Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Similar documents
Movil Lake BELTRAMI COUNTY

Platte Lake CROW WING & MORRISON COUNTIES

4% 3% 2% In addition, this data set will be used in the (d) State Assessment rotation.

Upper Hay Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Lower Hay Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Lower Cullen Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Walker Brook Lake CLEARWATER COUNTY

Lake Emily CROW WING COUNTY

Little Pine Lake DNR ID:

Gull Lake CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES

Section III. Aitkin County Large Lakes

Section III. Aitkin County Large Lakes

North Long Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Whitefish Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Clearwater Lake CLEARWATER / BELTRAMI COUNTY

Little Turtle Lake BELTRAMI COUNTY

Dead Lake DNR ID:

There is no organized lake association for Clearwater (Round) Lake at this time. Transparency data Good data set from , 2015.

Serpent Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Big Trout Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Upper South Long Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Chapter 2. Watershed Characteristics

Upper Cullen CROW WING COUNTY

Lake Ossawinnamakee CROW WING COUNTY

Lake Hubert CROW WING COUNTY

Franklin Lake OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Burnt Shanty Lake ITASCA COUNTY

Clitherall Lake DNR ID:

Prairie Lake OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Blackduck Lake BELTRAMI COUNTY

West Leaf Lake DNR ID:

Lida Lakes & OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Rose Lake OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Lake Blanche OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Lake Mille Lacs AITKIN, MILLE LACS, & CROW WING COUNTIES

Placid Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Lake Koronis STEARNS COUNTY

Grace Lake has an organized association that is involved in activities such as water quality monitoring and education.

Round Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Julia Lake BELTRAMI COUNTY

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

Big McDonald Lake OTTER TAIL COUNTY

Daggett Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Island Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Little Pine Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Loon Lake ITASCA COUNTY

Crow Wing Lake. Lake Water Quality Summary CROW WING COUNTY. Location Data. Physical Characteristics. Data Availability

Burrows Lake ITASCA COUNTY

Balsam Lake ITASCA COUNTY

Boy Lake CASS COUNTY

Pelican Lake CROW WING COUNTY

Draft Lake Management Plan for Lake Lida

Lake Minnewaska POPE COUNTY

Big Sand Lake HUBBARD COUNTY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DES PLAINES RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN WHY A WATERSHED-BASED PLAN? WHAT IS A WATERSHED?

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN MINNESOTA. GOVERNANCE, PLANNING, AND FUNDING June 19, 2018 Cedar Rapids, Iowa

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW Mississippi Dr Coon Rapids, MN SQ FT Residence on 0.64 Acre Lot

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Northern Chain of Lakes

DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CLMP+ Report on Fleming Lake (Aitkin County)

Gull Lake CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES

CHAPTER 7 PHYSICAL INVENTORY OF THE CITY

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Understanding Lake Data

CAMP KOOCH-I-CHING SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

Chapter 2: Conditions in the Spring Lake Watershed related to Stormwater Pollution

A Lake Classification and Conservation Portfolio for Wisconsin

Contiguous Lots, Relationships & Special Topics Fall Darrin Hoverson Area Hydrologist

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Section V.H. Fresh Water Resources

FY Biennial Budget Request Mille Lacs SWCD

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting. June 11, 2018

(Must be a county, city, township, watershed district, watershed management organization or joint powers organization.)

Crow Wing Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Plan

Vermillion River Headwaters Groundwater Recharge Area Inventory and Protection Plan

Municipal Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For The Borough of Cape May Point By Van Note-Harvey Associates VNH File No.

West Donegal Township. Pollutant Reduction Plan. Prepared for: West Donegal Township. One Municipal Drive Elizabethtown, PA 17022

Turtle Lake ITASCA COUNTY

Surface Water Management

Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan

C Fish Lake C Rice Lake C Mud Lake C Weaver Lake C Elm Creek*

Beltrami County Lake Protection Summary Report

An Overview of Vermont s Clean Water Act Julie Moore, P.E. August 14, 2017

Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University


2016 Monitoring Report; Mississippi River Tributaries

Environmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them

Final TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Little River Watershed Restoration Project. Mark Powell, Consultant Natural Resources Management

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW

Lake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting. Arrowhead Lake May 3, :00 PM

