Breeding Program of the Bulgarian Murrah Buffalo

Similar documents
Session 1. Presentation of the seven most relevant cases of on-field buffalo recording

11/30/2018. Introduction to Genomic Selection OUTLINE. 1. What is different between pedigree based and genomic selection? 2.

Strategy for Applying Genome-Wide Selection in Dairy Cattle

Philippine Dairy Buffalo Breeding Program

Dairy Cattle Development in China

Efficiency of Different Selection Indices for Desired Gain in Reproduction and Production Traits in Hariana Cattle

Current Reality of the Ayrshire Breed and the Opportunity of Technology for Future Growth

Development of the Sunandini cattle breed in India

Goal Oriented Use of Genetic Prediction

TWENTY YEARS OF GENETIC PROGRESS IN AUSTRALIAN HOLSTEINS

Applications of Genomics Introduction of genomics selection procedures in existing genetic improvement programmes

Section 9- Guidelines for Dairy Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Genomic selection applies to synthetic breeds

2/22/2012. Impact of Genomics on Dairy Cattle Breeding. Basics of the DNA molecule. Genomic data revolutionize dairy cattle breeding

The benefits of genotyping at farm level & the impact across the wider dairy herd in Ireland. Kevin Downing 27 th October, 2016

Establishment of a Single National Selection Index for Canada

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Evidence of improved fertility arising from genetic selection: weightings and timescale required

Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle

Genetics to meet pastoral farming requirements in the 2020 s a dairy perspective. Phil Beatson, R&D Manager CRV Ambreed

GENETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR HEIFER FERTILITY DR. HEATHER J. HUSON ROBERT & ANNE EVERETT ENDOWED PROFESSORSHIP OF DAIRY CATTLE GENETICS

Canadian Hereford Association

Using Genomics to Improve the Genetic Potential and Management of Your Herd

Genetic improvement: a major component of increased dairy farm profitability

Application of MAS in French dairy cattle. Guillaume F., Fritz S., Boichard D., Druet T.

Dr. Gatot Ciptadi. Fac. Of Animal Husbandry, UB. gatotciptadi.lecture.ub.ac.id. Dr.Gatot Ciptadi,Fac.Of Anim.

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Dr. Gatot Ciptadi. Fac. Of Animal Husbandry, UB. gatotciptadi.lecture.ub.ac.id.

Genetics of dairy production

REALISED RESPONSES TO DIVERGENT SELECTION FOR YEARLING GROWTH RATE IN ANGUS CATTLE

Genomic selection in cattle industry: achievements and impact

Breeding for Profit from Beef Production ( )

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Development of an Economic Breeding Index EBI for Ireland. Ross Evans (ICBF)

NTM. Breeding for what truly matters. The NTM breeding goal is healthy, fertile, high producing cows the invisible cow. Elisabeth

EPD Info 1/5. Guide to the American Gelbvieh Association Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

What dairy farmers should know about genetic selection

Placing: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th

Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs using genomic selection

AGE OF COW AND AGE OF DAM EFFECTS ON MILK PRODUCTION OF HEREFORD COWS 1. ABSTRACt"

Breeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G

DAIRY CATTLE EVALUATION CAREER DEVELOPMENT EVENT

1.1 Present improvement of breeding values for milking speed

User Guide

ESTIMATION OF GENETIC TRENDS FOR ECONOMIC TRAITS IN CROSSBRED CATTLE BY USING REGRESSION METHODS

GENOMICS AND YOUR DAIRY HERD

Genetic evaluations for crossbred Holstein x bos indicus cattle in India

TECHNICAL BULLETIN GENEMAX ADVANTAGE IS DESIGNED FOR COMMERCIAL BEEF HERDS. August Zoetis Genetics 333 Portage Street Kalamazoo, MI

TECHNICAL BULLETIN GENEMAX ADVANTAGE IS DESIGNED FOR COMMERCIAL BEEF HERDS. August Zoetis Genetics 333 Portage Street Kalamazoo, MI

Where can the greatest economic value of genomic testing be found?

