WASTEWATER FLOW FORECASTS

Similar documents
INTRODUCTION DATA COLLECTED WATER BILLING AND PRODUCTION DATA

Metro Atlanta s Water: Everything You Wanted To Know About Your Water (but were afraid to ask)

EXISTING WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Understanding the New ATL: Atlanta-Region Transit Link Authority

COUNTY-BY-COUNTY WATER FACILITY CAPACITY AND EXPANSION SCHEDULE

W A T E R S U P P L Y A N D W A T E R C O N S E R V AT I O N M A N A G E M E N T P L A N M A Y

REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES PLANS

Activity Based Model Calibration

CHAPTER 4 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS WASTEWATER FLOWS

Understanding The ATL and HB 930

AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND THE ATLANTA METRO AREA: LOCAL AND STATE-WIDE COSTS OF NON-ATTAINMENT

RE: Plan Amendment Process Documentation and Staff Recommendation

Planning for Cleaner Air

THE METRO WATER DISTRICT

DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANNING, ALTERNATIVES, MANAGEMENT

North Fulton Wastewater Capacity Analysis and Economic Assessment

MANAGEMENT PLAN. June Prepared by WT GNV

Appendix 2: Water Demand Projections

FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PROGRAM

Metro Water District Climate Utility Resiliency Study

MUNICIPAL WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION (MWPP) ANNUAL REPORT

Georgia s Aquifers. USGS Fact Sheet

Municipal and Industrial Water and Wastewater Demand Forecasting Methodology.

WATER RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

CONFORMITY DETERMINATION REPORT

GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS REPORTS

School District Flexibility Options: A Quick Summary

Draft Recommendations

DRAFT 2019 UPWP UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

Gwinnett County Department of Water Resources

NAAQS Attainment & PSD Modeling Update

Passive Onsite vs Centralized Wastewater Treatment Systems: A Comparison of O&M Energy Use and Carbon Generation

BASIC DATA REQUIRED FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DESIGN

Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District. Watershed/Stormwater Subcommittee of the. Technical Coordinating Committee.

SEWER USER RATE CHARGE STUDY

SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT PROJECT:

TOWN OF LONDONDERRY, NEW HAMPSHIRE WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAMBERS CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FACILITIES PLAN 4. POPULATION, FLOW, AND LOADING PROJECTIONS

Volume II Conformity Determination R Report March 2014 Update

CHAPTER 4 SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Community Engagement Strategy and Regional Transportation Plan Development Assistance

WATER CONSERVATION EVALUATIONS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLANNING IN FLORIDA

Strategy Committee Workshop

Spokane County Water Demand Forecast Model

FACT SHEET and NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT EVALUATION. Department of Environmental Quality Western Region-Salem Office

Micro-Dynamics of Business Location and Growth and its Effects on the Transportation Network and Congestion in Georgia and the Southeast Region

2017 CAPACITY REPORTS

Air Quality Data and Potential Nonattainment Areas

A Practical Guide for Fulfilling the Transportation Element for Cities and Counties in the Atlanta Region

South Fulton Parkway Transit Feasibility Study Stakeholder Committee Meeting #2

Advanced Demand Forecasting Methods for Water System Master Planning

CHAPTER 9: SANITARY SEWER INTRODUCTION FORECASTS CHAPTER 9: SANITARY SEWER 9-1

City of Oxnard. Public Works Integrated Master Plan WASTEWATER PROJECT MEMORANDUM 3.2 FLOW AND LOAD PROJECTIONS. FINAL DRAFT December 2015

3. Water Conservation Program

Planning, Flows, and Loads

Lynn Township Sewer Authority. Corrective Action Plan. March 2007

A resource assessment of the Etowah Watershed

Green Building with Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems: A Comparison of O&M Energy Use and Carbon Generation

Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan

Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District Activities & Progress Report

Town of Robbinsville Constructs Cheoah River BNR Wastewater Treatment Facility to Meet New Nitrogen and Phosphorus Permit Limits

Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District GOVERNING BOARD Minutes March 25, 2015

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Florida Water-Use Program

COBB COUNTY WATER SYSTEM RATES, CHARGES AND FEES MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGES

ago, increases in What can you do to educate driving behavior yourself and your students and how make auto can your actions improve air have

