Exploring Communication in the Supply Chain under REACH Authorisation process

Similar documents
Impact of PACT. RIEF IV Brussels 19 June Jánosi Amaya REACH manager Product Stewardship

US implication when purchasing ARTICLES from EU. Suppliers in the EU will provide this information to you.

Implementing REACH - Safer chemicals in Europe

Authorisation applications : process, learning lessons and suggestions. Aggie Kötze (REACH Manager, ILA))

REACHing the 2020 goals

REACH with Ecolab REACH CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE

SVHC Authorisation and Restrictions

Authorisation in REACH

REACH special subject: communication between companies

How to address chemicals of concern: roadmap 2020

REACH. Main concerns resulting from the implementation of REACH. Within the Aerospace Defence and Security business VERSION 1.5

The new Biocidal Products Regulation. Outline and key elements

Intertek Regulatory Services

Duties with regard to exposure scenarios

REACH & Supply Chain. Dr Chris Eacott Stewardship Solutions. June 14th Workshop Centro Reach

16361/14 AM/am 1 DG E 1A

FINAL DRAFT REACH: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND CURRENT WORK. ETRMA CRIA meeting Tyre Industry Regulatory Dialogue

REACH Compliance. (Registration, Evaluation, Restriction and Authorization of Chemicals) New EU Legislation

Update from ECHA. REACH Information and Experience Exchange Forum (RIEF IV) CEFIC 19 June 2015 Sheraton Brussels Airport Hotel

Principles of REACH. Andrew Fasey AIHce 2006 Chicago, USA 16 May 2006

Endocrine discuptors under REACH

REACH Review: Industry activities and views

REACH overview why, what s the objective?

PLANNING FOR REACH 2018 AS A NON-EU COMPANY

Impact of REACH on the Ni industry. France Capon Senior Advisor, Chemicals Management, Nickel Institute

Workshop on REACH(ing) the WSSD 2020 goals

Frequent challenges observed in SIEF

REACH REGULATION: the new management of chemicals in Europe and operational tools. R egistration. E valuation. A Ch. uthorisation.

Meeting 2020 WSSD targets Advance in ECHA regulatory strategy

EC-Regulation No.1907/2006 (REACH)

Authorisation State of play and NI activities. Dr. Tony Hart Consultant, Nickel Institute

REACH and the Challenge to the Leather Industry

Second REACH review and next steps

Feedback from ECHA on dossier and substance evaluation

REGULATORY ACTIONS UNDER REACH & CLP FEEDBACK FROM ECHA S RAC

Public Consultation in relation to the REACH REFIT evaluation

ECHA s four strategic aims: setting the scene

REACH: What ITI members need to know to limit business risk

ECHA policy for prevention of conflicts of interest

Assess hazards and risks What does it mean?

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

Best practices on physicochemical and substance identity information for nanomaterials

REACH & CLP Consequences for Plastics Converters, Compounders & Masterbatchers and Recyclers

SN Jonas Eriksson YDRC Lina Orbéus Standardisation engineer (contact person) SNI Fredrik Spele YDRC Michaela Bundschuh

An introduction to socioeconomic analysis in the REACH authorisation process

Behind the scenes of screening for SVHCs. Subtitle

David Green SLIC WG CHEMEX

DU obligations under REACH the formulators challenges

The European REACH Directive in a Nutshell

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

Interface between REACH and CAD:

Current and future EU policy on Substance Restrictions. Halogen-free Symposium Brussels October 27-28, 2009

2018 shortlisting letter campaign to industry: scope and expected outcome

FEASIBILITY OF A MATERIALS INFORMATION PLATFORM AND THE WAY FORWARD

Closing remarks. Seminar on applications for authorisation 17 June Tomas Öberg Chair of Socio-economic Analysis Committee ECHA

The consequences of REACH for SMEs

EU Rural Networks Strategic Framework and governance bodies

PARES Strategic Dialogue 2013 Drafting a Memorandum of Understanding on a national level. Recommendations to employment services

Helsinki, 13 February 2008 Doc: MB/07/2008 final POLICY ON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES. (Document endorsed by the Management Board)

The EU REACH Regulation

CLP Annex VIII. Preparation of notifications for poison centres according to Annex VIII CLP

