Fertilizer and Lime Project Final Report Increasing the magnesium concentration of tall fescue leaves with phosphorus and boron fertilization

Similar documents
PI: Dale G. Blevins, Professor & Kemper Fellow, Division of Plant Sciences

Using Magnesium and Phosphorus Fertilization to Improve the Macronutrient Quality of Stockpiled Tall Fescue Missouri Fertilizer and Lime Council

Missouri Fertilizer and Lime Board 2011 FINAL REPORT. Optimum Timing of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Applications for Improved Tall Fescue Seed Production

Adequate Soil Phosphorus Decreases the Grass Tetany Potential of Tall Fescue Pasture

Missouri Fertilizer & Lime Proposal

Fertilizer and Lime Board Annual Report 2005 (1.5 years into the study)

Using Phosphorus, Ammonium-nitrogen and Strip-kill to Increase Tall Fescue Seed Production in Missouri

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension

Mineral Content of Forages Grown on Poultry Litter-Amended Soils

Pasture Management- Fertility. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO

Hay Fertility Management

Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing

2006 Missouri Fertilizer and Agricultural Lime Board Report. Finding Alternatives to Ammonium Nitrate as a Nitrogen Source for Tall Fescue Pastures

Using Phosphorus, Ammonium-nitrogen and Strip-kill to Increase Tall Fescue Seed Production in Missouri Missouri Fertilizer and Lime Council

1998 Fescue Fertilization Demonstration Plots

IMPROVING PASTURES BY RENOVATION Ed Ballard,Retired Animal Systems Educator University of Illinois Extension

Missouri Fertilizer and Lime Board 2009 Project Proposal

Is Profitability in Cow-Calf Industry Really Possible???

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Reducing Livestock s Winter-Feed Costs. Mark Landefeld Extension Educator, Agriculture & Natural Resources, Monroe County

Grazier s Arithmetic. Mark Kennedy State Grazinglands Specialist (Retired) Kennedy Grassland Services, LLC Houston, MO

Economics of Grazing Cover Crops

THREE YEARS OF GRAZING CORN by Clif Little Extension Agent Agriculture/Natural Resources

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

Forage fertilization. Alex Rocateli

1. When transitioning from endophyte-infected tall fescue to an improved forage in the pasture.

Renovating Pastures to Novel Endophytes. Craig Roberts, University of Missouri

Integrating the Use of Spring- and Fall-Calving Beef Cows in a Year-round Grazing System (A Progress Report)

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

Equine Pasture Management

History. Grass Seed Production. Uses. Uses. Oregon Grass Seed. Environment Requirements 2/7/2008

PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZATION OF ALFALFA

Keeping the Grass Greener on Your Side of the Fence Understanding Pasture Fertility

EFFECTS OF LIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOLIDS CONTENT IN GARLIC CLOVES

This article was presented on June 26, 1996 at the Purdue Hay Day.

FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

Revised N Fertilizer. Recommendations for. Cool-Season Grasses

Evaluation of a Year-Round Grazing System: Summer Cow-Calf Progress Report

Carlisle County ANR Newsletter September, 2017

L.M. Lauriault, T.D. Phillips, J.C. Henning, and E.L. Baker. Introduction

A GRAZING AND HAYING SYSTEM WITH WINTER ANNUAL GRASSES. Steve Orloff and Dan Drake 1 ABSTRACT

Eastern/Interlake Region April 7, 1999

Pasture Monitoring. Charles Fletcher Edgewood Dairy Purdy, Missouri

EORDC Belle Valley Fescue Response to Variable Rates of Nitrogen Fertilization

Practices to Improve Beef Cattle Efficiency

Evaluating Soil Resources & Pasture Fertility

Soil Fertility Management for Forage Crops: Maintenance

Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers] is

Stockpiling Forages. Stockpiling Perennial Grasses. Stockpiling. Risky business? 8/22/2010. Rocky Lemus August 25, 2010 MSPFSC

Reed Canarygrass Response to Nitrogen and Chloride Fertilization

Grazier s Arithmetic. Wesley Tucker University of Missouri Extension Agriculture Business Specialist

2013 Georgia Grazing School:

Saving on Nitrogen Costs with Forages. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist

Drought-Stressed Corn Silage for Beef Cows

What is pasture? Pasture as a feed for stock

Optimal Nitrogen Application Rates for Stockpiling Tall Fescue Pastures 2009 Guide (AEC )

YIELD OF IRRIGATED COOL-SEASON GRASSES IN SOUTHWESTERN KANSAS

Forage Fertilization Based on Yield and Management Goals

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

Profitability of Nitrogen Applications for Stockpiling Tall Fescue Pastures 2015 Guide (AEC )

Profitability of Nitrogen Applications for Stockpiling Tall Fescue Pastures 2014 Guide (AEC )

The Problem. Literature Summary. Study Description. Applied Questions

Beef Cattle Nutrition Fast Start Training Dec. 11, Overview U.S. Beef Cattle Numbers. Industry Segments U.S.

