The ET Rover Pipeline Processes and Pitfalls of Pipeline Development

Similar documents
INTERSTATE PIPELINE FORUM FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS. Presented by: Rebecca F. Zachas, Esq.

Case 1:17-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Defendants.

National Environmental Policy. Act (NEPA)

Questions and Answers about the Final NEPA Procedures

NEPA ESSENTIALS FOR LOCAL AGENCY PROJECTS

Appendix A: Air Quality Environmental Documents

National Environmental Policy Act & Habitat Conservation Plans

Clean Water Act Challenges To Pipeline Projects

4. Applicants must satisfy the following requirements in order to demonstrate their substantial involvement in labour and employment law: (a)

Environmental Clearance and Next Year s Grant. Los Angeles Airport District Office. Presented by: Brenda Pérez George Buley David Cushing

Constructing Effective Comments Under NEPA. Mary Anne Nash Public Policy Counsel Oregon Farm Bureau Federation

August 12, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

Improving Your Chances to Avoid and Defend Grievances and Arbitration TxPELRA Annual Workshop. January 30, 2019

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20426

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance

151 FERC 61,140 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

PJM s Implementation of Order 845

East Tennessee Natural Gas Customer Meeting. Hilton Head, South Carolina September 24, 2015

Self help guide Preparing a grievance procedure

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

FERC NEPA PRE-FILING PROCESS: MILESTONES FOR SUCCESS

[ P] SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE) gives notice

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

125 FERC 61,057 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ON COMPLIANCE FILING. (Issued October 16, 2008)

Employee Representatives and the OSHA Inspection Process

Case Study: New LNG Supply to New York State

FRCC s Enforcement and More! (Revised with Information from the 2/19/15 FERC Order on RAI) FRCC Webinar

GRIEVANCES AND COMPLAINTS. 1. Disputes between the Government and employees and or their bargaining agent are resolved through the grievance process.

Nationwide Change in Postal Delivery Service Standards. SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service request

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Kammy Horne, AICP URS Corporation Multimodal Transportation Manager Phoenix, Arizona

144 FERC 61,130 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Year Base Residual Auction ( BRA ) scheduled to begin on August 14,

Kristen Bonanno & Dean Grover

September 21, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

PIPELINE SITING IN WEST VIRGINIA: An Uphill Battle Even in an Energy Friendly State. Bob Orndorff Dominion October 27, 2015

University of Wyoming The 2008 Conference The Wyoming Pipelines: The Territory Ahead

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No

Chapter 5:96 with amendments through October 20, Third Round Procedural Rules

NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT WITH FEDERAL/ STATE PERMITS

HARRIS FEDERATION OF ACADEMIES GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

134 FERC 61,158 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Opportunities for Accelerating FTA Project Development Post MAP-21

ARTICLE 29: GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

PRACTICE NOTE INTERIM PROHIBITORY ORDERS, STAYS OF PROCEEDINGS AND EX PARTE APPLICATIONS IN FAMILY PROCEEDINGS

1 AMENDMENT NO. 637 TO THE VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN (VAUGHAN 400 NORTH EMPLOYMENT AREA SECONDARY PLAN) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD HEARING SETTLEMENT

FERC and the Trump Administration

156 FERC 61,157 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ISSUING CERTIFICATE AND APPROVING ABANDONMENT

145 FERC 61,287 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

MC Legal Report Summary of Significant Filings And Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( Commission ) Orders (April 18, 2016 May 8, 2016)

Matter of Sane Energy Project; NYH20 LLC v Hudson River Park Trust 2013 NY Slip Op 30166(U) January 16, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket

ENTERPRISE BARGAINING PREPARATION & COMMENCEMENT (NSE)

Gas Infrastructure Trends and Impacts Downstream

FERC s Order Undermines the Legal Rights of Pipeline Impacted Communities Across the Nation.

WITH EFFECT FROM 1 JANUARY Many difficulties that arise can be resolved quickly and informally between managers and their staff.

Making a denial of contractual benefits claim. Information Kit. Advice Line or

Pipeline Projects: Preparing for FERC Certification, Addressing Environmental Impacts

Line N 2012 Expansion Project

MOUNTAINEER XPRESS. Columbia Pipeline Group

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC Docket No. CP

NEPA Mitigation Webinar:

March 23, 2012 GENERAL MEMORANDUM BIA Proposes Categorical Exclusion for Homesites

Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming. Chapter 1. Introductory Concepts in Transportation Decision Making

PUT IT OVER THERE : The Transmission Line Siting Process for Cities and their MOUs

Employment Tribunals and Early Conciliation

Departmental Manual Part 516

A PIPELINE REROUTE. A guide to understanding and effectively managing the concerns

Samuel J. Goolsarran Consultant Adviser CAGI

Abco International - Multi- Year Accessibility Plan and Policy

GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE SEPTEMBER 2007

LNG Exports in the Pacific Northwest Jordan Cove Update

[ P] Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP; Application to Export Domestic Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free Trade Agreement Nations

June 25, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

New Anti - Bullying Jurisdiction

Formalization of Middle School Provisions

January 13, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426

ENERGY TRANSFER ROVER PIPELINE. Beth Hickey - Sr. Vice President, Interstate

NYISO Dispute Resolution

Time scales have been fixed to ensure that grievances are dealt with quickly, however these may be extended if it is agreed upon by both parties.

Grievance Procedure School Based Staff

Grievance Policy/Procedure

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION. Docket No. CO SYNOPSIS

Improving the U.S. Coast Guard s Scoping & Public Involvement Processes

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

147 FERC 61,033 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

401 Water Quality Certification Process for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Hydro Relicensing

Accommodation and Compliance Series

161 FERC 61,088 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Flexible working policy and procedure Updated June 2014

Issue. Summary. Final SEC Rules on CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure. Updated from October 2015 Issue Summary. Provisions. April 2017 Update:

Table of Contents. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership. Third Revised Volume No. 1. Third Revised Volume No. 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CALIFORNIA S PAID SICK LEAVE LAW NO GET WELL CARD FOR EMPLOYERS PAUL LYND, ESQ. DECEMBER 18, 2014 AGSAFE

FLORIDA SOUTHEAST CONNECTION PROJECT. RESOURCE REPORT 12 PCB Contamination. FERC Docket No. PF

REGULAR ARBITRATION PANEL

ES&H DIVISION SLAC-I-750-0A16C-001 R001. SLAC National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementation Procedure

Grievances and Arbitration: A Guide for Police Unions

Overview. A specific example of the general EIA process Defined by Regulation 216

Prince Edward Island

Work Breakdown Structure Element Dictionary Preliminary Engineering

Transcription:

The ET Rover Pipeline Processes and Pitfalls of Pipeline Development Presented by: James J. Lanham J. Benjamin Fraifogl Critchfield, Critchfield& Johnston, Ltd. 225 N. Market Street Wooster, Ohio 44691 Ashland / Medina / Millersburg / Mount Vernon / Wooster

The ET Rover Pipeline Processes and Pitfalls of Pipeline Development Disclaimer: This presentation is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. If you need legal advice, seek independent legal counsel from a firm such as ours. We are providing a general guide for landowners to protect their property during the planning, approval, construction and operation of an interstate pipeline. Any examples below are fact specific and subject to each landowner s circumstances.

The Steps of the Process 1. Pre-Filing Application 2. FERC Pre-Filing Review 3. Official Filing for Section 7(c) Certificate 4. FERC NGA Section 7(c) Review 5. Issuance of FERC Order 6. Post Order Remedies 7. Final Easement Acquisitions 8. Pipeline Construction

Pre-Filing: What is It Allows a Project Sponsor to More Quickly Satisfy Legal Requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) When Filing an Application Open Season Stakeholder input Helps to Identify Issues Involved in and Expedite: Categorical Exclusion (CE) Environmental Impact Assessment (EA or EIA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)

Pre-Filing Process Project Sponsor Files Request for NEPA Pre-filing Review FERC formally approves Pre-Filing Process Docket Number: PF14-14 Sponsor Conducts Open Season FERC Conducts Preliminary NEPA Review Including: Open Houses Environmental Assessments and Studies Scoping Meetings Review of Stakeholder Comments Call-in Meetings Evaluations of Alternate Routes

Open Season Definition: One to two month period of time in which pipeline sponsor is able to market and enter into non-binding agreements with potential customers to use a portion of the proposed pipeline capacity June 27, 2014 July 25, 2014 Likely a Success During July 22, 2014 call-in, ET Rover indicated that they would like to put in two 42 pipelines

Public Input Opportunity During Pre-Filing Open Houses Public Comments Effective Drafting Individual or Group Bruce Township Scoping Meetings

Review of Application Public Notice of Application Issued in Federal Register Opportunity for Parties to Intervene Review Application and Issue Data Requests if Needed Determine Need Based on Non-Environmental Factors Drafts, Reviews and Issues Environmental Impact Study or Environmental Assessment Issues Order Approving or Denying Project

Intervention Opportunity After FERC receives the formal application from the Applicant, they issue a public notice in the Federal Register. Interested parties can then file a motion to intervene. Intervention is not guaranteed. Failure to follow proper procedures will result in a denial of a motion to intervene depending on the circumstances.