6. Pollutant Sources in

Protecting Water Resources: Elements of Success

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

Flow Projections from Significant Industrial Users

CENTRAL DAVIS SEWER DISTRICT

Peanut Production Update

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPACITY FEES REPORT PROPOSED

ATTACHMENT B. FEES AND CHARGES OF RENEWABLE WATER RESOURCES (ReWa) (Effective January 1, 2019) RESIDENTIAL CHARGES (1)(7)(9)

The Economic Importance of Food and Fiber

System Loading. Presentation Outline. Hydraulic Loading - Residential

Castle Pines North Metropolitan District

CHAPTER 4 Water Demand

CHAPTER 8 UTILITIES WATER SYSTEM. Summary & Recommendations

Potable Water and Wastewater Data and Analysis Report

Statewide Water Management Plan Association County Commissioners of Georgia May 2, 2008

Water Conservation Keeps Rates Low in Tucson, Arizona

Comprehensive Plan Update - Sanitary Sewer Section Planning Commission Workshop: November 10, 2014

Chapter 8-Sanitary Sewer

Wastewater Facilities Plan Existing Conditions Demographics Flows and Loads Future Effluent Limitation Scenarios

A Case Study on Integrated Urban Water Modelling using Aquacycle NTUA, 2007

ATLANTA REGIONAL TRUCK PARKING ASSESSMENT STUDY DRAFT FINAL REPORT

2015 Comprehensive Facilities MASTER PLAN SMART INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE

Presentable Market Data

Potable Water & Wastewater Element

MEMORANDUM. DATE: December 12, Steve Joseph, P.E. J. Philip Cooke, P.E. Monique Durand, P.E. Wastewater Flow Projections

A table is presented below with all wastewater generation sources: TABLE 18-1 WASTEWATER FLOWS. Sewage Loading (GPD/Unit)

Presentable Market Data Chuck Carr 2317 Briarleigh Way Dunwoody, GA 30338

Rainwater Harvesting:

Impact of Urban Conservation on Groundwater Pumping and Projected Effluent Flow in the Tucson Area

Wastewater Treatment Systems, Wastewater Issues and Permits

Capital Improvement Plan Update:

Colorado River Challenges Impacts to Southern Arizona

Transcription:

The population of the 15-county Metro Water District is expected to increase by over 3 million people during the planning period: from 4.4 million in 2005 to 7.5 million in 2035. A corresponding increase in economic activity is projected. The increase in population and economic activity is projected to produce 993 million gallons per day of wastewater that will need to be managed during a maximum month in 2035. WASTEWATER FLOW FORECASTS The wastewater flow calculation procedure used for this Plan is illustrated below in Figure 3-1. Wastewater flow calculations were based on water use information for Metro Water District water customers provided by local water providers. The Demand Side Management Least Cost Planning Decision Support System (DSS) model water demand input and outputs are outlined in greater detail in Section 3 of the Metro Water District s Water Supply and Water Conservation Management Plan. The DSS model provided per capita water customer usage as indoor and outdoor water use. Per capita and per employee indoor water use rates were multiplied by population and employment forecasts for the planning period. Only indoor water use was considered as wastewater generated since outdoor water use, such as lawn irrigation, is not captured by septic systems or wastewater collection systems. FIGURE 3-1 Wastewater Flow Calculation Total wastewater generated was determined by summing all indoor water uses (residential and non-residential). The wastewater generated is discharged to either septic systems or wastewater collection systems. The septic system flows were calculated, as outlined below, and subtracted to determine the flow into collection systems. Wastewater flows associated with existing non-residential septic systems are a small percent of the overall flows to septic systems and these flows are anticipated to transition to sewer during 3-1

the planning period. Therefore, non-residential septic system flows are accounted for in the flow forecasts to treatment facilities. It was assumed that all future non-residential wastewater flows will be sewered, to provide conservative future flow forecasts. Wastewater collection systems are subject to infiltration and inflow (I/I) which includes groundwater and stormwater entering the collection system. The industry standard of 20% is reflective of the Metro Water District based on information provided by local wastewater providers. Adding this I/I factor results in the Annual Average Daily Flow (AAD), which is the flow that arrives at the wastewater plant for treatment. Design capacities and discharge permits for wastewater treatment facilities are commonly based on the Maximum Monthly Flow (MMF). MMF represents the average of the daily flows for the month with the highest flows during the year. For the purpose of this plan, the MMF was calculated by adding 25% to the AAD. The monthly peaking factor of 1.25 was an average number based on a review of available plant data within the Metro Water District during the 2003 Long-term Wastewater Management Plan development and was determined appropriate for the Plan Update. Table 3-2 shows the MMF- MGD wastewater forecasts for each county in the Metro Water District. The projected wastewater flow trend for the planning period is illustrated in Figure 3-2. POPULATION FORECASTS Population and employment data for each of the 15 counties were obtained from each county s local Regional Development Center (RDC). Where data was not available from the local RDC, data from the Atlanta Regional Commission was used. For Hall, the Gainesville-Hall Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) data was used. Table 3-1 shows the population forecasts by county. 3-2