Profitability of Nitrogen Applications for Stockpiling Tall Fescue Pastures 2012 Guide (AEC )

2010 Results Improving Tall Fescue Production in Northwest Missouri with Legumes and Timing of Nitrogen Application

Beef Cattle Handbook

EFFECT OF LEGUME PERSISTENCE IN ENDOPHYTE-INFECTED TALL FESCUE PASTURES ON FORAGE PRODUCTION AND STEER PERFORMANCE

Taking a Closer Look at Your Soil Report

Taking a Closer Look at Your Soil Report

Corn Residue Removal by Grazing and Effects on Grain Yield. Introduction

Efficacy of Grazing Stockpiled Perennial Forages for Winter Maintenance of Beef Cows

Using a Grazing Stick for Pasture Management

2014 Georgia Grazing School:

Manure Management Plan Nutrient Balance Worksheet User Guide Completing Nutrient Balance Worksheets for Manure Management Plans

Soil fertility management for pepper production

Missouri Soil Fertility and Fertilizers Research Update 2008

Forage Production for Cow- Calf Operations

HOW TO ECONOMICALLY USE FERTILIZER IN PASTURE-BASED

Effect of Stocking Rate on Measures of Cow-Calf Productivity and Nutrient Loads in Surface Water Runoff

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Capturing Manure s Value. March 2008

Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue. John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech

Forage Systems for Dairy Grazing. Robert Kallenbach University of Missouri

This publication will summarize data on the yield of many newer varieties and give guidelines for selecting a variety.

The Effects of Supplementation and Forage Source on Performance of Steers During Fall Backgrounding

Forages are the foundations

Changes In Growth Performance Of Steers And Nutritive Value Of Wheat Pasture From Fall/Winter Grazing To Graze-Out

NITROGEN FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT OF TEMPORARILY FLOODED SOILS TO IMPROVE CORN PRODUCTION AND REDUCE ENVIROMENTAL N LOSS

Missouri Fertilizer Control Board Research, Education, and Outreach Projects Request for Proposals

The Importance of Maintaining Proper Grazing Height. Sarah Kenyon, Ph.D. University of Missouri Extension

Northern NY Agricultural Development Program 2004 Project Report

E conomic Favorability of Feeding

Winter Feeding & Management

Factors Affecting Timing and Intensity of Calving Season of Beef Cow-Calf Producers in the Midwest

Rotation Grazing Demonstrations With Beef Cows on HEL - Adams County Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Project

Soil Sampling & N Management. Nick Andrews (503) x 149

MATCHING FORAGES WITH LIVESTOCK NEEDS

Building Better Fescue. Tim Schnakenberg Regional Agronomy Specialist Galena, MO

Tall Fescue Festuca arundinacea Durable

Transcription:

Fertilizer and Lime Project Final Report - 24 Increasing the magnesium concentration of tall fescue leaves with phosphorus and boron fertilization Dale G. Blevins, Agronomy Department, University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri Missouri is number one in tall fescue production among states in the USA, and is number two in cattle numbers and feeder calf production (Missouri Farm Facts, 2). The beef cattle industry is based on the over 12 million acres of tall fescue pasture in the state. Missouri is also the leading state in tall fescue hay production, however many people are suggesting that it would be better economically for cattle producers to stockpile some tall fescue for winter grazing rather than investing in the harvesting and storage of hay. We have found that phosphorus fertilization of tall fescue pastures in southwestern Missouri is an effective way to increase the magnesium concentration of leaves during the early spring. Based upon our work on grass tetany, we have become concerned about the forage quality of tall fescue pastures and hay, in terms of the magnesium, calcium and phosphorus concentrations in the forage. A search of the literature revealed very little information on the nutrient concentration of stockpiled tall fescue leaves. In our laboratory research, boron nutrition was also found to be important for magnesium uptake by plants. Therefore the objective of this study was to determine if fertilization with both phosphorus and boron would increase tall fescue leaf magnesium concentrations more than phosphorus fertilization alone. Materials and Methods A tall fescue plot area was selected on August 9, 21 at the University of Missouri Southwest Center near Mt. Vernon (Creldon silt loam soil; Fine, mixed, mesic Mollic Fragiudalfs) and this site had the following soil test results: ph 5.4; N.A. 3. meq/1g; O.M. 2.9%; Bray I P 7 lbs/acre; Ca 2687 lbs/acre; Mg 247 lbs/acre; K 667 lbs/acre and B.26 lbs/acre. Please note two important problems with this soil, P level is very low and should be around 4 lbs/acre, and B level is low and should be 1. lb/acre for pastures. These problems are typical of tall fescue pastures in this part of SW Missouri. On August 23, tall fescue on the selected site was cut with a forage chopper and the forage was removed. Then 1' x 25' plots with 5' alleys were prepared and treated with the various quantities of P and B. Each treatment was replicated six times. Phosphorus was applied at rates of 12.5 or 25 lbs P/acre, as triple super phosphate, and boron was added at.5 and 1. lb B/acre as boric acid. On August 27, nitrogen was applied as topdress 1--. After forage removal in late August, the tall fescue grew and

