TESTING SLASH PINE FOR RUST RESISTANCE IN ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL CONDITIONS. Ronald J. Dinus

Similar documents
STABILITY OF FIELD RESISTANT SLASH PINE TO SELECTED ISOLATES OF FUSIFORM RUST FUNGUS. Calvin F. Bey and Charles H. Walkinshaw1 /

RESISTANCE OF SHORTLEAF X LOBLOLLY PINE HYBRIDS TO INOCULATION WITH FUSIFORM RUST. Timothy La Farge and John F. Kraus

RELATION BETWEEN HEIGHT GROWTH AND FUSIFORM RUST INFECTION IN SLASH PINE 1/ A. E. Squillace, P. A. Layton, and R. E. Goddard

INOCULATION OF LOBLOLLY PINES WITH CRONARTIUM FUSIFORME AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INTENSITY

Fertilizer-Induced Changes in Susceptibility to Fusiform Rust Vary Among Families of Slash and Loblolly Pine S. J. Rowan

ESTIMATING VOLUME POTENTIAL IN GENETIC TESTS USING GROWTH AND YIELD MODELS. Warren L. Nance and Osborn O. Wells 1/

UNIFORM SEEDLING DENSITY IS IMPORTANT IN HARDWOOD PROGENY TEST NURSERIES. Charles D. Webb'

GENOTYPE X MINERAL NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS WITH FUSIFORM RUST RESISTANCE IN SLASH PINE. Charles A. Hollis, Joel E. Smith and Robert A.

THE EFFECT OF SEED ORIGIN ON SEED WING MORPHOLOGY AND JUVENILE GROWTH OF EAST TEXAS GREEN ASH. R.A. Woessner and Van Hicks, Jr.

Seed and Seedling Size Grading of Slash Pine Has Little Effect on Long-Term Growth of Trees

RESULTS OF THE SOUTHWIDE PINE SEED SOURCE STUDY THROUGH Wells 1/

LOBLOLLY PINE IMPROVED PLANTING STOCK-VEGETATION CONTROL STUDY - RESULTS AT AGE 6. Plantation Management Research Cooperative

GENETIC VARIATION IN SURVIVAL OF LONGLEAF PINE. R. E. Goddard and Richard Bryant 1/

PREDICTING THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC TREE IMPROVEMENT ON STAND YIELD. Marilyn A. Buford 1

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH NORTH AMERICAN FOREST BIOLOGY WORKSHOP

-r' _in. s x.,. .,. x = c'.,,,.z'.,

SITE INDEX MODELS FOR HEIGHT GROWTH OF PLANTED LOBLOLLY PINE (Pinus taeda L.) SEED SOURCES. Warren L. Nance and Osborn O. Wells 1/

TAXONOMY OF CRONARTIUM QUERCUUM AND C. FUSIFORME

CHERRY PROGENY TESTS 1 /

EVALUATION OF FOUR 25-YEAR-OLD OPEN-POLLINATED FAMILIES OF CHINESE CHESTNUT* Roy N. Keys, Franklin C. Cech, and William L.

Regeneration: An Overview of Past Trends and Basic Steps Needed to Ensure Future Success

G.S. Foster 1/ and D.V. Shaw 2/

Analysis of Genetic Variation in 1-, 2-, and 3-year old Eastern White Pine in Incomplete Diallel Cross Experiments

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION OF SWEETGUM. Jerry Sprague and Robert J. Weir 1/

Third-Cycle Breeding Strategy for Slash Pine by the Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program

LOBLOLLY PINE IMPROVED PLANTING STOCK-VEGETATION CONTROL STUDY-AGE 15 RESULTS

Incorporating Whole-Stand and Individual-Tree Models in a Stand-Table Projection System

A New Algorithm for Stand Table Projection Models

SLASH PINE SITE PREPARATION STUDY: AGE 23 RESULTS

USDA FOREST SERVICE LONGLEAF PINE PROGENY TEST REVIEW AND ANALYSIS

Southern Research Station P.O. Box 2680 Asheville, NC 28802

GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN 1/ PROGENY TESTS OF BLACK CHERRY PLUS TREES

JUVENILE GROWTH PERFORMANCE IN A PROVENANCE TEST OF SWEETGUM. by Kim C. Steiner, Bruce Bongarten, and Randall J. Rousseau'

*

SEED CERTIFICATION AND PROGENY TESTING. Clayton E. Posey, Assistant Professor Department of Forestry Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla.

