SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #2: Soil Classification Solution.

Similar documents
SOIL CLASSIFICATION BASICS Commonly based on grain size and soil consistency. Several classification systems exist:

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

Sieve Opening, mm Opening, in Soil Type. Cobbles mm 3 in. Gravel mm (2.0 mm) #4 [# 10 for AASHTO) ~0.2 in (~0.

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Thi_ Qar University College of Engineering/Civil Engineering Department. Highway Lectures. Fourth Class. Part #2: - Subgrade Soil

Soil Relationships and Classification

Chapter 3 Soil Classification

Introduction to Road Soil

Laboratory Soil Classification

Chapter 2: Geotechnical Properties of Soil

PD - 6 THRUST RESTRAINT DESIGN EQUATIONS AND SOIL PARAMETERS FOR DUCTILE IRON AND PVC PIPE

Classification of Soils

Engineering Properties of Soils

Appendix C Geotechnical Soil Testing Data

Geotechnical Engineering Report

SECTION 500 STRUCTURES

EXHIBIT G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (DRAFT)

CONTRACT 5E-2 APPENDIX A - TEST HOLE LOGS DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. PORTAGE AVE WINSTON DR BOURKEVALE CAVELL PARKSIDE DR ASSINIBOINE AVE

SECTION UTILITY BACKFILL MATERIALS

Typical Subsurface Profile. November 28, 2016

Experimental Investigation on Compaction Properties of Sandy Soils

Soil Survey Summary Report

Investigations on Index Properties and Maximum Dry Density of Soils Found in Kemise Town

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY

You also requested information regarding a sieve analysis at each boring locations. The test results are attached.

Geotechnical Engineering Report

III. BASIC THEORY. occurring material composed primarily of fine-grained minerals, which is generally


Reliability, Laying the Groundwork in Theory and in Practice

WEEK 5 ACTIVITY. Lecture (2 hours)

INSTALLATION INSTALLATION

Excavation for Natural Gas Mains and Services

Geotechnical Engineering Report

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 1.3. Soil Particles (Das, Ch. 2)

Effect of Fine Percentage on the Properties of Sub-base Material

Middle East Technical University Department of Civil Engineering CE Soil Mechanics PROBLEMS

WILLMER ENGINEERING INC. Willmer Project No Prepared for. Clark Patterson Lee Suwanee, Georgia. Prepared by

Civil Geotechnical Surveying

Florida s Leading Engineering Source

USCS Site Soil Classification For OWDP Project

A.SOILS. Where: G s = Specific gravity of soil G t = Specific gravity of water at t; temperature W s = Weight of dry soil


Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 2nd Edition Das SOLUTIONS MANUAL

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

THE INFLUENCE OF FINES CONTENT AND PLASTICITY ON THE STRENGTH AND PERMEABILITY OF AGGREGATE FOR BASE COURSE MATERIAL

Site Location. Figure 1: Site Location Map US-24 and I-275 Interchange Ash Township, Monroe County, Michigan

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT B-1942

Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, 2e Das/Sivakugan Chapter 2 Grain-Size Analysis Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.

DEVELOPING STATISTICAL CORRELATIONS OF SOIL PROPERTIES WITH R-VALUE FOR IDAHO PAVEMENT DESIGN

Sepetember 27, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Dawn Templin 160 Governmental Center Pensacola, FL

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS IN OPEN CUT

Field (Visual) Classification of Soils

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR CLAY SEAL

Cement Stabilization of Embankment Materials

Geotechnical Engineering Report

SECTION 6. ROAD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

Renolith Appraisal on Lateritic Soils Along Oshogbo-Iwo Road in Southwest Nigeria

Geotechnical Data Report

Apparent Coefficient of Friction, f* to be Used in the Design of Reinforced Earth Structures. Technical Bulletin: MSE - 6

November 13, Eckas Water 1514 Ambrosia Court Fort Collins, Colorado Attn: Mr. Wayne Eckas

WATER INDUSTRY SPECIFICATION

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT US 95 WIDENING ANN ROAD

All tests from the new Cells 3 and 4 passed the licence requirements. Please provide approval to begin using the new Cell 3 and Cell 4.

