Guidance. Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs DRAFT GUIDANCE

Similar documents
Guidance for Industry ANDAs: Stability Testing of Drug Substances and Products

Expiration Dating of Unit-Dose Repackaged Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Guidance for Industry

Acceptability of Draft Labeling to Support ANDA Approval Guidance for Industry

Overview of a sterility assurance program for PET drugs

Established Conditions: Reportable CMC Changes for Approved Drug and Biologic Products Guidance for Industry

DSCSA Implementation: Product Tracing Requirements for Dispensers Compliance Policy (Revised)

USP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new)

Environmental Assessment: Questions and Answers Regarding Drugs With Estrogenic, Androgenic, or Thyroid Activity Guidance for Industry

Hot Topics in Drug Product Process Validation: A Reviewer s Perspective

Q & A on USP General Chapter <823> Revision Proposal Webinar held on 21 February 2011

for IND and RDRC Regulated PET Compounding

Guidance for Industry

Pharmacy Compounding of Human Drug Products Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators and Sponsors

The ABCs and Challenges of GMP The American Experience

Method Suitability Report Membrane Filtration Sterility Test with QTMicro Apparatus

September 2, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE

Proposed Revision of USP General Chapter Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography Compounding <823>

FDA s Guidance for Industry

Study Summary. Results: All tested media-filled vials were negative for growth of any microorganisms.

Guidance for Industry Compounding Animal Drugs from Bulk Drug Substances

Complaints Investigations Root Cause Analysis

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

This guidance is for immediate implementation.

Growth Promotion Test Guide for Media Used in Sterility Tests

Guidance for Industry

Compounding Pharmacies and the USP <71> Sterility Tests

Tests to Support Sterility Claim. Imtiaz Ahmed

IN THIS SECTION MICROBIOLOGY TESTING EXPERT SOLUTIONS FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Bacterial Endotoxin (LAL) Testing

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Guidance for Industry Tablet Scoring: Nomenclature, Labeling, and Data for Evaluation

Guidance for Industry Reference Product Exclusivity for Biological Products Filed Under Section 351(a) of the PHS Act

Definitions of Suspect Product and Illegitimate Product for Verification Obligations Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act Guidance for Industry

Guidance PET Drug Products Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP)

Compounding Animal Drugs From Bulk Drug Substances; Draft Guidance for Industry;

HardyVal TM CSP RANDOM TEST KIT

Unique Device Identification: Convenience Kits Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Industry Perspective on PET Manufacturing Comparison of EU and US

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; Prescription Drug Labeling Improvement and. Enhancement Initiative; Request for Comments and Information

Annex A2. Guidance on Process Validation Scheme for Aseptically Processed Products

3.2 Test for sterility

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 14, 2011

Overview of Inspection Issues with Legacy Products. Barbara Breithaupt Consumer Safety Officer

US Regulatory Requirements: Clinical & Clinical Research Production, SPECT & PET Radiopharmaceuticals (RPs)

Request for Quality Metrics Guidance for Industry

Validation Needs for Sterilization by Aseptic Filtration

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for Industry

FDA Quality Metrics, Data Integrity and Application of Statistics Throughout Process Validation in a Global Economy

Overview of Generic PET Applications. Sema Basaran, Ph.D. The 34 th Annual High Country Nuclear Medicine Conference.

Guidance for Industry

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Overview of FDA Regulations and Guidance Documents related to PET Drug Chemistry. Steve Zigler, Ph.D. Siemens PETNET Solutions

New and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 2)

GUIDANCE FOR SPONSORS, INDUSTRY, RESEARCHERS, INVESTIGATORS, AND FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION STAFF

Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions for Medical Devices that Include Antimicrobial Agents

The Deemed to be a License Provision of the BPCI Act Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry

TECHNICAL LEAFLET. MEDI-MEDIA-FILL KIT SUPPLY PACKAGE (Code: MR-25/S)

The draft of this document was issued on May 15, 2003.

Dissolution Testing and Acceptance Criteria for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Products Containing High Solubility Drug Substances

Microbiological Quality of Drug Products after Penetration of the Container System for Dose Preparation Prior to Patient Administration

GUIDE TO INSPECTIONS OF MICROBIOLOGICAL PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY CONTROL LABORATORIES

`HUMAN DRUG CGMP NOTES

Role of USP Monographs and. General Chapters. Steve Zigler, Ph.D.

Guidance for Industry

EU and FDA GMP Regulations: Overview and Comparison

How do you know the drug you are using is safe and effective?