Red Rock Lake: A Path Forward

BANKS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Adaptive Watershed Management for Control of Nutrient Loss in the Mackinaw River Watershed. Krista Kirkham and Maria Lemke The Nature Conservancy

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Plan

Byllesby Reservoir Phosphorus TMDL Public Meeting & Open House May 13, 2013 Phillippo Scout Reservation

Transcription:

Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment The lakeshed vitals table identifies where to focus organizational and management efforts for each lake. Criteria were developed using limnological concepts to determine the effect to lake water quality. Lakeshed Vitals Rating Major Basin Upper Mississippi River descriptive Major Watershed Leech Lake River descriptive Minor Watershed 8034 descriptive Lakeshed Leech River (803401) descriptive Ecoregion Northern Lakes and Forests descriptive Lake Area 1,420 acres descriptive Miles of Shoreline 8.17 descriptive Miles of Stream 18.56 descriptive Miles of Road 10.3 descriptive Lake Max Depth 5 ft. descriptive Lake Mean Depth NA NA Water Residence Time NA NA Municipalities None + Sewage Management None No residences on lake + Public Drainage Ditches None + Lake Management Plan None x Lake Vegetation Survey/Plan None x Forestry Practices None + Development Classification Natural Environment + Shoreline Development Index 1.5 + Total Lakeshed to Lake Area Ratio (total lakeshed includes lake area) 11.4:1 x Public Lake Accesses 3 x Inlets 3 Leech Lake River, Snake Creek, Unnamed x Outlets 1 L eech Lake River x Feedlots None + Agriculture Zoning 758 acres > 200 ft. from lake x Public Land : Private Land 11:1 + Wetland Coverage 61% + Lake Transparency Trend NA NA Exotic Species None + Rating Key: + beneficial to the lake - possibly detrimental to the lake x warrants attention RMB Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 1 of 6 2008 Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Lakeshed Understanding a lakeshed requires the understanding of basic hydrology. A watershed is the area of land that drains into a surface water body such as a stream, river, or lake and contributes to the recharge of groundwater. There are three categories of watersheds: 1) basins, 2) major watersheds, and 3) minor watersheds. Mud Lake is found within the Upper Mississippi River Basin, which includes the Leech Lake River Major Watershed as one of its sixteen major watersheds. The basin covers 20,000 square miles, while the Leech Lake River Watershed covers 1,335 square miles (approximately 854,349 acres). Mud Lake falls within minor watershed 8034, one of the 75 minor watersheds that comprise the Leech Lake River Major Watershed. Within this watershed hierarchy, lakesheds also exist. A lakeshed is defined simply as the land area that drains to a lake. While some lakes may have only one or two minor watersheds draining into them, others may be connected to a large number of minor watersheds, reflecting a larger drainage area via stream or river networks. Mud Lake falls within the Leech River (803401) lakeshed, covering 16,134 acres (includes lake area). Even though Mud Lake receives water from minor watershed 8037 via the Leech Lake River, for the purpose of this assessment it is decided that only the immediate lakeshed be inventoried and assessed. Mud Lake Lakeshed Water Quality Protection Strategy Each lakeshed has a different makeup of public and private lands. Looking in more detail at the makeup of these lands can give insight on where to focus protection efforts. The protected lands (easements, wetlands, public land) are the future water quality infrastructure for the lake. Developed land and agriculture have the highest phosphorus runoff coefficients, so this land should be minimized for water quality protection. Although the majority of Mud Lake s lakeshed is made up of public land, private forested uplands can be the focus of development and protection efforts in the lakeshed. Developed Agriculture Private (8%) 2% Public (90%) Forested Uplands Other Wetlands Open Water County State Federal Land Use (%) 1% 2% 4% 0% 1% 2% 0% 74% 16% Runoff Coefficient Lbs of phosphorus/acre/ year 0.45-1.5 0.26-0.9 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Description Focused on Shoreland Cropland Focus of development and protection efforts Open, pasture, grassland, shrubland Protected Potential Phase 3 Discussion Items Shoreline restoration Restore wetlands; CRP Forest stewardship planning, 3 rd party certification, SFIA, local woodland cooperatives Protected by Wetland Conservation Act County Tax Forfeit Lands State Forest National Forest RMB Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 2 of 6 2008 Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Figure 1. Upper Mississippi Basin and the Leech