverse effect on water quality, even in very low concentrations.

Significant Water Management Issues in the Danube River Basin District - Summary

Properties of Water. Their shapes change when they are in different containers. Their volumes stay the same in any container.

European Strategy for the Danube Region

Implementation of the UWWTD in Austria. Ernst Überreiter

Long-term change of stream water quality as a consequence of watershed development and management

Urban Geology Spring 2011

Hungarian Experiences in the Implementation of WFD

Current developments and challenges in drought management in Northern Bavaria

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

European Union Strategy for Danube Region and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive

Danube River Basin Management Plan

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1. Water status management. 1.1 Water status

DRAFT RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN

WASA Quiz Review. Chapter 2

ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF MUNICIPAL WATER AND WASTEWATER TARIFFS AND EFFLUENT CHARGES IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN.

Wastewater Treatment Works... The Basics

Council Directive 91/271/EEC The National Programme for Municipal Waste Water Treatment

GEP, Objectives & Measures in the Netherlands

The Elbe River Basin: Preliminary evaluation of the answers. Janos J. Bogardi Executive Officer of GWSP

Romania key input to the Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters under the UNECE Water Convention Prut River Basin

International cooperation for transboundary water pollution control:

Human Impact on Water

Water Account, Mauritius 2013

Water Quality Assessment in the Thames River Watershed

Water for life and livelihoods

SOURCES OF POLLUTION AS A HAZARD FOR RIVER ENVIRONMENT IN CASE OF FLOOD

Bavarian Climate Programme Christian Wanger Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Public Health Brescia, Octobre,10, 2013

DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY POST GRADUATE GOVT. COLLEGE FOR GIRLS.SECTOR-11 CHANDIGARH CLASS-B.A.II PAPER-A RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT: WORLD PATTERNS

Specific issues and challenges regarding the development of RBMP s in the EU: Example from the Netherlands

Sustainable Water Resource Practices

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRIA CLEMENS NEUHOLD AUSTRIAN FEDERAL MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABILITY AND TOURISM

An Introduction to the EU legislation on water. Title

The environmental objectives and Programme of Measures of the River Basin Management Plan. The case of Cyprus. Iacovos Papaiacovou

Water management plans in Estonia and impact of agriculture. Mariina Hiiob Environmental Board Environmental Department

Water reuse and water quality aspects in Europe

Chapter 14 Water: A Limited Resource

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

Drinking Water Sources and Extraction

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN. Prof. Dr. Laszlo Vermes

Controlling runon and runoff:

Tap into it! European Commission

Brahmatwinn Twinning European and South Asian River Basins to enhance capacity and implement adaptive management approaches

Market summaries for technologies on reuse of water, resource recovery and resource efficiency

Monitoring and data exchange at transboundary rivers, including water quality cooperation Almaty, October 2010

Water for life and livelihoods

From the Rhine River perspective to development of POM on regional level

Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive Drinking Water Directive, their relation to the Water Framework Directive, in a context of scarcity

Jordan River Basin. Planning for the Future. Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources

13 Water: A Limited Resource

Implementation of the water Directives in Romania

beneficial management practices

Clackamas County Septic Systems 101. Brannon Lamp, REHS

Wasserverband Eifel-Rur (WVER) Water Management Board River Rur Catchment. Mekong River Commission 5 December 2012.

Implementation of the WFD in Greece. P. Panagopoulos, ECOS Consulting S.A.

Climate Change and water resources: Scenarios of low-flow conditions in the Upper Danube River Basin

Issue paper: Aquifer Water Balance

Alternative water supply options

modified water bodies in the Netherlands

The EU Water Framework Directive A brief overview.

Classification of chemical status of rivers for water management planning in Lake VBrtsjarv catchment area, Estonia

ENNS Catchment area. Upper Austria. Lower Austria. S t yria. Inn. Linz. Erlau. Ybb. Enns. Traun. Age. Enns

PREPARATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FLOOD DIRECTIVE AT THE LEVEL OF THE RHINE DISTRICT

The Snapshot CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT

Flood risk management and land use planning in changing climate conditions Mikko Huokuna Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE

COASTAL AQUIFERS MANAGEMENT IN CROATIA

KEYS TO SUCCESS IN THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF THE RHINE RIVER : From an open sewer to a living river

6.6 WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY

The AdaptAlp Project: Impacts of Climate Change on Alpine Water Regimes -Results and Strategies from AdaptAlp WP4

Management of Water Resources in Cyprus

O R A N G E C I T Y S INTEGRAT E D W AT E R R E S O U R C E S M A N A G E M E N T & R E S I L I E N C Y P L A N

Where does drinking water come from?

