Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Building Subjected to Lateral Forces

Similar documents
Analysis and Design of an Earthquake Resistant Structure using STADD. Pro

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 07, 2016 ISSN (online):

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DESIGN RESULTS OF A MULTI-STORIED BUILDING USING STAAD PRO AND ETABS FOR REGULAR AND IRREGULAR PLAN CONFIGURATION

Behaviour of Symmetrical RCC and Steel Framed Structures Under Seismic and Wind Loading

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANALYSIS ON MASONRY INFILL WALLS

WIND AND EARTHQUAKE EFFECT ON R.C.C & STEEL STRUCTURE

Wind Analysis and Design of G+11 Storied Building Using STAAD-Pro

Seismic Behaviour of Different Bracing Systems in High Rise RCC Buildings

Investigation for Base Shear and Roof Displacement for Multi-Storey Building with Different Location of Shear Wall Using STAAD Pro

Ground + 4 floor RCC frame structure in Goa Floor to floor height is 3.0m Plan dimension, 24.0 m x 13.5 m SBC = 20 t/sqm, hard Strata is consider for

Analysis and Design of High-Rise RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 5, May ISSN

Static and Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Framed Building: A Comparative Study

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SHEAR WALL CONFIGURATIONS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A MOMENT-RESISTING FRAME

A Study on Seismic Analysis of High Rise Irregular Floor Plan Building with Different Position of Shear Walls

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SIX STOREYED RC FRAMED BUILDING WITH BRACING SYSTEMS

Seismic Analysis of Multistoried Building

EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A G+12 STOREY BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT INFILL FOR BHUJ AND KOYNA EARTHQUAKE FUNCTIONS

SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF RC BUILDING RESTING ON PLAIN AND SLOPING GROUND WITH BRACINGS AND SHEAR WALL

Effect of RC Shear Wall on Seismic Performance of Building Resting on Sloping Ground

Wind Analysis of High Rise Building with Different Bracing Systems Amol S. Rajas, Dr.N.L.Shelke

Analysis and Design of Residential Building Using ETABS V.MOUNUSHA 1, K.KARTHIK BABU 2, N.SIVAPRASADA RAO 3

Pushover Analysis of RC Bare Frame: Performance Comparison between Ductile and Non-ductile detailing

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PRE-ENGINEERED BUILDING AND CONVENTIONAL STEEL STRUCTURES

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Comparative study for Seismic Analysis of building using different software

SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering ( SSRG IJCE ) Volume 4 Issue 6 June 2017

Effect of Wind Load on High Rise Buildings Considering Aspect Ratio

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 2, No 2, 2011

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A MULTISTORY BUILDING BY RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD AND SEISMIC COEFFICIENT METHOD

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):

DESIGN OF G+5 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BY USING E-TABS

STUDIES ON LOCATION OF SHEAR WALL IN BUILDINGS FOR STRUCTURAL STABILITY

Seismic Behaviour Of Flat Slab Framed Structure With And Without Masonry Infill Wall

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A MID RISE RCC BUILDING WITH SOFT STOREY AT GROUND FLOOR

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDING

Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Framed Buildings with Columns of Different Heights within One Storey

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REGULAR & IRREGULAR STRUCTURES USING EQUIVALENT STATIC AND RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHODS

Comparative Study of Equivalent Static Analysis and Response spectrum analysis on Flat Slab Using Etabs

A Comparative Study of Stress Parameters Obtained by STAAD-Pro and ETAB

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF DIFFERENT BRACING HIGH RISE RCC BUILDINGS

Department of Civil Engineering, SKP Engg. College, Tiruvanamalai, TN, India

Comparative Study of Multi-storeyed RC Building With Open Ground Storey Having Different Type Infill Walls

Analysis the Behavior of Building with Different Soft Story

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 5, May ISSN

Comparative Analysis and Design of Flat and Grid Slab System With Conventional Slab System

Evaluation Of Pre-Engineering Structure Design By IS-800 As Against Pre-Engineering Structure Design By AISC