The Impact and Value of Tree Improvement in the South

14 Year Results of the PMRC Species Comparison Study

Growth and Growth Efficiency of Loblolly and Slash Pine Hybrid Stands. Jennifer Lauture June 2017

Genetic Variation in Needle Characteristics of Slash Pine and in some of its Hybrids l )

Genetically Improved Pines for Reforesting Florida s Timberlands 1

Seed Orchard Management Strategies for Deployment of Intensively Selected Loblolly Pine Families in the Southern US

PMRC SAGS CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 4 ANALYSIS

EVALUATION OF SEED PRODUCTION BY CONE ANALYSIS. R. P. Karrfalt and E. W. Belcher 1/ ABSTRACT

ADJUSTING SITE INDEX AND AGE TO ACCOUNT FOR GENETIC EFFECTS IN YIELD EQUATIONS FOR LOBLOLLY PINE

EASTERN WHITE PINE SEED SOURCE VARIATION IN A NORTHERN MINNESOTA PLANTING. R. M. Jeffers 1 ABSTRACT

Improving Minnesota's White Pine 1

Proposed Seed Collection Zones for the Central States

Simulating and Sampling the Hardwood Compone11t of Loblolly Pine Plantations

GENETIC, SPACING, AND GENOTYPE X SPACING INFLUENCES ON GROWTH OF EUCALYPTUS GRANDIS IN SOUTH FLORIDA

EFFECTS OF GENETICALLY IMPROVED STANDS ON GROWTH AND YIELD PRINCIPLES. P. T. Sprinz 1/

A Precision Seed Sower for Longleaf Pine Bareroot Nursery Seedlings

Optimal Method For Analysis Of Disconnected Diallel Tests. Bin Xiang and Bailian Li

SLASH PINE SITE PREPARATION STUDY: AGE 20 RESULTS

COMPARING FIRST-YEAR GROWTH OF BARE-ROOT AND CONTAINER PLANTINGS OF SHORTLEAF PINE HALF-SIB FAMILIES. J. C. Brissette and J. P.

STIMULATION OF FLOWERING IN SWEETGUM. J.B. Jett and George Finger 1/

FIVE YEAR GROWTH RESULTS OF WATER OAK (QUERCUS NIGRA L.) PROVENANCE. J.C. Adams 1/

Slash, Loblolly, and Shortleaf Pine in a Mixed Stand; A Comparison of Their Wood Properties

Screening Sitka Spruce for Resistance to Weevil Damage in British Columbia

EFFECTS OF CONTAINER SIZE ON WHITE PINE AND DOUGLAS-FIR. SURVIVAL AND GROWTH IN NORTH IDAHO --Daniel L. Miller and Richard M.

An Evaluation of Height as an Early Selection Criterion for Volume and Predictor of Site Index Gain in the Western Gulf

Clonal Christmas Trees

Racial Variation in Sand Pine Seedlings 1/

PMRC SAGS CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 6 ANALYSIS

Improve Your Future Forest Revenue Stream with Advanced Pine Genetics

PERFORMANCE OF BLACK WALNUT PROVENANCES AFTER 15 YEARS IN 7 MIDWESTERN PLANTATIONS. Knud E. Clausen 1/

ROOT GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE SEEDLINGS HELD IN COLD STORAGE UNDER DIFFERING MOISTURE TREATMENTS

PMRC COASTAL PLAIN CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 12 ANALYSIS

Pinus species. Propagation. Pests and Diseases. Borers (flathead borers, roundhead borers)

COMPARISON OF THE GROWTH OF VEGETATIVE PROPAGULES AND SEEDLINGS OF PINUS RADIATA

FROM PROGENY TESTING TO SEED ORCHARD THROUGH MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING. Fan H. Kung, Calvin F. Bey and Theodore H. Mattheiss

ASSESSING POTENTIAL GENETIC GAINS FROM VARIETAL PLANTING STOCK IN LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS

NATURAL VARIATION IN ROOTING ABILITY OF WESTERN PROVENANCES OF SHORTLEAF PINE. G. A. Fancher and C. G. Tauer1/

ENDOMYCORRHIZAE: THEIR IMPORTANCE IN NURSERY PRODUCTION OF HARDWOOD SEEDLINGS

Forests 2014, 5, ; doi: /f Review. Richard A. Sniezko 1, Jason Smith 2, *, Jun-Jun Liu 3 and Richard C.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH CONFERENCE ON SOUTHERN FOREST TREE IMPROVEMENT

