Declaring EFA: learning from a virtual case

Similar documents
ANNEXES. to the COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /...

Draft Commission Delegated Reg. amending delegated Reg. 639/2014 on rules for direct payments to farmers (incl. greening)

Spatial location of EFAs on the farm: searching for a compromise between environmental benefits and economic impact

GREENING IN LATVIA. GAEC Workshop, Riga September 1

A new policy framework for a more sustainable EU agriculture. Pierre Bascou DG Agriculture and rural development European commission

Draft Commission Delegated Reg. amending delegated Reg. 639/2014 on rules for direct payments to farmers (incl. greening)

Agroforestry: opportunities under the Common Agricultural Policy and the Research & Innovation frameworks

All farmers subject to greening. Crop Diversification Permanent grassland Ecological focus area (EFA)

ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC GOODS IN THE NEW CAP : IMPACT OF GREENING PROPOSALS AND POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES

Managing EFA declarations and the development of LPIS in year 2015.

A software tool to support farmers decisions on Ecological Focus Areas

EXPLANATORY DOCUMENT: METHODS OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT

* CSF: Common Strategic Framework including the EFRD, ESF, CF, EAFRD and EMFF

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Secretariat-General

Cross compliance & FAS post 2014

Geomatics technologies in support to the Common Agriculture Policy

EIONET Meeting National Reference Centres Agriculture and Environment 21 June Directorate General Environment European Commission

Guidance document on on-the-spot checks DSCG

Members' Research Service

Water and Agriculture

Greening the CAP. Outline of existing rules and look into the future options

Implementation of the CAP in Bavaria: a focus on familiy farms

Cross-compliance implementation in Natura 2000 area in Italy

Eligibility of agricultural areas used for non-agricultural activities

DG ENV - EU Soil Policy and soil erosion. Soil erosion modelling workshop, Ispra 20 March 2017

Potential impacts of the changes made to CAP Greening in 2017 on Green and Blue Infrastructures: Briefing from the BIOGEA Project

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Guidance document on LPIS

Opportunities for interaction of EAGF and EAFRD under a common planning strategy

LAND MANAGEMENT AND LEGISLATION. Tim Schofield Suffolk FWAG Wednesday - 9 th December 2015

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Review of greening after one year

Opportunities for interaction of EAGF and EAFRD under a common planning strategy

Buchan Agricultural Consultants Ltd. Greening: Crop Diversification & Ecological Focus Areas

MEMO/11/685. CAP Reform an explanation of the main elements. 1.Direct Payments. Brussels, 12 October 2011

EVALUATION OF THE CAP GREENING MEASURES

Organic Production Requirements: Crop production and animal husbandry in general S S R A N A S R S C I E N T I S T

Case Study of Payments for Environmental Services: the United Kingdom

Information on LULUCF actions by Sweden. First progress report

MEASURES APPLIED TO ACHIEVE THE AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS UNDER LITHUANIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOR

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Evaluation study of the payment for agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment

EVALUATION OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES

6390/17 MKL/amcr DGB 1A

Greening Update FAS Webinar 31 st October Simon Lunniss, RPA

EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY IN RELATION TO THE LANDSCAPE

GAEC definitions by Member States Situation 2009 GAEC Workshop 2010 Rome 6 October 2010

7766/17 SC/GDLC/io DGB 1

Permanent pastures - a reminder of the issues

Explanatory Memorandum to The Common Agricultural Policy Basic Payment and Support Schemes (Wales) Regulations 2015

Basic Payment Scheme: Greening

REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS

A Guide to Land Eligibility. Direct Payment Schemes

Managing archaeological sites in arable systems. Some farming issues

Using Open Data and New Technology To Tackle the Greening of the CAP from a broader perspective

Basic Payment Facts

LPIS CONDITIONS FOR PERMANENT GRASSLANDS PROTECTION

Bedfordshire and Luton Habitat Action Plan: Arable Margins

8th of July, Definition of an active farmer. Legislation Article 9 (EU) No 1307/2013