Document issued on: March 19, The draft of this document was issued on May 20, 2010.

Distinguishing Medical Device Recalls from Product Enhancements and Associated Reporting Requirements

á61ñ MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF NONSTERILE PRODUCTS: MICROBIAL ENUMERATION TESTS

Product Identifier Requirements Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act--Compliance Policy;

Guidance for Industry Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations

Guidance for Industry New Chemical Entity Exclusivity Determinations for Certain Fixed-Combination Drug Products

Why Do I Test, What Do I Test & When Do I Test It? Ross Caputo, PhD Chief Technical Officer Eagle Analytical Services

Guidance for Industry

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; The Content of Investigational

Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application

ICH Topic Q4B Annex 8 Sterility Test General Chapter. Step 3

TECHNICAL DATASHEET. in compliance with: USP, ISO and all appropriate subsections FQ 106 v3.0 August, 2015

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

CGMP Requirements for Investigational Products

Overcome the Top Challenges of Handling OOS Results by Knowing FDA Observations

Draft Guidelines for Radiopharmacy

Harmonizing FDA Regulation and the Practice of Pharmacy: Challenges and Opportunities. Plus an update on PET Drug User Fees

Guidance for Industry

Validation of Sterilizing Grade Filters

Risk based approaches for a sterility assurance application review: a microbiologist s perspective Dr. Yeissa Chabrier Roselló

LABORATORY COMPLIANCE

Aseptic Process Validation

Guidance for Industry

Emcure Pharmaceuticals Limited 3/3/16

Advancements on implementation of single use technology in vaccine manufacturing

International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council Of The Americas

Microdose Radiopharmaceutical Diagnostic Drugs: Nonclinical Study Recommendations Guidance for Industry

Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) Fraction V

Transcription:

Guidance Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document should be submitted within 90 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance. Submit comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. For questions regarding this draft document contact (CDER) Elizabeth Giaquinto at 301-796- 3416. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) September 2011 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP)

Guidance Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs Additional copies are available from: Office of Communications Division of Drug Information, WO51, Room 2201 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Ave. Silver Spring, MD 20993-0003 Phone: 301-796-3400; Fax: 301-847-8714 druginfo@fda.hhs.gov http://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/default.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) September 2011 Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP)

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. BACKGROUND...1 III. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS...2 A. WHAT IS A MEDIA FILL?...2 B. WHAT IS THE MEDIA FILL DESIGNED TO EVALUATE?...2 C. WHAT ARE THE STEPS INVOLVED IN A MEDIA FILL?...2 D. HOW DO I CHOOSE THE GROWTH MEDIUM?...4 E. HOW OFTEN SHOULD A MEDIA FILL BE PERFORMED?...4 F. A MEDIA VENDOR IS TYPICALLY QUALIFIED BY TESTING THREE BATCHES OF MEDIUM. HOW DO I DO THAT?..4 G. WHAT IS GROWTH PROMOTION TESTING? HOW IS IT USED IN PET PRODUCTION?...5 H. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GROWTH PROMOTION TEST AND A POSITIVE CONTROL?...5 I. WHEN DO I USE A POSITIVE CONTROL?...5

Draft Not for Implementation Guidance 1 1 2 3 4 Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs 5 6 This draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current 7 thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to 8 bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of 9 the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA 10 staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call 11 the appropriate number listed on the title page of this guidance. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 I. INTRODUCTION This guidance is intended to help manufacturers of positron emission tomography (PET) drugs meet the requirements for the Agency s current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations for PET drugs (21 CFR part 212). Most PET drugs are designed for parenteral administration and are produced by aseptic processing. The goal of aseptic processing is to make a product that is free of microorganisms and toxic microbial byproducts, most notably bacterial endotoxins. A media fill is the performance of an aseptic manufacturing procedure using a sterile microbiological growth medium, in place of the drug solution, to test whether the aseptic procedures are adequate to prevent contamination during actual drug production. FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency's current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required. II. BACKGROUND In 1997, Congress passed the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (Public Law 105-115) (the Modernization Act). Section 121 of the Modernization Act directed FDA to establish appropriate approval procedures and Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP) for PET drugs. The procedures were finalized and an implementation timeline was instituted on December 9, 2009, when FDA published regulations that described the minimum CGMP standards that each PET drug manufacturer is to follow during the production of a PET drug. 2 Under the requirements of section 121, within 2 years following that publication date, a new 1 This guidance has been prepared by the PET Drugs Working Group in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at FDA. 2 The regulations, CGMP guidance, and supportive information, including historical documents, are available at http://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/manufacturing/ucm085783.htm.