Intervention Steps 1. File a motion to intervene in the applicable time period satisfying the requirements of federal law and FERC regulations. 2. File a motion to intervene after the applicable time period satisfying the requirements of federal law and FERC regulations and also explaining why you should be allowed to intervene late. 3. Wait for other participants to files answers objecting to your motion. 4. If a motion to intervene is timely filed, the motion will be automatically granted if no other participant objects within 15 days. 5. If an answer is filed or the motion to intervene is filed outside of the specific time period. FERC must expressly grant the motion and determine the conditions under which a party is allowed to intervene.

Effect of Participating Correspondence or Documents Right to Participate in Hearings Right to Rehearing Right to Appeal Burdens

Penalties for Late Motions Motion May Not Be Granted Good Cause for Filing Late Disruption of the Proceeding Interest is Otherwise Represented Prejudice or Burden to Existing Parties Conformity to Other Requirements Limitation of Certain Rights Limitations on Participation of Late Participant Acceptance of Record Prior to Late Intervention Prior Correspondence or Documentation

Issuance of EIS or EA Draft Reports Environmental Assessment versus Environmental Impact Statement Preparation of Preliminary Report Issuance of Draft Comments by Other Agencies Public Comment

Public Input Opportunity During Filing FERC issues the draft of an EIS: 1. FERC opens comment period to the public. 2. FERC holds meeting(s) in the project area to hear public comments on the draft of the EIS. FERC issues a draft of an EA: 1. FERC opens comment period to the public.

FERC s Response After public comment periods and meetings on EIS: 1. FERC responds to comments and revises the draft of the EIS; and 2. Issues final EIS and project is up for final approval. After public comment period on the EA: 1. FERC responds to the comments received on the EA in a Commission Order and project is up for final approval.

FERC s Approval of Project Once FERC Issues an Order on Approval: 1. Participants May Request a Rehearing 2. Participants May Appeal the Order 3. Applicant can construct and operate the project after obtaining permits from: Clean Water Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, and Clean Air Act.

Pipeline s Proposed Timeline: File NGA Section 7(c) Application January 2015 FERC already indicated that this date is probably too optimistic Issuance of FERC Order November 2015 File Initial Implementation Plan December 2015 Commence Construction December 2016 Midwest Hub to the Union Gas Dawn Hub In- Service 2017 Date Based on One Pipeline

Pipeline s Proposed Timeline: pro se: Latin on one s own behalf. A party who represents herself in legal matters.

Pitfalls in Pipeline Negotiation: WHY ET ROVER MIGHT SUPPORT PRO SE PIPELINE NEGOTIATIONS

Pitfalls in Pipeline Negotiation: SO YOU CAN SETTLE FUTURE DISPUTES IN TEXAS

Pitfalls in Pipeline Negotiation: SO YOU CAN STORE THE PIPELINE COMPANY S EQUIPMENT

Pitfalls in Pipeline Negotiation: SO YOU CAN HAVE THREE PIPELINES CROSS YOUR PROPERTY FOR THE PRICE OF ONE

Pitfalls in Pipeline Negotiation: SO WORKERS CAN DRIVE EQUIPMENT ACROSS YOUR FRONT LAWN

Pipeline s Proposed Timeline: SO YOU CAN REPLACE ALL OF YOUR DRAIN TILES

Pitfalls in Pipeline Negotiation: SO THE PIPELINE COMPANY CAN WORK ON YOUR PROPERTY 24 HOURS A DAY

James J. Lanham J. Benjamin Fraifogl Critchfield, Critchfield& Johnston, Ltd. Ashland / Medina / Millersburg / Mount Vernon / Wooster Email: Lanham@ccj.com Fraifogl@ccj.com Phone: (330)-264-4444