Land use & water quality project Hurunui case study area

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Aquatic Science Unit 1. Introduction to Freshwater Ecology

RWASH Information System Household Access Survey. Completion notes. H2: What is the main source of drinking water used by members of your household?

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

Do Now pg 91: Describe how freshwater is a renewable resource, but can also be a limited resource.

Read: Case Study: America s First River : A Success Story Summarize the story of the Hudson River and PCB s:

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/11/2018. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Fresh Water 4/20/2009. Chapter 7. Earth s Water Resources. Chapter 7: Outline

Automation in one of the most modern water treatment plants in Europe. Water s long journey

CAMP KOOCH-I-CHING SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT

POTABLE WATER SUPPLY DEFINITIONS

Stormwater Management in Your Backyard: Stormwater 101

Member State: The Netherlands (NL)

Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) Practical Techniques for the Caribbean

Biomonitoring in the Water Framework Directive

CHEMICAL MONITORING & MANAGEMENT LESSON 6: WATER QUALITY 1 SAMPLE RESOURCES

Control and Mitigation of Drinking Water Intake Problems along Nile River

United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) QUESTIONNAIRE 2016 ON ENVIRONMENT STATISTICS

A nice looking lake, right?

Water Pollution. Chapter 20

Transcription:

Danube Facts and Figures (July 2007) General Overview Of s territory, over 56,184 km² in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg are drained by the Danube River almost 17 % of the country and 7 % of the Danube River Basin. In, 9.4 million inhabitants live in the area, making up 11.6% of the population in the entire Danube Basin. has been a Signatory State to the Danube River Protection Convention since 1994 and a Contracting Party since 1998. Topography The source of the Danube is in the Black Forest in Baden-Württemberg at the confluence of the Brigach and Breg Rivers in Donaueschingen. The river flows 584 km from the Black Forest Mountains to the Austrian border. Interestingly, the Danube loses about half its discharge to the Rhine Basin through underground passages in its upper course near Immendingen. The larger tributaries, comprising approximately 4000 km² in the German Danube region, are the Naab, Isar, Lech, Inn and Salzach Rivers. In addition, the Donauried and Donaumoos moor landscapes are located along the Danube. The German Danube region covers the Swabian and Frankonian Alb, parts of the Oberpfälzer and the Bavarian and Bohemian Forests in the north. To the south lie the Swabian-Bavarian-Austrian foothills. The southern borderline is formed by the Alpine Rhine and Lake Constance as well as the southern tributaries of the Lech, Inn and Salzach Rivers. In the Alpine foothills there are many lakes formed by glacial processes. The largest are Chiemsee (80 km²), Starnberger See (56 km²), Ammersee (47 km²), Walchensee (16 km²), Waginger See (9 km²), Tegernsee (9 km²), Alpsee (9 km²), Staffelsee (8 km²), Simssee (7 km²), Kochelsee (6 km²) and Königssee (5 km²). In addition there are several large reservoirs as Forggensee (16 km²), Sylvensteinspeicher (6 km²) and Altmühlsee (5 km²) in the Bavarian part of the Danube region. Precipitation, climate and water flow The German Danube region is influenced by the Atlantic Climate with an average precipitation of about 1030 mm per year, increasing from north to south. The average monthly temperature is at its minimum in January (Danube Valley 1 C,