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Investigation on Genotype by Environment Interaction for Milk Yield of Holstein Cows in Luxembourg and Tunisia

CULLING: REPLACEMENT HEIFER STRATEGIES

Heritability and genetic correlation of production and reproduction traits of Simmental cows

6 Breeding your cows and heifers

Farm Management Decisions in the Era of Genomics

Understanding Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Genomic selection and its potential to change cattle breeding

The development of breeding strategies for the large scale commercial dairy sector in Zimbabwe

Economic Impact of Bull Choices... A.I. Or Otherwise

Statistical Indicators

Genomic Postcard from Dairy Cattle Breeding GUDP Project. Søren Borchersen, Head R&D VikingGenetics

Implementation of dairy cattle breeding policy in Ethiopia some reflections on complementary strategies

American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Breeding Programs Review of approaches in Australia

DAIRY CATTLE CROSSBREEDING- POLICY AND RESPONSIBILITY

Genomic selection in the Australian sheep industry

Introduction. Veterinary World, EISSN: Available at RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access

Issues and challenges in improving dairy genetics for smallholders. Badi Besbes, Animal Production and Health Division, FAO

Including feed intake data from U.S. Holsteins in genomic prediction

João Dürr Interbull Centre Director. Animal identification and traceability Interbull s s and Interbeef s perspectives

Dairy Recording in Kenya

GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING PERSISTENCY OF MILK PRODUCTION IN KARAN FRIES CATTLE*

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

Sire Selection. Dr. Tim Marshall Retired UF Professor of Animal Science Retired Dean and Professor, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College

Breeding your cows for genetic gain. Max Tweedie, B+LNZ Genetics

Herd Improvement Roadshow Presented by: Greg Hamill

Genomic prediction. Kevin Byskov, Ulrik Sander Nielsen and Gert Pedersen Aamand. Nordisk Avlsværdi Vurdering. Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation

WHETHER dealing with a commercial

OPTIMIZATION OF AGE AT FIRST CALVING IN KARAN FRIES CATTLE

Czech Agricultural University, Praha, Czech Republic. * Supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (Project No.

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Genetics on Wheels An innovative way to propagate available best genetic resources of indigenous cattle and buffalo breeds

BREEDPLAN EBVs The Traits Explained

Introduction to Animal Breeding & Genomics

Factors Affecting Holstein Cattle Fertility Traits in the Slovak Republic

TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

A PROFITABLE AND SUSTAINABLE IMPROVEMENT OF THE CATTLE PRODUCTION IN SMALL HOLDERS EGYPTIAN HERDS BY THE USE OF ADAPTED GENETIC MATERIAL

CHOOSING A BREEDING BULL

The economics of using DNA markers for bull selection in the beef seedstock sector A.L. Van Eenennaam 1, J.H. van der Werf 2, M.E.

15. Breeding Program Design Principles

ACCELERATE HEIFERS THROUGH TRANSITION

EFFICIENCY OF THE COW HERD: BULL SELECTION AND GENETICS

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

Ukraine. Vladimir Shablia, PhD. Institute of Animal Science of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine ( Kharkov )

2018 ICBF and Sheep Ireland Genetics Conference 20 th Anniversary. Dorian Garrick

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Angus BREEDPLAN GETTING STARTED

Conformation Assessment

Transcription:

Breeding Program of the Bulgarian Murrah Buffalo Tzonka PEEVA *, Plamen NIKOLOV, Tania NIKOLOVA, Pencho PENCHEV and Yordanka ILIEVA Bulgarian National Association for Development of Buffalo Breeding, 3 Simeon Veliki Blvd., Shumen 9700, Bulgaria *Corresponding email: tzonkapeeva@abv.bg ABSTRACT The aim of Bulgarian National Association for Development of Buffalo Breeding (BNADBB) is to work out an effective breeding scheme (BS) for fast genetic progress and improved profitability of production for Bulgarian Murrah (BM) buffalo through application of the latest achievements at the field of breeding and use of modern selections methods. Basic principles for the development of the breeding program is based on the most important phenotypic and genotypic parameters of the selection traits; fixed factors of the breeding policy, selection intensity (I), duration of the generation interval (L), breeding value (BV), optimization of selection by selection index (SI) including age at first calving (AFC), calving interval (CI) and milk yield for first lactation (MYFL); estimation of genetic progress (ΔG). Keywords: AFC, breeding value, Bulgarian Murrah buffalo, genetic gain, MYFL, selection index INTRODUCTION The main objective of the Breeding ptogram of the Bulgarian Murrah (BM) breed, created on the basis of crossing between the native Bulgarian buffalo and the Murrah breed from India, is to work out an effective breeding scheme (BS) for fast genetic gain and improved profitability of the farms through application of modern methods of selection. Selection in buffalobreeding is a more difficult and complex process in comparison with cattle, resulting from the differences between the species. The difficulty of applying these methods of selection originate from the fact that it is to be applied in smallholders in the private sector. The realized genetic progress is lower than the theoretic one because of the various factors reducing the efficiency of theoretical models. These limitations are much more present in buffaloes. Independently of this difficulty our efforts should be directed towards more effective methods of selection and breeding systems to increase the genetic progress in the buffalo population. KEY STEPS IN THE BREEDING PROGRAM Number of buffaloes According to "Agrostatistics" program of the Ministry of Agriculture (2012) dated 01.11.2011, the number of buffaloes was 9,900, of which 6,300 dairy Accepted April 10, 2013; Online November 11, 2013. 236