TABLE 3-1 Population and Employment Forecasts by Population Forecasts (# of people) 2015 2025 2035 Bartow 1 139,600 210,800 304,900 Cherokee 229,900 303,000 410,700 Clayton 288,600 294,000 307,300 Cobb 694,200 737,400 796,900 Coweta 2 124,900 162,500 253,400 DeKalb 747,100 789,800 856,400 Douglas 138,000 182,000 257,000 Fayette 114,700 142,200 181,200 Forsyth 1 256,700 342,100 412,800 Fulton 943,900 1,065,500 1,233,800 Gwinnett 843,900 945,900 1,044,300 Hall 3 245,300 325,200 405,200 Henry 222,600 309,700 424,100 Paulding 1 215,700 353,000 445,600 Rockdale 88,600 117,100 159,200 District Total 5,293,700 6,280,200 7,492,800 Employment Forecasts (# of employees) 2015 2025 2035 Bartow 1 44,900 56,300 67,900 Cherokee 66,700 99,800 141,500 Clayton 138,900 155,700 181,600 Cobb 361,600 415,200 480,700 Coweta 2 43,300 59,600 82,900 DeKalb 343,600 397,100 459,200 Douglas 53,600 72,900 92,400 Fayette 56,800 76,900 99,100 Forsyth 1 89,800 120,700 146,600 Fulton 845,600 978,300 1,103,600 Gwinnett 396,100 477,200 546,100 Hall 3 134,300 230,700 327,200 Henry 70,100 103,800 140,900 Paulding 1 27,000 33,900 40,800 Rockdale 42,200 52,900 65,200 District Total 2,714,500 3,331,000 3,975,700 Source: ARC Population and Employment Forecasts were used for all counties within the ARC Region; sources for counties outside the ARC Region are as follows: 1 RDC Population and Employment Forecasts (Bartow, Forsyth and Paulding) 2 ARC Population and Employment Forecasts (Coweta) 3 Gainesville-Hall 2030 MPO Population and Employment Forecasts (Hall) 3-3

TABLE 3-2 Summary of Forecasted Wastewater Flow to be Received at Treatment Facilities by Forecasted Flow (Maximum Monthly Flow MGD) 2015 2025 2035 Bartow 19 25 34 Cherokee 20 28 40 Clayton 37 40 46 Cobb 91 98 108 Coweta 10 15 25 DeKalb 101 107 117 Douglas 11 15 22 Fayette 12 16 22 Forsyth 29 42 52 Fulton 191 213 240 Gwinnett 107 121 135 Hall 27 39 51 Henry 19 28 39 Paulding 20 37 50 Rockdale 7 9 12 District Total 701 833 993 3-4

FIGURE 3-2 Trend of Wastewater Flow to be Managed at WWTPs 1,200 Maximum Monthly Flow (MMF - MGD) 1,000 800 600 400 200 Projected Flow - 2005 2015 2025 2035 Year SEPTIC SYSTEM USAGE FORECASTS The septic system usage forecasts for the planning horizon of 2035 are shown in Figure 3-3. The baseline septic system usage was based on the Metro Water District s Septic Systems Status and Issues Working Paper 1, which tabulated the number of structures that use septic systems in the 15- county Metro Water District, shown in Section 2. As growth occurs in the Metro Water District over the planning period, population density in many areas will increase. As population becomes denser, the prevalence of collection systems will increase and the prevalence of septic systems will decline. To reflect this transition, the following empirical correlation was developed between the percent of the population served by septic systems and the population density for the 2003 Plan, and was considered valid for this Plan. Information from the Metro Water District s Septic System Working Paper for the 15 counties and the U.S. Census Bureau on septic systems was input into the following empirical correlation: % population served by septic systems = 87.4 x e -(0.83 x density [people/acre]) Population density was calculated using the population forecasts for 2035 in Table 3-1 divided by the county area in acres. This correlation with the calculated projected population density provides the percent of the population forecasted to be served by septic systems in 2035. When determining the percentage of units within the Metro Water District with septic systems, it was assumed one septic system served a single housing unit. The flows to treatment facilities in Figure 3-2 reflect the total wastewater treatment flows minus the flows to septic systems in Figure 3-3. Figure 3-3 shows the 1 Septic Systems Status and Issues Working Paper,, March 2006. 3-5

