Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

Similar documents
ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CLASS I RAILROADS

Class I Railroad Statistics

Kentucky Transportation Conference January 22, 2015

Test bank Chapter 4. Multiple Choice

Rail Service 101. MEDC Spring Conference June 10, 2014

Rail Fast Facts For Operations Number of freight railroads 25 Freight railroad mileage 2,552

Joel Palley Office of Policy Office of Rail Policy and Development Federal Railroad Administration April 2013 FREIGHT RAILROADS BACKGROUND

Missouri Freight Transportation Economy on the Move. Waterway Freight. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center

Freight Railroads: Linking Pennsylvania to the World. Rudy Husband Lehigh Valley Planning Commission April 4, 2018 Allentown, Pennsylvania

Overview of America s Freight Railroads

Revenue Freight Traffic Statistics for the Major North American Railroads. Weekly Railroad Traffic

Arkansas Transportation Report

Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee January 8, NCDOT Rail Division. Paul Worley, NCDOT Rail Division Director

The Intermodal Connection to Rural America's Resources, Economic Development, and Sustainability

Chapter 3 Missouri Freight System

BNSF Railway. Moving you Forward

Transportation Research Forum

KICK-OFF MEETING April 2, 2014 Topeka, Kansas

Evolution of Rail Related Energy Markets. The Energy Forum New York, NY March 18, 2013

A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads

Analyst: Meilin C. Pierce Spring Recommendation: Hold Target Stock Price (12/31/2016): $120

Billions of dollars per year in: Savings in shipping costs Taxes and purchases that support tens of thousands of additional jobs Avoided highway

The Point Intermodal River Port Facility at the Port of Huntington Project Benefit Cost Summary

RAIL RENAISSANCE The Changing Dynamics of Freight Transportation. John Miller Group Vice President, Agricultural Products BNSF Railway

D E C AT U R I N T E R M O D A L R A M P O P P O R T U N I T Y F I N A L R E P O R T A U G U S T 3 1,

Arkansas Transportation Report

Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan

Freight Rail Economic Development. Libby Ogard Prime Focus LLC April 11, 2014

Appendix B. Commodity Flow Profile

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

USDA s Perspective on Agricultural Transportation Priorities

American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association. North American Short Line and Regional Railroads Industry Report

National Conference of State Legislatures. Minneapolis, Minnesota August 20th, 2014

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

THE IMPACT OF JUMBO COVERED HOPPER CARS ON KANSAS SHORTLINE RAILROADS

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

TARIFF BPRR SWITCHING CHARGES

HIGH WATER MARK. History First From roughly 1993 to 1998, tie suppliers. Small Market Purchases

Rail Freight and Passenger

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Presentation to 2017 Annual Alabama Water Resources Conference. By: Larry Merrihew, Presdent Warrior-Tombigbee Waterway Association

Trends in the U.S. Rail Network. Mike McClellan Vice President Industrial Products Midwest Association of Rail Shippers July 15, 2014 Lake Geneva, WI

Union Pacific Railroad & BNSF Railways HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT

Results: 6 th Annual Railroad Report Card 2015

Results: 6 th Annual Railroad Report Card 2016

BNSF Railway. The West Coast is the Best Coast. Fred Malesa. Vice President International Marketing Oct. 11, 2011

Chapter 1 Introduction

Arkansas Transportation Report

The Economics and Regulation of the Freight Rail Industry. Third Annual Colloquium. June 16, 2017

TAPPI Shipping, Receiving & Warehousing Workshop

MARCH 14 TH 2017, 2:00 PM ET WITH

Feasibility of an Intermodal Transfer Facility in the Willamette Valley. Final Report December 14, 2016

The Economic and Community Impacts of Freight Rail

Transportation Trends

7. FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

Introduction to North American Rail Transportation

Central Minnesota Regional Freight Forum. May 17, :00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. St. Cloud, MN

AUGUST CLOSER LOOK SERIES: Open Top Hoppers SAMPLE

Concerns Regarding Freight Rail Transportation and Regulation. Marvin E. Prater, Ph.D. US Department of Agriculture Transportation Services Division

Inland Waterway Navigation

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads May Summary

The Fertilizer Institute. Current Transportation Dynamics November 6, 2006 By Tom Williamson, Transportation Consultants Co.

