Imperial County Transmission Consultation Current Resource Deliverability Capabilities from Imperial Valley

Similar documents
the most promising locations for new renewables in the Imperial CREZ.

Forward to the Revised Draft Transmission Plan

Stakeholder Comments 2020 and 2024 Draft Local Capacity Technical Study Meeting Draft Results March 14, 2019

2018 & 22 Draft LCR Study Results LA Basin Area

CALIFORNIA ISO TRANSMISSION PLAN

Addendum for Clusters 10 and 11

CAISO Generator Deliverability Assessment Methodology. On-Peak Deliverability Assessment Methodology (for Resource Adequacy Purposes)

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jan Strack and Huang Lin March 14, 2017

March 17, 2017 BOARD APPROVED

2020 & 2024 Draft LCR Study Results for LA Basin and San Diego-Imperial Valley Areas

COMMENTS OF THE STAFF OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

ISO Transmission Plan February 1, 2016

TRANSMISSION PLAN. March 14, 2018 REVISED DRAFT

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 1

TRANSMISSION PLAN. March 19, 2019 Version: Revised Draft

Conceptual Statewide Transmission Plan Update. California ISO Regional Transmission Planning Process.

Conceptual Statewide Transmission Plan Update. CAISO Regional Transmission Planning Process. October 31, 2014

Pursuant to the California Independent System Operator s ( CAISO s ) February 7, 2013

October 6, Submitted to: CAISO

Recommendations on the TPP policy and economic assessment by TPP topic

Stakeholder Comments. 2012/2013 Transmission Planning Process. Presentations from December 11 and 12 meetings

ISO Transmission Planning Process. Supplemental Sensitivity Analysis: Benefits Analysis of Large Energy Storage

Transmission Planning Process Unified Planning Assumptions and Study Plan. March 31, Final

California leads the nation in the transition to a reliable,

2018 & 2022 Draft LCR Study Results San Diego-Imperial Valley

Agenda. Imperial County Transmission Consultation Stakeholder Meeting

TESTIMONY OF ROBERT SPARKS ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION

Sierra Club Comments on the ISO Transmission Plan

Re: Base Case and Alternative Renewable Resource Portfolios for the CAISO Transmission Planning Process

A. RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROPOSED RELIABILITY PROJECTS

Bulk Energy Storage Resource Case Study Update with the 2016 LTPP Assumptions

Appendix 1 PRELIMINARY DELIVERABILITY BASELINE ANALYSIS STUDY REPORT

TESTIMONY OF MARK ROTHLEDER ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION

Stakeholder Comments Transmission Planning Process Stakeholder Meeting Reliability Assessment September 20 & 21, 2018

Transmission Planning Process. Study Scope for

March 3, Submitted to: CAISO

2015 and 2019 Final LCR Study Results San Diego-Imperial Valley

Transmission Planning Process Unified Planning Assumptions and Study Plan March 31, 2017 FINAL

Revised Transmission Planning Process. Complete Final Proposal

1. Is there a preference between MW and MWh? RPS need for San Diego Gas & Electric is based upon a percentage of retail sales, which is in MWh.

Transmission Planning Process. Study Scope for

FILED :59 PM

Storage as a Transmission Asset:

Agenda Unified Planning Assumptions & Study Plan

Annual Interregional Information Transmission Planning Process. Annual Interregional Coordination Meeting Folsom, CA February 22, 2018

CAISO Generator Deliverability Assessment Methodology. On-Peak Deliverability Assessment Methodology (for Resource Adequacy Purposes)

California Independent System Operator Renewable Integration Study

A Bulk Energy Storage Resource Case Study with 40% RPS in 2024

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Storage as a Transmission Asset Stakeholder Comment Template

Annual Interregional Information

CHAPTER 6 - Load Forecast & Resource Plan

BPA Comments on Appendix H. Pacific Northwest California Transfer Increase Informational Special Study

Roadmaps for Demand Response & Storage

Stakeholder Comments. San Diego County Water Authority and City of San Diego Comments on Storage as a Transmission Asset Issue Paper

Increased Capabilities for Transfers of Low Carbon Electricity between the Pacific Northwest and California Informational Study

Stakeholder Comments Draft Transmission Plan Stakeholder Meeting February 17, 2015

Regional Resource Adequacy Stakeholder Meeting on Straw Proposal

Transmission Planning Process Unified Planning Assumptions and Study Plan. February 22, Draft