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012

Keywords: Multistorey building, seismic analysis, wind analysis

Behaviour of RCC Multistorey Structure With and Without Infill Walls

Seismic Retrofitting of Building with Soft Storey and Floating Column

Seismic Analysis of RC Framed Building for Different Position of Shear wall

Analysis of RC building in different seismic zones by moment resisting frame using IS 1893:2002

Seismic Analysis of Space Frame with T and Square Shaped Column

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POSITION OF SHEAR WALL ON DEFLECTION IN HIGH RISE BUILDING

Comparative Analysis of Moment Resisting Frames of Steel and Composite Materials

ANALYTICAL STUDY ON SEISMIC RESPONSE WITH AND WITHOUT SOFT STOREYS IN MULTISTOREY RC BUILDING

Comparison and Optimization of 8 Storeys Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame and Special Moment Resisting Frame Building

Earthquake Resistant Design for Low Rise Open Ground Storey Famed Building

Seismic Behaviour of an R.C. Multistorey Frame with R.C. Rectangular Shear Walls at Different Locations

A Comparative Study between RCC and Steel Design for Industrial and Commercial Structures

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF HIGH RISE BUILDINGS WITH PLAN IRREGULARITY

Seismic Analysis Of Multi Storied Irregular Building Using Flat Slab And Grid Slab In Zone III & V

ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS WITH BRACING AND SHEAR WALL

Research Article Volume 6 Issue No. 6

Study on seismic analysis of high-rise building by using software

Effect of Mass and Stiffness of Vertically Irregular RC Structure

Comparative Analysis and Design of Flat and Grid Slab System with Conventional Slab System

DESIGN OF MULTILEVEL CAR PARKING BUILDING

Significance of Shear Wall in Multi-Storey Structure With Seismic Analysis

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Comparison Between Wind And Seismic Load On Different Types Of Structures

Economizing Steel building using Pre-Engineered Steel Sections

Earthquake Behavior of RCC Building for Various Shear Wall Configurations

Seismic Performance of Multistorey Building with Soft Storey at Different Level with RC Shear Wall

Seismic Performance of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Column Building

ISSN: [Rai* et al., 6(10): October, 2017] Impact Factor: 4.116

Approximate Seismic Analysis Procedure for Multibay RC Framed Structures

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI STOREY STRUCTURE FOR DIFFERENT SHAPES. K.Upendra Reddy 1,Dr.E.Arunakanthi 2

Soil Structure Interaction (Pumphouse) for Bending Moment Mr S.K. Musande 1, Prof. V.P. Kumbhar 2, Prof. A.H. Kumbhar 3

Result Analysis of Multistorey Building by Using Response Spectrum Method for Floating Column

ANALYSIS OF P-DELTA EFFECT ON HIGH RISE BUILDINGS

Study on lateral deflection of buildings with fixed support under various soil conditions

A Study on Comparative Analysis of RCC Building Resting on Plain and Hilly Terrain

Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building With Different Plan Shapes Resting on Sloping Ground

Seismic Response of Vertically Irregular RC Frame with Stiffness Irregularity at Fourth Floor

Effects Of Vertical Geometric And Mass Irregularities In Structure

International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER) ISSN: [ ] [Vol-3, Issue-3, March- 2017]

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING

Seismic Analysis of a Multi-Storeyed Building with Irregular Plan Configuration Using ETABS N. Mohan Reddy 1 Dr. E. Arunakanthi 2

THE STUDY ON BEHAVIOUR OF OUTRIGGERS FOR TALL BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOAD

Earthquake Analysis of Multi Storied Residential Building - A Case Study

Behavior Analysis of a Medium High-Rise Building, Using ETABS

LEARNING OF ETABS. 15 ft

Design Criteria For Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Seismic Loading

Seismic Analysis of Soft Storey Buildings Considering Structural and Geometrical Parameters

Performance of Multi-story RCC structure with Floating Column

Comparison of Seismic Performance of Solid and Hollow Reinforced Concrete members in RCC framed Building using ETABS Software