Lake River Watershed. Figure 2. Minor Watersheds 8034 & 8037 contribute water to Mud Lake. Figure 3. The Leech River (803401) Lakeshed (Aerial Imagery 2008 1M). RMB Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 3 of 6 2008 Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Land Cover / Land Use The activities that occur on the land within the lakeshed can greatly impact a lake. Land use planning helps ensure the use of land resources in an organized fashion so that the needs of the present and future generations can be best addressed. The basic purpose of land use planning is to ensure that each area of land will be used in a manner that provides maximum social benefits without degradation of the land resource. Changes in land use, and ultimately land cover, impact the hydrology of a lakeshed. Land cover is also directly related to the lands ability to absorb and store water rather than cause it to flow overland (gathering nutrients and sediment as it moves) towards the lowest point, typically the lake. Impervious intensity decribes the lands inability to absorb water, Figure 5. The Leech River (803401) lakeshed land cover (http://land.umn.edu). the higher the % impervious intensity the more area that water cannot penetrate in to the soils. Monitoring the changes in land use can assist in future planning procedures to address the needs of future generations. Phosphorus export, which is the main cause of lake eutrophication, depends on the type of land cover occurring in the lakeshed. Figure 5 depicts Mud Lake s lakeshed land cover. The University of Minnesota has online records of land cover statistics from years 1990 and 2000 (http://land.umn.edu). Table 1 describes Mud Lake s lakeshed land cover statistics and percent change from 1990 to 2000. Due to the many factors that influence demographics, one cannot determine with certainty the projected statistics over the next 10, 20, 30+ years, but one can see the transition within the lakeshed from agriculture, forest, and water acreages to grass/shrub/wetland and urban acreages. The largest change in percentage is the decrease in water cover (88.6%); however, in acreage, grass/shrub/wetland cover has increased the most (1,626 acres). In addition, the impervious intensity has increased, which has implications for storm water runoff into the lake. The increase in impervious intensity is consistent with the increase in urban acreage. RMB Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 4 of 6 2008 Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Table 1. Mud Lake s lakeshed land cover statistics and % change from 1990 to 2000 (http://land.umn.edu). 1990 2000 % Change Land Cover Acres Percent Acres Percent 1990 to 2000 Agriculture 888 5.5 738 4.57 16.9 % Decrease Forest 9,848 61.04 8,985 55.69 8.8 % Decrease Grass/Shrub/Wetland 4,566 28.3 6,192 38.38 35.6 % Increase Water 694 4.3 79 0.49 88.6 % Decrease Urban 142 0.88 144 0.89 1.4 % Increase Impervious Intensity % 0 16,067 99.56 16,056 99.49 0.1 % Decrease 1-10 30 0.19 32 0.2 6.7 % Increase 11-25 26 0.16 29 0.18 11.5 % Increase 26-40 11 0.07 14 0.09 27.3 % Increase 41-60 5 0.03 5 0.03 No Change 61-80 0 0 1 0.01 100 % Increase 81-100 0 0 1 0.01 100 % Increase Total Area 16,134 16,134 Total Impervious Area (Percent Impervious Area Excludes Water Area) 11 0.07 15 0.09 36.4 % Increase Demographics Mud Lake is classified as a natural environment lake. Natural environment lakes usually have less than 150 total acres, less than 60 acres per mile of shoreline, and less than three dwellings per mile of shoreline. They may have some winter kill of fish; may have shallow, swampy shoreline; and are less than 15 feet deep. The Minnesota Department of Administration Geographic and Demographic Analysis Division extrapolated future population in 5- year increments out to 2035. These projections are shown in Figure 6 below. Cass County as a whole has a higher, positive extrapolated growth projection than Salem Township, which has a negative extrapolated growth projection. Figure 6. Population growth projection for the townships around Mud Lake and Cass County. Figure excludes one unorganized township that lacks individual population data (source: http://www.demography.sta te.mn.us/resource.html?id= 19332). Percentage of 2006 Population 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% Population Growth Projection Salem Township; 2006 population: 71 Cass County; 2006 population: 28,949-40% 2006 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Extrapolation RMB Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 5 of 6 2008 Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Status of the Fishery No information available. RMB Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 6 of 6 2008 Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment