ENHANCED PROPELLANT AND ALTERNATIVE CARTRIDGE CASE DESIGNS

Similar documents
FIVE-SECOND EXPLOSION TEMPERATURE (U.S. ARMY ARDEC METHOD) USERS MANUAL

Technical Report ARMET-TR INVESTIGATION OF ELASTOSIL M4370 SILICONE RUBBER RELEASE AGENT FOR USE ON M1130 PROJECTILE

Contractor Report ARAET-CR AQUEOUS SOLUBILITY OF CL-20

MICROSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF BORON NITRIDE

USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD TO ESTIMATE THE MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF A BEARING CAGE

FINAL REPORT. Joint Army/Navy Program for Environmentally Acceptable Propellant Charges for Medium Caliber Guns. ESTCP Project WP

ELIMINATION OF ALUMINUM FOIL FOR 81-mm AND 120-mm MORTAR AMMUNITION FIBER CONTAINER

Nonlinear Optics at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory s Weapons and Materials Research Directorate

Parametric Study of Heating in a Ferrite Core Using SolidWorks Simulation Tools

IMPROVING RELIABILITY BY REDUCING TOLERANCE STACK-UP FAILURES

Processing of Hybrid Structures Consisting of Al-Based Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) With Metallic Reinforcement of Steel or Titanium

Corrosion Immersion Testing of 13-mm-Diameter Grade-10.9 Bolts for Bolt-on Armor

Yttria Nanoparticle Reinforced Commercially Pure (CP) Titanium

60mm M225 FATIGUE TEST AND BURST TEST

Simulation of Heating of an Oil-Cooled Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors Converter Model

A New Technique for Wirebonding Using Indium Spheres

Aircraft Enroute Command and Control Comms Redesign Mechanical Documentation

Technical Report ARMET-TR mm MORTAR FUZE REDUCED THREAD GUN LAUNCH SURVIVABILITY. R. Terhune J. A. Cordes S. DeFisher R. Wong.

Fort Belvoir Compliance-Focused EMS. E2S2 Symposium Session June 16, 2010

PHOTOCATALYTIC CHARACTERIZATION OF FLUORINATED METAL PHTHALOCYANINE/METAL OXIDE HYBRID MATERIAL DEGRADATION BY REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES

Biased Cramer-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators (Preprint)

Using Ferromagnetic Material to Extend and Shield the Magnetic Field of a Coil

Galvanic Corrosion Study on SS Cartridge Design

Robustness of Communication Networks in Complex Environments - A simulations using agent-based modelling

Ultraviolet (UV) Curable Coatings DoD Executive for Bullet Agent Tip Identification

Hot-Metal Simulating Igniter for In-Bed Thermal Initiation of Granular Charges

TITLE: Identification of Protein Kinases Required for NF2 Signaling

Earned Value Management on Firm Fixed Price Contracts: The DoD Perspective

Characterization of Nanocrystalline Aluminum Alloy 5083 Powders Produced by Cryogenic Attrition

Determination of Altitude Sickness Risk (DASR) User s Guide for Apple Mobile Devices

SENSITIVITY TESTING OF CONTAMINATED SURFACES TO ESTABLISH NON-REACTIVITY LEVELS OF HMX, TATB, HBNQ, NC, AND TETRYL ON WOOD, CONCRETE, AND METAL

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Rockville, MD 20852

Parameter Study of Melt Spun Polypropylene Fibers by Centrifugal Spinning

Determination of Altitude Sickness Risk (DASR) User s Guide

ITEA LVC Special Session on W&A

Improvements to Hazardous Materials Audit Program Prove Effective

ROCK STRIKE TESTING OF TRANSPARENT ARMOR NLE-01

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

A Tracer Analysis for the M1002 Training Projectile

Simulation of Dual Firing of Hydrogen and JP-8 in a Swirling Combustor

Based on historical data, a large percentage of U.S. military systems struggle to

DISTRIBUTION A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED

TITLE: Molecular Determinants Fundamental to Axon Regeneration after SCI

Accelerated Corrosion Results for Zinc/Nickel-Plated Automotive Parts Posttreated With Trivalent Chromate Rinse

Panel 5 - Open Architecture, Open Business Models and Collaboration for Acquisition

CORROSION CONTROL Anniston Army Depot

Implementation of the Best in Class Project Management and Contract Management Initiative at the U.S. Department of Energy s Office of Environmental

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Sa. CONTRACT NUMBER W911 QX-11-C-0023

Future Capabilities of GenCade Ashley Frey

INDIAN HEAD DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER INDIAN HEAD, MD. Erratum to IHTR 2375

Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facilities (TEMF) Update To The Industry Workshop

AMMUNITION STORAGE ANALYSIS MODEL. determining magazine requirements. The Ammunition Storage Analysis Model is a series of

Field Demonstration of Alternative Coatings for High Strength Steel (HSS)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Advances in Nanocarbon Metals: Fine Structure

Report Documentation Page

Geothermal Energy Demonstration at Fort Indiantown Gap

Flexible Photovoltaics: An Update

Joint JAA/EUROCONTROL Task- Force on UAVs

Application of the HEC-5 Hydropower Routines

Operational Effectiveness Modeling of Intelligent Systems

DTIC ELECTE FEB D TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF RAPIDLY SOLIDIFIED DU-5% W ALLOY. January 1991

Defense Business Board

Determining the Exempt Solvent Content of Coatings Using Gas Chromatography

Earned Value Management from a Behavioral Perspective ARMY

FUEL REFORMING TECHNOLOGIES (BRIEFING SLIDES)

Hybrid Vapor Compression Ejector Cycle: Presentation to IAPG Mechanical Working Group

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOXICITY VALUES FOR THE HEALTHY SUBPOPULATION AND THE GENERAL POPULATION

RFID and Hazardous Waste Implementation Highlights

Improving Energy Efficiency at the Watervliet Arsenal

Characterizing PCB contamination in Painted Concrete and Substrates: The Painted History at Army Industrial Sites

The Mechanical Behavior of AZ31B in Compression Not Aligned with the Basal Texture

GUIDE FOR EVALUATING BLAST RESISTANCE OF EXISTING UNDEFINED ARCH-TYPE EARTH-COVERED MAGAZINES

Predicting Disposal Costs for United States Air Force Aircraft (Presentation)

DoD Solid Waste Diversion

Screening Adhesively Bonded Single-Lap-Joint Testing Results Using Nonlinear Calculation Parameters

Performance of FRP Connectors for Seismic Rehab of Michie Stadium

DETERMINATION OF CRITICAL FLAW SIZE IN GUN LAUNCH 40-mm GRENADE

DESCRIPTIONS OF HYDROGEN-OXYGEN CHEMICAL KINETICS FOR CHEMICAL PROPULSION

Microscale Waste Heat Driven Cooling System

Issues for Future Systems Costing

Standard Operating Procedure for Accelerated Corrosion Testing at ARL

Safe Disposal of Secondary Waste

JUDGING THE EFFICACY OF ANTHRAX FUMIGATIONS

Assessment of DEMN-based IM Formulations for Octol Replacement

From Environmental Science to BMP The Canadian Experience

TITLE: Molecular Targeting of the P13K/Akt Pathway to Prevent the Development Hormone Resistant Prostate Cancer

Army Quality Assurance & Administration of Strategically Sourced Services

Army Ground Vehicle Use of CFD and Challenges

Construction Engineering. Research Laboratory. Resuspension Physics of Fine Particles ERDC/CERL SR Chang W. Sohn May 2006

Shock Mitigation Analysis Using Recycled Composites for Application to Guided Projectiles

Spit-Hole Effects on the Ballistics of a 7.62-mm Cartridge

Augmenting Task-Centered Design With Operator State Assessment Technologies

PL and Payment of CWA Stormwater Fees

An Approach to Analyze Personnel Injury of Reflective Spall From Small-Arms Protective Body Armor

Sustainable Management of Available Resources and Technology (SMART) Cleanup

Tailoring Earned Value Management

Stakeholder Needs and Expectations

James F. Miller and Chase A. Wortman Dynetics, Inc Explorer Boulevard Huntsville, AL 35806

Contractor Past Performance Information: An Analysis of Assessment Narratives and Objective Ratings. Rene G. Rendon Uday Apte Michael Dixon

Transcription:

AD AD-E403 045 Technical Report ARAEW-TR-05004 ENHANCED PROPELLANT AND ALTERNATIVE CARTRIDGE CASE DESIGNS George Reynolds Knox Engineering Company 2978 Knox Highway 3 Altona, IL 61414 Lucian Sadowski Project Engineer ARDEC May 2005 ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER Armaments Engineering and Technology Center (Benet) Picatinny, New Jersey Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 20050602 063