Bavarian Forest 2 C, Alps 10 C) and reaches its maximum temperature in July (Danube Valley 20 C, Bavarian Forest 18 C, Alps 4-10 C). Hydrographic key figures of the German Danube region Waters Gauge Site Series Donau Ehingen- Berg 1930-1998 Donau Neu-Ulm 1954- Donau Achleiten 1954- Iller Wiblingen 1971- Lech Kraftwerk 1982- Rain 2001 Isar Plattling 1954- Naab Heitzenhofen 1954- Regen Regenstauf 1954- Altmühl Beilngries 1985-2002 Inn Passau- 1954- Ingling Mean Low Discharge [m3/ s] Mean Discharge [m3/ s] 12.9 37.9 204 Mean High Discharge [m3/ s] 44.9 125.0 581.0 645.0 1,438.0 4,317.0 7.7 56.0 428.0 47.8 116.0 485.0 95.3 176.0 562.0 18.5 50.2 298.0 13.1 37.9 297.0 6.56 17.2 91.0 296.0 747.0 3,058.0 Land use and settlements Of the 9.2 million inhabitants living in the German Danube Basin, 41 % live in urban agglomerations with more than 100,000 inhabitants: Ulm, Ingolstadt, Augsburg, Ratisbon and Munich. The most important settlements and industry centres are located around these cities, such as the automobile, machine and electric industries as well as the petrochemical and chemical industries. In addition, the processing of agricultural products is also very important and 57.5 % of the German Danube region is used for agricultural activities, mainly in the Danube valley (Donaumoos), in the northern part of the Danube (Ries, Keuper- Lias-Land) and portions of the south-eastern part of the Danube (Hallertau, Gaeuboden). Human uses of water and water bodies Flood and torrent management, landslides

Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg have a long history of dealing with floods. The first guidelines for the organisation of flood forecasts were set in 1883. The Bavarian Ministry of the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection developed the programme Sustainable Flood Control in Bavaria Flood Protection Action Programme 2020 for the Danube and Main River Basins, which stipulates specific targets, groups together individual activities at bodies of water and indicates the expected costs for a time horizon of 20 years. However, in highquality use areas, technological flood control measures are required: dykes and walls, measures to improve flow, retention reservoirs, or dams. In principle, only settlements or transport systems of more than regional importance are protected against floods by these means. Such cases are usually assessed based on a flood arising on a long-term average of once in one hundred years. Thus, 300 km of protective dykes were renovated in improve flood control along the Danube and its tributaries. To limit damage, impending floods are identified and announced by the Bavarian and the Baden-Wuerttemberg Environment Agencies. Flood forecasts are constantly improved thanks to state-of-the-art technology and support from the German Meteorological Service. The Danube water level can be predicted for a period of twelve hours to within 20 centimetres. Use of hydroelectric power Water power currently amounts to a 15 % share of the total energy consumption in Bavaria. About 13 billion kilowatt hours are generated annually in 4,250 water power stations 90 % of this in 218 large plants of over 1,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity. The majority of these power stations are situated on the alpine tributaries of the Danube: the Iller, Lech and Isar Rivers. Measures have been taken to protect the environment, such as the additions of fish-ladders or bypassing streams created near power stations to make the river passable for fish and other aquatic organisms. Further extension of water power requires balanced solutions taking into account the interests of environmental protection and of energy management. Navigation From Kelheim on, the Danube serves as an international waterway. The river is also linked with the Rhine River Basin by way of the Main-Danube Canal, connecting the Main River at Bamberg with the Danube at Kelheim in Bavaria. Construction of the canal started in 1960 and was completed in 1992. The canal is 55 m wide and 4 m deep. Rivers as receiving waters for effluents Rivers have been used as receiving waters for both urban and industrial waste water effluents for hundreds of years. They also transport diffuse pollution loads. Over the past decades, general water quality has improved considerably through