on ober 23, 2 of the most recently collared leaf blades were harvested from each plot. Other leaf harvests were made in late ember 21, early uary and early ruary, mid-ch and mid-il 2. Leaf samples were dried, ground, and digested with nitric acid in a microwave digestion system. These samples were used for flame ionization, atomic absorption analyses of K, Mg and Ca. Phosphorus concentrations in the samples were determined colorimetrically. Fertilization treatments were repeated during the third week of August 2, and leaf samples were harvested in mid-ober, ember, December (2), uary, ruary, ch and il (2). Forage was harvested for hay yields the third weeks of May and August of both years and hay samples were analyzed for macronutrient concentrations. Results and Discussion The boron treatments used in this study had very little effect on macronutrient composition of the tall fescue leaves in the fall, winter, and spring. Consequently results from the boron treatments were pooled and, as a result, each point shown for phosphorus was the mean of plots The phosphorus treatments were applied the third week of August each year and leaf samples were harvested monthly during fall, winter and spring beginning in ober. Phosphorus levels in the leaves dropped from ober to ruary of the first year and from ember to ruary of the second year (Fig. 1). Since the most recently collared leaves were harvested, the decline in phosphorus concentrations may reflect mobilization downward through phloem tissue to the root system. By ch of each year, the phosphorus concentration of the leaves increased. Phosphorus treatments increased the leaf phosphorus concentrations, especially in the second year. The diet of a lactating, grazing beef cow requires forage with 2 mg/g dry wt P, and levels of leaf phosphorus were well below this level during winter. However, forage phosphorus levels remained above 2 mg/g dry wt with the 25 lb P/acre treatment except in ruary of 2, when the level dropped just below 2 mg/g dry wt. This raises the question about whether or not a higher phosphorus fertilization rate would cause the leaf phosphorus concentrations to remain above 2 mg/g dry wt throughout the winter and into spring in stockpiled tall fescue?

4 3.5 3 2.5 P (mg/g) 2 1.5 1.5 P 1 1 Dec Leaf Harvest Dates Figure 1. Leaf phosphorus concentrations in stockpiled tall fescue treated with phosphorus fertilizer in August 21 and 2. Twenty of the most recently collared leaves were harvested from each plot, and each point represents the mean of 18 plots. Magnesium concentrations of the stockpiled tall fescue leaves declined in much the same manner as found for phosphorus concentrations (Figs. 1&2). Leaves from plots treated with phosphorus had higher magnesium concentrations than control leaves during fall, winter and spring. By the second season, leaves from plants with the highest phosphorus treatment had 25% higher magnesium concentration than control leaves. During the first winter magnesium concentrations of all leaves fell below 2 mg/g dry wt, the critical concentration required for the diet of a lactating, grazing beef cow. However, during the second winter, leaves from plants treated with the highest phosphorus levels remained above the 2 mg/g dry wt level. During both winter seasons, leaf tissue from plants receiving no phosphorus dropped to 1.5 mg/g dry wt. Again, the question is whether or not higher levels of phosphorus fertilization would result in higher magnesium tissue levels during late winter.

4.5 4 3.5 3 P Mg (mg/g) 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 1 1 Dec Leaf Harvest Dates Figure. 2. Leaf magnesium concentrations in stockpiled tall fescue treated with phosphorus fertilizer in late August 21. Twenty of the most recently collared leaves were harvested from each plot, and each point represents the mean of 18 plots. The most striking point about the calcium concentration of leaves of stockpiled tall fescue plants is that they were level throughout the two-year study (Fig. 3). This is an important observation, however, since calcium is not phloem mobile in plants and is not re-translocated during late fall and winter months. The fact that calcium concentrations remained level throughout the year, supports the proposal that the decline in phosphorus and magnesium levels was a result of re-mobilization during late fall and early winter. By the second year, the phosphorus treatments had an impact on the calcium levels of the leaves. The 25 lbs P/acre phosphorus treatment increased the leaf calcium concentration by 25% over the control. The leaf calcium concentrations were above those required for the diet of a lactating, grazing beef cow throughout the year.