Genetic Selection in Coastal Douglas-fir for Tolerance to Swiss Needle Cast Disease

Selection and Propagation of Highly Graft-Compatible Douglas-fir Rootstocks A Case History

Tree improvement has been a standard

MOISTURE STRESS CONDITIONING OF CONTAINERIZED LOBLOLLY PINE. John R. Seiler and Jon D. Johnson 1/

VARIATION AMONG PROGENY OF MASS-SELECTED BALSAM FIR1

PMRC COASTAL PLAIN CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 6 ANALYSIS

Introduction Executive Summary

Craig D. Whitesell, Research Forester. Maryland Department of Research and Education

Douglas-Fir Planting Stock Performance Comparison After the Third Growing Season

SLASH PINE SITE PREPARATION STUDY RESULTS AT AGE 11. Plantation Management Research Cooperative. Warnell School of Forest Resources

RELATIONSHIP OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND TRACHEID LENGTH TO GROWTH RATE AND PROVENANCE IN SCOTCH PINE. Donald Dorn 1/ INTRODUCTION

Growth Comparisons of Planted Sweetgum and Sycamore. Roger M. Krinard

OPTIMUM FERTILIZER RATES FOR LOBLOLLY PINE SEED ORCHARDS R.C. Schmidtling¹

SAGS CULTURE/DENSITY STUDY: RESULTS THROUGH AGE 10

PROGENY TEST DESIGN AND ANALYSIS. J. P. van Buijtenen

A Progeny Tes orf Douglas-Fir

Seedling Age and Fertilization Affect Susceptibility of Loblolly Pine to Fusiform Rust

FIFTEEN-YEAR RESULTS OF A LIMITED RANGE EASTERN LARCH SOURCE STUDY 1/

Auger Hole Shape, Size, and Tree Placement Affect Survival and Root Form of Planted Ponderosa Pine in South Central Idaho1

GROWTH COMPARISONS OF TAMARACK AND EUROPEAN LARCH IN UPPER MICHIGAN. David D. Reed, Robert L. Sajdak, and John Kotar

Initiatives for improving productivity in Southern Pine plantations. IFA Plantation Productivity Symposium Mt Gambier 12 May 2014

Cultural Practices to Improve Survival and Growth of Loblolly and White Pine Seedlings

PMRC CULTURE / DENSITY STUDY: AGE 2 ANALYSIS

ROOTING OF MATURE AMERICAN SYCAMORE CUTTINGS. G. Sam Foster and Eyvind Thor¹ /

T H O M A S M C N E I L L S A I E L L I

Transcription:

1/ TESTING SLASH PINE FOR RUST RESISTANCE IN ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL CONDITIONS Ronald J. Dinus Field tests to locate southern pines resistant to fusiform rust (Cronartium fusiforme Hedgc. & Hunt ex Cumm.) are costly, time-consuming, and often unreliable (Henry and Jewell 1963; Kinloch and Kelman 1965; LaFarge and Kraus 1967). Hence, Jewell (1960) devised an inoculation technique in which telia-bearing oak leaves are suspended over pine seedlings in the cotyledon stage grown under controlled conditions of temperature and moisture. The technique was subsequently modified (Jewell and Mallett 1964, 1967) to increase its capacity and efficiency. This and related approaches (Arnold and Goddard 1966; Davis and Goggans 1968; Driver et al. 1966) attempt to provide favorable conditions for infection and uniform, abundant supplies of inoculum. The test may be too severe, however, since selections having slight but useful resistance might be eliminated. Since resistance to some diseases varies with age (Patton 1961), tests on juvenile material could be unrealistic. Furthermore, testing during a single life stage with more or less local inoculum could result in selection for specialized rather than generalized resistance (Smith 1968). This paper describes the relationship between infection rates under artificial conditions and those observed in field plantings at a number of locations and after several years of exposure. Results indicate that response to artificial inoculation is a reliable index of field performance; both types of tests, however, are valuable in breeding for rust resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six slash pines (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) were selected in Harrison County, Mississippi, for use in artificial and field inoculation tests (Jewell and Mallett 1967). Three were rust-free (8-7, 11-6, and 18-27), and three were infected (18-40, 18-41, and 18-62). The natural stands involved were about 75 percent infected. Open-pollinated seed was collected over a period of several years from each of the six selections. Dr. F. F. Jewell. artificially inoculated open-pollinated progenies in identical randomized block designs in 1963 and 1964. Each family was represented by two rows of 18 trees in each of five blocks. Proportions of plants infected per row were determined 9 months after inoculation. Results of one of the individual experiments were reported previously (Jewell and Mallett 1964). For presentation here, the original data were reanalyzed as separate tests and as a single experiment combining both years. The proportion of plants infected was 1/ The author is stationed at the Institute of Forest Genetics, Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Gulfport, Mississippi. 2/ Currently Associate Professor of Forest Pathology, Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, Ruston, Louisiana.

