No. HR Page 1 of 5 Effective Date: 08/31/15

Similar documents
DISCIPLINE AND DISMISSAL OF CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES

The University of Texas System System Administration Internal Policy

The University of Texas System Administration. 1. Title. Discipline/Dismissal of Employees. 2. Policy

Dalton State College Progressive Discipline Policy for Staff May 13, 2013

A. Code of Conduct Code of Conduct and Disciplinary Actions 3/8/2016

Employee Relations Advisory Organization and the Representatives' Role. Employee Relations Advisory Organization. ion.

Generally, there are three conditions leading to the need for discipline at Tennessee State University. They are:

BOX ELDER COUNTY PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Office of Administrative Services-Human Resources may consult with management as necessary in administering disciplinary action.

HORRY-GEORGETOWN TECHNICAL COLLEGE PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINE AND DISCHARGE

A. Intent. B. Definitions

To outline the College s policies and procedures for taking corrective action in personnel matters.

DISCIPLINE, SUSPENSION AND DISMISSAL OF CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES

KCTCS Human Resources Procedures #3 Progressive Disciplinary Action Procedures

Policy Management Area: Human Resources and Equal Opportunity

D. Disciplinary action, up to and including termination, may be imposed for misconduct.

PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE: MISCONDUCT OR INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOUR #2-12

Disciplinary Process Policy Document BTC/006/DISC Dated: January 2016 Status: Adopted Last Reviewed: May 2016

NOTE TO PERSONNEL FILE

Proposed Re-statement of Staff Disciplinary Policy Summary of Primary Changes

South Texas College Policy Update BOARD APPROVED: JANUARY 31, 2017

FAYETTE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION Fayetteville, West Virginia 1. PURPOSE.

Temple University. Rules of Conduct

THE CITADEL The Military College of South Carolina 171 Moultrie Street Charleston, SC MEMORANDUM 18 August 2009 NUMBER 2-109

Discipline and Discharge

WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY. Board of Governors. Policy No. 57

SECTION 24 DISCIPLINE

3. Pending the resolution of a disciplinary review, the Appointing Authority, shall place the employee on leave without pay if:

Ames Public Library Policy Section: Personnel Approved: 5/98 Subject: Performance Discipline Reviewed: 4/01 Revised:

Human Resources People and Organisational Development. Disciplinary Procedure Manual Staff

2. Policy. Employee management and disciplinary action practices at the University are subject to the following policies:

Purpose To establish general guidelines for implementing progressive discipline.

ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ON JUNE 20, 2007 TO ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

REEMPLOYMENT, NON-REEMPLOYMENT, SUSPENSION, DEMOTION OR TERMINATION OF SUPPORT PERSONNEL POLICY

Employee Conduct--Recognition, 501 Improvement & Discipline

TEMPLE UNIVERSITY WORK RULES

Performance Management, Employee Discipline and Termination of Employment Effective Date: 06/29/2015 Last Revision Date: 06/29/2015

BSS Disciplinary Policy

Policy Number G9 Effective Date: 25/05/2017 Version: 1 Review Date: 25/05/2018

Disciplinary Procedure. General Policy

SFCC EMPLOYEE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION POLICY 4-2

Chapter 10: Disciplinary Policy. or that results in unacceptable performance. Disciplinary action is to be in proportion

DISCIPLINE, SUSPENSION, AND DISCHARGE

Positive Corrective Action

Disciplinary and Dismissal Policy and Procedure

Policies and Procedures Manual Page 1

Barnies Day Nurseries and Out of School Clubs Grievance and Disciplinary Policy and Procedures

Progressive Discipline Policy

SELECT EMPLOYMENT POLICIES

DISCIPLINARY POLICY. Page 1 of 14 Date: 11/2014. PE06 Revision: 1

Disciplinary Action. POLICY: 6Hx28:3E-08. Responsible Official: Vice President, Organizational Development and Human Resources

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE. 1 Aims and Objectives

University Policies and Procedures DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS FOR EMPLOYEES

TALLAHASSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES POLICY

SUBJECT: TERMINATION OF NON-ACADEMIC STAFF EMPLOYEES AND DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS

PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE

Disciplinary Procedures

This policy covers disciplinary action against staff but a similar process will apply to volunteers.

Sample Policy Statement. Principle: Introduction

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Number IV-1

5-111B: 1. 4, 2017 I.

2.3 An employee or volunteer may be disciplined by the Fire Chief or designee for any of the following reasons:

1.4. Ermha adheres to a progressive discipline approach as a means of ensuring a method which is fair and responsive.

Discipline and Dismissal Policy

1. To provide guidelines for disciplining classified employees in accordance with applicable laws, District policy, and Personnel Commission rules.

DISCIPLINARY POLICY. November 2013

Fairmont State University Board of Governors POLICY NO. 64

Subject: Definitions: None.

Subject: Definitions: None.

GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

Staff Disciplinary Policy and Procedure July 2014

Disciplinary Policy and Procedures for SPA Employees

COMPANY ORIENTATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Reference: HR037 Version: 1.0 Number of Pages 5. Managers are encouraged to help and counsel employees in the first instance to resolve

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF O'CONNOR

Disciplinary & dismissal policy

MARSHALL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE MANUAL. For all Non-Professional At-Will Employees

Employee Disciplinary Procedure

Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures for the Health Service. May 2004

OLD WOUGHTON PARISH COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY POLICY v1 rev1

Western Michigan University Division of Multicultural Affairs Student Employee Manual - Appendices STUDENT EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINARY REPORT

P-4: Administrative Procedures Discipline of District Employees

UNIVERSITY OF EXETER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Review date: November 2014 Responsible Manager: Director of Human Resources Group Director (HR and Corporate Services) Accessible to Students: No

All classified employees at WVU are covered by these disciplinary procedures.

Bicester Studio School Disciplinary Procedure

Disciplinary, Dismissal and Grievance Procedures. The following general principles will apply to the Disciplinary, Dismissal and Grievance Procedures

Policy No: 36. Staff Disciplinary Policy

UNIVERSITY of HOUSTON MANUAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

KENOSHA COUNTY UNIFORM WORK RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL DEPARTMENTS

PROPOSED BY: Original Signed by Hannah Love TITLE: Interim Lead for Human Resources Date:3 /19/15

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION PACKAGE #1

PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS

Rule 5-111A: Implementation of Staff Corrective and Disciplinary Actions (non-hospital and Clinics-UUHC). Revision 0. Effective Date: October 11, 2011

Disciplinary Action Policy

Grievance Procedures for Classified Employees

Wheels on the Bus, Inc Disciplinary Guidelines

UNIVERSITIES ACT, 1997 UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK STATUTE NO. 4

UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Transcription:

TEXAS STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE STATEWIDE OPERATING STANDARD No. HR 2.4.1 Page 1 of 5 Effective Date: 08/31/15 DIVISION: SUBJECT: Human Resources Employee Corrective Action AUTHORITY: Minute Order #06-13 PROPOSED BY: TITLE: RECOMMENDED BY: TITLE: APPROVED BY: Original Signed by Gail Lawrence Vice Chancellor & Chief Culture Officer Original Signed by Gail Lawrence Vice Chancellor & Chief Culture Officer Original Signed by Mike Reeser Date: 08/31/15 Date: 08/31/15 TITLE: Chancellor Date: 08/31/15 STATUS: Approved by the Chancellor 08/31/15 HISTORICAL STATUS: Revised 07/2015 Approved by MC 05/9/13 HR.2.4.1 Non-contract, Non-faculty Employee Performance Improvement Process and HR.2.4.2 Discipline, Dismissal, and Grievances of Contract and Faculty Employees, combined and renamed HR.2.4.1 Employee Corrective Action Approved by BOR 2/7/13 Approved by MC 09/09/05 Revised 08/17/05 MO #127-94, Discipline & Dismissal of Non-faculty and Noncontract Employees, Rescinded by MO #93-02 07/26/02 Approved by MC 06/24/02 Revised 06/2002 Approved MC 11/17/94 Approved 10/24/94 Proposed MC 07/24/02 Revised 6/24/02

POLICY It is the policy of Texas State Technical College that all employees shall maintain standards of conduct and performance established by the college and that any noncompliance with these standards will be subject to corrective action. PERTINENT INFORMATION All non-contract employees are at will, meaning that any employee not under contract may be dismissed from employment with or without cause. Any such dismissal must be in compliance with federal and state law. Nothing in this regulation shall be construed as modifying any noncontract employee s at-will status. Although the principle of corrective action found in this policy is not required for employees, it is encouraged as a good management practice when practicable. In addition, even if corrective action is chosen, not every step must be taken in each case. This regulation is for guidance purposes only and is specifically not intended to create any right to notice and opportunity for a hearing. Failure by TSTC to follow the procedural steps outlined in this regulation will not form the basis of any employee s complaint or grievance. Employees are expected to acquaint themselves with Statewide Operating Standards. Heads of departments or similar administrative units are responsible for informing their employees of the department procedures to be followed, the standards of conduct to be met and the job performance to be achieved. Those employees who do not follow the procedures or meet the standards of conduct or job performance will be subject to corrective action. Standards of conduct and job performance to be met: A. Conduct All TSTC employees are expected to adhere to such standards of conduct that will result in a productive environment. Examples of misconduct include but are not limited to: 1. Falsification of time sheets, personnel records or other records of the college; 2. Violation of safety rules or accepted safety or risk management practices; 3. Refusal to follow instructions or to perform designated work that may be required or refusal to adhere to established rules and regulations; 4. Neglect of duties, or failure to meet a reasonable and objective measure of efficiency and productivity; 5. Smoking in areas where prohibited; 6. Gambling, or participation in other games of chance on the premises at any time; 7. Soliciting, collecting money or circulating petitions on the premises other than within the rules and regulations of the college; 8. Possessing intoxicants or drugs in the work place or the use of intoxicants or drugs during working hours; 9. Abuse or waste of tools, equipment, fixtures, property, supplies, or goods of the college or any item on loan and under the control of the college; 10. Creating or contributing to unhealthy or unsanitary conditions;