Regione Marche. Development Programme Non techincal summary. Roma, June 2015

EFNCP comments on EC s proposed CAP regulations - December EFNCP comments on. EC s proposed. CAP regulations

EXPERIENCE FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES - AUSTRIA Brussels, 23 th March 2016

Bedfordshire and Luton Habitat Action Plan: Arable Margins

Measure fiche NATURA 2000 AND WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE PAYMENTS. Measure 12

Estonian case study Evaluation of agri-environment schemes biodiversity objective

High Nature Value farming indicators: what are they really for?

THE HIDDEN TRUTH Italy Veneto Environmental impact of new Rural Development Programmes

Basic Payment Facts England 2015

Overview of objectives and planning tools emanating from EU environmental legislation

Natura 2000: Benefits and Opportunities for Farmers. Małgorzata Siuta, CEEweb for Biodiversity and Olivia Lewis

EUROPEAN POLICIES TO PROMOTE ENERGY CROPS

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Review of greening after one year

Building CSOs Capacity on EU Nature-related Policies EU Rural Development Policy

HNV Farmland in Bulgaria. Vyara Stefanova Conference High Nature Value Farmland in Europe June 2010, Vilm

FARM ADVISORY SERVICE. «Preparation of the Farm Advisory service employees for the implementation of the Agri-environmentalclimate

The consequences of climate change for EU agriculture

EVALUATION OF RDP IMPACTS ON EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURE IN IRELAND. Richard Gooday Environmental Consultant ADAS

Land use management in LPIS

Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:

Assessing the role of agri-environmental measures to enhance the environment in the Veneto Region with a model based-approach

Austria s Agriculture

Policies for Anaerobic Digestion in Europe

JOINING THE DOTS SOIL HEALTH, AGRICULTURE AND CLIMATE

Smarter Water Catchments

EU Agri-Environmental indicators and the Rural Development CMEF indicators (Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework): a coherent system of analysis

HNV and results-based payment schemes

February Special Report 21/2017. Greening: a more complex income support scheme, not yet environmentally effective

ANNEX III. Executable Test Suite (ETS)

The CAP towards 2020

ANNEX III. Executable Test Suite (ETS)

Country fact sheet. Land cover Luxembourg. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Welcome to the Farming Advice Service newsletter

Country fact sheet. Land cover Albania. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Forestry Grant Scheme Financial Support: Woodland Creation. Ian Cowe Forestry Commission Scotland - Grampian Conservancy 26 th October 2017

Cross Compliance. Click to edit Master title style. Bob Bulmer

Policies, programmes and strategies addressed in Ireland s Climate- Smart Agriculture case study

Land Management and the Delivery of Public Goods

Country fact sheet. Land cover Cyprus. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Implications of climate and energy policy on the agricultural and forestry sectors

Transcription:

Declaring EFA: learning from a virtual case Vincenzo Angileri European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy 2014 LPIS Workshop Brussels, 22-24 April 2014 Aim of the presentation Provide EFA declaration advices based on a practical case: Provide the farmer with accurate information Facilitate farmer s choice with a supporting tool (EFA calculator) How farmer can optimize EFA implementation Increase awareness on the impacts of Member States choices 2 1

The case: the Incognito farm A real question that was asked to DG AGRI a typical farm it includes most of the features on a farm The question: demonstrate the most efficient way to minimise loss of cropping area when applying 5% EFA On the other hand, what would be maximum lost of cropping area The calculation and allocation of EFA are based on the information at the moment the exercise was carried out. This may not be fully consistent with final decisions about EFA implementation. 3 Analysis of the farm Boundaries (in red) of cropping land do not follow the logic of arable land (i.e. woodland and permanent grassland is included) and they do not exclude features such as buildings and tracks 4 2

Analysis of the farm Boundaries (in red) of cropping land do not follow the logic of arable land (i.e. woodland and permanent grassland is included) and they do not exclude features such as buildings and tracks We refer to the LPIS 0 5 8 1 3 5 Analysis of the farm Boundaries (in red) of cropping land do not follow the logic of arable land (i.e. woodland and permanent grassland is included) and they do not exclude features such as buildings and tracks We refer to the LPIS 0 7 5 8 1 3 6 3

Analysis of the farm For the basic payment scheme Eligible area: area of cultivated land (arable land): 88 ha Permanent grassland: 1 ha Water meadow: 5 ha Land in existing environmental schemes -> arable land: 3 ha LPIS + orthophoto 5 8 1 0 7 Non eligible: Woodland: 2 ha Buildings, farm tracks, footpaths: 1 ha 3 drainage ditches not made of concrete: 1100m No GAEC landscape features No environmentally sensitive grassland 7 Analysis of the farm For the Ecological Focus Area Area of the farm (ha) 100,00 Cultivated crops 88,00 Land in existing environmental schemes (fallow land) 3,00 arable land (ha) 91,00 Permanent grassland 6,00 UAA (ha) 97,00 0 7 3 5 8 1 arable land (ha) 91,00 % EFA 0,05 EFA area (ha) 4,55 8 4

Calculation of EFA already present Assumption at MS level (MS choice!): All elements in the EFA list apply the MS applies conversion and weighting factors At farm level: 1100m of drainage ditches not made of concrete The land under AES is fallow Fallow land: 3 ha Ditches: 1100 m 0 7 3 5 8 1 9 Calculation of EFA already present Assumption at MS level (MS choice!): All elements in the list apply the MS applies conversion and weighting factors At farm level: 1100m of drainage ditches not made of concrete The land under AES is fallow Fallow land: 3 ha Ditches: 1100 m A EFA calculator can be used Features Land lying fallow Terraces ( per 1m) Landscape features: Buffer strips Hedges/wooded strips Isolated tree (per tree) Trees in line (per 1m) Group of trees/field copses Field margin Conversion factor (m/tree to m2) Features in the farm Ecological focus area (m2) (if both factors are applied) 2 1 m 0 20 1,5 nr 0 n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ponds n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ditches 3 2 m 0 Traditional stone walls Other features not listed above but protected under GAEC7, SMR 2 or SMR 3 Hectares of agro-forestry Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges Without production With production Areas with short rotation coppice (per1m 2 ) Weighting factor 1 1 m 0 0 6 0,3 m 0 Afforested areas as referred to in Article 32(2)(b)(ii) (per m 2 ) Areas with catch crops or green cover (per 1m 2 ) Areas with nitrogen fixing crops 10 TOTAL EFA HA 0 EFA difference ha -4,55 5

Calculation of EFA already present Assumption at MS level (MS choice!): All elements in the list apply the MS applies conversion and weighting factors Assumption at farm level: 1100m of drainage ditches not made of concrete The land under AES is fallow Fallow land: 3 ha Ditches: 1100 m A EFA calculator can be used Features Land lying fallow Terraces ( per 1m) Landscape features: Buffer strips Hedges/wooded strips Isolated tree (per tree) Trees in line (per 1m) Group of trees/field copses Field margin Conversion factor (m/tree to m2) Features in the farm Ecological focus area (m2) (if both factors are applied) n.a. 1 30000 m2 30000 2 1 m 0 20 1,5 nr 0 n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ponds n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ditches 3 2 1100 m 6600 Traditional stone walls Other features not listed above but protected under GAEC7, SMR 2 or SMR 3 Hectares of agro-forestry Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges Without production With production Areas with short rotation coppice (per1m 2 ) Weighting factor 1 1 m 0 0 6 0,3 m 0 EFA missing: 8.900 m² Afforested areas as referred to in Article 32(2)(b)(ii) (per m 2 ) Areas with catch crops or green cover (per 1m 2 ) Areas with nitrogen fixing crops TOTAL EFA HA 3,66 11 EFA difference ha -0,89 Making choices to allocate EFA The farmer has different options to fulfill this 0,89 ha missing 5 8 To minimize the loss of crop area: choose practices with the maximum conversion and weighting factors It depends on what it is feasible in the farm 0 1 Buffer strips: 1 m = 6 x 1,5 = 9 m² (not less than 1m wide) Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges without production: 1 m = 6 x 1,5 = 9 m² (1-10m wide) 3 12 6