transformed to degrees arc sine and subjected to analysis of variance for the randomized block design with more than one observation per experimental unit (Steel and Torrie 1960). Family means were compared by multiple range tests at the 0.01 level. Field tests of open-pollinated progenies from the same selections were established by Jewell in 1963 at Gulfport, Mississippi, and in 1964 on Crown Zellerbach Corporation land near Bogalusa, Louisiana. The Gulfport planting contains progenies from all six selections in a randomized block design. Each family is represented by two rows of 15 trees in each of seven blocks. The Bogalusa planting consists of five blocks each containing two rows of 15 trees; five families are represented. Survival, total height, and rust infection were measured annually. Rust infection was observed in terms of three indices: number of stem infections per plant, total number of infections per plant, and proportion of plants infected per row. The proportion infected in the latest year was also analyzed after plants previously infected but currently rust-free had been deducted. Percent of survival and the proportion infected were transformed to degrees arc sine. Row means for the six variables were subjected to analysis of variance for the randomized block design with more than one observation per experimental unit. A combined analysis of both locations was not attempted as the effect would have been confounded with different planting dates. Family means were compared by multiple range tests at the 0.01 level. _In addition, simple correlations were calculated to determine if survival and growth were associated with infection and which index best measured infection. RESULTS Artificial inoculation.--variation among families was significant in both 1963 and 1964. In both years, the proportion of diseased plants from one rustfree and the three infected selections was greater than from the remaining rust-free selections (fig. 1). The combined analysis confirmed the significance of variation among families. However, both the year x family interaction and differences between years were nonsignificant. -99-

Field survival.--survival at the latest measurement varied significantly among families at Bogalusa, but not at Gulfport (table 1). Mortality was heaviest shortly after planting. Simple correlations between survival and the three indices of infection were nonsignificant. Table l.--mean percentage survival of open-pollinated slash pine progenies Total height.--differences among families in total height became apparent after 3 years in the field. After 4 years at Bogalusa, variation among families was significant. A rust-free selection, 11-6, produced the slowest growing progeny. Their mean height was significantly less than that of the tallest family (fig. 2). Differences among families after 5 years at Gulfport were not significant. Regardless of age or location, progenies of both rust-free and infected selections were among the fastest growing lines. Simple correlations between infection rates and height or average annual height increment during the first 3 years were nonsignificant. Figure 2.--Mean height of open-pollinated slash pine progenies at two locations. Values connected by the same vertical line do not differ significantly at the 0.01 level according to Duncan's test. -100-

Stem infections.--stem infections appeared as early as 1 year after planting at both locations. Since then, the number per plant has increased steadily and significant differences among families were noted after 2 years of exposure. Although few changes in family ranking have occurred since, considerable variability was encountered within families. For example, the coefficient of variation at Gulfport ranged from 108 percent during the second year to 65 percent in the fifth year. This high error rate indicates that distinguishing between resistant and susceptible lines required at least 4 to 5 years of exposure. By then, progenies of 18-40 and 18-62 had more stem infections than those of any other selection (table 2). In addition, progeny of 8-7 at Gulfport had fewer stem infections. Simple correlations between numbers of stem infections and "ther infection indices were significant at the 0.01 level. Total infections.--increases in the total number of infections per plant occurred each year and were consistently larger for progenies of rust-infected selections. However, the frequency of new infections fluctuated widely from year to year and considerable variability existed within families. Coefficients of variation decreased with years of exposure, but were never less than 41 percent. However, differences among families have been significant since the second year and family ranking has changed only slightly since the third year. At Gulfport after 5 years of exposure, progenies of 18-40 and 18-62 had more infections than those of all other selections (table 2). Progenies of 18-41, 18-27, and 11-6 had fewer infections than these, but more than those of 8-7. A similar pattern emerged at Bogalusa after 4 years (table 2). Progenies of 8-7 and 11-6 had fewer infections than any others. Simple correlations between total infections and the proportion infected were significant at the 0.01 level. -101-