Business Practice Manual for The Transmission Planning Process

ISO Transmission Plan February 1, 2016

All-Source Solicitation In Utility Procurement

From: Keith Casey, Vice President, Market and Infrastructure Development

Rice Solar Energy Project

Update on the 2015 Special Study

Flexible Resource Adequacy Criteria and Must-Offer Obligation

2019 Three-Year Policy Initiatives Roadmap and Annual Plan

2011 Final LCR Study Results San Diego Local Area

Re: Base Case and Alternative Renewable Resource Portfolios for the CAISO Transmission Planning Process

Renewable Energy in California Building Livable Communities: Creating Resilient and Sustainable Economies

Stakeholder Comments Reliability Results and PTO Proposed Solutions Stakeholder Meeting September 21-22, 2015

Peninsula Clean Energy could launch a CCE by Fall January October 2015 October 2015 February 2016 March 2016 October 2016

Draft Plenary Report Presentation

SCE s Preferred Resources Pilot (PRP) Annual Progress Update

1 Market Structure and Design Changes

Imperial Irrigation District Energy Consumers Advisory Committee Agenda Report

Interregional Transmission Project Evaluation and 50% RPS Out-of-state Portfolio Assessment Study Plan

Resource Adequacy Deliverability for Distributed Generation DG Deliverability Assessment Results

Regional Expansion SB 350 Implementation Timeline Special Study Portfolios

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Southern California Edison

Pacific Northwest Low Carbon Scenario Analysis

Pacific Northwest Low Carbon Scenario Analysis

SPP at a Glance. Located in Little Rock. Approximately 600 employees

Moorpark-Pardee 230 kv No. 4 Circuit Project

Stakeholder Comments Template. RA Enhancements

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OPENING BRIEF OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION

Stakeholder Comments on Transmission Planning Process Stakeholder Meeting 11 February 2013

DRA Comments To The CAISO On Its Proposed Generator Interconnection And Deliverability Study Methodology. Stakeholder Comments Template

The Role of RETI and the Constraints Imposed by CREZs in Meeting California s Renewable. Portfolio Standard By Tynan McAuley

Stakeholder Comments Template

Response to Comment AA-1

PGE s 2013 Integrated Resource Plan

AEP Transmission Local Planning Assumptions, Models, and Criteria

Southern California Edison Preferred Resources Pilot Portfolio Design Report Revision 2

California Independent System Operator Corporation Comments on Draft Resolution E-4909

Stakeholder Comments Reliability Results and PTO Proposed Solutions Stakeholder Meeting September 21-22, 2016

Storage as a Transmission Asset:

Transcription:

Imperial County Transmission Consultation Current Resource Deliverability Capabilities from Imperial Valley Technical Addendum to the July 2, 2014 Imperial County Transmission Consultation Draft Discussion Paper July 30, 2014

Background The California ISO is conducting a stakeholder consultation on options to address renewable generation deliverability out of Imperial County to the San Diego and LA Basin areas in support of the California ISO s transmission planning process. This consultation effort will provide opportunities for stakeholder input on a range of issues that will inform the California ISO s 2014-2015 transmission planning process, which is currently underway. This effort was initiated in July by the release of a draft discussion paper 1 on July 2 followed by a stakeholder meeting on July 14. During the July 14 stakeholder meeting, it became evident that there was a need for greater clarity regarding the current deliverability capability for the Imperial county area. This brief paper provides additional details and clarifications regarding the current state of resource deliverability in the Imperial county area (a.k.a. the Imperial zone). Summary 1. As part of the resource adequacy program, the ISO was required to determine how much import capacity (deliveries from outside the ISO balancing authority area) could be relied upon to meet the needs of ISO consumers during peak load conditions. To accomplish this goal, the ISO established the Maximum Import Capability (MIC) process to assess the import capacity based on historical high flows of energy being delivered into the ISO. Since the IID system is its own balancing authority area, the ISO has established MIC values for each import path from IID. 2. IID currently has 462 MW of deliverability (MIC) to the ISO on Path 42. 3. The ISO previously targeted increasing the MIC from IID to a total of 1,400 MW (462 MW existing + 938 MW additional). This objective was established in the CPUC renewable generation portfolios that set amounts for the Imperial zone at 1,700 MW. Importantly, the 1,700 MW RPS target for the Imperial zone is incremental to the existing 462 MW IID MIC and did not distinguish between whether the resources would be connecting to the ISO grid directly or to the IID system. Previous transmission plans indicated this target was achievable with the approved transmission development that was already underway. Specifically, prior transmission plans indicated there was sufficient transmission approved to support a potential incremental 938 MW of IID MIC needed to reach the 1,400 MW IID MIC target as well as support a potential additional 762 MW of Imperial zone generation connecting directly to the ISO system for a total of 1,700 MW. 1 http://www.caiso.com/planning/pages/transmissionplanning/2014-2015transmissionplanningprocess.aspx California ISO/MID 1

