Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify

Similar documents
On-Site Sewage System Nitrogen Reduction Methods Washington State Department of Health March 6, 2013

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Nitrogen Removal with the Waterloo Biofilter

Enhanced Nutrient Removal by Extended Aeration. Christina Edvardsson MicroSepTec, Inc

Relative influences of human nutrient sources, the Pacific Ocean, and climate change on Salish Sea dissolved oxygen through 2070

Representative Nitrogen Removal Project Descriptions

The difference in unit processes for a traditional on-lot wastewater treatment system compared to the AdvanTex Treatment System

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

Hence, most commentators will indicate a range of values for effluent quality and maybe put forward a typical concentration.

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Nitrogen, Septic Systems, Great Bay and Why it Matters

ENGINEERING OWTS FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL. Simon Farrell, PE, REHS JVA Consulting Engineers March 27, 2015 CPOW mini conference

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

Town of Robbinsville Constructs Cheoah River BNR Wastewater Treatment Facility to Meet New Nitrogen and Phosphorus Permit Limits

Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems in Florida

General Information on Nitrogen

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

Secondary Treatment Process Control

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech

Treatment of Milk House Wash Water

Passive, Two-stage Nitrogen Reduction Systems for Onsite Wastewater Treatment

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2009 results update 1

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Module 12: Laboratory Overview Answer Key

Constructed Wetlands

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT IN SMALL COMMUNITIES

Fixed-Film Processes

THE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION PROGRAM

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

ETV Joint Verification Statement

2015 Spring Conference

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF IN-TANK PASSIVE NITROGEN REDUCTION SYSTEMS (PNRS)

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

2017 Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference Concurrent Session Abstracts Tuesday, October 24, Track: Technical Nitrogen

Alternative Onsite Septic Systems

Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment. Emily Gonthier & Jennifer Lawrence April 30, 2018

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Nitrogen Treatment in onsite septic systems The Big Picture

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Harrisburg, PA

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

ClearPod Enhanced Septic System Treatment

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

NITROGEN REMOVAL GUIDE FOR WASTEWATER OPERATORS THE WATER PLANET COMPANY FORMS OF NITROGEN OF INTEREST TO WASTEWATER OPERATORS

THE FATE OF FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA IN THE OSCAR SYSTEM. Dave Lowe 1 ABSTRACT

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

Feel free to contact me should you require any additional information regarding the report. I can be reached at

a) Biological Oxygen Demand b) Biology Oxygen Demand c) Biochemical Oxygen Demand d) Biomicrobics Oxygen Demand

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Oyster recruitment and climate change: do higher summer temperatures mean earlier and greater settlement in Pacific oysters?

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2008 results

EFFICACY OF A HYBRID SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLAND FOR THE TREATMENT OF AQUACULTURE WASTEWATER

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

Nitrogen Removal Using Saturated Upflow Woody Fiber Media

Best Practices Improvements: Nitrogen Pretreatment Performance of Land Based Wastewater Treatment Systems

Performance of a Tire Chip Media Constructed Wetland Presented by William Li, PE, Stantec Consulting Inc Geoffrey Holmes, Superintendent, Fisherman

Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes. Guo, Lei (Eric)

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

SWAT INPUT DATA: SEPTWQ.DAT CHAPTER 34

BASICS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING TERTIARY FILTRATION. Suzie Hatch & Colum Kearney. Sydney Water Corporation

Combined Optimization of the Biological Nitrogen Removal in Activated Sludge-Biofilm Wastewater Treatment Systems

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

Onsite Systems, Soils, and Climate Change Jennifer Cooper University of Rhode Island

Onsite Wastewater Pretreatment Technologies

Early Onsite Systems

Making Your Plant Denitrify

February 16, Ministry of the Environment Southwestern Region 733 Exeter Road London, Ontario N6E 1L3. Attn.: Mr. Tom Clubb

OWEA 2013 Technical Conference and Exposition June 18 21, 2013

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

A Novel Testing Approach for BNR Optimization in NYC. Vera Gouchev, P.E. January 23, 2017 NEWEA 2017 Annual Conference

Probabilistic Modeling of Two-Stage Biological Nitrogen Removal Process: Formulation of Control Strategy for Enhanced Process Certainty