Proportion infected.--annual increases in numbers of newly infected plants varied between years and locations (fig. 3). However, family rankings have been similar at both locations since the first infections were noted. Initially, variation within families was large, but coefficients of variation have been less than 30 percent since the third year. Consequently, differences which were evident among families within 2 years of planting have become more definite. At last measurement, variation among families was significant. Regardless of location, fewer progeny of 8-7 were infected than of any other selection (fig. 3). On the other hand, progenies of 18-62 and 18-40 were by far the most frequently infected. Progenies of one rust-infected (18-41) and two rust-free selections (18-27 and 11-6) differed significantly from both the best and worst families and exhibited intermediate levels of infection at both locations. When plants previously infected but rust-free at the last measurement were deducted from the analyses, results were essentially the same (fig. 3). Figure 3.--Mean proportions of plants infected (percent) among open-pollinated slash pine progenies at two locations. Values connected by the same vertical line do not differ significantly at the 0.01 level according to Duncan's test. Years in parentheses denote results after plants previously infected but now healthy were deducted. -102-

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The three indices of infection gave the six families similar ratings and were significantly correlated. The proportion infected seemed the most reliable index. A curvilinear relation existed between total infections and the proportion of plants infected similar to that found for loblolly pine,(pinus taeda L.), (Kinloch 1968). That is, infections per plant tended to increase faster than the number of infected plants. This relation suggests that infections per plant may be more sensitive in heavily infected areas or when families concerned have only slight resistance. However, this trend did not appear until the fourth and fifth years. In addition, large error terms were encountered in analyses based on stem and total infections. Results from the proportion of plants infected paralleled those obtained after adjustment for plants previously infected but not showing infection at the last measurement. This agreement demonstrates that a single scoring 4 or 5 years after planting can provide a realistic estimate of field performance, at least in controlled, well-replicated plantations. Combined analysis of the two artificial inoculation tests demonstrated that the technique yields consistent results. Progenies of 8-7 and 18-27 resisted artificial inoculation and performed better than average in the field (fig. 4). While not best in the field, progeny of 18-27 were significantly more resistant than the worst families. Since both these selections demonstrated heritable resistance in both types of test, it appears that they can be used safely in breeding programs as suggested by Jewell and Mallett (1967). This conclusion seems especially sound as these were open-pollinated progeny from a rust-free selection in a stand that was 75 percent infected. Even better field performance can be expected from crossing individuals thus identified. For example, progeny from the cross between 8-7 and 18-27 or its reciprocal averaged only 10 percent infection in a series of artificial inoculations (Jewell and Mallett 1967). Consequently, selection and breeding on the basis of artificial inoculation results should yield rapid improvement. Judgments based on artificial inoculation results err only on the safe side. Of the progenies resistant to artificial inoculation, none were found susceptible in the field (fig. 4) even after several years of exposure at two locations. While some potentially useful selections may be overlooked, susceptible ones will not go undetected. According to the nursery test (fig. 1), the infected selections, 18-62, 18-40, and 18-41, are undesirable for inclusion in breeding programs. The presence of 18-62 and 18-40 in the upper right quadrant of figure 4 supports this conclusion and further demonstrates the close agreement between artificial and field testing. While 18-41 seems undesirable at first glance, its intermediate field performance (fig. 3) makes outright rejection questionable. Assuming that resistance is controlled by additive genes (Kinloch 1968) or at least not by a single dominant gene (Jewell and Mallett 1967), this intermediacy suggests that 18-41 possesses some genes for resistance. That is, it has a larger complement than 18-62 or 18-40, but smaller than 8-7. Data from previous artificial inoculations (Jewell and Mallett 1967) support this inference. Progeny from the cross between 8-7 and 18-62 were 44 percent infected. Crossing 8-7 with 18-41, however, produced progeny which were only 23 percent infected. -103-

