S T R U C T U R. Technology. magazine. Software for the Structural Design of Masonry. The Design Basis. Copyright

Similar documents
NCMA TEK. TEK 14-5A Structural (2006) LOADBEARING CONCRETE MASONRY WALL DESIGN

VERIFICATION OF MASONRY DESIGN SOFTWARE NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY INSTITUTE PHASE III

ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS. TEK 17-1C Structural (2009) Related TEK: Uniform load. Triangular load. Concentrated loads

MASONRY WALL DATA: Wall Height = ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in.

Ce 479 Reinforced Masonry Fall 2005

REINFORCED ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION. John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers

ASD OF CONCRETE MASONRY LINTELS BASED ON THE 2012 IBC/2011 MSJC. TEK 17-1D Structural (2011) Related TEK: 14-7C, 14-13B, 17-1C, 17-2A

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR BEAM FRAME 1

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

Research Evaluation of Single Lift Grouting in Concrete Masonry Wall Panels

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

twenty three Masonry Construction 1 APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

ADAPT-PT 2010 Tutorial Idealization of Design Strip in ADAPT-PT

ADAPT-PTRC 2016 Getting Started Tutorial ADAPT-PT mode

NCMA TEK DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF DRY-STACK MASONRY WALLS TEK Provided by: Cinder & Concrete Block Corporation

Chapter. Masonry Design

Structural Performance of 8-inch NRG Concrete Masonry Units. Report Compiled for: Niagara Regional Group. Date: January 28, 2013

ADAPT Floor Pro 2009/2010 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT PT or ADAPT RC

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

Shear Wall Sample Problem

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania

LEARNING OF ETABS. 15 ft

Technical Notes on Brick Construction Brick Industry Association Commerce Park Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR ONE-WAY SLAB 1

Bautex Wall System. Design & Engineering Guide

Masonry Structures James Robert Harris, PE, PhD, and Fredrick R. Rutz, PE, PhD

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Reinforced Concrete Tilt-Up Wall Panel Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

HILLCREST MANOR Palo Verde, California

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

Masonry Veneer - Chapter 6. Masonry Veneer Anchored Veneer

Reinforced Concrete Tilt-Up Wall Panel with Opening Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

Reinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design. Design Footing

Precast Concrete Bearing Wall Panel Design (Alternative Analysis Method) (Using ACI )

CONCRETE MASONRY VENEERS TEK 3-6C

CE 160 SAP 2000 Notes for 2D Problems. Element and Joint Drawing Tools Global Coordinates of Cursor Position Units in View Window

mortarless masonry Design Manual Part 1 (IS 456:2000) Section 1 Page 1 IS 456:2000 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE - CODE OF PRACTICE

ARCH 631 Note Set 23.1 S2017abn. Masonry Design

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report

Originally Issued: 05/01/2015 Revised: 09/01/2017 Valid Through: 05/31/2018

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

Hyatt Place North Shore. Pittsburgh, PA T. Technical Assignment #1. Kyle Tennant. Kyle Tenn. Structural (IP) [Type the document subtitle]

RMMI Take Out Talk January

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)

Masonry and Cold-Formed Steel Requirements

Multi-Story Solid Tilt-Up Wall Panel Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

AIA Disclaimer Notice

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

Design Example 2 Reinforced Concrete Wall with Coupling Beams

Earth and Engineering Sciences Building University Park, Pennsylvania

Contents. 1.1 Introduction 1

User Guide. for Eurocode Modules. Design+ Interface General Column Design Combined Wall Design Strip Foundation Design Design Parameters

TEK 14-17: CONCRETE MASONRY CANTILEVER HIGHWAY NOISE BARRIER WALLS (1986)

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

CBC SECTION/TABLE NUMBER NEW -CHANGE COMMENTARY. X Flexible and Rigid definitions removed and found in ASCE 7-10

Technical Notes 39A - Testing for Engineered Brick Masonry - Determination of Allowable Design Stresses [July/Aug. 1981] (Reissued December 1987)

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

ISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings

NCMA TEK. TEK 14-11B Structural (2003) STRENGTH DESIGN OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS FOR AXIAL LOAD & FLEXURE

Concrete Block Machines Typical Fixed Block Machine

DESIGN OF WALLS FOR SHEAR

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Calculations

ADAPT PT7 TUTORIAL FOR A NON-PRISMATIC SLAB 1

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Design of Semi gravity Retaining Walls

Technical Report 1. Hakuna Resort Swift Water, Pennsylvania. Image Courtesy of LMN Development LLC

Masonry movement joints

48.5% Throughput. 6 Connector 51.5% Plastic. 45.7% Throughput. 4 Connector 54.3% Plastic. 51.0% Throughput. 2 Connector 49.