40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 drug application (NDA) or abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) must be submitted for any PET drug marketed for clinical use in the United States. Recognizing that many PET drug producers are unfamiliar with the drug approval process, FDA issued the guidance PET Drug Applications Content and Format for NDAs and ANDAs, 3 and held a public meeting in March 2011 to assist applicants in preparing NDAs and ANDAs for the three most commonly used PET drugs. In comments to the guidance and in questions raised at the public meeting, stakeholders requested that FDA provide guidance on media fills for validation of aseptic preparation for PET drugs. This guidance is being issued in response to these requests and is designed to help manufacturers of PET drugs comply with FDA regulations. III. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS A. What is a media fill? A media fill (sometimes known as a process simulation ) is the performance of an aseptic manufacturing procedure using a sterile microbiological growth medium in place of the drug solution. Microbiological growth medium is used in place of the drug solution during media fills to test whether the aseptic procedures are adequate to prevent contamination during actual drug production. A media fill is one part of the validation of an aseptic manufacturing process. B. What is the media fill designed to evaluate? The media fill should evaluate the aseptic assembly and operation of the critical (sterile) equipment, qualify the operator, and demonstrate that the environmental controls are adequate to meet the basic requirements necessary to produce a sterile drug by aseptic processing. The media fill does not validate the ability of the filter to sterilize growth media. C. What are the steps involved in a media fill? 1. Design A media fill should be carefully designed to ensure that the simulation is representative of all the aseptic manipulations performed during production. These include preparation and assembly of the product containers (and their transfer to the fill area) and all process steps downstream from the sterilizing filter up to product release, including packaging into finished product containers. Finished product containers with medium should then be incubated to permit the growth of microbial contamination in any containers. Microbiologically contaminated containers are expected to become visibly turbid due to growth of the organisms after suitable incubation. The same containers should be used for media fills as are used in production. Media fills should be conducted in the same locations where the production occurs and employ the broadest scope of possible 3 We update guidances periodically. To make sure you have the most recent version of a guidance, check the FDA Drugs guidance Web page at. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/default.htm. 2

83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 manipulations that could occur during production. Every aseptic manipulation during production up to the point of finished product release should be included in the media fill. Because of the need for PET products to be sampled directly prior to release, sample withdrawal and any adjustments should be simulated as well. The media fill experiment should include a positive control, which is a sealed container of medium that is inoculated with a minimum number ( 10 2 ) of microorganisms. Consult United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter 71 (<71>), Sterility Tests, for appropriate organism selection (one species is enough). To ensure the absence of false positive results, a negative control should be included to demonstrate that the medium was sterile to begin with. A negative control may be prepared by preincubating the medium, or by aseptically transferring medium into a separate suitable sterile container and incubating the control simultaneously with the media fill test containers. The controls should be incubated under the same conditions as the media fill containers. These controls may not need to be repeated when multiple media fills are being done within a week and use the same lot of growth medium. All critical steps intended for aseptic manufacturing should be reproduced in the media fill, including sampling and dilution of the final product. All personnel involved in the manufacture of the drug product should participate in the media fills. The simulation process should duplicate the actual production process, from the set-up of the vial assemblies to the transfer of the bulk drug from the sterilizing filter into the final containers that are ready for release. A connection to the container of sterile medium may be substituted in place of the filter. Alternatively, a filter may be included during media fills, but the filter should not be used to sterilize the growth medium. If the process is expected to include the addition of sterile diluent to adjust the strength following radionuclidic assay, sterile medium should be added in the same manner during the media fill. The temperature of the medium should be the same temperature as the drug solution would be during manufacture. If multiple vials are assembled, stored, and used over a period of days, the simulation should use vials that have been assembled in advance and stored as they would be during actual production. After the final product container is filled and ready for release, it should be incubated in a temperature-controlled incubator. Although USP Chapter <71> recommends incubation at 20 o 25 o C for the aerobic growth medium, as a practical matter any controlled temperature between 20 o and 35 o C would work for media fills. However, the controlled temperature should be specified in your procedures and be maintained within a range that does not exceed ±2.5 o C. The incubation period of a media fill should be no less than 14 days and the containers should be examined every 2 or 3 days. All steps in a media fill should be done in the same locations as the drug production steps. If the product container is filled within the hot cell, then the media fill should also be performed in the hot cell. 3