projected flows to be managed by septic systems by county in 2035. Based on the 2035 forecasts, flows to septic systems will represent 11% of residential wastewater generated and 6% of total wastewater generated. FIGURE 3-3 2035 Forecasted Annual Average Septic System Usage 8 7 Septic Flows in 2035 Septic Flow (AAD-MGD) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Bartow Cherokee Clayton Cobb Coweta DeKalb Douglas Fayette Forsyth Fulton Gwinnett Hall Henry Paulding Rockdale SEPTIC SYSTEM IMPACT TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES While septic system flows are not directly treated by the local wastewater treatment facilities, the septage that is pumped from septic systems may impact future treatment facility sizing. Septage is stronger than traditional wastewater influent, specifically there is a higher total suspended solid (TSS) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) load on receiving wastewater treatment plants. To facilitate planning for septage disposal (Action Item 8.4), Table 3-3 provides estimates of the BOD and TSS loading from septage by county. The forecasted loads are based on septic system usage in Figure 3-3 and a septic system pump-out rate of every seven years, consistent with Georgia DHR guidance. Wastewater treatment facilities may need to plan for more capacity than is shown in Table 3-2 to handle anticipated local septage treatment needs. 3-6

TABLE 3-3 TSS and BOD Loading Forecasts from Septic Systems Forecasted TSS Loading (lbs/day) Forecasted BOD Loading (lbs/day) 2015 2025 2035 2015 2025 2035 Bartow 3,321 4,107 4,560 631 781 867 Cherokee 3,893 4,107 4,010 740 781 763 Clayton 726 704 653 138 134 124 Cobb 1,837 1,656 1,428 349 315 272 Coweta 3,002 3,500 4,187 571 665 796 DeKalb 814 702 555 155 133 105 Douglas 1,975 1,959 1,702 375 372 324 Fayette 1,826 1,891 1,867 347 360 355 Forsyth 2,034 1,664 1,341 387 316 255 Fulton 3,578 3,003 2,304 680 571 438 Gwinnett 2,301 1,903 1,567 437 362 298 Hall 3,692 3,767 3,611 702 716 687 Henry 3,096 3,041 2,636 589 578 501 Paulding 2,985 2,776 2,394 568 528 455 Rockdale 1,251 1,247 1,119 238 237 213 District Total 36,331 36,027 33,934 6,907 6,849 6,453 BEYOND 2035 The beyond 2035 wastewater flow forecasts were calculated to initiate planning for long-term wastewater treatment needs for the Metro Water District. Population information for 2050 was obtained, where available, from long range planning by the local Regional Development Centers (RDC), counties and the City of Atlanta. Where this information was not available, the population forecasts were linearly projected out to 2050. Wastewater demands for 2050 were estimated for each county by applying a best fit line to the county-level forecasts (as presented in Table 3-2) to extrapolate year 2050 flows. The population and employment forecasts for 2050 as part of the Comprehensive State-wide Water Management Plan will be used, when available, for the next Plan update. 3-7

TABLE 3-4 2050 Population and Wastewater Flow Forecasts 2050 Population 2050 Demand (MMF-MGD) Bartow 1 486,254 52 Cherokee 499,639 65 Clayton 388,064 55 Cobb 869,974 122 Coweta 287,444 45 DeKalb 923,885 136 Douglas 2 310,000 34 Fayette 208,278 32 Forsyth 2 538,606 61 Fulton 3 1,692,114 280 Gwinnett 1,158,000 146 Hall 1 442,800 73 Henry 531,098 66 Paulding 1 479,393 73 Rockdale 185,543 20 District Total 9,001,092 1,260 Notes: 1. Population forecast provided by local RDC. 2. Population forecast provided by county water system. 3. Population forecasts by county water system and City of Atlanta. 3-8