large investments into wastewater treatment plants. There have been substantial reductions in the oxygen-sapping organic substances and nutrients, such as phosphate and nitrogen. Since 1950 the number of wastewater treatment plants has increased from 20 to about 3,000. In the year 2000, around 93 % of the Bavarian population was connected to these wastewater disposal facilities. The wastewater of the remaining 7 % is treated in around 190,000 small wastewater plants. Since 1975 water body protection includes measures specifically relating to the treatment of mixed water and rainwater. So far, storm-water tanks with a total capacity of 1.95 million m³ have been built. Use of groundwater bodies: drinking water supply Bavaria's drinking water comes mainly from the subsoil: 93 % from ground or spring water. More than 10,000 wells and springs currently supply about 0.9 billion m 3 of ground water with drinking water quality per year. Almost two-thirds of the abstracted water requires no purifying treatment. The rest is processed largely for technical reasons: substances such as iron, manganese or carbonic acid, which might cause corrosion or deposits in the pipes, are removed. Only a small amount of the water has to be disinfected for health care purposes. Use of surface water bodies: drinking water supply Ground or spring water is not available everywhere in Bavaria in the quantity water suppliers need. In parts of the Upper Franconia and the Bavarian Forest the water supply has been secured by the construction of drinking water reservoirs. Some regions also rely on bank filtrate. In Bavaria, the water resources are subject to highly varied conditions. Whereas Southern Bavaria is rich in water due to his high precipitation, water is short in supply in large parts of Northern Bavaria. At times of low discharge, there is three times more water available per inhabitant in the Danube region in comparison to the Main (part of river Rhine) region. For this reason an inter-regional compensation system has been created between Southern and Northern Bavaria, i.e. between the Danube and the Main region. Through the Main-Danube Canal water is abstracted from the Bavarian part of the Danube River at Kelheim and diverted to the Rhine River Basin. Depending on the needs and the discharge of the Danube, up to 20 m³/s or 125 Mio m³/year are transferred to the Main i.e. Rhine river Basin. Pressures on surface and groundwater bodies Sewerage and organic pollution Biological indicators, known as 'indicator organisms,' can be used to determine the extent to which running waters are contaminated with organic pollutants. Saprobes may also be enlisted as a measuring standard for the biological quality

of water bodies. Water body status is classified in four quality grades with intermediate stages. Nutrient discharge In addition, there are non-point source pollutants from the air, mostly emitted by road traffic and heating systems in buildings. Eutrophication, was the result in many water bodies. The corresponding loss of oxygen led again and again to the death of fish populations. Stricter legislation and the construction of biological waste water treatment plants have made it possible to reduce the nutrient entry into water bodies. Phosphorus contamination has decreased over recent years, but the nitrogen concentration in most surface waters remains at a high level. Priority substances A larger set of emissions ordinances specifies the requirements for industrial wastewater discharges to waters and public sewerage systems. The effective implementation of emission based requirements for industrial effluents is primarily characterised by internal or front of pipe measures, such as the prevention of raw material losses or water reuse added by reasonable end of pipe techniques of wastewater treatment. Impacts on surface and groundwater bodies Impacts on rivers (based on the Year 2004 National Analysis for Water Framework Directive implementation). The risk assessment for rivers is based on four categories of evaluation: the biological categories of the saprobic situation (pollution by organic, oxygen depleting substances) and the trophic situation (pollution due to plant nutrients), chemistry (pollution due to specific chemical pollutants) and structure or flow regulations (hydromorphological alterations). The four categories were evaluated separately in order to point out the different problems and pressures. Additionally, the significance of the four categories greatly varies. Biological and chemical criteria are decisive for the status of waters, structure is an additional criterion. For the saprobic situation and trophic situation categories the achievement of objectives is expected for more than 65 % of rivers. With respect to chemistry the percentage even amounts to 90 %. The percentage is lower for the structure of water bodies: The achievement of objectives is only expected for 29 %, due to the multiple uses of the rivers. Impacts on lakes (based on the Year 2004 National Analysis for Water Framework Directive implementation, including the initial classification of heavily modified water bodies).

Of the 49 lakes surveyed, 25 are expected to achieve the objectives, 8 of them are at risk. For the examination of lakes, nutrient pollution (trophic situation) proves to be the most important criterion. There are only two cases in which possible effects of bank protection works or of chemical pollutants have been estimated to pose a risk. Impacts on groundwater (based on the Year 2004 National Analysis for Water Framework Directive implementation, including the initial classification of heavily modified water bodies). Nitrate pollution proves to be the decisive risk assessment criterion for groundwater: Therefore, if no further measures are taken, 11 groundwater bodies (13 % of the German Danube) will presumably not achieve the objectives set out in the WFD. Among the plant protective agents it is mostly atrazine and its derivatives which pollute groundwater. Due to the fact that, in, application of this agent has been forbidden since 1991, it is expected that residues of this substance accumulated in the soil will, by 2015, have decreased to such an extent that they no longer pose any risk. As far as the quantitative status of groundwater is concerned, there is no known risk for not achieving objectives. Pressures and impacts from hydrological alterations (based on the Year 2004 National Analysis for Water Framework Directive implementation, including the initial classification of heavily modified water bodies). Analysis has provisionally designated 21 % of the rivers and 16 lakes in the German Danube region as artificial or heavily modified. Web-links www.wrrl.bayern.de www.wrrl.baden-wuerttemberg.de