Introduction to Structural Analysis TYPES OF STRUCTURES LOADS AND

Structural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ

Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 15.2 LOADS AND REACTIONS 15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations

STRENGTHENING OF MASONRY WITH NEAR SURFACE MOUNTED FRP BARS. Abstract

6.0 TUTORIAL. Cascade Consulting Associates, Inc. PO Box 1617 Corvallis, Oregon 97339

Structural Study of the Existing Lateral System

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1

ADAPT-Floor Pro 2009 Tutorial Export Design Strip to ADAPT-PT or ADAPT-RC

MASONRY INSIGHTS. Finite Element Modeling, Analysis, and Design for Masonry. Introduction

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS OF SHEAR WALLS IN MULTI-STOREY MASONRY STRUCTURES UNDER HORIZONTAL LOADINGS

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

PERFORMANCE OF LAP SPLICES IN CONCRETE MASONRY SHEAR WALLS UNDER IN-PLANE LOADING

Cantilever or Restrained Retaining Wall Design Calculations

MDOT Camelback Bridge Example

DESIGN INFORMATION WAFFLE-CRETE. FOR MORE INFORMATION, WRITE OR CALL International, Inc.

IF SECOND-ORDER EFFECTS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS EXAM, ASSUME A B1 MOMENT-MAGNIFIER OF 1.05.

mortarless Design Manual Part 3 (AS 3600:2009) Section 2 Page: DESIGN OF WALLS FOR AXIAL COMPRESSION USING SIMPLIFIED DESIGN METHOD

Structural Engineering Library

INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER

CTP STITCH-TIE AGAIN! Quick and easy way to re-anchor existing veneers to back-up structures.

ANCHOR BOLTS IN CLAY MASONRY WALLS

Boyds Bear Country Pigeon Forge, TN

Dead Loads (psf): Concrete Floor Slab on Metal Deck 45 psf Mechanical and Ceiling 7 psf Miscellaneous 5 psf Exterior Wall 80 psf

Originally Issued: 03/31/2017 Revised: 03/15/2018 Valid Through: 03/31/2018

Transcription:

Software for the Structural Design of Masonry By Russell H. Brown, James K. Nelson, Jr. and Dennis Graber Using software can free the design engineer from the drudgery of routine calculations and enable him to explore many more options, quickly and accurately. The capabilities of the fourth release of the structural masonry design software include design of masonry and precast concrete lintels, walls loaded out-of-plane, walls loaded in-plane (shear-walls) and columns. Wall and column elements can be designed by allowable stress design or strength design using the Masonry Standards Joint Committee Codes (1995, 1999, 2002 or 2005) and the IBC Codes (2000 and 2003). One major addition since Version 3 of the software is the addition of hollow clay unit masonry construction. The engineer may specify the critical design forces, or may choose to have them calculated from specified design loads and dimensions. In the latter case, load combinations are calculated at very small intervals along the wall, and the critical design forces are determined and reported. Finally, printable documentation is provided for inclusion in design calculations that may be submitted to building officials or to archive designs. Structural design of masonry can be tedious and complex, with so many choices available. Use of software allows the design professional to quickly determine designs that work, and therefore to try more options until an optimum solution is reached. Version 4.0 of the software for structural design of masonry is a significant improvement to the previous releases of the software. The new features include: Hollow Clay Unit Masonry (previously only concrete masonry was included), 2003 International Building Code has been added, 2005 MSJC Masonry Code has been added, Column Design including the following: o Interaction diagrams that are plotted with superimposed calculated axial load and bending moment, o Member forces can be calculated from specified load data, o Maximum and minimum reinforcing steel areas are calculated and compared to specified values, o P max values are displayed (from slenderness and ρ max provisions), o Shear design is performed. Ties are used as stirrups when needed, and required spacing is displayed. Lintel Deflection, Specified cover below the reinforcing steel, Lintel bar size choices have been expanded, Lintel Stirrups, Out of Plane wall deflection under service loads, Development lengths and splice lengths for bars selected are displayed Wall thicknesses of 14 inches and 16 inches for concrete masonry walls. and The ability to customize face shell and web thicknesses of the masonry units The software is limited to hollow unit masonry, single wythe construction, but the masonry can be fully grouted or partially grouted (including ungrouted), and reinforcement may be included within grouted cells. The location of the reinforcing steel is specified by the design engineer and may be off center when an increase in effective depth is desired, as with retaining wall construction. Other modifications include a new Design Basis icon that combines all code selection and material properties into one location. The Design Basis Figure 1 shows the design codes tab in the design basis window. The building code, design criteria (strength design or allowable stress design), type of masonry (concrete or clay), concrete building code (for precast concrete lintels) and design criteria are selected on this tab. Figure 1: Design Basis - Building Code Figure 2: Clay Masonry Unit Properties Figure 2 illustrates the options available for selecting hollow clay unit properties. The mortar used with clay masonry is also selected on this tab. The unit length and height are specified by the engineer, because the spacing of reinforcing steel depends on unit length and the height of masonry courses in lintels depends upon the unit height. Density of the material used in making the units is needed to calculate the weight of the masonry. Specified masonry compressive strength, f m, is entered by using either the unit strength method or the prism test method. In the unit strength method, it is not necessary to test prisms to determine compliance with f m, so it is most often used. In Figure 2, a unit strength of 8250 with Type S mortar results in f m of 3000 psi based on historical data. The unit size is specified on the Unit Size tab shown in Figure 3 (on next page). The default values correspond to the minimum face shell and web thicknesses required by the applicable ASTM Standard. Sometimes units with thicker face shells and webs are desired, such as for fire ratings or sound attenuation. The engineer can now take advantage of the additional material by increasing the default values. continued on next page Technology discussions and information on the impact of technology on structural engineering STRUCTURE 45 May 2006

Figure 3: Design Basis Unit Size After specifying the design basis, the design engineer is ready to select the type of component to be designed lintel, wall with outof-plane loads, wall with in-plane loads (shear wall) or column. Using the design drop-down menu just over the left tool bar or by using the appropriate icon on the tool bar, the type of component is chosen. Wall Design Walls can be either reinforced or unreinforced. Strength design of walls loaded out of plane includes the P- effect, including walls with boundary conditions other than simply supported. Graphical information makes it easy to quickly converge on an economical design. The software takes full advantage of code provisions that optimize the design by using the beneficial effects of axial load on the moment capacity. Partially grouted construction is included as an option in the software to minimize the amount of grout required in reinforced masonry construction. Shear walls can be designed with special end-zone reinforcement that greatly increases the bending capacity of the wall, with minimal increase in reinforcing steel area. Earth retaining structures can be designed with reinforcement placed off-center to optimize the capacity of retaining walls and basement walls. If Wall Design for Out-of-Plane Load is selected, Figure 4 will appear. The three tabs at the top of the window are Design Data, Construction Data and Load Data. Design Data includes the forces at the design section. The engineer can calculate these forces at the section assumed to control the design and specify them. Or, if the Compute using load data box is checked, the software will calculate the design forces based on information the engineer specifies on this and other tabs in the Design window. In this mode, the software divides the wall into 100 increments along its height and designs for all required load combinations at each increment. This ensures that the critical design section and load combination is used in the final design. The engineer can select reinforced or unreinforced masonry and boundary conditions with the dropdown menu. Use of the a stress increase option button is limited to allowable stress design when Compute Using Load Data is not selected. Display options include Design Calculations, Interaction Diagram or Calculated Loads. When compute using loads is selected, the software automatically uses the a stress increase for load combinations for which it is permitted (MSJC ASD only). Figure 5: Construction Data Tab for Walls Loaded Out-of-Plane Figure 4: Design Calculations Output for Out-of-Plane Walls Figure 6: Load Data Tab for Out-of-Plane Wall Design The Construction Data Tab (Figure 5) allows the engineer to specify the wall thickness, wall height, location of the reinforcement (centered or off-center), grouting (full or partial), bond pattern (running or stack), and horizontal spacing of reinforcing. Default values are recommended until an initial trial design is performed. Then these values can be changed quickly to arrive at an optimum design. Partial grout construction requires that only the cells receiving reinforcing be grouted. In the example shown in Figure 5, with a grout space of 48 inches, every 6 th cell is grouted and the five cells in between are not. This can save significantly on grouting costs. Mortaring of the cross-webs is required adjacent to the grouted cells, however, and is included in the STRUCTURE 46 May 2006