Decentralized WW Management: Issues for Small-Scale WWTPs. Mike Stephens MWEA Local Sections Committee Frankenmuth, MI

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

EXPERIENCES FROM FLORIDA S NUTRIENT REMOVAL ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM DESIGNS. Eberhard Roeder 1

Presentation Outline

Wastewater Systems. By Reza Shams-Khorzani, Ph.D. VP - Bio-Microbics, Inc. 9 th KWEA/KsAWWA Annual Joint Conference August 29, 2017 Wichita, Kansas

Baltimore City Department of Public Works

AdvanTex AX-RT Treatment Systems

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Improving Water Quality in the Lick Creek Watershed by Improving the Performance of Septic Systems

Using Compact Combined Constructed Wetland as Post Treatment for Biogas Wastewater

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Appendix A Literature Review - Septic System Performance Criteria, Technologies, and Cost Factors

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

Transcription:

Western Washington University Western CEDAR Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference 2014 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference (Seattle) May 1st, 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify Lynn Schneider WA State Department of Health, lynn.schneider@doh.wa.gov Follow this and additional works at: http://cedar.wwu.edu/ssec Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Schneider, Lynn, "Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify" (2014). Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference. 193. http://cedar.wwu.edu/ssec/2014ssec/day2/193 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Events at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact westerncedar@wwu.edu.

Evaluation of OSS Nitrogen Removal Technologies 2014 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference May 1, 2014 Lynn Schneider & John Eliasson, Washington Department of Health Office of Shellfish and Water Protection 1

Wastewater Nitrogen Management Approaches A. Source diversion B. Post-septic tank treatment C. Design of the soil dispersal component (drainfield) A B C 2

OSS Nitrogen Removal Project Design Problems: N reduction in OSS is highly variable Limited treatment options Regional environmental and water source affects on N removal not well-known Biological System Nitrogen In Nitrogen Out 3

OSS Nitrogen Removal Project Design Objectives: Maximize N removal efficiencies Verify performance objective (<20 mg/l TN full test avg.) Expand reliable, affordable options 4

OSS Nitrogen Removal Project Design Methods: Partner with UW & Ecology to: Use ETV Nutrient Reduction Protocol Develop standards & guidance 12 Month Evaluation 5

ETV-Nutrient Reduction Protocol Performance Parameters: Total N, NH 3 -N, NOx-N (NO 3 +NO 2 ), Total P, CBOD, COD, TSS/VSS, alkalinity Site Grab for lab: fecal coliform In-situ samples: dissolved oxygen, ph, temperature 6

Snoqualmie WWTP Test Site 7

Snoqualmie WWTP Test Site w/autosampler locations 8

Two step process: Nitrogen Biochemical Transformations 1) Nitrification - nitrifies NH 4+ to NO 3-2) Denitrification - reduces NO 3 - to nitrogen gas NH + 4 NO - 2 NO - Organic N 3 N 2 ALKALI O 2 C C N 2 O 2 O 2 Ammonification Nitrification Denitrification (Aerobic) (Anoxic) Biological System C 9

Vegetated Recirculating Gravel Filter (VRGF) Nitrification 8 Denitrification 1 10

VRGF June 2013 August 2012 11

VRGF Influent and Effluent Nitrogen Over 12-Month Test Period 12

Average Performance for VRGF Over 12-Month Test (68.9% TN Removal) Parameter units Influent Effluent Total N mg/l 48.6 (9.5) 15.1 (1.9) NH 3 -N mg/l 29.3 (5.3) 4.1 (1.0) NOx-N mg/l - 9.5 (2.1) Org-N mg/l - 1.6 (0.9) BOD/CBOD* mg/l 314 (98) 5.6 (1.8) TSS mg/l 354 (137) 3.2 (2.0) VSS mg/l 324 (131) 2.9 (1.7) COD/SCOD* mg/l 715 (223) 21.0 (7.2) Total Phosphorus mg/l 5.8 (1.3) 3.5 (1.1) Fecal Coliform** CFU/100 ml 13 8.4E+6 2.3E+5 Alkalinity as CaCO 3 mg/l 231 (36) 153 (23) ph 7.4 (0.3) 6.8 (0.2) *Effluents, **Geometric mean, ( ) is standard deviation