buffaloes (Table 1). Compared to the same time in 2010 it increased by 7.6 and 11.7 % for total number and dairy buffaloes, respectivly. Roughly 70% of the total number of buffaloes are reared in herds with more than 20 heads. The average size of the herds is 12.8 heads. The smallest buffalo population in Bulgaria was registered in 2002. Genetic Progress ( G) The value of the realized genetic progress determines the selection effectiency in the Bulgarian Murrah breed. Despite of the high phenotypic performance of the trait, in practice it is possible to have a negative progress. This is due to ill-organized selection and inaccurate methods of genotype evaluation. According to Alexiev (1979), Vankov (1980) and Peeva (2000), the predicted genetic progress of milk yield is from 1.069 to 3.2%. Breeding value Breeding value on the basis of the pedigree. Selection based on pedigree is the earliest evaluation of animals. Selection can be based either on the information about one parent or on the basis of information about the two parents, or the grandparents. In buffalo farms this kind of selection is used very often. Selection of bulls based on their mothers is less effective. Relatively high genetic progress ( G= 1.78%) can be attained when the selection of bulls is based on their fathers. Breeding value on the basis of the phenotypic performance of the selection trait. This selection is too much time consuming. The animal recording is the most important task of the breeding work in the Assotiation. The selection of the buffaloes was done on the basis of the information from milk recording. The application of AI with frozen semen is highly recommended for the genetic improvement of the buffaloes. About 70% of the buffalo cows are under milk recording (A4). Breeding value on the basis of half and full sibs. The coefficients of determination (R²) show that only 6.42 and 7.63% of the expected genotype is formed by the productivity of the half and full sister and 93.58 and 92.37% by other factors. The analysis of the many our researches shows that the relative accuracy of the selection by using the information from the lateral relatives would not have a significant effect on the magnitude of the genetic progress in the population. Despite of the low accuracy of the method, it allows early prediction of breeding value of the bulls. Proreny testing. Progeny testing has been proposed persistently in the recent three decades as a method to accurately estimate breeding. Progeny testing consists in taking into consideration the performance of the offspring as a criterion for selection among the parents. The principles of the progeny testing come from the sampling nature of inheritance. Sire index is used in the selection of best sires among those subject to testing. In Bulgaria the most commonly used was the daughter-dam comparison representing the difference between the production levels of a sire s offspring and their dams. Another method of evaluating sires is the daughter-herdmate comparison practised in Bulgaria as well. The implementation of AI in buffaloes significantly increased the bulls influence on the creation of the dairy population. This estimation was and remains a basic method of evaluation of the additive genotype. The large size of the farms (100 500 buffalo cows) allowed to accomplish the progeny testing of the bulls. The milk 237

recording (A4) and the well organized information system in the Bulgarian National Association for Development of Buffalo Breeding are the basis for realizing the progeny testing program. Over 20 recorded daughters per sire were used in order to increase the accuracy of progeny testing. SELECTION METHODS USED IN THE BREEDING PROGRAMME Selection index The method of selection indices, as more effective than the tandem selection and independent culling levels, has been applied during the last decades in the countries with developed cattle breeding. Most of the theories of the quantitative genetics and the selection criteria are based on the individual s phenotype, but a problem appears in their practical application for simultaneous improvement of a couple of traits. In buffaloes the method of selection index is introduced 20 years ago. Some authors (Gajbhiye, 1987; Sharma & Singh, 1988; Gajbhiye & Tripathi, 1991) reported significant effect of multiple selection. For first time in Bulgaria the method of selection indices was used by Peeva (2000) in buffalo breeding. The selection index was expressed by the following equation: I = b 1 P 1 + b 2 P 2 + b n P n = Σb n P n, where: P 1 phenotypic value of the economic traits, included in the index (P = 1...n) b 1 regression coefficient (b = 1...n) Selection indices have been developed combining the traits: milk yield at first lactation (MYFL), fat (F), protein (P), body weight of the buffalo cows (BW), age at first calving (AFC) and calving interval (CI) as most important for the selection in Bulgarian buffalo population. Fifty-seven selection indices are constructed with different combination of the traits. Their relative effectiveness depends on the number of the included selection traits. The index combining milk yield for 305-day first lactation, calving interval, and age at first calving: I = 0.332 MYFL + (-4.81 CI) + (-62.92 AFC) proves to be most efficient. If the selection uses this selection index, the genetic merit for MYFL, CI and AFC will be 36.8 kg, -10.7 days, and -120.5 days, respectively. Identification and recording The main objectives of identification and recording are: - identification of high productive animals; - optimization of nutrition and management; - estimation of Breeding Value; - optimization of the genetic progress. The well-organized buffalo farms created good conditions for milk recording, which comprised all buffalo cows on the large farms. Another reason for establishing a well-organized recording system was the implementation of machine milking on buffalo farms and AI. 238

