The courthouse exterior. Courtesy of NLA/HLM Architects. United States. Courthouse Sacramento, Robert D. McCartney, S.E.

Similar documents
LPA Inc./Cris Costea Photography Inc.

Civil District Court Parish of New Orleans. Image Courtesy of EDR MA. Renovation & Utilization Feasibility

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

The building on 250 West Street is a 7-story multi-use that provides space for parking,

A small but significant structure provides an inspiring focal point for a large healthcare complex. Healing LIGHT

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

EXTREME. Makeover. Nu Skin Enterprises Utah campus gets a fresh new look.

Steel Expansion. Located along the Grand River in

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Structural Redesign Gravity System

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2014 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

UP BY ERIC M. HINES, P.E., PH.D., AND J. FRANO VIOLICH

Structural Breadth Study

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

SHARP. Focus. AESS serves as the focal point of a small eye-care office in Austin. BY BRIAN SAYRE, P.E., AND K. MARK MERRYMAN, P.E.

DVASE 2018 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

STEEL STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Kaleida Health Global Heart and Vascular Institute University at Buffalo CTRC/Incubator. Buffalo, New York. Technical Report #2

THE USE OF FRICTION DAMPERS FOR SESIMIC RETROFIT OF THE MONTEREY COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER

Thesis Proposal December 5, 2003

HIGH Art. A new steel art building brings its own sense of style and flair to the Stanford campus.

ECMC Skilled Nursing Facility Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis AE 481W Thesis Proposal Dr. Ali Memari December 12 th, 2011

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

POINT. Making the. The highlights of High Point University s newest academic building are comprised of open volumes, and steel makes them happen.

Structural Design Engineers 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410 San Francisco, California / Fax 415/

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

Point Pleasant Apartments Point Pleasant, NJ Ryan P. Flynn Structural Option Faculty Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 1 9/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Technical Report #1. Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA. Cody A. Scheller. Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Report

Overall Existing Conditions Summary

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Building in Beijing. Steel provides the support for two new high-profile atriums in China s capital.

By Thomas Taylor, PE, Datum Engineers Inc.

Design Criteria. Analysis and Design of a High Rise Steel Braced Frame Core 22

PRESENTATION OUTLINE. Proposal. Design of Chevron and Diagonal Braced Frames STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY I. Ting Wall Façade STRUCTURAL DEPTH STUDY II

Types Of Roofs - Vault

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Tech Tips SidePlate Connections FAQ 09/30/2017

ECMC Skilled Nursing Facility Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis AE 481W Thesis Proposal Dr. Ali Memari January 13 th, 2012

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Stephan Northrop Structural Option Dr. Linda Hanagan. North Shore Equitable Building Pittsburgh, PA Senior Thesis Proposal

THESIS PROPOSAL. Page 1 of 20

Totaling approximately 617,000

Visteon Village Corporate Center

Project. San Jose City College Physical Education Building. Prepared For. Prepared By PLACE IMAGE HERE. Ken Bauer, AIA Principal

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER HAMILTON BOULEVARD AT 9 TH STREET - ALLENTOWN, PA

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004

Thesis Proposal. Matthew R Peyton

Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Christopher McCune Structural Option 2006 Senior Thesis Penn State Architectural Engineering. Eight Tower Bridge Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

REVISED PROPOSAL. University Academic Center. Eastern USA. Alexander Altemose. Structural Option. Advisor: Thomas E. Boothby

Crossroads at Westfields Building II

Stone and Masonry Veneer

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Structural Systems Problem Statement 9 Proposed Solution 10 Breadth Topics 11 Tasks and Tools

Jonathan R. Torch Technical Report 2 Columbia University. Technical Report 2. Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

LEGAL. Lessons BY JEFF THOMPSON, P.E., AND ERIKA YARONI

TECHNICAL REPORT III. University Academic Center. Eastern USA. Alexander Altemose. Structural Option. Advisor: Thomas E. Boothby

Nortrax Section David Manchester Road, Ottawa NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING 16 May 2014 Page 1

Drexel University Race Street Dormitory REVISED THESIS PROPOSAL Doug Tower Structural Advisor: Kevin Parfitt 2/7/07

Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium

Park Potomac Office Building E

THOUGH STILL SUCCESSFUL, Keeping all of the stores open was critical during renovation and vertical expansion of the this 40-year-old mall

THE PARKING STRUCTURE PROTOTYPE II

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2017 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

SECTION NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

Thesis Proposal. Student Health Center Penn State University. Prepared By: Jacob Brambley (Structural Option) Prepared For: Dr.

Thesis Proposal. CHRIS VANDELOGT Structural Option

January 14, 2006 Structural Thesis Proposal: Structural and Breadth Redesign Options

Thesis Proposal Structural Redesign / Cost, Schedule and Coordination Analysis / Architectural Impact

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2018 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

Franklin Square Hospital Center Patient Tower

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Biobehavioral Health Building

Trump Taj Mahal Hotel

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

National Truss for Historic Preservation

Expanding the Indiana Convention

La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

TEMPERING. Tremors. San Bernardino s new courthouse features a comprehensive seismic design that minimizes life-cycle costs.