Figure 7: Interaction Diagram, Family of Curves section properties for analysis. The internal calculations for partially grouted construction are rigorous for these calculations. Performing such calculations by hand would be tedious and time-consuming, but the software does them almost instantaneously. The value of x enables the engineer to locate the reinforcing steel within the wall. The default is in the center of the wall which is most common, since most lateral loads such as wind and earthquake are reversible. However, in cases of lateral loads from soil, Page: Prjct: Masonry Software Sample Output Topic: Design of Out of Plan Wall placing the steel off center can result in Design of a Reinforced Masonry Wall with Out-of-Plane Loads significant savings. Using the 2005 MSJC ASD Design Code If unreinforced masonry is selected Material and Construction Data from the Design Data tab, then another 8in. CMU, Partial grout, running bond Wall Weight-41.03 psf option in the Construction dropdown Type S Masonry cement/air-entrained PCL Mortar, Coarse Grout menu is ungrouted. CMU Density-115pcf 1 m-1500 psi (Specified) When a bar spacing is selected that Em-900lm-1350000 psi exceeds six times the wall thickness or 72 Wall Design Details inches, the software uses only that width in Thickness - 7.625 in. conjunction with a single bar to calculate Height - 216in. (Simply Supported Wall Effective height - H) x - 3.813 in. the wall resistance. A message will appear #6 Bars, Fy-60000.0 to notify the engineer in this case. Reinforcement Spacing - 48 in. On-Center The Load Data tab (Figure 6) permits Wall Design Section Properties the engineer to specify various loads Ao - 1626 in. Io - 1328 in. (dead, live, wind, etc.). As shown in the So - 348.4 in. inset drawing in Figure 6, loads can be axial (with or without eccentricity), lateral Ro - 2.858 in. Wall Support: Simply Supported Wall distributed loads (such as wind or earthquake), Specified Load Components that can vary with height (as with Load P e W1 W2 L h1 h2 earth retaining walls) and concentrated (lb) (in) (psf) (psf) (lb/ft) (in) (in) lateral loads. Loads can be positive or Dead 1000 2 0 0 0 0 216 negative, especially wind and earthquake. Live 800 2 0 0 0 0 216 The direction of the load shown in the inset in Figure 6 is positive in the direction Soil 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 Fluid 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 shown. Depending on the code selected and whether allowable stress design or Wind 0 0 25 25 0 0 216 strength design was selected, the software Seismic 0 0 20 20 0 0 216 uses the appropriate set of load factors and Roof 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 load combinations to conduct the design. Rain 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 If the interaction diagram was selected Snow 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 on the Design Data tab, it will be displayed. When Family is selected, the Figure 8: Design Calculations Output for Out-of-Plane Walls Figure 7A: Click None under Family to obtain a Single Interaction Diagram and Select Desired Reinforcement Spacing interaction diagram (Figure 7) allows the designer to quickly select the optimum bar spacing for the wall thickness selected. For example, in Figure 7, the different contours represent the interaction diagram for an 8 inch partially grouted wall with #6 bars. Each contour corresponds to a different bar spacing. The dots are the calculated or specified forces at the critical sections. By selecting the contour that encompasses all of the loading dots, an acceptable design for combined flexure and axial load results. The closer the dots are to the contour, the more optimum the design. Under Family, if none is selected, only the single bar spacing selected is shown in the interaction diagram (Figure 7A). Name: Russ Brown Date: 2006 Chkd: Jim Nelson Controlling Load Cases Section Forces with Controlling Flexure and Axial Load-D + W x/h - 0.550 from bottom of wall V - 13.24 lb/ft - 12028.5lb-in./ft P - 1332 lb/ft at e n - 0.8256 in M T - + Pe n - 13128.5 lb-in/ft Moment Capacity - 16323.9 lb - in/ft (1350.33 lb-in/ft) at this axial load Shear Capacity - 1049.59 lb/ft The wall is adequate for these critical section forces. Section Forces with Controlling Shearing Force - D + L + L r + S + R + W x/h - 0.000 from bottom of wall V - 241.7 lb/ft - 0 lb-in./ft P - 2539 lb/ft at en - 0 in M T - + Pe n - 0 lb- in/ft Moment Capacity - 18151.6 lb -in rt at this axial load Shear Capacity - 1049.59 lb/ft The wall is adequate for these critical section forces. These were found to be load cases that controlled the design. The flexural, shear and axial forces shown are those occuring at the critical section for the case controlled by flexure and at the critical section for the case controlled by shear. The following design calculations are for the section with controlling bending moment Section Design Forces Used V - -13.24 lb/ft (Computed from Loads) - 12028.5 lb-in./ft (Computed from Loads) P - 1332 lb/ft at e - 0.8256 in (Computed from Loads) Computed Design Values Note: a stress increase was used Effective Width - 48in. Web Width - 8.313 in. on effective width Allowable Shearing Force - 1050 lb/ft The wall is adequate in shear STRUCTURE 47 May 2006