11. Failure to cooperate with supervisor or co-worker, impairment of function of work unit, or disruptive conduct; 12. Disorderly conduct, horseplay, harassment of college personnel, including racial and/or sexual harassment, or use of abusive language on the premises; 13. Fighting, agitating a fight, threatening or attempting bodily harm or causing injury to another employee of the college; 14. Failure to meet a reasonable and objective measure of efficiency and productivity; 15. Theft, dishonesty or unauthorized use of college property or equipment, including college records and/or confidential information; 16. Creating a condition hazardous to the individual or fellow employee; 17. Refusal to follow instructions or to perform designated work in the time prescribed that may be required or refusal to adhere to established rules and regulations; 18. Repeated tardiness or absence, absence without proper notification to the supervisor or without satisfactory reason or unavailability for work; 19. Violations of college policies or rules; 20. Other acts or omissions of misconduct determined to be negligent. B. Job Performance The general standard of job performance of employees should exceed the merely satisfactory level, and employees are expected to strive for excellence. Job performance is to be judged by supervisory evaluation describing the quality and quantity of work performed by each employee. When the job performance of an employee is unsatisfactory, the supervisor must take appropriate corrective action. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The Chancellor or his or her designated Executives have the responsibility to maintain standards of conduct and job performance for Texas State Technical College. The designated Executives have the responsibility to maintain standards of conduct and job performance for their respective campus. The Office of Human Resources, in conjunction with the Office of General Counsel, will recommend changes to this Statewide Operating Standard. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS The Corrective Action Process should ensure that employees are informed of exactly what behavior needs to be corrected, inform employees of the measures they must take to correct the behavior, and give employees adequate opportunity to correct the behavior. Employees will be asked to sign the Record of Conversation and/or Notice at each step of the Corrective Action Process. The employees signature is to acknowledge that the Corrective Action Step occurred. Refusal to sign may result in termination. Step One: Record of Conversation The immediate supervisor of the employee will meet with the employee and inform him or her of the specific behavior that is unacceptable. The behavior will be clearly identified and a time by which the situation must be corrected is set. A written record of this conversation should be signed by the employee and forwarded to Human Resources to be placed in the employee s personnel file. Please contact Human Resources for the Record of Conversation form.

Step Two: Final Written Notice The same procedure as the Record of Conversation will be followed. The Final Written Notice must specify that the consequences of failure to correct the behavior will be termination of employment. Please contact Human Resources for the Final Written Notice form. In conjunction with issuing an employee a Final Written Notice, a supervisor also may grant an employee a one-day paid Decision-Making Leave of Absence in order to impress upon the employee the seriousness of his/her situation. A Decision-Making Leave of Absence must be documented in the Final Written Notice and approved by Human Resources. Employees will be permitted only one Decision-Making Leave of Absence during their employment with TSTC. If an employee is granted a one-day paid Decision-Making Leave of Absence then the employee must return to work with a written plan for changing their behavior. Immediately upon return from a Decision-Making Leave of Absence and prior to beginning work on the day of return, the employee shall meet with the supervisor for review and approval of the employee s written plan for changing his/her behavior. Failure to report for the return meeting or failure by the employee to provide a written plan for review will result in the employee being terminated. An employee who does not correct his or her behavior after the above steps will be terminated if the behavior continues. If six months have elapsed since the employee received corrective action, the Corrective Action Process begins at Step One (Record of Conversation). Acceleration of the Corrective Action Process to Termination The corrective action process may be accelerated and an employee may be terminated for a single occurrence or violation of TSTC policy without having been previously warned. Once campus administration has approved, supervisors should suspend the employee pending a complete investigation of the situation before terminating the employee. The investigation shall be performed by Human Resources. Any termination of this nature must be reviewed with the Vice Chancellor or his or her designee in conjunction with campus administration prior to the termination. Where the supervisor feels an employee should be terminated immediately, the supervisor should: 1. Immediately inform campus administration and Human Resources of the circumstances 2. Advise the employee that he or she is suspended; and 3. Request the employee immediately leave the premises. Alternative Corrective Action Measures Demotion and Suspension without Pay In consultation with the Vice Chancellor or designated Executives, demotion and/or suspension without pay may also be used at any point in the Corrective Action Process. Suspension without pay may not exceed five working days as a corrective action measure. Probationary Employees Any new or transferred non-faculty employee will be in his/her probationary period for the first 180 days of his/her employment. Members of faculty remain in their probationary status for 12 working months after hire. If corrective action needs to be taken during the probationary period, the employee will be issued a Final Written Notice that clearly states any additional occurrence

of unacceptable behavior within the probationary period will result in termination. The new employee will be asked to sign the document indicating that he/she has read the notice. Any written notice issued during the probationary period will become a Record of Conversation upon completion of the probationary period. Appeal of Corrective Action If an employee wishes to appeal any corrective action or termination for employment, the appeal must be made in accordance with the provisions of SOS HR.2.4.14 Conflict Resolution Complaint and Grievance. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All corrective action documentation is maintained in accordance with this policy and appropriate records retention schedule. All accelerations and terminations are reviewed by the Vice Chancellor or his or her designee to assure compliance with EEO guidelines.