Precision Ag. Back to Basics

Similar documents
Cropping System Nutrient Management

To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?

How Do You Evaluate Precision Ag Strategies On Farm? Lessons Learned from the GFO Precision Ag Project

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE

FUNGICIDE & INSECTICIDE ON SOYBEANS

Western Lake Erie Watersheds

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

The value of proper soil testing and use in precision Ag

Updating Soil Maps Who, what, where, when,

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES

Using precision agriculture technologies for phosphorus, potassium, and lime management with lower grain prices and to improve water quality

Understanding How Precision Ag Works Regardless of Your Farm Size

ONTARIO 4R DEMONSTRATION FARM TOUR SUMMARY 2017 REPORT

Purdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol

Data Layers of Value in Corn Production. Nate Douridas, CCA Molly Caren Farm Manager

FUTURE OF TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS

Canada-Ontario Domestic Action Plan for Lake Erie Phosphorus Reduction. Agriculture Sector Working Group April 19, 2017

FERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF

ASSESSING LAND PRODUCTIVITY: A GROWER S PERSPECTIVE PRESENTED BY: IAN OLSON REGULATORY SPECIALIST CENTROL CROP CONSULTING

GLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative

4R Nutrient Stewardship

CROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS ARE CURRENT FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS ADEQUATE?

Addressing Economic & Environmental Risks While No-Tilling

Re-evaluating Phosphorus and Potassium Management for Soybeans

Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN

Agronomic Management for Optimizing Corn Yields

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

MANAGEMENT MATTERS SERIES. Tips to help North Carolina soybean growers increase yield & profits. Maximizing Yields

The Phosphorus Management Tool

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET

Optimizing yield while minimizing phosphorus water quality impacts: Some do s and don ts

Variable Rate Application. by Jason Wilson. Product Specialist. ATI Solutions LLC.

11. Precision Agriculture

4R Nutrient Stewardship Opportunities for Ontario

Agribusiness Association of Iowa Ag Retailer Survey Executive Summary

Adapt-N Setting The Standard in Nitrogen Management

Technology and Agriculture: History and Future

Nutrient Stewardship for Cleaner Water

it s about whole farm management with the goal of optimizing returns to input and preserving resources! Crop Fields: Time Equipment size

Management and Conservation in the Face of Lower Returns

SST Software Mark Pawsey

Exeter Demo Plot: Split vs Single App of Nitrogen, Fungicide or No Fungicide

4R UPDATE Sally Flis, CCA, Ph.D. Director of Agronomy The Fertilizer Institute

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM II. November 7, There are 15 questions (plus a bonus question) worth a total of up to 100 points possible. Please be concise.

Crop Enterprise Budgets

Utilizing the Precision Ag Tools you Already Have

A world record: insights into the current state of ag data.

Between a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability

Addressing Economic & Environmental Risks While No-Tilling

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Resources Conservation Practices Tillage, Manure Management and Water Quality

Introduction. Manure Management Facts Prioritization and Rotation of Fields for Manure Application. July 2014

Phosphorus for the Ontario CCA 4R Nutrient Management Specialty

Phosphorus for the Ontario CCA 4R Nutrient Management Specialty

Given the complexities, we must look at practice-based metrics in conjunction with performance-based metrics when assessing results

Variable Rate Treatments

MANURE MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOSS WITH SURFACE RUNOFF AND ON-FARM PHOSPHORUS INDEX IMPLEMENTATION. AN OVERVIEW OF ONGOING RESEARCH

Should I be Concerned About High Soil Test Levels on my Farm?

Re: Response to New Horizons: Ontario's Draft Agricultural Soil Health and Conservation Strategy

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT RESULTS. Anthony Martin Northeast Iowa Regional Agronomist

Elin Betanzo July 14, 2015

2014 Executive Summary

Developing Ontario s Agricultural Soil Health and Conservation Strategy

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

4R Practices. Guidance Document

1. Potassium deficiency in corn and soybeans 1 2. Residue treatment in continuous no-till wheat systems 3

Development of an Adaptive Management Approach for Nutrient Management in New York

Making rational adjustments to phosphorus, potassium, and lime application rates when crop prices are low and producers want to cut inputs

2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn

Starter Fertilizer for Corn in Vermont

Integrating Technologies to Enhance the Simplicity of Strip Tillage Systems

Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.