Figure 4.--Relationship between the results of artificial and natural inoculations of open-pollinated slash pine progenies., Relying on the artificial testing of open-pollinated progenies would have eliminated 18-41. Thus, such tests may be too severe, but they identify the most resistant selections several years before field tests would. The accumulated data suggest a means of circumventing this weakness. For example, partially resistant and potentially useful selections such as 18-41 can be identified by screening control-pollinated progenies or at least progenies of crosses between candidates and specific tester parents like 8-7. Partially resistant selections thus could be located among individuals more desirable from other aspects. Parents with appropriate degrees of resistance could be identified to reforest areas of varying rust hazard. The rust-free selection, 11-6, performed better in the field than might have been expected on the basis of artificial inoculation alone (fig. 4). Its performance in other Gulfport plantings has also exceeded expectation. This deviation from agreement infers that 11-6, like 18-41, either possesses fewer genes for resistance than 8-7 or has a different form of resistance. Available evidence favors the latter premise. First, 11-6 performed quite differently in two types of test. Second, artificial inoculation of progeny from crosses between 11-6 and 8-7 resulted in 53 percent infection (Jewell and Mallett 1967). Progeny from its cross to 18-62 were 95 percent infected. Thus, 11-6 did not combine as well with 8-7 as 18-41 and was highly susceptible in combination with a susceptible selection. The field resistance of 11-6 may be dependent upon age or interaction with the environment for its expression. An increase in resistance to blister rust, Cronartium ribicola J. C. Fisch., with age was observed by Patton (1961). The progeny of 11-6 tended to be the slowest growing of those tested (fig. 2). -104-

Hence, its resistance may be an indirect result of mediocre growth. Low vigor and resistance are often related in cases of obligate parasitism (Heimburger 1962; Illy 1966). Whatever the underlying causes, the departure of 11-6 from agreement demonstrates that joint artificial and field tests can identify selections having different forms of resistance. Thus, acceptable genotypes can be combined purposefully, rather than haphazardly, for greater progress. LITERATURE CITED Arnold, J. T., and Goddard, R. E. 1966. Variation in resistance of slash pine to southern fusiform rust. Eighth South. Conf. on Forest Tree Impr. Proc. 1965: 100-104. Davis, T. C., and Goggans, J. 1968. Fusiform rust in southern pines. Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Highlights of Agr. Res. 15(3): 10. Driver, C. H., Stonecypher, R. W., and Zobel, B. J. 1966. The "rust nursery" technique of mass screening known seed sources of southern pines for relative resistance to fusiform rust. In Breeding pest-resistant trees, pp. 399-401. Oxford and N. Y.: Pergamon Press. Heimburger, C. 1962. Breeding for disease resistance in forest trees. Forest. Chron. 38: 356-362. Henry, B. W., and Jewell, F. F. 1963. Resistance of pines to southern fusiform rust. Proc., World Consultation on Forest Genet. and Tree Impr., Vol. 2, Sect. 6a, 4 pp. FAO, Stockholm, Sweden. Illy, G. 1966. Note on the resistance to pine twist rust caused by Melampsora pinitorqua in the offspring of Pinus pinaster. In Breeding pest-resistant trees, pp. 125-126. Oxford and N. Y.: Pergamon Press. Jewell, F. F. 1960. Inoculation of slash pine seedlings with Cronartium fusiforme. Phytopathology 50: 48-51. Jewell, F. F., and Mallett, S. L. 1964. Resistance to fusiform rust in slash pine as shown by artificial inoculation. Phytopathology 54: 1294. Jewell, F. F., and Mallett, S. L. 1967. Testing slash pine for rust resistance. Forest Sci. 13: 413-418. Kinloch, B. B., Jr. 1968. Genetic variation in susceptibility to fusiform rust in (control- and wind-pollinated progenies of) loblolly pine. Ph.D. Thesis. N. C. State Univ. Raleigh. 54 pp. -105-

Kinloch, B. B., Jr., and Kelman, A. 1965. Relative susceptibility to fusiform rust of progeny lines from rust-infected and noninfected loblolly pines. USDA Plant Dis. Reporter 49: 872-874. LaFarge, T., and Kraus, J. F. 1967. Fifth-year results of a slash pine polycross progeny test in Georgia. Ninth South. Conf. on Forest Tree Impr. Proc. 1967: 86-91. Patton, R. F. 1961. The effect of age upon susceptibility of eastern white pine to infection by Cronartium ribicola. Phytopathology 51: 429-434. Smith, H. C. 1968. Plant breeding for disease resistance. Span 11: 89-91. Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. 481 pp. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.