Calculation of EFA minimizing loss Buffer strips (1m wide): 750 m = 6 x 1,5 = 6750 m² EFA = 750 m² lost Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges without production (1m wide): 250 m = 6 x 1,5 = 2250 m² = 250 m² lost Features Land lying fallow Terraces ( per 1m) Landscape features: Buffer strips Hedges/wooded strips Isolated tree (per tree) Trees in line (per 1m) Group of trees/field copses Field margin Conversion factor (m/tree to m2) Features in the farm Ecological focus area (m2) (if both factors are applied) n.a. 1 30000 m2 30000 2 1 m 0 20 1,5 nr 0 n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ponds n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ditches 3 2 1100 m 6600 Traditional stone walls Other features not listed above but protected under GAEC7, SMR 2 or SMR 3 Hectares of agro-forestry Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges Without production With production Weighting factor 1 1 m 0 6 1,5 750 m 6750-750 0 6 1,5 250 m 2250-250 6 0,3 m 0 cropping land lost compared to present (m2) Areas with short rotation coppice (per1m 2 ) Afforested areas as referred to in Article 32(2)(b)(ii) (per m 2 ) Areas with catch crops or green cover (per 1m 2 ) Areas with nitrogen fixing crops TOTAL EFA HA 4,56 13-0,1 EFA difference ha 0,01 Calculation of EFA minimizing loss Buffer strips (1m wide): 750 m = 6 x 1,5 = 6750 m² EFA = 750 m² lost Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges without production (1m wide): 250 m = 6 x 1,5 = 2250 m² = 250 m² lost This will be transferred into the farmer s declaration 14 7

Opposite solution Opposite: maximum lost of cropping area practice(s) with the minimum conversion and weighting factors leave an additional 0,89 ha of cultivated land as fallow Features Land lying fallow Terraces ( per 1m) Landscape features: Buffer strips Hedges/wooded strips Isolated tree (per tree) Trees in line (per 1m) Group of trees/field copses Field margin 2 1 m 0 20 1,5 nr 0 n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ponds n.a. 1,5 m2 0 Ditches 3 2 1100 m 6600 Traditional stone walls Other features not listed above but protected under GAEC7, SMR 2 or SMR 3 Hectares of agro-forestry Strips of eligible hectares along forest edges Without production With production Conversion cropping land lost Ecological focus area (m2) factor Weighting factor Features in the farm compared to present (m2) (m/tree to m2) (if both factors are applied) n.a. 1 38900 m2 38900 8900 1 1 m 0 0 6 0,3 m 0 Areas with short rotation coppice (per1m 2 ) Afforested areas as referred to in Article 32(2)(b)(ii) (per m 2 ) Areas with catch crops or green cover (per 1m 2 ) Areas with nitrogen fixing crops TOTAL EFA HA 4,55 0,89 EFA difference ha 0 15 Opposite solution Opposite: maximum lost of cropping area practice(s) with the minimum conversion and weighting factors leave an additional 0,89 ha of cultivated land as fallow 16 8

Lessons learnt Provide clear and accurate information to farmers: EFA elements that can be included clear definition of the element (dimensions, weighting and conversion factors etc.) information on the farm that affects the EFA percentage (e.g. in graphical pre-established form) Provide self-decision supporting tools (e.g. an EFA calculator) Give indications to farmers how to report EFA Consider all issues + compliance to legislation when defining your EFA 17 9