Fertilizer Management Effects On Phosphorus Concentrations in Runoff from No-Till Corn and Soybean

Crop Production Costs

Andrew Vrbka, TSA Servi-Tech, Inc National Alliance of Independent Crop Consultants Annual Meeting January 20, 2011

PRECISION AGRICULTURE ROI STUDY REPORT EXCERPTS JULY 2012

UPDATING TRI STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS

Seeding Soybeans in Narrow Rows E.S. Oplinger

Agronomic Management Considerations for Fields Flooded in Ronnie Helms Stuttgart, Arkansas

SIDEDRESSING CORN USING DRONE-DERIVED ZONE MAPS

Ohio State University On-Farm Fertilizer Strip Trial Guidelines 2018 and beyond

SMart On-Farm Part 1. Michigan Soybean Committee, PO Box 287, Frankenmuth, MI FRANKENMUTH, MI PERMIT 20 PAID US POSTAGE NON-PROFIT

Guidelines for Estimating Crop Production Costs. in Manitoba

ESN Controlled Release Fertilizer on Corn and Spring Wheat

106 N. Cecil Street Bonduel, WI (715) Submitted For:

An Agronomic Look at Low Lignin Crops.

Infrared Sensors, Row Clutches, Auto-Steer - Precision Practices That Pay.

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

19th 18th 21st Annual National No-Tillage Conference. Thursday, January 17, 13

Purdue s Collaborative On Farm Research Program. Outline. Why Do Research? v Purdue's Collaborative On-Farm Research Program

The magazine for certified crop advisers, agronomists, and soil scientists.

A Farmland Water Management and Drainage Collaborative Strategy to Reduce Phosphorus Loss in the Thames River Basin

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Proceedings of Indiana Crop Adviser Conference 2004

Special Crop Production Costs

Missouri Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Nutrient Management Technical Standard

Objectives: Background:

A December 18, 2007 article (printed below) from South Dakota State University on the Plant Management Network web site addresses this issue.

Corn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County

RURAL CONSERVATION CLUBS PROGRAM CHARING CROSS CONSERVATION CORPORATION "Manure Management in High Residue Applications" FINAL REPORT

Transcription:

Precision Ag Back to Basics Nicole Rabe (Land Resource Specialist OMAFRA) Mike Wilson (CCA-ON, Advanced Agronomy Solutions Manager - Thompsons Limited)

What is Precision Agriculture a management system that is information and technology based, is site specific and uses one or more of the following sources of data: soils, crops, nutrients, pests, moisture, or yield, for optimum profitability, sustainability, and protection of the environment Source: NRCS Support for Emerging Technologies (2003 & 2007) Technical Note 11/21/2014 2

Trends in Precision Agriculture Open Ag Data Alliance (OADA) 11/21/2014 3

Why precision ag? 1. Your operation, your farm, your field goals Cut your input investment with out sacrificing yield Increase yield by increasing crop inputs Invest in the soil with the right amount 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Farming with Average s Over application Wasting $$$ Environmental Impact Yield vs. Inputs Under Application Loss of Yield inputs 0 Low Productivity Areas Medium Productivity Areas High Productivity Areas Current Yield Current Imput level Yield Goal Input Goal

Technology will change our Future 450 Yield vs. Inputs 400 350 Targeting Maximum Yield Potential 300 250 200 150 100 Very little Waste 50 0 Low Productivity Areas Medium Productivity Areas High Productivity Areas Current Yield Current Imput level Yield Goal Input Goal

Today vs. Tomorrow 450 Current Yield & Inputs vs. Yield Goal & Inputs Required. 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Low Productivity Areas Medium Productivity Areas High Productivity Areas Current Yield Current Imput level Yield Goal Input Goal

Why Precision Ag (con td )Blooms 2. Environmental goals 3. Social license to farm at risk?????? - Perception or fact? - How will ag sector respond to more scrutiny on nutrient management by public? Agricultural land represents about 70% of the Lake Erie watershed in Ontario. Urban areas (5%), wetlands (10%) and natural areas (15%) make up the remaining. Source: AAFC Mid 1990s blooms begin to appear again since 1970s 2011 worst algal bloom in Lake Erie history 2014 harmful bloom, impacts drinking water supply Toledo & Pelee Island Western Lake Erie basic most severe bloom in recent years 7

Additional Commitments Involving Ontario A Collaborative Agreement was signed by the Premier of Ontario and the Governors of Michigan and Ohio in June 2015. The agreement commits to a 40% phosphorus reduction target for Lake Erie s Western Basin with the following timelines: 20% reduction by 2020; 40% reduction by 2025 Crop Sector Land Area (Million Acres) Total 12.7 Field Crops 8.90 Hort Crops 0.20 Greenhouse 0.03 Pasture 1.60 Other 1.97 Agricultural land represents about 70% of the Lake Erie watershed in Ontario. 10

Up to $25,000 in cost-share funding available

Precision Applications: Crop Nutrient Plans Soil and manure testing, mapping, zones 5 year plan of conservative fertilizer use Tillage and Equipment Modifications Tire deflation systems Planter modifications for fertilizer placement http://www.ontariosoilcrop.org/oscia-programs/glasi/