The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation. The citation in this report of the names of commercial firms or commercially available products or services does not constitute official endorsement by or approval of the U.S. Government. Destroy this report when no longer needed by any method that will prevent disclosure of its contents or reconstruction of the document. Do not return to the originator.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-01-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) May 2005 Final July 2003 to July 2004 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER DAAE30-03-C-1 131 ENHANCED PROPELLANT AND ALTERNTIVE CARTRIDGE 5b. GRANT NUMBER CASE DESIGNS 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHORS 5d. PROJECT NUMBER George Reynolds, Knox Engineering Company Lucian Sadowski, Project Engineer, ARDEC 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION USA ARDEC, AETC (Benet) REPORT NUMBER Knox Engineering Center Weapons Systems and Technology 2978 Knox Highway 3 (AMSRD-AAR-AEW-M) Altona, IL 61414 Picatinny, NJ 07806-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) USA ARDEC, EM Technical Research Center (AMSRD-AAR-EMK) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT Picatinny, NJ 07806-5000 NUMBER(S) Technical Report ARAEW-TR-05004 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The soldier on the battlefield carries a lot of equipment into combat. The ammunition load of 600 or more rounds of 5.56-mm ammunition is a burden to our soldiers. By the use of a higher thermodynamic efficiency and higher combustion pressure, the size of the current 5.56-mm brass cartridge case can be reduced, saving considerable weight and volume. This report describes the enhanced propellant, the novel cartridge case, and the results of ballistic testing. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Small arms Energetic propellant. Ammunition Cartridge case 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF 18. NUMBER 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBE PERSON ABSTRACT OF L. Sadowski a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE PAGES 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (lncludearea U U U SAR 11 code) (973) 724-2555 Standard Form 298 JlRev. 6/98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18

CONTENTS Preface 1 Barrel Heating Reduction 1 Global/KEC Cartridge Weight and Volume Reduction with Increased Velocity 1 Compared to the M855 Cartridge Introduction 2 Background 2 Scope 2 Summary 2 Propellant Test Results 2 Conclusions 5 Distribution List 7 Page

PREFACE Barrel Heating Reduction The use of global enhanced propellants in the Global Manufacturing Solutions/Knox Engineering Company (KEC) high efficiency cartridge results in a 75% reduction in barrel heating, permitting the design of a significantly lighter barrel capable of sustaining the current firing schedule. Global/KEC Cartridge Weight and Volume Reduction with Increased Velocity Compared to the M855 Cartridge Using 14.0 gr of Global Manufacturing Solutions enhanced propellant in the KEC cartridge [figure follows (with an M855 cartridge for comparison)], an average muzzle velocity of 3,128 fps was achieved firing 62-gr projectiles. The Global/KEC cartridge weighs 28.5% less than the M855 and occupy 49.8% less volume. This does not take into account the significant link weight reduction if a steel push through link were used. Furthermore, the use of a plastic pullout link would result in a dramatic weight savings versus a steel push-through link. The M27 links used with M855 ammunition weigh 32 gr each. A strong plastic pull-out link for the Global/KEC cartridge would weigh about 7 gr. Nor does this take into account the magazine weight and volume savings resulting from the 49.86% cartridge volume reduction. Six hundred rounds of M855 cartridges in M27 links in three magazines of 6.78 lbs each, weigh a total of 20.35 lb. Six hundred rounds of Global/KEC cartridges in plastic links in two smaller magazines of 6.15 lbs each would weigh a total of 12.30 Ibs; a 39.55% weight savings and providing over a 52% volume reduction. The high efficiency Global/KEC cartridge permits design of shorter, lighter barrels with reduced muzzle blast while delivering M855 ballistics.

INTRODUCTION This report is a deliverable under Contract DAAE30-03-C-1 131, dated 28 July 2003, "Enhanced Propellant and Alternative Cartridge Case Design." The contract was issued in response to the Armaments Research, Development and Engineering (ARDEC), Picatinny, New Jersey BAA DAAE30-03-BAA-400, dated 20 December 2002; the purpose of that BAA was to solicit proposals for component technologies to support the development of a Lightweight Family of Weapons to provide a lethality component of the Objective Force Warrior (OFW) program. BACKGROUND The initial focus of the Lightweight Family of Weapons and Ammunition (LFWA), a Joint Service Small Arms Program (JSSAP), was on developing a lightweight machine gun and ammunition. The specific focus was to develop weapon and ammunition technologies that are reproducible en mass, robust, easy to operate and maintain, and reliable under all conditions, while taking up less volume and weighing 30 to 35% less than current systems while maintaining current performance. SCOPE The statement of work defines the effort required for the research related to, engineering development of, and testing of the technical feasibility and applicability of an enhanced propellant and an alternative cartridge case design for a lightweight machine gun. SUMMARY It was demonstrated that higher thermodynamic efficiency results from employing higher combustion pressure. M855 external ballistics was achieved in an experimental cartridge that, if redesigned into a production cartridge, would result in a cartridge with about 50% of the total volume and about 72% of the total weight of the M855 cartridge alone. Link weight savings and the reduced magazine volume would result in further ammunition weight reductions totaling more than 39% reduced weight and over 52% reduced volume. PROPELLANT TEST RESULTS Global propellants were developed, formulated, and tested. The purpose of the enhanced propellant research was to study a series of simple propellant formulations and test these to study their ballistic performance. The goals were to: * Produce more gas per unit volume of propellant * produce gas pressure profiles so as to enhance energy coupling to the projectile 2

* reduce total propellant charges to produce equivalent velocities reduce heat loss to the barrel All these goals were met. Global Manufacturing Solutions propellant codes predicted that velocities exceeding 3200 fps could be achieved with conventional propellants in the KEC high efficiency cartridge. But the codes also predicted that the pressures would be very high. So Global searched the literature and compiled a chart of relative burn rates for most of the commercially available propellants to be used as a guide for testing. Then, tests with a series of conventional off-the-shelf propellants were conducted and the Global predictions were verified. The high velocities could be achieved, but the pressures were very high. Several Global enhanced propellants were formulated and tested. Various types that produce more gas per unit volume were made. Propellants that vary in burn rate and calorific output were formulated. The enhanced propellants studied provided a multitude of parameters that could be varied to achieve our desired projectile performance goals while at the same time bring the high pressures experienced with pure commercial propellants down to acceptable pressure ranges. The enhanced propellants produced more gas per unit volume, in some cases produced more energy per grain, less energy per grain, and increased or decreased the rates of reaction. Impact tests were conducted, and no increased sensitivity was noted as compared with commercial single and double based powders. Some friction tests were performed to establish baselines, but due to the limitations of time and funding, none of the blended propellants were tested to failure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize the starting materials and the formulations. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to examine the onset of reaction temperatures, heats of reaction, and relative rates of reaction. A tabulation of the calorific outputs for some of the propellants studied is shown in the following table. These propellants gave a wide range of parameters to use to tailor the ballistic results. Samples A H J/gm Gl-5538N 3298.77 G1-2333T 2947.31 G1-2333H 2154.33 G2-2667NX 4340.66 G2-5667NM 4347.25 G2-5552N 3801.47 G2-5538N 4222.08 G2-3839N 3359.41 G2-3048N 4714.02 G2-2333T 3301.9 G2-2333H 3632.81 G2-3459-3 2680.62 3

Some of the ballistic results for the various Global enhanced propellants are presented in the following table. Muzzle velocity Propellant type Charge (gr) Projectile (gr) (fps) Projectile (ft-lbs) Projectile (E/gr) Gl-2947 15 62 2674 984.164 65.61093 GI-5538 17 62 3126 1345.001 79.11771 These results show significant muzzle velocities with as little as 17 gr of propellant. The next chart shows additional 17-gr load results. Muzzle velocity Propellant type Charge (gr) Projectile (gr) (fps) Projectile (ft-lbs) Projectile (E/gr) G2-3048 17 62 3310 1507.998 88.70574 G2-3857 17 62 3345 1540.057 90.59161 G2-5538 17 62 3344 1539.137 90.53745 G2-5538 17 62 3394 1585.508 93.26516 These formulations produced superior muzzle velocities when compared to the baseline of 3050 fps and 27 gr of propellant. The following chart shows the results from a series of Global propellants that produced over 3600 fps with as little as 19 gr of propellant and a 62-gr projectile. It should also be noted that loads as small as 11 to 12 gr produced 2800 + fps with the 62-gr projectile. Muzzle velocity Propellant type Charge (gr) Projectile (gr) (fps) Projectile (ft-lbs) Projectile (E/gr) G2-2000 15.0 62 2763 1050.767 70.05113 G2-2800 19.0 62 3326 1522.612 80.13746 G2-3030 13.3 62 2875 1137.681 85.5399 G2-3048 17.0 62 3310 1507.998 88.70574 G2-3857 17.0 62 3345 1540.057 90.59161 G2-4000 12.5 62 2755 1044.691 83.57528 G2-5538 17.0 62 3344 1539.137 90.53745 G2-5538 17.0 62 3394 1585.508 93.26516 G2-5552 19.0 62 3599 1782.824 93.83282 G2-5552* 19.0 55 3684 1657.124 87.21703 G2-5552 19.0 62 3604 1787.781 94.09372 G2-5555 11.8 62 2828 1100.787 93.28707 G2-5552B 19.0 62 3662 1845.786 97.14663 G2-5552D 19.0 62 3465 1652.537 89.97562 G2-5552C 19.0 62 3541 1725.824 90.83284 G2-9090 11.1 62 2732 1027.321 92.55142 The following chart shows some of the 19 grain propellant tests in the Global/KEC cartridge with 62 grain projectiles. *55-gr projectile. 4