Figure 9: Reinforcement Tab for Shear Wall Design Clearly, all of the loading dots fall within the contour for the 48-inch spacing selected. If no satisfactory contour is displayed, the engineer can either select different bar sizes or different wall thicknesses. When a satisfactory wall design is determined from the interaction diagram, the Design Calculation display can be selected. The information on the design calculation page is intended to provide the engineer with more detailed information, including shear design and reinforcing bar development and splice lengths. Specified design data is presented in a format intended to be suitable for submitting to building officials. Files can be easily saved electronically as well. A sample design calculation page is shown in Figure 8 (on previous page). If Wall Design for In-Plane Load and the reinforcement tab are selected, Figure 9 will appear. An end zone can be included in a shear wall to increase its moment carrying capacity with little increase in reinforcing steel. Reinforcing steel placed in such an end zone is subjected to higher stress than interior bars, and these steel forces have a larger lever arm than those for interior bars. End zone steel significantly increases moment capacity, with little impact on the maximum area of reinforcement limitations in strength design and in the allowable stress design provisions of 2003 IBC. All of the cells in the end zone are reinforced, and grouted whereas cells in the middle zone can be partially grouted and reinforced with different sized bars. Loading for shear walls is specified in the window displayed when the Load Data tab is selected (Figure 10). The engineer specifies the shearing force, the bending moment and the axial load at the top of the shear wall and the software internally calculates the forces at other locations. Walls with openings are not included in the design. However, a pier between two openings can be designed as a shear wall if the forces are determined using some other method, such as a finite element program. After all information is entered, the interaction diagram can be displayed to determine if the wall has adequate capacity. Figure 11 illustrates such a diagram. Since all of the loading dots fall inside the interaction diagram, the wall is satisfactory for flexure and axial loads. The horizontal line at an axial force of 120 kips is the maximum axial load associated with the maximum steel area provisions of the code. None of the dots (loads) are permitted to be above this line. Once a design is found that satisfies the interaction diagram, select design calculations on the design data tab, and Figure 12 is displayed. Only a portion of the design calculation output is shown in this figure. The critical loading combination and location for flexure and axial load are shown along with the applied loads and capacities. The same information is also shown for the critical shear case. When shear reinforcing is needed, suggested horizontal bar sizes and spacings are also displayed. Figure 10: Load Data Tab for Shear Wall Design Figure 11: Interaction Diagram for Shear Wall Lintel Design Lintels also can be designed according to the MSJC codes (1995, 1999, 2002 or 2005), the IBC Code (2000, 2003) or, in the case of reinforced concrete lintels, ACI 318 (1999 or 2002) Code. As with walls, the critical shearing force and bending moment can be entered directly or the software can compute them from specified load data and dimensions. Stirrups can be used in the new version of the software to resist shear forces if the masonry or concrete alone is not sufficient. Lintel deflections are also calculated for service dead and live loads. Column Design The new column provisions are similar to those for shear wall design. The engineer can specify up to eight layers of reinforcing steel in a concrete masonry or clay masonry column. Allowable stress design and strength design procedures are supported, and code provisions such as maximum axial load or maximum steel area are calculated. Interaction diagrams can be displayed and compared to calculated STRUCTURE 48 May 2006