Body weight of young animals is: - at 6 months of age 140 kg - at 12 months of age 290 kg - at 22 months of age 400 kg Body weight of breeding animals is given in Table 2. Body measuremens taken at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months Age and body weight at first insemination are: -body weight 390-400 kg -age 22-24 months Selection criteria for bull-mothers Average values of the milk production: І- lactation ІІ- lactation ІІІ- lactation Milk yield, min, kg 1900 2600 3500 % fat, minimum 7.0 7.0 7.0 % protein, minimum 4.0 4.0 4.0 Body measurements and body weight height at withers 140 cm body length 146 cm rump width 58 cm chest girth 220 cm body weight 550-600 kg Type rating In all countries with traditions in buffalo breeding no proper attention is paid to this type of selection, as to the selection on productive and reproductive traits. Only in the recent decades does it attain definite importance. Depending on breed, type of productivity, and region of breeding, clearly are outlined the features of the buffalo that form the ratings of the different traits to determine the overall score. Studies of Bulgarian (Peeva, 1981, Peeva & Alexandrov, 1993) and other authors (Velea, 1991, Velea et al., 1991, Bingzhuang et al., 2002) show that body measures, type and conformation are more substantially affected by the environmental than by the additively determined factors. On the basis of the relationships between the body measures and the milk production traits Peeva (1981) and Saini and Gill (1984) have, independently for Bulgaria and India, developed 100-score cards involving four main groups of traits. Hundred-score cards were used for estimation including four groups of traits general appearance (30 scores), dairy character (20 scores), body capacity (20 scores), mammary system (30 scores) and overall rating in Breeding Programme (Peeva, 1981). OPTIMIZATION OF THE BREEDING PROGRAMME The optimization of the breeding program is based on the most important phenotypic and genetic parameters of productive and reproductive traits (Penchev, 239

1999; Peeva, 2000; Ilieva, 2006) (Table 3) and fixed factors of the breeding policy (Table 4). The phenotypic parameters of the selection traits, including in Breeding Programme were determined by LS-analysis as follow: Y ijmnp = μ + a i + b j + l m + f n + g p + E ijmnp Where: Y ijmnp observation vector μ - overall mean a i fixed effect of i -th farm in j th season, from m -th line, on n -th lactation, during p th period (i= 1...10) b j fixed effect of j th season in i -th farm from m -th line, on n -th lactation, during p th period (j= 1...4) l m fixed effect of m -th line in i -th farm during j th season for n -th lactation, during p th period (m= 1...6) f n fixed effect of n -th lactation in i -th farm during j th season for m -th line during p th period (f = 1 3) g p fixed effect of p th period в i -th farm during j th season for m -th line of n -th lactation (р= 1...4) E ijmnp residual error Based on the optimization and reporting the impact of various factors on the genetic progress for milk yield, age at first calving and calving interval as optimal, the following criteria and parameters were suggested: Sires per stud for AI 3 Preliminary selected bull mothers 135 Actually selected bull mothers 45 Young tested bulls 15 Tested sires 11 Number of stored doses from a tested sire 20 000 Number of daughters per bull 15 REFERENCES Alexiev, A. 1979. A breeding program for improvement of the native Bulgarian buffalo on dairy direction. Thesis, Sofia. Bingrhnang, Y., L. Zhongquan, Z. Guiwen, Z. Qingkun and Q. Jing. 2002. Present status of cross improvement and utilization of Guanidxi buffalo and proposal for near future. In: Proceedings of the First Buffalo Symposium of America, 1-4 September 2002, Belem, Brazil. pp. 281-286. Gajbhiye, P.U. 1987. Envolving restricted indices for selection in buffaloes. Ph.D. Thesis. Kurukshetra University, India. Gajbhiy, E.P.U. and N. Tripathi. 1991. Multiple traits selection for the genetic improvement of Murrah buffaloes. In: Proceedings of the Third World Buffalo Congress, 13-18 May, Varna, Bulgaria. Vol. 1: 47. Ilieva,Y. 2006. Optimization of productive life in buffalo cows of the Bulgarian Murrah Breed. Ph.D. Thesis, Sofia. Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 2012. Agrostatistics. Bulletin 186. 240