Water Well Report. Site Name

The Use of Carbonated Cement Kiln Dust as a Soil Stabilization Amendment

Sieve Analysis. Introduction

Geotechnical Engineering Report

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS IN OPEN CUT

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS IN OPEN CUT

Report of Exploratory Test Pits

Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Communications Tower Spain Park Site Hoover, Alabama

vulcanhammer.net Visit our companion site

HCMTCB SOILS CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION

LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS AND MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP OF SUBGRADE, EMBANKMENT SOILS, AND BACKFILL MATERIAL

Ootischenia Pit No. 0925

TLT-113 (02) STANDARD PRACTICE FOR IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF AGGREGATE PROSPECTS (Visual Manual Procedure)

BEST PRACTICE DESIGN FOR CONCRETE PAVERS FOR CANADIAN MUNICIPAL APPLICATIONS

PRACTICAL COURSE III CLASSIFICATION & COMPACTION. Res. Assist. İREM KALIPCILAR

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT DAYBREAK VILLAGE 8 ROADS SOUTH JORDAN, UTAH PROJECT No JULY 8, Submitted To:

Geotechnical Engineering Report

IFCEE 09, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009, Orlando, Florida

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE DATA REPORT

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Structural Design of Porous Asphalt Pavements. Tuesday, July 17, :00-3:30 PM ET

CONDUCTED FOR: PREPARED FOR: 18 October 2010 YPC Project No. 10GY133

APPENDIX A DRAINAGE STUDY PHASE 2 ALTERNATIVE IMPROVEMENTS CRYSTAL LAKE ALTERNATIVE 4C IMPROVEMENTS LAKEWOOD PIRATELAND SWASH HORRY COUNTY, SC

Reducing Aggregate Thickness on Forest Roads Designed for Log Trucks Equipped with Tire Pressure-Control Systems

Improvement Of Plasticity And Cbr Characteristics Of Gravelly Soils Using Rice Husk Ash-An Agricultural Industrial Waste

Stress-Strain and Strength Characteristics of Sand-Silt Mixtures

Proctor Compaction Testing

Geotechnical Investigation Report

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CHEYENNE AVENUE DISTRESS INVESTIGATION

Geotechnical Exploration and Evaluation Report

Characterizing Engineering Properties of Foundry Sands

Geotechnical Testing Laboratory, Inc. Engineering and Construction Materials Testing Services

EFFECT OF SAND ADDITIVES ON THE ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF FINE GRAINED SOILS

Transcription:

Geotechnical Engineering Research Laboratory One University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts 01854 Edward L. Hajduk, D.Eng, PE Lecturer PA105D Tel: (978) 934 2621 Fax: (978) 934 3052 e mail: Edward_Hajduk@uml.edu web site: http://faculty.uml.edu/ehajduk DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PROBLEM #1 (60 Points): GIVEN: 14.330 SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #2: Soil Classification Solution. Table 1. Soil Index Testing Summary. Sample 1 2 3 D422 D4318 Sieve Number % Retained LL PL 10 0.1 30 0.7 40 0.9 60 8.3 100 57.2 120 17.5 200 11.9 Pan 3.1 10 0.0 30 1.2 40 2.0 60 22.7 100 35.2 120 5.7 200 14.6 Pan 18.4 10 0.0 30 0.4 40 1.2 60 19.4 100 47.9 120 6.4 200 14.9 Pan 9.8 NA NA 21 15 54 31 REQUIRED: Determine USCS and AASHTO soil classifications for each soil sample. 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 1 of 10

SOLUTION: USCS Classification: Plot grain size distribution for all soils and determine D 60, D 30, and D 10 when necessary for Soil Samples #1, #2, and #3. Figure A. Grain Size Distributions and D 60, D 30, and D 10 for Samples #1, #2, and #3. Calculate C c and Cu using information in Figure A for Samples #1 and #3 and the equations shown below. See Table A for summary of C u and C c calculations. Coefficient of Uniformity = C u = D 60 D 10 Coefficient of Curvature (a.k.a. Gradation) = C c = (D 30 ) 2 (D 60 xd 10 ) 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 2 of 10

Table A. Summary of C u and C c calculations. Parameter Sample #1 Sample #3 D 60 (mm) 0.172 0.208 D 30 (mm) 0.15 0.147 D 10 (mm) 0.106 0.076 C c 1.62 2.74 C u 1.23 1.37 Knowing that PI = LL-PL, LL vs. PI was plotted for Samples #2 and #3 on Figure B. Figure B. Atterberg Limits Test Results Plotted on Casagrande s Chart. Since each soil sample has a % Passing a #200 sieve < 50%, use Figure 3 of ASTM D2487 to classify soil. See Figures C thru E for soil classification using ASTM D2487 Figure 3 for Soil Samples #1 thru 3, respectively. 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 3 of 10

No Gravel FC = 3% C u = 1.23 SP - Poorly Graded Sand Figure C. USCS Soil Classification of Sample #1 (using Figure 3 of ASTM D2487). No Gravel FC = 18% SC-SM- Silty, Clayey Sand Figure D. USCS Soil Classification of Sample #2 (using Figure 3 of ASTM D2487). 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 4 of 10