axial loads and bending moments. The shearing force capacity is also calculated and compared to calculated design shearing forces. If needed, shear reinforcement (in the form of column ties) can be used to resist shear forces. Summary Software to structurally design masonry has been updated to include hollow clay unit masonry, masonry column design and the newest building codes (IBC 2003 and MSJC 2005). New features also include the addition of stirrups as a design option for lintels, calculation of lintel deflections, user control over reinforcement location in lintels, the calculation of development and splice lengths for reinforcing bars, and service load level P- deflections for walls loaded out of plane. Anticipated release date is April 15, 2006 (www.ncma.org). Dr. Nelson is the Brazzel Professor of Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler, and Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. He teaches courses in the area of structural analysis and design and has been involved in the development of engineering design software for many years. Structural Masonry Design System Version 4.0 Formerly NCMA Masonry Design Software Version 3 New! Dennis W. Graber, P.E. is Director of Technical Publications for the, National Concrete Masonry Association. Mr. Graber is a Fellow of the American Concrete Institute and is also active in The Masonry Society and American Society of Civil Engineers. He can be reached at dgraber@ncma.org. Dr. Brown is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Clemson University and chaired the Flexure and Axial Loads Subcommittee of the Masonry Standards Joint Committee during the 2005 Code Cycle. He is a Founding Member and Fellow of The Masonry Society and Fellow of American Society for Testing and Materials. For Advertiser Information, visit www.structuremag.org Allowable Stress Design & Strength Design Design Codes: MSJC or IBC Compare Designs with the Click of a Mouse! Combined Axial and Lateral Loading In-Plane Loading (Shear Walls) or Out-Of-Plane Reinforced and Unreinforced Designs Lintel Design - Masonry or Precast Custom Face Shell Thicknesses Software Only - Order # CMS10 - Professional Price: $259 Upgrade from CMS10 Ver.3.0 and later - $129.50 (Registration ID Required) All plus shipping and handling Make short work of your masonry designs. Design from input applied axial and lateral loads or input axial loads, moments, and shear values. Quickly optimize design among the different design options with the mere click of the mouse. Controlling load case for bending moment: 0.9D + 1.2F + 1.6H + 1.6W Controlling x/h ratio for bending moment: 0 = 2464 kip-in (205.33 kip-ft) = 31.8557 kips M = 1540 kip-in (128.333 kip-ft) P = 21.2371 kips Controlling bending moment capacity: 5.468.87 kip-in (455.74 kip-ft) Controlling load case for shearing force: 0.9D + 1.2F +1.6H + 1.6W Controlling x/h ratio for shearing force: 0.23 = 1934.08 kip-in (161.173 kip-ft) = 30.7389 kips M = 1208.8 kip-in (100.733 kip-ft) P = 20.4926 kips The following design calculations are for the section with controlling bending moment Section Design Forces Used = 31.86 kips = 2464 kip-in P = 21.24 kips M = 1540 kip-in Wall Flexural Design Data P b = 332.2 kips (C b = 63.47 in) Maximum P n = 625.5 kips (Section 2108.9.5.4) Maximum Available = 0.65(625.5) = 406.6 kips (Section 2108.9.5.4) Figure 12: Design Calculation Output for Shear Wall New Features for 4.0: Hollow Clay Masonry Design Includes 2005 MSJC and 2003 IBC Column Design Lintel Stirrups and Deflections 14 and 16 in. Concrete Masonry Order Yours Today! To order, order on-line from our web site at www.ncma.org or contact NCMA s publication department at 703.713.1900. STRUCTURE 49 May 2006