VRGF Clogging Problem 14

Enhanced Recirculating Gravel Filter (ERGF) 8 (5) Nitrification Denitrification 1 15

ERGF July 2012 January 2013 16

ERGF Influent and Effluent Nitrogen Over 12-Month Test Period 17

Average Performance for ERGF Over 12-Month Test (82.3% TN Removal) Parameter units Influent Effluent Total N mg/l 48.6 (9.5) 8.6 (2.2) NH 3 -N mg/l 29.3 (5.3) 6.8 (1.9) NOx-N mg/l - 0.6 (0.6) Org-N mg/l - 1.3 (0.5) BOD/CBOD* mg/l 314 (98) 8.6 (1.9) TSS mg/l 354 (137) 5.3 (2.2) VSS mg/l 324 (131) 4.4 (2.0) COD/SCOD* mg/l 715 (223) 24.6 (5.7) Total Phosphorus mg/l 5.8 (1.3) 3.5 (1.4) Fecal Coliform** CFU/100 ml 8.4E+6 4.6E+5 Alkalinity as CaCO 3 mg/l 231 (36) 203 (27) ph 7.4 (0.3) 6.9 (0.2) *Effluents, **Geometric mean, ( ) is standard 18 deviation

Recirculating Gravel Filter (RGF) & Woodchip Bed - Two Stage System 1 6 Nitrification Denitrification 3 days 19

RGF & Woodchip Bed August 2012 June 2013 20

RGF & Woodchip Bed July 2012 June 2013 21

Nitrogen Removal in RGF and Woodchip Bed Over 12-Month Test Period 22

Average Performance for RGF-Woodchip Bed Over 12-Month Test Period (91.8% TN Removal and 960 CFU/100 ml effluent fecal coliform) Parameter units Influent RGF Effluent Average Woodchip Effluent Total N mg/l 48.6 (9.5) 23.9 (5.4) 4.0 (3.8) NH 3 -N mg/l 29.3 (5.3) 0.7 (0.4) 0.5 (0.5) NOx-N mg/l - 21 (5.5) 2.4 (3.7) Org-N mg/l - 2.2 (1.2) 1.1 (0.3) BOD/CBOD* mg/l 314 (97.8) 4.7 (2.6) 10.8 (14.1) TSS mg/l 354 (137) 10.1 (12.7) 2.1 (2.0) VSS mg/l 324 (131) 5.8 (5.5) 0.9 (2.3) COD/SCOD* mg/l 715 (223) 21.6 (5.5) 37.6 (20.7) Total Phosphorus mg/l 5.8 (1.3) - 3.4 (1.9) Fecal CFU/100 Coliform** ml 8.4E+6 1.6E+05 0.96E+03 Alkalinity as CaCO 3 mg/l 231 (36) 84 (28) 154 (36.6) ph 7.4 (0.3) 6.8 (0.3) 6.6 (0.2) 23 *Effluents, **Geometric mean, ( ) is standard deviation

Comparison of the 3 Nitrogen Removal Systems Parameter Unit Vegetated RGF Enhanced RGF RGF/ Woodchip Bed Total Area ft 2 256 180 221 Treatment Media Depth ft 3.5 3.5 2.0-RGF 2.8-Woodchip Bed Average Effluent TN mg/l 15.1 8.6 4.0 Average TN removal % 68.8 82.3 91.8 24

Project Outcomes 1. Post ETV Reports summarizing the results from the 3 systems 2. Provide technical support for Hood Canal On-site Sewage System Nitrogen Reduction (HCOSSNR) demonstration project 3. Complete RS&Gs for the RGF/Woodchip Bed and the VRGF systems 25

Acknowledgements from Health UW Civil and Environmental Engineering David Stensel - UWCEE Project Coordinator Michael Brett UWCEE Project QA Manager Crystal Grinnell Research Assistant Stephany Wei - Research Assistant Songlin Wang UWCEE field engineer City of Snoqualmie Wastewater Treatment Plant Tom Holmes - Wastewater Superintendent Lyle Beach - Laboratory Analyst Brian Richardson - Senior Operator Peter Lombardi, Orenco Systems Inc. Dennis Hallahan, Infiltrator Systems Inc. 26

To learn more about the project go to www.doh.wa.gov search for Denitrification 27

28