Muzzle velocity Propellant type Charge (gr) Projectile (gr) (fps) Projectile (ft-lbs) Projectile (E/gr) G2-2800 19 62 3326 1522.612 80.13746 G2-5552 19 62 3599 1782.824 93.83282 G2-5552* 19 55 3684 1657.124 87.21703 G2-5552 19 62 3604 1787.781 94.09372 G2-5552D 19 62 3465 1652.537 86.97562 G2-5552B 19 62 3662 1845.786 97.14663 G2-5552C 19 62 3541 1725.824 90.83284 *55-gr projectile. Some of the 15-gr load propellant tests are shown in the following chart. Type Load grains Projectile grains V (fps) G2-3839 15 62 3097 G2-3839 15 62 3211 G2-3839 15 62 3202 Average 15 62 3170 sigma 63.37981 Some of the 14-gr load propellant tests are shown in the following chart. Type Load grains Projectile grains V (fps) G2-5667 14 62 3125 G2-5667 14 62 3130 G2-5667 14 62 33129 14 62 3128 sigma 2.645751 As can be seen, the M855 cartridge muzzle velocity (3050 fps) was exceeded in the Global/KEC cartridge with only 14 gr of Global enhanced propellant. Additional tests in standard and shortened KEC cartridges produced results with muzzle velocities exceeding baseline with as little as 13.5 gr of Global enhanced propellants. CONCLUSIONS The results of the testing demonstrates that much lighter ammunition firing conventional 62-gr projectiles at M855 velocities is possible through the employment of enhanced propellants in small volume, high efficiency cartridges. High efficiency enhanced propellants impose much lower heat loads on barrels permitting the design of weapons with lighter barrels, but permitting significantly heavier firing schedules. Since high efficiency cartridges permit full power cartridge cases to be of significantly smaller diameter, this means much smaller and lighter weapons can, therefore, be provided to the soldier. Given the same combat weight, a smaller and lighter weapon means significantly more ammunition can be carried in the weapon magazine, increasing the weapon firepower. 5

Enhanced propellants that can be easily tailored to produce varying outputs in a variety of case sizes were demonstrated. It has been shown that M855 velocities can be achieved with 14 gr of propellant in Global Manufacturing Solutions/Knox Engineering Company (KEC) cartridges. And it has been shown that due to the increased efficiency of coupling the energy to the projectile in the Global/KEC cartridge, and the overall reduced quantity of hot gas produced in the system, the end result is significantly less excess thermal energy,and cooler gas imparted to the barrel resulting in less barrel heating. This has significant ramifications for increasing barrel life or firing schedule or reducing barrel weight with also the possibility of eliminating the need for a second barrel altogether. It has also been demonstrated, that these enhanced propellants can be employed in the M855 cartridge itself to produce significantly higher muzzle velocities without the significantly higher pressures that would be encountered by increasing the existing loads. 6

DISTRIBUTION LIST USA ARDEC ATTN: AMSRD-AAR-EMK (2) AMSRD-AAR-GC AMSRD-AAR-AEW-M(D), L. Sadowski (5) AMSRD-AAR-AIJ, J. Goldman K. Spiegel Picatinny, NJ 07806-5000 Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ATTN: Accessions Division 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Ste 0944 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218 Commander Soldier and Biological/Chemical Command ATTN: AMSSB-CII, Library Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423 Director U.S. Army Research Laboratory ATTN: AMSRL-CI-LP, Technical Library Bldg. 4600 Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066 Chief Benet Weapons Laboratory, AETC U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center ATTN: AMSRD-AAR-AEW Watervliet, NY 12189-5000 Director U.S. Army TRADOC Analysis Center-WSMR ATTN: ATRC-WSS-R White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002 Chemical Propulsion Information Agency ATTN: Accessions 10630 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 202 Columbia, MD 21044-3204 GIDEP Operations Center P.O. Box 8000 Corona, CA 91718-8000 Knox Engineering Company 2978 Knox Highway 3 Altona, IL 61414 7