Executive Summary ²²²² DRAFT 00

PLATFORMA. The European voice of local and regional authorities. for development. Policy Officer. Brussels, November 2016

Nanomaterials in REACH

Chemical Safety Report

Demonstrating safe use of chemicals under REACH

Petroleum Products in the REACH Regulation Klaas den Haan, Stewardship Conference, SCL 1 June 2015

3: REACH Case Story Summaries

REACH Authorisation. Elanor Ball UK REACH Competent Authority

Micromega: REACH for Nanomaterials

From 2013: «Unauthorised myths» of Applications for authorisation. Hugo Waeterschoot Eurometaux Erwin Annys /Amaya Jánosi Cefic

Case Study Non-EU Manufacturers

The Interface between REACH and CAD/CMD

Supporting Document for REACH authorisation: Public consultation on streamlining

Requirements for substances in articles

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

REACH restriction process. REACH Conference Bratislava September 3-4, 2018

Study on hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, not regulated by the RoHS Directive

New IT Tools ECHA s outlook

Effectiveness Evaluation of Stockholm Convention

EurEau position paper on the revision of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)

Guidance for downstream users

Benefit-Cost Analysis in Chemicals Regulation in the EU

RISK & POLICY ANALYSTS LTD. Highly regarded for our superior services by clients, contemporaries and colleagues alike

CHEMAWARE Knowledge Services FAQ: Trichloroethylene under REACH

Setting priorities and processes at EU level to address dossier compliance

Information note I. BACKGROUND

Risk management get ready

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Civil Society Engagement and Grants Programme on Transitional Justice, Reconciliation and Institutional Reforms

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of XXX. on the audits and assessments performed by notified bodies in the field of medical devices

REACH. Intertek Group PLC July By Ms. Sunanda Kadam. Intertek REACH Presentation, May

Experiences of Enforcement with authorisation

EU legislation: Chemicals REACH

Communicating safe use information on mixtures

Contents Page 1. Introduction Context of this Document How to use this Guidance Overview of REACH

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 December 2016 (OR. en)

This Agreement (hereinafter: "the Agreement") is made and entered into on May 13 th, 2003, by and between

REACh : Device Maker Perspective

REACH REGISTRATION 2018 WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE COMPLIANCE DEADLINE International Aerospace Environmental Group. All rights reserved.

SME Issues. webinar, 02 July 2013, 2pm BST

Transcription:

Exploring Communication in the Supply Chain under REACH Authorisation process RIEF II Brussels - 18 December 2013 Jànosi Amaya REACH manager Product Stewardship

Communication Communication 2

Communication Communication Supply Chain 3

Communication Communication Supply Chain REACH Authorisation process 4

Content 1. Introduction 2. Communication workshop framework 3. Identified issues 4. Suggestions/recommendations 5. Key messages 6. Conclusion 5

1. Introduction Many communication tools exist Which is true for our daily life is not applicable in the business area. Companies are looking to their own interests/ priorities and communicate with the entire world mainly on purpose (regulatory, safety, business). Presentation: How people not used to be in contact with each other met and discussed How a dialogue has been initiated between different actors of the supply chain The first outcome in the REACH authorisation framework 6

1. Introduction Communication tool used in REACH may vary according to the process followed. Registration process => legislation foresees to share available data before submitting registration dossier and to communicate on identified uses. Communication is mandatory Authorisation process => legislation does not provide same obligations. Communication is highly recommended to pursue company activities. Development of a business network involving the whole supply chain becomes crucial. Nature of the information => sensitive, individual commercial aspects, CBI From a competition law perspective, more complicated issue in authorisation than in registration. 7

1. Introduction Authorisation process tackles the USE of the substance Demonstration of potential available and viable alternative is required to submit an application An application for authorisation (afa) allows to cover your specific use uses down the supply chain But only one level up! => So depending the place in the supply chain, question raised and concerns will differ. Set up a communication WS on authorisation To listen concerns from different actors To initiate a dialogue between all parties. To initiate a first brainstorming. 8

2. Communication WS framework Audience: M Distr DU individual companies or associations Mixed per table to initiate discussion Support: Legal advisor => communication between companies How? Open discussion in small groups then in plenary. What? Presentation of concerns perceived per actors at different level of the supply chain. Presentation in front of other actors! First brainstorming Outcome: Identification of issues (per actors or common) Suggestions/recommendations 9