129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 The synthesis box is generally located upstream from the sterilizing filter and is not considered a sterile component or part of the aseptic operations. In such cases, do not include the synthesis unit in the simulations. 2. Preparation for the Test Once the media fill procedures are established, all of the components necessary for the simulation should be assembled, including all of the equipment used in the aseptic part of the process. Media to be used in the simulation may be obtained commercially or prepared on site, and should be sterile. When media are prepared on site, sterilization should be conducted using a validated steam autoclave process. Filtration is not recommended to sterilize the growth medium. D. How do I choose the growth medium? The most commonly used growth medium is soybean casein digest medium (SCDM), which is commercially available under various names such as Trypticase Soy Broth. A recipe for this medium is found in USP <71>. This medium is widely available and has the practical advantage of passing through a sterilizing-grade filter (0.2 or 0.22 micron rated) without clogging the membrane, in the event you choose to include a filter in the simulation. Recipes for SCDM in other pharmacopeia may have slight variations from the USP, but are acceptable. Other general growth media are available, but their use may not be as practical and may require justification. Medium from a qualified commercial vendor may be used by multiple PET facilities for media fills. Shipping, storage, preparation, and handling procedures should be carefully designed, documented, and followed to ensure media integrity and stability. Commercially prepared media should be used within the label s shelf life and stored according to the label s recommendations. E. How often should a media fill be performed? To initially qualify an aseptic process at a specific facility, three media fills should be conducted on three separate days at that facility using the specific production process that is being qualified. Additionally, media fills should be conducted whenever significant changes are made to the aseptic process (e.g., changes in personnel, components, or equipment) or whenever there is evidence of a sterility breach. To become a qualified operator, an operator should perform three media fills on three separate days. A qualified operator may be requalified annually by performing a single media fill. F. A media vendor is typically qualified by testing three batches of medium. How do I do that? Three commercially available batches/lots of medium from a single supplier should be subject to quality control tests. These tests should include visible inspection, ph, sterility, and growth 4

174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 promotion. Results of this testing should conform to the results reported in the certificate of analysis (CoA). You can refer to USP <71> for conduct of growth promotion tests. Many vendors will have samples of different batches available for purchase and testing. If three different batches are not available initially, then it may be necessary to test each of the first three incoming batches for conformance to the CoA. According to USP <71>, SCDM should be sterile (confirmed by incubating samples for 7 days at a defined controlled temperature), ph 7.3 (±0.2), and able to permit growth of selected aerobic species (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa). For media fills, use of only one species of bacteria is necessary once a media vendor is qualified. Media qualification programs should periodically verify the full CoA and growth promotion capability to ensure continuing vendor reliability. G. What is growth promotion testing? How is it used in PET Production? A growth promotion test ensures that the medium used in the media fill will support the growth of contaminating microorganisms. This is an essential control for media fills because the desired test result is no growth and only by demonstrating the medium s ability to support microbial growth can the negative result be relied upon. Growth promotion testing should be performed on the growth medium used in media fills. This may be performed by inoculating a portion of the batch with a small number ( 10 2 ) of microorganisms to confirm that the medium supports growth. When the medium is prepared in-house (at the site of the PET drug manufacture), a growth promotion test should be performed for each batch of medium prepared. Medium should be prepared using autoclave sterilization processing and not by sterilizing filtration. A ready to use liquid medium supplied from a commercial vendor should be confirmed as suitable by growth promotion and other testing to confirm that it meets specifications and conforms to its CoA. Once a supplier has been demonstrated to provide consistently suitable medium, the CoA and positive control will suffice to establish the medium s suitability for use in media fills (the positive control will be used in lieu of demonstrating growth promotion potential). H. What is the difference between a growth promotion test and a positive control? Growth promotion testing confirms the medium s ability to support growth. Growth promotion testing is commonly done before using the medium in an experiment. A positive control tests the ability of the test method to result in a positive outcome and is commonly done concurrently with an experiment. However, for media fills, the positive control test may also serve as the growth promotion test for the medium, as long as a qualified vendor is being used. I. When do I use a positive control? 5

219 220 221 222 223 224 225 A positive control is needed for each media fill that is performed using a single batch of medium. As stated previously, a positive control in the media fill may also serve as the growth promotion test of the medium (from qualified vendor) employed for the media fill. When performing a media fill, the positive control test may be done simultaneously with the media fill by inoculating a vial of medium from the same batch used for the media fill. It is also permissible to perform a positive control at the end (after incubation) of a media fill by inoculating an uncontaminated media fill test container and returning it for additional incubation. 6