No Gravel FC = 10% C u = 1.37 MH SP-SM - Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Figure E. USCS Soil Classification of Sample #3 (using Figure 3 of ASTM D2487). AASHTO Classification: Use Table 2 from ASTM D3282. Determine % Passing #10, #40, and #200 sieves (see Figure A for grain size distribution plots). See Figure F for soil classification using ASTM D3282 Table 2 for Samples #1 thru 3. General Classification Group classification TABLE 2 Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures Granular Materials Sample (35 % or less #1passing No. 200 (75 µm)) A-1 A-2 Sample #3 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-1-a A-1-b A-2-4 A-2-5 A-2-6 A-2-7 Silt-Clay Materials (More than 35 % passing No. 200 (75 µm)) Sieve analysis, % passing: No. 10 (2.00 mm) 50 max.............................. No. 40 (425 µm) 30 max 50 max 51 min........................ No. 200 (75 µm) 15 max 25 max 10 max 35 max 35 max 35 max 35 max 36 min 36 min 36 min 36 min Characteristics of fraction passing No. 40 (425 µm): Liquid limit Plasticity index... 6max... N.P. 40 max 10 max 41 min 10 max 40 max 11 min 41 min 11 min 40 max 10 max 41 min 10 max 40 max 11 min 41 min 11 min A Usual types of significant constituent materials Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand Fine Sand Sample #2 A-7 A-7-5, A-7-6 Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils General rating as subgrade Excellent to Good Fair to Poor A Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to or less than LL minus 30. Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30 (see Fig. 1). Reprinted with permission of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Figure F. AASHTO Soil Classification of Sample #1, #2, and #3 (using Table 2 of ASTM D3282). 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 5 of 10

Problem #1 Summary: Sample Soil Classification USCS Group Symbol & Name AASHTO #1 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand A-3 #2 (SC-SM) Silty, Clayey Sand A-2-4 #3 (SP-SM) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt A-2-7 PROBLEM #2 (40 Points): GIVEN: Soil #2 Soil #3 Soil #1 Figure 1. Mechanical Sieve and Hydrometer Results for Problem #2. Table 3. Atterberg Limits (ASTM D4318) for Problem #2. Soil LL PL #1 61 31 #2 NA NA #3 37 10 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 6 of 10

REQUIRED: Classify the soils in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and AASHTO. USCS Classification: Calculate % Gravel, % Sand, and % Fines from Figure 1. A summary of these percentages is provided in Table B. Table B. Summary of % Gravel, % Sand, and % Fines from Figure 1. Soil % Gravel % Sand % Fines Soil 1 0 0 100 Fine Grained 2 2 98 0 Coarse Grained 3 0 50 50 Fine Grained Knowing that PI = LL-PL, PI vs. LL was plotted for Soils #1 and #2 on Figure G. Figure G. Atterberg Limits Test Results Plotted on Casagrande s Chart. Therefore, use Figure 1 from ASTM D2487 for Soils #1 and #3 and Figure 3 from ASTM D2487 for Soil #2 to classify the soils. See Figures H thru J for soil classification using ASTM D2487 Figures for Soils #1 thru #3, respectively. 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 7 of 10

0% Plus #200 CH Fat Clay LL = 61 Figure H. USCS Soil Classification of Soil #1 (using Figure 1 of ASTM D2487). For Soil #2 (Using Figure 3, ASTM D2487): C c (D (D 60 ) D 30 2 10 ;C ) u D D 60 10 Soil D 10 (mm) D 30 (mm) D 60 (mm) #2 0.32 0.58 0.85 1.1 2.7 C c C u 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 8 of 10

2% Gravel FC = 0% C u = 2.7, C c = 1.1 SP Poorly Graded Sand Figure J. USCS Soil Classification of Sample #2 (using Figure 3 of ASTM D2487). 50% Plus #200 CL Sandy Lean Clay LL = 39 Figure I. USCS Soil Classification of Soil #3 (using Figure 1 of ASTM D2487). 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 9 of 10

AASHTO Classification: Use Table 2 from ASTM D3282. Determine % Passing #10, #40, and #200 sieves (see Figure 1 for grain size distribution plots). See Figure K for soil classification using ASTM D3282 Table 2 for Soils #1 thru 3. Soil #1 Soil #2 Soil #3 Figure K. AASHTO Soil Classification of Soils #1, #2, and #3 (using Table 2 of ASTM 14.332D3282). Problem #2 Summary: Sample Soil Classification USCS Group Symbol & Name #1 (CH) Fat Clay AASHTO A-7 (Acceptable) A-7-5 #2 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand A-1-b #3 (CL) Sandy Lean Clay A-6 EXTRA CREDIT (+5 Points): Which discipline of civil engineering you would like to work in when you graduate? Write a paragraph or two why you have selected this discipline. Use Guest Lecture assignment guidelines. Self-explanatory. 14.330 2013 Assignment 2 Solution Page 10 of 10