EARTHQUAKE LOADS ON MULTISTOREY BUILDINGS AS PER IS: AND IS: : A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Comparative Study of R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite Structures

Transcription:

Analysis and Design of MultiStorey Building Subjected to Lateral Forces Pratik Dadsena 1, Nishant Rajoria 2, Bhaskar Dadsena 3 Student, Department of Civil Engineering, S.E.T., Sharda University, Greater Noida (UP), India 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, S.E.T, Sharda University, Greater Noida (UP), India 2 Structural Engineer, Greater Noida (UP), India 3 Abstract: This work involves the analysis and design of irregular 3D frames of (basement + ground + 5) storeys using a software tool STAAD Pro. Using the analysis results various members of the structure are designed i.e. beams, columns, slabs. After the design of beam, column and slabs the design of retaining wall and raft foundation is done. Slab, retaining wall and raft foundation are designed manually. In addition to this the detailed study of seismic and wind forces were undertaken. Keywords: Raft foundation; Seismic zone; Basic wind speed; Beam; Column; Slab; Retaining wall; Critical stresses I. INTRODUCTION In this thesis work a residential building which consists of basement + ground floor + 5 storeys is taken whose height is 21.00 m, length is 36m and width is 30m. The heights of different levels are as follows: Basement height = 4m Ground floor to 5th floor = 3.5m The building is of irregular shape and consists of multiple bays. The modelling of the building is done in the STADD Pro software. The overall plan dimensions are 36m x 30m. The height of different floor levels is stated previously. A solid slab of 150mm has been considered for all storeys. Live load intensity on floor is taken as 3KN/m 2 for all over the floor area and 0.75KN/m 2 for the roof in which access not provided except for maintenance as per IS 875 (part2):1987. Dead load of beams, columns, slabs and masonry wall are taken as per IS 875 (part1):1987. Wind load calculations are done as per IS 875 (part3):1987. Seismic load calculation is done as per IS 1893 (part1): 2002. And the building has been designed as per IS 456:2000. The other details are tabulated in Table 1. No. of stories Basement + ground + 5 Seismic zone V, Darbhanga, (Bihar) Soil type Soft soil Basic wind speed 55 m/sec, Darbhanga, (Bihar) Grade of concrete M25 Grade of steel Fe500 d, Fe415 Table 1: Description of Building.

II. METHODOLOGY The building components are analyzed for different load combination and the load combinations as per IS 875 (part 5):1987. And the load combinations are given in Table 2. Where, DL = Dead load. LL = Live load. WLX = Wind load in X direction. WLZ = Wind load in Y direction. SLX = Seismic load X direction. SLZ = Seismic load Y direction. DL LL WLX WLZ SLX SLZ 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.5 0.9 1.5 0.9 1.5 0.9 1.5 Table 2: Load Combination For RCC Structures. Once the building is analyzed for above load combinations different components of the building i.e. beams, columns, slabs, foundations, retaining wall etc will be designed as per IS 456:2000 recommendations.stadd Pro modeling is shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. After the application of loads and load combination; beam, column and slab are dimensions. Figure 1: STADD pro modeled plan of building.