GREATER CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

April 18, South Carolina s Inland Port. ULI Spartanburg

Open Top Opportunities. Business Development Design Product for Rail Transport. Brent Lichty Union Pacific RR. Lindy Pope Norfolk Southern RR

Profile of Short Line Railroads in High Grain Production States

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads June Summary

NAFTA at 20 Infrastructure Overview. Tamara A. Nelsen Senior Director of Commodities Illinois Farm Bureau

Thank you. I m pleased to have the opportunity to share with you AAPA s position on the importance of efficient and competitive intermodal

KYLE Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services. Customer Switching.

Duluth-Superior Area Freight Planning

THE AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS ABOUT US

Leveraging Intermodal Transportation. Georgia Environmental Conference August 21, 2014

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

Union Pacific in Houston: Investing to Meet Freight Demands. Brenda Mainwaring, VP Public Affairs, November 12, 2013

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PASSENGER RAIL FREIGHT RAIL. Executive Summary.

FREIGHT TARIFF WTS 9500-B

FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE. Rail to Rail Competition and its Importance to Agriculture

A Comparison of Contributions to the Canadian Economy of Key Bulk Commodity Shippers and Rail Freight Carriers

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) Analyst: Brandon Montler Fall Recommendation: HOLD Target Price until (12/31/2016): $94

MAY CLOSER LOOK SERIES: Box Cars SAMPLE

Intermodalism -- Metropolitan Chicago's Built-In Economic Advantage

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES IN AGRIBUSINESS

FREIGHT P T OLICY RANSPORTATION INSITUTE. Rail to Rail Competition and its Importance to Agriculture

Rail Industry Overview and Trends

Railroads and Fertilizer

Railway-Related Cement Consumption Outlook

Rail Freight Service Review. Submission of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation

RAIL COMMODITY FLOWS

AN INTERMODAL NETWORK MODEL OF COAL DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES

FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE. The Critical Status of Agricultural Transportation in the Pacific Northwest

The U.S. Freight Railroad Industry: Where We Are in Dan Keen Wichita Ad Valorem Conference July 31, 2018

Railroads - The Economy and Trade National Coal Transportation Association Denver, Colorado September 19, 2017

1. Reasons for Recommendation

AAR DP & FC CONFERENCE: BRIDGING TO THE FUTURE. Mike McClellan Vice President Industrial Products

Transcription:

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr. Brendan Buras

Background Terminology Short Line Rail Short line (Class III) rail is often characterized as providing the first mile and last mile of rail service Class I Large Railroads Class II Regional Class III - Local Class III rail is generally defined as those rail operations with revenues of $31.9 million or less and those handling terminal and switching operations Class III rail operations are generally responsible for moving commodities from manufacturing sites to interchange points with Class I rail operations where they can be transported to transnational locations

Key Facts National Class III Rail Operations Class Number Miles Operated Employees Revenue (billions) Class I 7 95,573 151,854 $56.3 Class II 21 10,407 5,334 $1.2 Class III 537 32,596 12,092 $2.1 Class III Average freight revenue per railroad: $5.6 million Average freight revenue per mile: $89,000 Average employment per railroad: 23 81% of Class III rail owned by independent business entities Traffic Type: Local (14%), Forwarded (33%), Received (34%), Bridged (19%)

Louisiana Rail Snapshot Part 1 Overall, approximately 2,830 miles of freight railroad mileage are maintained by seventeen freight railroads in the state On an annual basis, roughly 25 million tons of goods are shipped from the state with Chemicals, Pulp & Paper, Petroleum and Food Products representing the leading shipped commodities Over 30 million tons of commodities are shipped to the state on an annual basis with Coal, Farm Products, Chemicals and Stone, Sand and Gravel representing the primary commodities There are currently six Class I railroads operating a total of 2,610 miles of track within Louisiana: BNSF Railway Company (348 miles), CSX Transportation (43 miles), Grand Trunk Corporation (263 miles), Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (737 miles), Norfolk Southern Corp (81 miles) and Union Pacific Railroad Co. (1,138 miles)

Louisiana Rail Snapshot Part 2 Approximately eleven Class III rail operations (8 freight and 3 switching & terminal) maintain approximately 829 miles of track, representing nearly a quarter of the state s total rail mileage (AAR, 2011a). Nonswitching, Class III rail operations include the following: Acadiana Railway Company, Inc. - 87 miles Arkansas, Louisiana &Mississippi Railroad - 40 miles Delta Southern Railroad, Inc. - 15 miles Louisiana & Delta Railroad, Inc. - 400 miles Louisiana& North West Railroad Co. 37miles Louisiana Southern Railroad, Inc. - 157 miles Ouachita Railroad 9 miles Timber Rock Railroad, Inc. 22 miles

Louisiana Rail Snapshot Part 3 Rail Traffic Originated, 2010 Intermodal 3% Food 6% Other 11% Petro/Coal 10% Pulp & Paper 11% Chemicals 59%

Louisiana Rail Snapshot Part 4 Rail Traffic Terminated, 2010 Stone, sand, gravel 21% Coal 19% Other 18% Farm products 19% Food 6% Chemicals 17%

Louisiana Rail Snapshot Map (AAR)

Economic Concerns Facing Louisiana Short Line Rail Growing concern about the capacity of Class III rail in the state to handle heavier 286,000 pound rail cars Concern by Class III operators over their inability to solicit higher fees from Class I operators in those cases where they only connect to a single Class I rail network Public safety concerns in those instances where their tracks pass through high density populations Concern among operators regarding the loss of business during economic downturns Concern over the ability to obtain funding for capital improvement projects and the quality of interchange service provided by Class I operators Alternative transportation options: truck, barge, etc.

National/State Impact of Short Line Rail Operations Part 1 Overwhelming majority of Class III rail operations are privately owned (81.2%) Class III rail operations play a vital role in connecting local agricultural and industrial operations to Class II and Class I rail networks Class III rail operations provide a valuable benefit to regional communities by reducing traffic on more congested highway transportation networks when truck-based transportation might be the only viable alternative for businesses to move their goods to market (2010 ASLRRA) Louisiana Annual carloads handled: 164,000 Truck Equivalents: 472,000 75% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions when using rail Estimated Pavement Damage Savings: $21,000,000

National/State Impact of Short Line Rail Operations Part 2 Nationally, the average small rail customer has approximately 100 employees and there are over 1 million individuals nationwide employed in companies serviced by short line rail operations (2010) Nationally, it is estimated that small rail accounted for over $900 million in pavement damage savings, with an estimated $21 million in savings for the State of Louisiana (2010) Locally, the average rail employee in the state of Louisiana earns approximately $102,940 per year in wages and benefits, and nationally, one rail job indirectly supports 4.5 jobs in the broader economy (2010) Locally, there are approximately 7,000 railroad retirees in the in the state of Louisiana receiving approximately $133 million in paid benefits (2010)

Project Justification Given the critical role that Short Line rail operations play in connecting State industries with larger rail networks, it is imperative to have an accurate assessment of their total economic impact within the State For example, an economic analysis of short-line rail operations in western Kansas projected $50 million in annual state savings due short-line operations. The Kansas study also found that rail line abandonment would cause grain prices to fall, shipper costs to rise, and development opportunities in rural communities to decline (ASLRRA, 2012 p. 41). It is the aim of this research project to replicate this type of analysis for the State of Louisiana in an effort to provide policymakers with an accurate assessment of the direct and indirect benefits of short line rail operations.

Project Description Phase I Project Goal: To provide a comprehensive assessment of the economic role and impact of Class III rail operations, this research project will employ a mixmethod analytical approached staggered across three core research phases. Phase I: This phase of the research project will focus on the identification of all Class III rail operations within the state, along with their direct customer base, indirect customer base and potential business interests. The primary goal of this component of the research project will be to determine the scope of Class III rail s impact within the state by collecting critical data on how many business interests are served by Class III rail as well as which industries (agricultural, manufacturing, natural resources, etc.) are directly impacted by Class III rail access.

Project Description Phase 2 Phase 2: During Phase II, the survey instrument developed in Phase I will be distributed to all identified customers and Class III rail operators. Next, this phase of the research project will be followed up by in-depth, qualitative interviews with Class III operators, customers of Class III operators and local community leaders in those areas serviced by Class III operators. Research collected during this phase of the project will also include the evaluation of the economic state of those communities where Class III rail operations are currently in place. Specifically, the research team will seek to determine the extent to which certain local communities rely upon employers supported by Class III rail and the potential costs to these communities that would result from a loss of Class III rail access.

Project Description Phase 3 Phase 3: The third and final phase of the research project will entail the analysis of collected survey and qualitative interview data, as well as the composition of the final project report. Ultimately, the results of this research project will directly contribute to existing research on the scope and importance of short line rail in rural communities. Additionally, it is expected that this research project will serve as a worthwhile resource for local and state policymakers seeking to explore potential targets for economic development investments in rural communities. Last, the results of the analysis provided in the project will be made available to stakeholders in three primary formats (1) a formal report provided to the UTC, (2) related conference presentations and (3) a condensed executive summary to be provided to interested policymakers.