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Spring Hill Suites Marriott

Reading. Between. the Lines

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

90% Design Submittal Structural Calculations Parking Garage CDRL

Transcription:

The courthouse exterior. Courtesy of NLA/HLM Architects. United States Courthouse Sacramento, Robert D. McCartney, S.E. CA Modern Steel Construction / November 2001

Public entrances to courtrooms occur at the curved south side of the courthouse tower. Courtesy of NLA/HLM Architects. Varying court layouts from floor-to-floor, as well as the complex circulation system, made it unlikely that an effective lateral system would be developed using a braced-frame. The main courthouse tower includes 32 courtrooms (19 courtrooms initially), judges chambers, ancillary judicial areas, courtrelated executive offices and a 300-car below-grade parking garage. Challenged by the constraints of a 2.5-acre urban site, this solution utilizes an original three-court per floor plan for the District Court floor and a four-court plan for both the Magistrate and Bankruptcy Court floors. While the concept of a three-court floor implies an inefficiency relative to the shared holding, this design yields a compact and highly efficient plan in which four Magistrate or Bankruptcy courts can be fitted below the larger district courts. This stacking concept does not require additional incompatible functions to be added to the Magistrate or Bankruptcy floor to augment the shortfall in habitable square footage. As a result of this compact plan, the site is freed up for future expansion (the parking area to the north of the tower), public space and a slightly larger base. For the courthouse, the varying court layouts from floor-to-floor, as well as the complex circulation system (elevator cores especially), made it unlikely that an effective lateral system would be developed using a bracedframe approach. Main elevator cores are located at the east end of the building, which would have meant an unbalanced system. There are also not enough interior walls that align for the full height of the building, due mostly to the varied court layouts. Finally, braces were not allowed at the building perimeter. Middlebrook+Louie (M+L) prepared three structural systems for the final scheme (two steel and one concrete). Some other aspects of the programming that affected the structural design options: The courtrooms themselves are large and require larger floor-tofloor dimensions. Floor heights are 20 in general to accommodate 16 ceilings. The floor height at the 16th level is 24. Some floors require 150 psf live loads for libraries and file storage. CMU walls surround the holding cells at courtrooms. To adapt to these conditions, M+L opted for what essentially is a perime- November 2001 / Modern Steel Construction

ter moment frame system. Braced frames occur in the east-west direction at roof level of the building. Steel was selected over concrete due to several factors: A steel system would weigh less, reducing the cost of the foundations and having less impact on seismic design considerations. Steel members could be smaller than concrete members, which is especially important in a facility with this level of specialized mechanical and electrical demands. Construction time would be shorter and more economical. (The steel erection took 5 1 /2 months). Column spacing is 32 in the eastwest direction, based on a 16 planning module. In the north-south direction, column spacing is 38 on the north side, 50 at the interior bay (for maximum courtroom flexibility) and variable at the wall on the south side, which is curved. Public Entry Building & Rotunda (Building B) The public enters through a vestibule into a foyer/queuing space prior to the security checkpoint. The semi-oval rotunda is sky-lit to provide daylight into the expansive building base and creates a strong orientation point for the first time visitor. In addition to expressing the building circulation system, this rotunda will provide the human spirit with a strong sense of Top: The atrium interior. Courtesy of NLA/HLM Architects. Bottomt: Exterior view of atrium framing. arrival and a feeling of dignity associated with our federal courts system. The public spaces are enhanced by one of the most comprehensive programs of public art in any federal building. Thirteen works of art represent the vision of fourteen major artists, who drew their inspiration from the natural, cultural and political history of the building s site. First, the architects designed a uniquely shaped structure with several openings. They also needed a thin sandwich of materials between the structural system and the interior finishes. The interior finish is a stone panel system consisting of a thin veneer of stone mounted on a backing of honeycomb board, supported on light gage metal framing.

The rotunda is 60 high. Gradually rising in a telescoping ovoid shape, the rotunda finishes in an elliptical skylight. This unique building shape form resulted in a structure where columns meet beams at all different angles. Steel pipes, with their unidirectional properties, proved to be just the right solution to the architectural constraints and structural complexities of this dramatic public building. Sixteen-inch diameter pipe columns (ASTM A500, Grade C, extra strong) are spliced at each level with two horizontal plates extending out from the columns, supporting the beam connection plates. This detail was modified from the original, which had the beam connection plates fitted into slots cut into the pipe columns and then welded on the outside and inside. This proved very complex for the detailers, as the columns all sloped at different angles. In addition, M+L had detailed two stiffener plates inside the pipe columns at each level. On top of that, M+L detailed a cover plate to be field-welded to the top beam flange and the sloping pipe column, which would have required the plate to be cut to a portion of an elliptical curve. It looked great on paper, but it was too tough to build. By working back and forth with the detailer and fabricators, M+L arrived at the final design: two plates were cut through the column to serve as stiffeners at the beam connections. The top plate was also a continuity plate for all of the beams framing to the columns. The edges of the plates were cut straight, and the beam top flanges were complete-penetration welded to the plates. The two plates also provided a simple means for attaching the beam shear tabs. At the top of the pipe columns is a rigid ring box girder, 24 x 14, fabricated to different radii between columns and with sloping sides. Top and bottom flanges of each section were also fabricated to different radii Other interesting facts about this project: All steel was produced in the U.S. (Arkansas, Oregon and Texas) in mini mills, which recycle autos, refrigerators, etc. The courthouse complex used 8,500 tons of steel. Pipe column splice detail. Typical beam to column connection detail.

A future expansion is planned for the north side of this structure. Foundations and columns are designed for a new six-story building. The north and south plazas have a load capacity of up to 900 psf in some areas to accommodate heavy landscaping, trucks and fire truck loading. Because the building has a very wide face, wind forces controlled portions of the structural design. Provisions were made for an underground tunnel to a county jail across the street. Robert D. McCartney, S.E., is Design Principal with Middlebrook + Louie Structural Engineers in San Francisco. OWNER: United States General Services Administration Atrium steel after application of spray-on fire protection. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Middlebrook + Louie, San Francisco, CA ARCHITECT: NLA HLM Architects, Sacramento, CA STEEL FABRICATOR, ERECTOR AND DETAILER: Herrick Corporation, Pleasanton, CA GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Morse Diesel, Apple Valley, CA SOFTWARE: ETABS HSS column splice with shear-connected beams.