FDA initiatives to facilitate evaluation of novel percutaneous valve technologies within the US

Similar documents
Issues in Clinical Trial Designs for Devices

Murray Sheldon, MD Associate Director for Technology and Innovation Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Office of the Center Director

U.S. FDA CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH UPDATE

Regulatory Perspective on the Value of Bayesian Methods

CRNs as Foundational Blocks of the National Evaluation System for Medical Devices: A Call to Action

Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices

Use of Postmarket Data to Support Premarket Approvals

US Regulatory and Marketing Barriers for Medical Devices

Evolving Regulatory Pathways for Medical Devices FDLI Annual Conference Access materials at fdli.org/annual2018

FDA s Center for Devices and Radiological Health: Strategic Priorities for 2017 and Beyond

Breakthrough Devices Program Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Clinical Trials and Investigational Device Exemptions

Using Real-World Evidence (RWE) for Regulatory Decision Making and Pracatice. Danica Marinac-Dabic, MD, PhD Director, Division of Epidemiology

Early Feasibility Study (EFS) IDEs

UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. Emergency Use of an Investigational Drug, Biologic or Device

Regulatory Issues and Strategies: U.S. FDA

Speed your time to market with FDA s expedited programs

Medical Device Regulatory Science: A View from 20 Years at FDA s Device Center

Introduction to the FDA. Historical Context. Changes over Time FDA - BE-200 9/23/2004. Copyright C. S. Tritt, Ph.D. 1

Statement of the. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. Presented by. Augusto D. Pichard, MD, FSCAI. Before the

NEW FDA GUIDELINES. How will they affect your next development?

Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests

Table of Contents Adverse Event Reporting SOPs for Medical Devices

Fast track Approval process- Ethical considerations

Benefit-Risk Considerations for Medical Devices: A Panel Discussion. Tuesday, March 28, :00 4:15 pm ET

INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTIONS AND EARLY FEASIBILITY STUDIES TO SUPPORT DEVICE INNOVATION

Scott Gottlieb, MD Commissioner of Food and Drugs Food and Drug Administration New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993

European Society of Cardiology Lessons learned from a decade of engagement

Compliance Central: CDRH 2017 Trends and 2018 Priorities

March 5, Discussion Guide

FDA as Innovator: Reimagining the Medical Device Oversight Paradigm

Rare Diseases and CDER: Challenges and Opportunities

Using Benefit Risk in Making Post Market Decisions. Adam E Saltman MD PhD Medical Officer, FDA CDRH Office of Compliance AFDO 2018

Accelerating Pre-Market Approval for Medical Devices

CDRH s Inspection Strategy for 2018: How it Will Impact Your Company

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulatory Pathways for Medical Devices

Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety Compliance Update GAP Analysis: How We Get to Where We Want to Be

Medidée Services SA. Nano-Tera.ch. 05 February 2015 part 8. PMA, 510k, IDE. Pierre-Alain Sommer

Current Trends at FDA: Implications for Data Requirements

Copyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.

US FDA Expedited Programs and Expanded Access

Structure and Mandate of FDA

Edwards Lifesciences. The global leader in patient-focused innovations for structural heart disease and critical care monitoring.

New Drug Application (NDA) Webinar December 6, 2016

Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff DRAFT GUIDANCE

Re: Docket No. FDA-2015-D-2818: Rare Diseases: Common Issues in Drug Development, Guidance For Industry; Draft Guidance

Early Feasibility Studies (EFS) in the U.S. with a Focus on Valvular Heart Disease: Updates, Impact and Future Directions. Chip Hance June 16 th 2017

Advance Topics in Pharmacoepidemiology. Risk Management. Conflict of Interest Declaration. Benefit Harm Profile?

Bayesian Submissions to FDA and the Evidentiary Standard for Effectiveness: the CDRH Experience

CBER Regulation of Devices for Cell Therapy

Rare Diseases Drug Development and Patient Perspective Initiatives at FDA

Docket #: FDA-2018-D-3268

Current Issues in Device Development and Approval An Academic Perspec7ve

Latham & Watkins Corporate Department

Regulatory update from Europe:

October 13, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

Clinical Trials and Medical Device Innovation in the US New Policies and Trends

AtriCure Inc. Jonathan McElwee Regulatory Affairs Manger 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

Re: Docket No. FDA 2015-D-1580:

DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: July 14, 2011

Prequalification of in vitro diagnostics - Technical Update 24 November 2015

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Impact of the Regulatory. Development and Innovation

Pediatric drug development - do we need a PIP so early in development? American versus European approach

Expanded Access. to Investigational Drugs & Biologics. for Treatment Use

January 3, AtriCure Inc. Melissa Smallwood Associate Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

THE FDA, THE DRUG APPROVAL PROCESS, AND THE PATIENT VOICE

Disclosures. Laboratory Stakeholders. IVD vs. LDT. FDA Regulation of Laboratory Developed Tests 10/2/2015. FDA Regulation of LDTs

Preparing For A New Era of Medical Product Development

EMA - Early Access. PEARRL Annual Meeting 2017-Regulatory Science Symposium. University College Cork, Ireland