3. Common issues identified ROLE => different role played by companies in the supply chain Manufacturers (M) are also Downstream Users (DU) Distributors (distr) can be M / Importers (I) / distr / DUs For EU DUs and distr; how to deal with non EU Manufacturers? MARKET Complexity / length of the supply chain = challenging! Different company interests => not the same individual goal! UNDERSTANDING of the PROCESS => different levels of knowledge in: The authorisation process before, after candidate list / Annex XIV Substances life cycles (uses, end uses) Uses might be covered or not in the application for authorisation Legal aspect of market trades / trade secrets 10

3. Common issues identified DATA SHARING: What? How? When? With whom? What about competition law? Activities which may be conducted together in this REACH authorisation phase are much more problematic under competition law than those in SIEFs or Consortia set up for registration. Companies may be worried to exchange information for mere competitiveness and confidentiality reasons (eg. List of main customers). How to get information submitted during registration (CSR?) TIME TO REACT!!! => AWARENESS RAISED ON TIME: At each level of the supply chain At a very early stage to get time to gather information on time. INDUSTRY ONE VOICE How to ensure common/coherent industry voice submitted on time? 11

3. Common issues identified All about communication!!! 12

4. Suggestions/recommendations A - Tools: 1. To reach (un-)known targeted people: Set up communication platforms to map actors/substances. Set up Open Active Passive communication 2. To collaborate for a robust application despite different interests: => Set up targeted translation tool Language (per country) Specific audience technical, business, economic, sales, scientific, regulatory, etc.. Broad information for larger audience Specific communication letter to give clear indication from suppliers of what is expected from DUs (end-)users. 13

4. Suggestions/recommendations B - Authorisation process for dedicated task force: 1. Understanding - knowledge: Set up training sessions for targeted companies. Clear list of what will be covered or not in the application for authorisation base for discussion iterative process. 2. Develop a structure / platform with identified responsibilities (lead) Draft a flow chart on structure required to set up communication for an application and on the role of each actor. 3. To raise awareness very earlier: => Develop more pre-alert systems: Association interne database Use of REACH Art 33 information duty on substances in articles and leave time after inclusion into the candidate list. 14

4. Suggestions/recommendations C - Industry: 1. Use a third party to treat sensitive information and to ensure compliancy with competition law and protection of CBI issues. 2. Final decision for applying for authorisation and considering substitution IS and SHOULD remain entirely within individual companies. 3. Contact your association to ensure common understanding. 4. Mapping of the supply chain: Identify a lead Send specific information via targeted communication letters 5. Develop/share consolidated manual on confidentiality, authorisation process, role of each actor in the supply chain 6. Quality of data => Keep your registration dossier up to date!!! 15

4. Suggestions/recommendations D - Authorities: 1. Involve industry as early as possible in any preparatory assessment. 2. Pre-alert system needed ensure good communication between National associations and competent authorities 3. How to use Art 33 REACH as a tool for awareness raising in the supply chain? why? => Ensure enough time between the inclusion in the candidate list and before entering Annex XIV! To leave time to most actors of the supply chain to be informed about the inclusion of the SVHC on the candidate list. To gather better relevant - faster input from the whole supply chain during the next public consultation 4. Set up training sessions for companies Authorities HelpDesks. 16

5. Key messages Key message for industry = Continue to set up networks and be pro-active vis-à-vis authorisation process! Advanced participation and preparation are key element! Find general common position Look at your business in REACH perspective and start defining strategies Key message for authorities = Allow enough time in the process to contact and build relationship and prepare relevant input for any assessment or public consultation. Request to all MSCA to open dialogue with industry Leave time to industry to set up communication strategy to allow: Providing relevant input during the public consultation Building business strategies 17

6. Conclusion Communication is key in our daily life. Communication has been identified as a key instrument to tackle REACH authorisation process. Need to work together BUT competition law constraints and confidential sensitive data Communication workshop has been set up to initiate a dialogue between several actors of the supply chain. Very useful and fruitful workshop 1 issues have been identified and shared with all actors 2 recommendations and potential actions have been suggested Necessity to continue a constructive dialogue: between ALL ACTORS: within the supply chain AND with authorities to try to be prepared as much as possible AS SOON AS possible. 18

19