2012-2013 Imperial Zone New Generation IID MIC Portfolio Amount Existing IID MIC 462 MW Additional targeted future IID MIC 938 NW 938 MW Additional ISO-connected renewables 762 MW Total 1400 MW 1700 MW 4. With the early retirement of SONGS, the ISO s forecast for additional deliverability from the Imperial zone above the existing 462 MW IID MIC was reduced from 1700 MW to zero MW. In light of this, the ISO assessed the impact approved upgrades in the 2013-2014 ISO transmission plan had in supporting future generation deliverability for the Imperial zone. 5. The transmission additions approved in the 2013-2014 transmission planning cycle restored the future additional amount of deliverability for the overall Imperial zone to up to 1,000 MW. 2 Based on a recent review of CPUC approved power purchase agreements conducted since the July 14 stakeholder meeting, the ISO has determined that all of the 1,000 MW is expected to be used by generation that is already moving forward and connecting directly to the ISO grid. (Estimates at the time of the July 14 meeting indicated that some small amount of capacity could still be available for increasing the MIC from IID a review of confidential CPUC approved contract information recently obtained has since revealed that generation connecting directly to the ISO grid is expected to fully utilize the transmission capacity, however.) 6. The ISO is further re-examining the deliverability limits from the Imperial zone in the 2014-2015 planning cycle as well as exploring options to increase deliverability from this area. Specifically, the ISO will be assessing options for meeting two renewable development scenarios provided by the CPUC for the 2014-2015 planning cycle. A base case scenario that includes 1,000 MW of additional renewable generation in the Imperial zone 3, which as noted in #5 above was found to be supported in the 2013-2014 transmission plan but is nonetheless being reassessed in the 2014-2015 planning cycle 2 The recently approved major transmission projects that are needed to improve the deliverability generation out of the Imperial Zone are the Imperial Substation Phase Shifter (expected in-service 2017), and the Delaney- Colorado River 500 kv line (expected in-service 2020). Approved in earlier transmission planning cycles, the Sycamore-Penasquitos 230 kv line (expected in-service 2017) and the Bay Blvd Substation (expected in-service 2017) are also needed to ensure the delivery of renewable generation from the Imperial zone. 3 The Imperial zone includes both IID and ISO connected new generation in Imperial County. California ISO/MID 2

along with the rest of the updated RPS portfolio amounts provided by the CPUC, and a second sensitivity scenario that includes an increase of 2,500 MW in that zone. 4 7. Another option for increasing MIC without transmission upgrades is the re-purposing of import capability from Arizona. While not expected to be a 1-for-1 trade-off, this option considers reducing MIC from Arizona import paths to increase the MIC from IID. Other options being examined in the 2014-2015 planning cycle include relatively low cost transmission operation changes that could potentially provide several hundred MW of additional deliverability from the Imperial zone. In summary The ISO 2013-14 TPP currently supports: o The existing IID MIC of 462 MW o An additional 1,000 MW of deliverability from the Imperial zone all of which is being utilized by projects connecting directly to the ISO grid. The ISO 2014-15 TPP is exploring achieving additional deliverability from the Imperial zone through: o Updating the base case study assumptions (i.e., recalculating baseline of what level IID MIC can be supported absent further action, based on expected CPUC procurement) o Re-purposing import capability from Arizona to increasing the IID MIC o Transmission upgrades or operational modifications Next Steps The overall schedule provided in the July 2 draft discussion paper is shown in Table 1. The ISO is currently reviewing written comments received on July 28 and plans to post a final draft discussion paper on August 14, followed by an in-person stakeholder meeting on August 28. 4 http://www.caiso.com/documents/2014-2015renewableportfoliostransmittalletter.pdf California ISO/MID 3

Date July 2 July 14 July 28 August 14 August 28 September 11 September 24-25 November 19-20 January 2015 Table 1 Proposed Stakeholder Consultation Schedule Action Post draft discussion paper Stakeholder meeting (in person) Stakeholder comments due by 5:00 p.m. Post final draft discussion paper Stakeholder meeting or call (if needed) Stakeholder comments due by 5:00 p.m. Stakeholder meeting #2 of the 2014-2015 transmission planning process Stakeholder meeting #3 of the 2014-2015 transmission planning process California ISO posts draft transmission plan California ISO/MID 4