Where and How do we start Precision Ag Approach? Yield Elevation Hydrologic Slope Value High : 1.0 peak or ridge, dry Low : 0.0 stream channel or pit (wet) Soil Remote Sensing Soybeans Sept 4, 2013

Zone Based Field Management allows us to achieve these goals! We can reduce cost in specific areas with out harming yield We can build other areas back up to acceptable levels to increase yield, or to have a soil reserve there when we need it. We can apply product only where needed to reduce input costs We can apply different products in different areas to maximize the potential of each product and our input investment. This process Matches the 4R s approach perfectly. Sustainably and Profitably

Case Study: Zone Management & Profitability Chatham-Kent

PA Step 1: Collect Data (The key to our future success) Couple years of yield data + Elevation data off guidance system or a D.S.M. from a UAV flight + Soil sampling

297 308 0 0 300 0

PA Step 2: Integrate Data to make management zones Yield + Elevation + Soil Sampling Integrated Analysis Management Zones Evolutionary Build

PA Step 3: Grower knowledge Management Zone Map Revisions Review with your agronomist Crop Input Recommendations Prescription Map for Product Application

Review with Your Agronomist. Review the Zones created from your data to determine their validity. Grower knowledge is crucial to success especially in the early stages. Review Operations goals and discuss how to properly implement an input strategy. Determine Crop Yield goals to accurately recommend nutrient rates Determine which Fertilizer Recommendation Strategy is to be used (Sufficiency approach or the Build and Maintenance method) VR Application allows us to do both in a field at the same time! Discuss all other nutrient sources that are planed to be applied to the field this season and adjust our application rates accordingly. Work through application method and timing to be compliant with a 4R strategy. Review Cost of application to ensure you are on track with Cost of production calculations and profitability goals

Building a Crop Input Recommendation We must matches the goals of the Operation!

Phosphorus Example: Removal of 200 bu corn: 200 x.41 lbs. = 82 lbs. P205 82 lbs. /.52 = 158 lbs./acre of MAP We are saving where Phosphorous is high by applying 30 lbs of Map less than the removal requirement. We are building the Phosphorus Levels in the Low ground by applying 80# s of extra Map. The Total recommendation is 10 lbs per acre of product less than the removal value.

Straight Show Rate MAP vs. Difference Variable map Rate Comparison

PA Step 4: Implement Rx Maps Check as-applied maps Harvest Debrief & post-harvest analysis

Validating Prescription Maps How do you know the prescription for crop inputs was correct? Implement checks in two ways: Strips Blocks Dry fertilizer spreader @ 80ft wide passes = 3 passes with 20ft combine header

2015 Rx Map Nitrogen full length strips Farm GIS Desktop software Strips not preprogrammed Operator toggles to full rate or none Managing your own data Requires training Analysis after harvest more involved because each zone needs a yield result

2015 Rx Map Nitrogen small strips Farm GIS Desktop software pre-programmed VR-N zones + checks operator places checks in map based on equipment size Semi-automated reporting after harvest requires investment in training

Small Blocks Online system with secure user account Less real estate in checks Less frontage for replicated trials required Pre-programmed into Rx map by client or done by your consultant Applied automatically on day of application

Reporting automated at end of season post-harvest

Combination Approach Some blocks put together Trying to accommodate: equipment size zone configuration Acquiring enough yield points to be statistically relevant

Profitability: Does Not Come from Higher Yields Alone. We must: Increase yield wherever we can Maximize our input dollars where we can not, And market our crop for as profitable of a price as often as possible

Profitability: Yield Analysis

Profitability: Gross Profit Map

Profitability: Field Records (Straight Rate Info) We must accurately track all Operations preformed on a field Tillage Planting Chemical Applications Herbicide Fungicide Insecticide Fertilizer Application Fall or Spring Broadcast Planter Starter Side Dress N (Early or Late) Agronomy Services Prescription Fee Scouting Imagery Yield Processing Profitability Mapping Harvest Costs Combining Trucking Drying Elevation The list continues!

Profitability: As-Applied Data (Variable Rate Info) 28-0-0 MAP Potash Population K-MAG

Profitability: Field Summary

Variable Rate Net Profit Comparison Straight Rate -92 - -40-92 $23.00/acre advantage to the Variable Rate Program

Variable Rate R.O.I. Comparison Straight Rate 5% Higher ROI using the Variable Rate Program

In Conclusion Profitability Does Not Come from Higher Yields Alone, True Profitability Comes when we Merge our Proven Agronomic Practices with a Solid Marketing Plan The Future of farming is not based on bushels per acre but rather farming with dollars per acre and calculated return on investment numbers. If we continue to farm based on our farm average, we will continue to harvest average yields. Start collecting today the data you will need to farm with tomorrow