Peeva, T.Z. 1981. Study on type and body-build of the buffalo population raised in Bulgaria. Ph. D. Thesis, Sofia. Peeva T.Z., A. Alexandrov. 1993. Comparative evaluation of type and build of buffalo cows. Zhivotnovadni Nauki, 30: 35-39. Peeva, T.Z. 2000. Optimized selection methods in buffaloes. Dr.Sci. Thesis, Sofia. Penchev, P. 1999. A study on the phenotypic and genotypic parameters of selection traits in the newly created buffalo population in Bulgaria. Ph.D Thesis, Sofia. Saini A. and R.S. Gill. 1984. Physical factors affecting scorecard judging and its relationship with yield in buffaloes. In: 7th Workshop of all India Coordinated Research Project on Buffalo Breeding. PAU, Ludhiana, India. pp. 56-59. Sharma, R.C. And B.P. Singh. 1988. Genetic studies on Murrah buffaloes in livestock farms in Uttar Pradesh. In: Proceedings II -nd World Buffalo Congress. 12-16 December, New Delhi, India. Vol. 2: 128-133. Vankov, K.1980. Establishing phenotypic and genotypic parameters of the selection traits in buffaloes in Bulgaria. D.Sci.Thesis, Sofia. Velea, C. 1991. The Roumanian breed of buffalo. In: Proceedings of the Third World Buffalo Congress. 13-18 May, 1991, Varna, Bulgaria. 2: 486-490. Valea, C., I. Bud, Gh. Muressan, V. David, M. Vomir, C. Cristea and L. Lisei. 1991. The main milk traits of Romanian buffaloes breed. In: Proceedings of the Third World Buffalo Congress. 13-18 May, 1991, Varna, Bulgaria. 2: 494-499. Table1. Number of buffaloes according to Agrostatistics, Ministry of Agriculture, 2011. Years 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2011 2011:2010 Total 9000 7500 8000 8200 9200 9200 9900 +7.6% Buffalo cows 5200 3900 4100 4800 5300 5400 6300 +11.7% Table 2. Body weight of breeding animals. Age, mo Male Female Body weight kg Daily gain g Body weight kg Daily gain g 6 150 650 140 600 12 280 680 270 650 18 360 600 350 580 24 470 600 400 300 36 600 520 550 250 241

Table 3. Phenotypic and genetic parameters of the selection traits. Traits Values of parameters 1. 305-day milk yield at 1-st lactation, kg 1700 2. Fat content in milk,% 7.55 3. Average number of lactations 4 4. Maximum number of lactations 10 5. Calving interval, days 420 6. Inseminations per conception 2.3 7. Daily gain of female calves from birth to weaning, kg/day 0.600 8. Daily gain of female calves from 6 months to conception, kg/day 0.550 9. Daily gain of young bulls, kg/day 0.700 10. Age at first calvind, days 720 11. Proportion of live borne calves of the total number of borne calves 0.97 12. Proportion of calves at 6 mo of the total number of borne calves 0.95 13. Proportion of calved heifers of the number of female calves at 6 mo, % 45 14. Proportion of culled calves of the total number of borne calves, % 15 15. Phenotypic standart deviation for lactation milk yield, kg 420 16. Heritability of milk yield 0.25 17. Heritability of age at first calving 0.50 18. Heritability of calving interval 0.13 19. Heritability of daily gain 0.50 20. Repeatability of milk yield 0.52 21. Selection intensity in bull dams 2.50 22. Selection intensity in buffalo cows 1.10 23. Selection intensity in sires of bulls 2.70 24. Phenotypic standart deviation for daily gain (SD), g 100 25. Numbers of buffalo cows for 1 effective daughter 5 26. Stored semen doses per year per bull 6000 27. Generation interval in sires of bulls, years 7.5 28. Generation interval in dams of bulls, years 8.3 29. Live weight of young breeding bulls, kg 420 30. Live weight of mature bulls, kg 800 242

Table 4. Fixed factors of the breeding policy. Factors Value 1. Total number of buffaloes (year 2011) 9300 2. Size of active breeding population, heads 1350 3. Number of potential bull mothers 135 4. Bull mothers per 1 selected young bull 4 5. Proportion of culled bulls after semen production 0.10 6. Proportion of culled bulls after sexual activity 0.15 7. Proportion of heifers at first calving 0.30 8. Sires per stud for AI 3 9. Storing period of frozen semen, years 12 243