Dead Load Calculation III. LOAD CALCULATION 1. Selfweight of Building frame: Selfweight of building frame, i.e. Column, Beam & Slab have modelled in staad. This load shall be calculated by staadpro itself by giving command "SELFWEIHT" 2. Brick Wall Load: Thickness of Brick Wall = 0.23m Height of wall = 3.5m Density of Brick = 18 kn/m 3 Thickness of Plaster outside the wall = 20 mm Thickness of Plaster inside the wall = 15 mm Density of Plaster Masonry = 20 kn/m 3 Total Weight per running meter = 16.94 kn/m 3 Live Load Calculation 1. As per IS 875 Part 2, live load on residential building has been recommended as 3.0 kn/sq metre. The same magnitude has been applied on building as Floor Load in Stadd model. 2. Live load on roof has been applied as 0.75 kn/sq meter, considering rarely accessibly. 3. Since a water tank is coming on the roof of the building, therefore an additional live load of 1.5 kn/sq m have been applied on water tank area for tank maintenance. Wind load calculation Wind load shall applied as per IS 875Part III. Basic Wind Speed Vb = 55 m/sec Probabilility Factor K1 = 1.0 (As per IS 875 III Clause 5.3.1 (Table 1)) Terrain, Height & structure size factor K2 = Terrain Category 2, Class B 0 (As per IS 875 III Clause 5.3.2 (Table 2)) Topography Factor K3 = 1.0 (As per IS 875 III Clause 5.3.3) Design Wind Speed Vz = Vb*K1*K2*K3 (As per IS 875 III Clause 5.3) Design Wind Pressure Pz = 0.6Vz 2 (As per IS 875 III Clause 5.4) As per IS 875 III Clause 5.3.2 (Table 2), K2 value shall be calculated h K2 K1 K3 Vz (m/sec) Pz (kn) 10 0.98 1 1 53.9 1.74 15 1.02 1 1 56.1 1.89 20 1.05 1 1 57.75 2 30 1.1 1 1 60.5 2.2 50 1.15 1 1 63.25 2.4 Table 3: Design wind pressure values.

External Pressure Coefficient h/w l/w Angle (in Degree) A B C D 0.7 1.2 0 0.7 0.25 0.6 0.6 90 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.25 Table 4: External pressure coefficient. CASE1 Force Coefficient (CpeCpi) A B C D Angle (in Degree) 0.2 0.75 1.1 1.1 0 X Direction 1.1 1.1 0.2 0.75 90 Z Direction CASE2 Force Coefficient (CpeCpi) A B C D Angle (in Degree) 1.2 0.25 0.1 0.1 0 X Direction 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.2 90 Z Direction Table 5: Force coefficient factors. Seismic force calculation Seismic force is calculated by doing mass lumping and finding out the reaction on the joint and then applying same reaction in x, y and z direction and then applying spectrum method to it directly in the software. The algorithm automatically generates mask image without user interaction that contains only text regions to be inpainted. IV. DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Step 1 Assume square size of column and beam. Step 2 Apply dead load and live load on it. Step 3 Analyse the structure and then see the bending moment diagram Step 4 According to BM diagram size and orientation of beam and column are decided. Step 5 According to the stresses that are coming to ground through column raft foundation is designed for the most critical load combination. Design of raft foundation and retaining wall is shown in fig3, critical cases stress diagram is shown in Figure 4 (A,B,C) RESULTS 1. Size of beam is 0.375m x 0.600m 2. Size of column is 0.900m x 0.600m; 0.600m x 0.900m; 0.600m x 0.600m 3. Size of retaining wall is: thickness is 0.200m and height is 4m. 4. Thickness of raft footing is: under column is 1.5m and other places 0.600m.

Figure 2: STADD pro 3D modelled view. Figure 3: STADD pro 3D modeled view of raft foundation and retaining wall. Figure 4 (a): STADD pro 3D modeled view of critical stress for raft foundation and retaining wall. Figure 4 (b): STADD pro 3D modeled view of critical stress for raft foundation and retaining wall. 2 Figure 4 (c): STADD pro 3D modeled view of critical stress for raft foundation and retaining wall.

V. CONCLUSION 1. For the building in seismic Zone V and basic wind speed 55m/sec the depth of foundation is more. 2. One way shear and two way shear are large, so the depth of foundation below column is increased. 3. The lateral force that is governing on the building is seismic force. REFERENCES [1] Bureau Of Indian Standard (1987) IS 875 (Part 1): 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Part I Dead Loads Unit weights of building materials and stored materials. [2] Bureau of Indian standard (1987) part 3: 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. [3] Bureau of Indian Standard (1987) Part 2: 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. Part 2 Imposed Loads. [4] Bureau of Indian Standard (2000) IS 456:2000. Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standard (2002) IS 1893(Part1):2002. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures.