Status of Implementation of RED GHG Requirements

Similar documents
Implication of New EU RED GHG requirements

Implementing New GHG Requirements under the RED in Europe

Introduction of GHG calculation and ISCC Certification System

Feedstock Classification, its Implications and Double Counting in EU Member States

Verification of CI and Prevention of Land Use Change in Global Biofuel Supply

ISCC PLUS. Version 3.0

Introductory presentation EU

ISCC Sustainability Certification for Palm Oil

Life cycle GHG emissions in the EU biofuels legislation Luisa Marelli and Robert Edwards

Bioenergy in the European Union

ISCC 204 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT. Version 3.0

The sustainability criteria for biofuels in the Renewable Energy Directive and the Fuel Quality Directive

2nd ISCC Global Sustainability Conference. ISCC in 2011 and the way forward. Brussels, February 8, Supported by:

Practical implementation of sustainability criteria in the EU Member States. Alba DEPARTE ADEME Public workshop Paris May 19, 2011

Regulations to issue Proofs of Compliance with Sustainability

EU legislation on biogas sustainability. Andreas Pilzecker European Commission, DG Energy - Renewable Energy and CCS

GHG balancing crop-by-crop vs. crop rotation cycles. how figures can differ

ILUC: Status of EU legislation

GHG reduction with solid separation in POME ponds

Accounting for GHG emissions from biofuels production and use in EU legislation

ifeu - Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH 3. BioGrace calculation rules

Meeting the 10% Biofuel Target in Germany: A Member State Perspective

JEC Biofuels and Well to Wheels Analyses. Heather Hamje European Biofuels Technology Platform Meeting Brussels, October 14 th 2014

The European Biofuels Scene

RHI Sustainability Criteria & The Sustainability Audit

GHG calculations under RED and FQD. John Neeft Agency NL GHG calculation course for verifier trainers

CHP, Land use change, N 2 O field emissions

ENSUS VOLUNTARY SCHEME UNDER RED FOR ENSUS BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION

Renewable fuels of non-biological origin in transport decarbonisation

Implementing Sustainability Requirement within the Low Carbon Fuel Standards A Performance-Based Approach

1. Description of all elements of the sum formula used to calculate

Waste fuels and renewable fuels of non-biological

RSB ROUNDTABLE ON SUSTAINABLE BIOMATERIALS RSB Standard for EU market access. Version 3.2 Publication Date 15 February 2018

EU sustainability framework for bioenergy

RSB Standard for EU market access

Sustainable raw material supply for the Biomethane production FACHAGENTUR NACHWACHSENDE ROHSTOFFE E. V. AGENCY FOR RENEWABLE RESOURCES

ISCC PLUS SAI Gold. SAI Gold ISCC PLUS V 1.0

BioGrace, CEN, ISO and RED standardisation processes and interrelations. Bruno GAGNEPAIN ADEME Public workshop Paris May 19, 2011

Featuring 100 % renewable cartons

Consumables of a Production Process

Sustainable raw material supply for the Production of Biomethane

Wilhelmstraße 54 Tel.: / Berlin, Germany Fax: /

1 How do I get access to Nabisy? How do I get access to Nabisy as a producer (last interface)?... 3

ifeu - Institut für Energieund Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH Manual Funding:

in the context of the EU RED and

Guide regarding the documentary control on the obligation to add biofuels to petrol and diesel used for transportation purposes

How to measure GHG emissions from bioenergy production and use: field measurements and calculators

Electricity and Heat from Biogas Plants

Mass Balance Requirements

Policies to Promote Biogas in the EU. David Baxter. European Commission/IEA Bioenergy. JRC Institute for Energy

Policies on Sustainability for Biofuels

Methodology and tool for GBEP sustainability indicators 1 and 4

Sustainability of biofuels and bioenergy EU activities. Fanny-Pomme LANGUE Renewable Energy Policy DG Energy European Commission

Biofuels and Bioliquids. iquids Sustainability Criteria. Ing. Igor VEREŠ Dep. of Environmental Policy MoE SR

Verification Considerations for California s Low Carbon Fuel Standard

Alternative Fuels Considerations on Land Use Impacts and complementarity/competition for feedstocks

The Global Bioenergy Partnership

How produce biomass for energy without competing for food while avoiding ILUC related GHG emissions

Overview about different certification systems

What issues need to be addressed in the RED II draft to ensure environmental integrity and net climate benefit of bioenergy use?

Implementation of the EU climate policy in the EU Member States: the case of Poland

RSB ROUNDTABLE ON SUSTAINABLE BIOMATERIALS. RSB Standard for the Certification of Bio-Based Products and Bio-Based Processes. Version 2.

CertifHy Developing a European Framework for the generation of guarantees of origin for green hydrogen

The Global Bioenergy Partnership

CropEnergies AG Joachim Lutz (CEO) 14 February 2017

Biomass Sustainability Ordinance (BioNachV) - Germany

ERGaR: Cross-border transfer of environmental characteristics of biomethane GIE-ERGaR-CEDEC Workshop

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON INDIRECT LAND-USE CHANGE RELATED TO BIOFUELS AND BIOLIQUIDS

by 3 rd Party Verification

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

EU policy developments in the field of bioenergy. Andreas Pilzecker European Commission, DG Energy - Renewable Energy and CCS

ABSTRACT METHOD LIST OF ABREVIATION RSPO

Sustainability criteria for biofuels EU state of play

Ray Massey Commercial Ag Program Crops Economist

Bio-methane and the UK Fuels roadmap to /06/2014 NGV Day Element Energy Limited

by: EDI WIBOWO Directorate General of New, Renewable Energy, and Energy

Biomass Sustainability in the UK. Jasmine Killen: Senior Manager Fuelling and Sustainability

ISCC General Assembly 2011, February 8, 2011 Brussels. Wilhelmstraße 54 Tel.: / Berlin, Germany Fax: /

Sector coupling with Power-to-Gas

GLYFINERY. Life cycle assessment of green chemicals and bioenergy from glycerol: Environmental life cycle assessment. Dr Maria Müller-Lindenlauf

ISCC for Non GMO food and feed

Information Leaflet Sustainable Biomass Production. Growers Agricultural Operations

Structured list of requirement for green hydrogen

EMAS, a premium environmental management tools for organisations Benefits for public authorities

Policy Developments in Turkey Bioenergy Markets Turkey

Sweden s view on EU-policy for renewable energy after 2020

D5.3 Calculation of GHG emission caused by biomethane

The EU policy on renewable energy

Hedging the Risks through Standards, and Avoid GHG Double Counting

Indirect Land Use Change Impacts of Biofuels

EU 2030 Road Transport Decarbonisation Scenario Analysis

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Corn-Based Ethanol

Agri-environment-climate measures: support for results, controllability and the way to go?

Policies for Advanced (Bio-)Fuels and other GHG reduc:on op:ons in Germany

German National Programme on Bioenergy

version 4.1 october 2016 BONSUCRO/BONSUCRO EU RED MASS BALANCE COC STANDARD

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. State aid SA (2017/N) Sweden Tax reductions for pure and high-blended liquid biofuels

WP 3.3: Policy Roadmap for large-scale biogas implementation in Latvia

Green Gold Label Program

Sustainability Certification of Bioethanol Production Facilities

Transcription:

ISCC Regional Stakeholder Dialogue, ISCC TC SEA Meeting, December 6, 2016 Status of Implementation of RED GHG Requirements Dr Jan Henke, ISCC System GmbH

The original RED and FQD set the framework for the implementation of renewable energy regulations for the transport sector in the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED) Fuel Quality Directive (FQD) 2009/28/EC from 2009 2009/30/EC from 2009 10% mandatory target (2020) for the use of renewable energy in transport Minimum GHG savings for biofuels according to original RED/ FQD: Decarbonization strategy: Obligation for mineral oil companies to gradually reduce life cycle greenhouse gas emissions by a minimum of 6% by 2020 35% for existing installations until Dec 2016 50% from 1 Jan 2017 60% for new installations from 1 Jan 2017 Use of voluntary certification schemes ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 2

The RED/ FQD Amendment 2015/1513/EC published in October 2015 will affect biofuel policy until 2020 Renewable Energy Directive (RED) Fuel Quality Directive (FQD) 2015/1513/EC from 2015 2015/1513/EC from 2015 7% cap on food/feed crop biofuels Reference value for national targets: 0.5% for advanced biofuels Provisional iluc factors, only for reporting by member states Minimum GHG savings for biofuels: 35 % for existing installation until Dec 2017 50 % from 1 Jan 2018 60% for new installations* directly * New installation: Physical production of biofuels/-liquids started after October 2015 ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 3

The Amendment 2015/1513/EC includes changes in GHG saving thresholds for biofuels Renewable Energy Directive (RED) Fuel Quality Directive (FQD) 2015/1513/EC from 2015 2015/1513/EC from 2015 % GHG saving compared to fossil fuel 60 % 60" 50" 50 % GHG saving requirements for biofuels: 40" 30" 20" 10" 0" 35 % until un,l"oct"4,"2015" 5 after Oct"5,"2015" 2015 2017" 2018" 2020" New"installa,ons" Old"installa,ons" 35 % for existing installation until Dec 2017 50 % from 1 Jan 2018 60% for new installations directly ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 4

In the transport sector, a maximum GHG emission of 54.5 g CO2e/ MJ of biofuel is possible to still reach the 35% GHG saving threshold g CO 2 eq/mj Minimum GHG saving: 35% 83,8 g CO 2 e/mj 54,5 g CO 2 e/mj 2018: 50% 41,9 g CO 2 e/mj New installations: 60% 33,5 g CO 2 e/mj Fossil reference GHG value* Maximum possible GHG value for biofuels * Value comes from the Renewable Energy Directive (RED). Currently no other value can be applied. ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 5

In the next years also the switch from energetic quota (RED) to GHG reduction quota (FQD) will have an effect. Example Germany Year Energetic biofuels quota GHG reduction quota of total fuel market Min. GHG saving requirement for biofuels based on RED 2015 2010-2014 6.25% n/a 35% 2015 n/a 3.5% 35% for existing and 60% for new installations 2017 n/a 4% 35% for existing and 60% for new installations 2018 n/a 50% for existing and 60% for new installations 2020 n/a 6% 50% for existing and 60% for new installations The GHG reduction quota is seen as a technology neutral instrument Biofuels are used to fulfill the target. The cap for food/feed crop biofuels as well as GHG saving requirements still apply à Importance of actual GHG calculations and performance of biofuels will increase à Market size dilemma ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 6

High GHG savings must be reached to be competitive BLE Evaluation Report for 2015 (based on NABISY) Average GHG savings biofuels FAME HVO Leap in GHG savings with the implementation of the GHG quota in Germany in 2015 Biodiesel achieves 70%, HVO 62% average GHG savings Low GHG emissions of CPO are curcial Traditional biofuels reach high GHG savings Under the GHG quota in Germany this reduces the biofuel market size Source: BLE: Evaluations- und Erfahrungsbericht für das Jahr 2015 (http://www.ble.de/shareddocs/downloads/02_kontrolle/ 05_NachhaltigeBiomasseerzeugung/Evaluationsbericht_2015.pdf? blob=publicationfile) ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 7

The GHG Note from the EU Commission, which must be implemented by end of 2016 will change the GHG methodology tremendously GHG Note from the Commission GHG Note Details of implementation still unclear 1. Information transfer of individual GHG calculation formula elements along supply chain 2. Calculate and forward GHG value per dry-ton matter (applicable for all materials including crude and refined oils and ethanol) 3. Feedstock factor 4. Guidance on emission allocation 5. Further specification on CCR, CCS, and methane capture 6. Further requirements on competences of auditors and reporting 7. Compulsory use of EC lower heating values and emission factors 8. Third country reports with typical emissions from cultivation 9. Expiration of NUTS2-requirements ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 8

According to new requirements from the European Commission the way of forwarding GHG information in supply chain will change Today: SD: kg CO 2 eq/ton crop SD: kg CO 2 eq/ton product Future: SD: e ec in kg CO 2 eq/ dry-ton crop SD: e ec, e p, e td, in kg CO 2 eq/ dry-ton product Farm/ Plantation/ Central office/ FGP Processing unit 1 Processing unit 2 Raw material emissions (e ec ) Transport emissions (e td ) Processing emissions (e p ) Transport emissions (e td ) Processing emissions (e p ) Transport & distribution emissions (e td ) SD: Sustainability declaration ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 9

Third countries can submit to the Commission reports with data on typical emissions from cultivation of feedstock GHG note from the Commission Member States or competent authorities of third countries may submit reports with typical GHG emissions from cultivation Reports are treated similar to NUTS2 -reports from EU Member States Values need to be reported in kg CO 2 eq/dry-ton feedstock ISCC allows system users to use those values as alternative to actual GHG values for cultivation GHG values can be used by system users cultivating crops within the defined area In case of interest ISCC must be contacted Third countries reports ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 10

EU Member state implementation of the RED/FQD Amendment still unclear Some Member States have contradicting legislation to the new requirements of the amended RED/FQD and to the requirements under the re-recognized voluntary certification schemes As usual, it will take time until the RED/FQD Amendment is implemented by all Member States ISCC will remain flexible with respect to the differing requirements between Member States, will inform all system participants and certification bodies of any changes and will try to install generous transition periods ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 11

Overview on shortcomings regarding GHG calculations and audits (based on key learnings from ISCC Integrity Audits) Incorrect, inaccurate or non-transparent calculation of GHG emissions Use of software allowing only the visualization of inputs and final GHG results. Calculation method and correctness of GHG calculations cannot be verified Incorrect emission factors and missing sources of emission factors Incorrect allocation of GHG emissions to main output product and to co-products Incorrect or inconsistent use of conversion factors Missing waste water treatment emissions Units of emission factors are missing Specific input data (e.g. amount of N fertilizers, sodium hydroxide) not realistic in relation to the amount of processed material or outputs Individual calculations of farm/ first gathering point or processing emissions provided by company do not result in the processing emissions stated in the audit procedure Adjusted GHG calculations not send to CB. CB must adjust audit procedure and send to ISCC ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 12

On November 30, the EC published the RED 2 proposal comparison of GHG savings between current RED and proposed RED 2 % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60 % minimum GHG savings for new operations after October, 5 2015 50 % minimum GHG savings from 1 Jan 2018 83% 83% 77% 72% 65% 87% 60% 50% 47% 56% 51% 50% 55% 40% 30% 20% 38% 19% 25% 31% 35 % minimum GHG savings 10% 0% Rapeseedbiodiesel Palm-biodiesel (CH4-capture) Palm-biodiesel (open effluent pond) Soybeanbiodiesel Waste cooking oil biodiesel Current RED RED 2 Animal fats from rendering biodiesel Palm-HVO (CH4-capture) Waste cooking oilhvo ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited. 13

THANK YOU! Contact Dr Jan Henke ISCC System GmbH Hohenzollernring 72 D-50672 Cologne, Germany Email: henke@iscc-system.org Tel: +49 221 3799 8487 Fax: +49 221 941 5863