6 5 4 Ca (mg/g) 3 2 1 P 1 Dec Leaf Harvest Dates Figure. 3. Leaf calcium concentrations in stockpiled tall fescue treated with phosphorus fertilizer in late August 21. Twenty of the most recently collared leaves were harvested from each plot, and each point represents the mean of 18 plots. Leaf potassium concentrations declined during fall and winter until ch, again indicating re-mobilization (Fig. 4). In the fall of both years, the leaf potassium concentrations responded to the potassium treatments, but there was little response during the remainder of the year. Potassium levels in the leaves were well above those required in the diet of a grazing, lactating beef cow through each month of both years.

45 4 35 3 K (mg/g) 25 2 15 1 5 P 1 1 Dec Leaf Harvest Dates Figure 4. Leaf potassium concentrations in stockpiled tall fescue treated with phosphorus fertilizer in late August 21. Twenty of the most recently collared leaves were harvested from each plot, and each point represents the mean of 18 plots. Hay production of the tall fescue responded to phosphorus fertilization treatments with the high treatment increasing annual have yield by 15 lbs/acre compared to the control (Fig. 5). Hay yield in 2 was higher than that found in 2 reflecting the lower rainfall in the second year.

Hay (lbs/acre) 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 2 2 12.5 25 P (lbs/acre) Figure 5. Hay yields for 2 and 2 following treatment of tall fescue plots with, 12.5 or 25 lbs P/acre. Hay yield for each was a sum of both hay harvested the third week in May and the third week in August of each year. Yields results are the average from 18 plots with each treatment. Phosphorus concentration of the hay was very responsive to the phosphorus fertilization treatments at each sampling date (Fig. 6). The high phosphorus fertilization treatment increased the phosphorus concentration of the hay by over 35% compared to the control.

2.5 2 P (mg/g) 1.5 1.5 P May Aug May Aug Hay Harvest Dates Figure 6. Phosphorus concentration of hay from plots treated with, 12.5 or 25 lbs P/acre. The hay harvest in May 2 showed no response in magnesium concentration with phosphorus treatment (Fig. 7). However in August 2 and for both harvests in 2, phosphorus treatments increased the magnesium concentrations of the hay.

4 3.5 3 Mg (mg/g) 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 P May Aug May Aug Hay Harvest Dates Figure 7. Magnesium concentration of tall fescue hay treated with, 12.5 or 25 lbs P/acre. The calcium concentration of hay from tall fescue plots treated with the 25 lbs P/acre were a little higher than those from control plots at all sampling dates (Fig. 8).

6 5 4 Ca (mg/g) 3 2 1 P May Aug May Aug Hay Harvest Dates Figure 8. Calcium concentration of tall fescue hay treated with, 12.5 or 25 lbs P/acre. Potassium concentrations of tall fescue hay showed very little response to phosphorus fertilization treatments in this two years study (Fig. 9).

3 25 2 K (mg/g) 15 1 5 P May Aug May Aug Hay Harvest Dates Figure 9. Potassium concentration of tall fescue hay treated with, 12.5 or 25 lbs P/acre. The soil test Bray I P levels was 8 lbs P/acre, and after two years of the Bray I P level dropped to 5 lbs P/acre. With P fertilization treatments, the Bray I P level increased to 8 and 12 with the 12.5 and 25 lbs P/acre treatments, respectively (Fig. 1). The Bray II analysis revealed the bulk of the phosphorus fertilizer added in the study with an increase of about 8 and 3 lbs P/acre for the 12.5 and 25 lbs P/acre treatments, respectively. Therefore for the 25 and 5 lbs P/acre added during the two year study to the treated plots, Bray I and Bray II totally accounted for 11 and 38 lbs P/acre of the 25 and 5 lbs P/acre applied. Bray I and II analyses accounted for 44% of the phosphorus applied with the 12.5 lbs P/acre applications and 76% of that applied with the 25 lbs P/acre rate.

6 P content (lbs/acre) 5 4 3 2 Bray I Bray II 1 12.5 25 P lbs/acre Figure 1. Soil test Bray I and Bray II phosphorus levels of plots treated with, 12.5 or 15 lbs P/acre and sampled at the end of the two-year experiment. Summary Tall fescue growing in established pastures on Creldon soil in Southwestern Missouri was very responsive to phosphorus fertilization. Phosphorus treatments increased phosphorus, magnesium and calcium concentrations of stockpiled tall fescue leaves and hay, and increased hay yields by 15 lbs/acre. Tall fescue apparently mobilized nutrients, except calcium, during late fall and early winter causing a decrease in leaf concentrations of phosphorus, magnesium and potassium. The phosphorus and magnesium concentrations of leaves dropped to levels in ruary that were too low for grazing, lactating beef cows, and levels were especially low in leaves from plots not treated with phosphorus.