Regulatory Perspectives on Gene Therapies for Rare Diseases Rare Diseases Forum Washington, D.C. October 17, 2018

CDRH Device Approval

Keynote: Progress on the NEST Coordinating Center

Clinical Study Design for Medical Devices

Developing a European First-in-Human Study: Three Key Decisions

RE: Docket No. FDA 2017 N 0041: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Safety Assurance Case

It costs too much to bring medical products through the pipeline to patients

The Leader in the Science of Heart Valves and Hemodynamic Monitoring

Complex Care Program Development: A New Framework for Design and Evaluation

Necessary Elements for Clinical Oral Mucositis Research of FDA-Regulated Products

Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency

MANUAL: Administrative Policy & Procedure Manual POLICY:

C D R H. Computational Modeling in Medical Devices. Prasanna Hariharan, PhD

Policy Issues in the Clinical Development and Use of Biomarkers for Molecularly Targeted Therapies: Device Issues

Medical Device Development Tools. Draft Guidance for Industry, Tool Developers, and Food and Drug Administration Staff

De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation) Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

October 25, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

Overview of the FDA Approval Process for TB Diagnostics

Impact of Patient Engagement on Project Valuation

Industry Perspective: The Challenges and Benefits in using Expedited Regulatory Pathways

The Emerging Role of Post-Market Evidence Generation in Decision-Making: Linkages to the Product Lifecycle Approach

Clinical Trials Augmented by Simulation and Bench Testing. Mock Submission Informational Meeting

The Center for Devices and Radiological Health s Medical Device Innovation Initiative

The Brave New World of Medical Devices

Implications of the FDASIA 2012 Investigational Device Exemption Provisions

May 13, Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

Methods for Expediting Innovative Novel Drugs to Market

The Balance of Safety, Efficacy, and Reasonable Assurance in DES An FDA View

Key Activities. Ofer Reizes, Ph.D. Skills Development Director

Developing Drugs for Rare Diseases: Patient Advocacy s Perspective. Kristina Bowyer Executive Director, Patient Advocacy

Transcription:

FDA initiatives to facilitate evaluation of novel percutaneous valve technologies within the US Nicole Ibrahim, PhD Chief, Structural Heart Devices Branch Division of Cardiovascular Devices ODE/CDRH/FDA

IDE PMA Filed PMA Approved Bench Bedside Early Feasibility Study Program

Early Feasibility Study Program Encourage medical device innovation to address clinical needs and improve patient care Provides the earliest and broadest patient access to beneficial medical devices Regaining and maintaining innovation in the US The core principle is the application of benefit/risk principles throughout regulatory decision-making Patient tolerance for risk & perspective on benefits Risk mitigation strategies when balancing risks and benefits

Early Feasibility Study Program Features: Small number of subjects Device intended for a specific indication that may be early in development, typically before the device design has been finalized Does not necessarily involve the first clinical use of a device Just in Time Testing Comprehensive testing during early phases of device development may add cost without return May be acceptable to defer some testing until the device design has been finalized Smaller number of samples, shorter durations

EFS in Heart Valve Arena Currently 10 approved EFS trials Transcatheter mitral valve therapies Tricuspid valve therapies 2-7 months from first contact with FDA to EFS IDE approval 9/10 approved within 30 days of IDE submission Lessons learned Early and frequent interaction with FDA Live demo with engineers Uncertainties are expected but focus is on mitigation

IDE PMA Filed PMA Approved Bench Bedside Early Feasibility Study Program Pre-/Post-market Balance

Pre/Post-Market Balance Shifting some premarket data needs to the postmarket setting Acceptance of a greater degree of uncertainty regarding the probable benefits or risks Balancing the possible benefits of earlier patient access to the device, especially when the alternatives are either absent or of limited use, versus the possible risks of patient harm from exposure to an unsafe or ineffective device

Pre/Post-Market Balance Expedited Access Program Intended for unmet medical need for life threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions Device must meet at least one of the following: No appropriate alternative treatment Represents a breakthrough technology Offers significant, clinically meaningful advantages In the best interest of patients Agreement on Data Development Plan Features: Interactive review Senior management involvement Case manager Priority review FDA recommends discussing with review branch prior to submitting for EAP designation

IDE PMA Filed PMA Approved Bench Bedside Early Feasibility Study Program Pre-/Post-market Balance Use of Registries

Use of Registries for Regulatory Decisions CDRH Strategic Priority: Increase the use of evidence from clinical experience to support regulatory decision making Already used for TAVR post-market studies Potential use for pre-market data collection Registry data as valid scientific evidence Reliable: Are the data adequate the answer the question at hand? Population Data checks Monitoring/auditing patient protection Robust: Is it supported by the medical community? Benchmarking and performance Set practice guidelines Generates peer reviewed publications Allows validated predictive risk modeling Sufficient for signal recognition and assessment Relevant: Is aggregate data sufficient to make a regulatory decision?

Developing Partnerships Key aspect of implementation of FDA s initiatives Clinical/Academic Partnerships ACC/STS: TVT Registry ACC: LAAO Registry VARC/MVARC efforts ISO standards Industry Partnerships Increased outreach to encourage early interactions with heart valve team Increased interactions during application review