Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Similar documents
Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Activated Sludge Base Notes: for student. Activated Sludge Intro. What is Activated Sludge? 3/12/2012

Activated Sludge Process Control: Nitrification

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Comnletely Mixed Activated SIud2e (CMAS) Bioreactor Desi2n Eguations

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

AquaSBR. Sequencing Batch Reactor Process

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

Secondary Treatment Process Control

Presentation Outline

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Key Points. The Importance of MCRT/SRT for Activated Sludge Control. Other (Confusing) Definitions. Definitions of SRT

American Water College 2010

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Making Your Plant Denitrify

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Probabilistic Modeling of Two-Stage Biological Nitrogen Removal Process: Formulation of Control Strategy for Enhanced Process Certainty

19. AEROBIC SECONDARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

19. AEROBIC SECONDARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

The oxidation index: a tool for controlling the activated sludge process

OPTIMIZING THE OPERATION OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES GRANT WEAVER, PE & WASTEWATER OPERATOR WEBINAR MARCH 18, 2014

6. Activated Sludge Process : Introduction

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

Bio-Tiger Model Biokinetic Model that Simulates Activated Sludge Processes

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

OPTIMISING OPERATIONS OF YOUR ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Module 19 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater. Lecture 24 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater

UNOX Wastewater System Evaluation, March 10-13, 2008 Draft for Client Review

Environmental Engineering I Jagadish Torlapati, PhD Fall 2017 MODULE 3 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CONTROL PARAMETERS QS = VX F M

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

HOW TO SELECT SRT. SRT is selected based on the following treatment requirements/objectives:

Simultaneous Nutrient Removal: Quantification, Design, and Operation. Leon Downing, Ph.D., PE Donohue & Associates

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Oxidation Ditch Technologies

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

Utilization of Dynamic Modeling to Evaluate and Design Secondary Clarifiers for the Muddy Creek WWTP

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Oxidation Ditch Technologies WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

ANOXIC BIOREACTOR SIZING

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

EFFECT OF FERROUS SULPHATE ON THE SIMULTANEOUS ORGANIC MATTER AND NUTRIENT REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

General Information on Nitrogen

SWIM and Horizon 2020 Support Mechanism

Elements of Process Control Copyright February 1, All rights reserved. Revised January 11, 2013

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

Chapter 2: Conventional Wastewater Treatment (continue)

NC-PC Industry Day Pretreatment 101. Industrial Waste Impacts on POTW Treatment Processes. Dawn Padgett Operations Manager Charlotte Water

TREATMENT OF HIGH SULFITE REFINERY WASTEWATER BY CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

Integrated Activated Sludge and Biosolids Treatment to Conserve Energy & Waste Solids Disposal

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Activated Sludge Process Control:

PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ

Goals of Process Analysis. Process Operation of the Winslow WWTP. Initial Operations Analysis. Flow Data from 1/2014 to 3/2015 8/14/2015

Sequence Batch Reactor A New Technology in Waste Water Treatment

NITROGEN REMOVAL GUIDE FOR WASTEWATER OPERATORS THE WATER PLANET COMPANY FORMS OF NITROGEN OF INTEREST TO WASTEWATER OPERATORS

By Jack Wendler/Ripon WWTF

RYKI WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIRST NEREDA IN POLAND Authors: Joana Doutor, Janusz Sławiński and Bart de Bruin

April 29, 2012 Should We Do More with Less or Less with More? The Next Frontier of Wastewater Treatment

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Transcription:

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Outline Process Types & Kinetics Influent Monitoring Process Monitoring & Control Nitrification

Intensive Sampling?

Process Flow Regimes Complete Mix (CSTR) and Plug Flow Processes

Substrate Concentration Complete Mix (aka CSTR) Ideal CSTR Dilution Effects Influence on Kinetics Influent Pros: Stable Process Can Handle Shock Loads Cons: Low Rate Larger Tanks Effluent Time

Specific Growth Rate Growth Kinetics Kinetic Considerations K s Half Saturation Coefficient Low DO Low substrate µ max μ max 2 K s Limiting Nutrient Concentration

Growth Kinetics How does this affect operation/performance? Process Kinetics= Low Rate Process Monod Kinetics: (Substrate Limited Growth) μ = μ max S Ks + S Where: µ = Specific growth rate (day -1 ) µ max = Maximum Specific Growth Rate (day -1 ) K s = Half Saturation Constant (mg/l) S = Limiting Substrate Concentration (mg/l) Example Low DO on Autotroph Growth Rate µ max = 1.0 /day K s = 0.5 mg/l S = 0.25 mg/l µ = 0.33 /day 1/3 of maximum growth rate

Plug Flow Processes

Plug Flow Processes Ideal/Theoretical PFR No Longitudinal Mixing CSTR s in Series

Substrate Concentration Plug Flow Processes Concentration Gradient through tank length, High to Low Favorable Kinetics: Substrate Concentration High S >> Ks Maximum Growth Rate High Rate Process Pros: High Efficiency Low Effluent Concentrations Smaller Reactors Influent Cons: Susceptible to Shock Loads Requires Tighter Control Effluent Time

Influent Monitoring Influent changes are often the cause of operational issues.

Influent Monitoring Changes in loading Seasonal Industries Nutrient Balance Sidestreams Temperature Representative Sampling

Influent Monitoring Changes in loading Nutrient Balance Macronutrients Phosphorus Nitrogen Ratio of macronutrients required for microbial growth C:N:P 100:5:1

Influent Monitoring Nutrient Balance BOD 5 = 500 mg/l TKN = 20 mg/l TP = 5 mg/l Is this OK for normal growth?

Influent Monitoring Chemical Oxygen Demand- COD Develop Relationship with BOD 5 for your facility COD Typically 2 to 2.5 x BOD 5 COD analyses is fast compared to BOD 5 3hrs compared to 5 days min

Influent Monitoring Process Sidestreams Biosolids Processing- Typically a high strength waste stream 12 Try to avoid return during peak loading periods Ammonia at the anoxic zone 10 8 6 4 2 0 0:00 2:24 4:48 7:12 9:36 12:00 14:24 16:48 19:12 21:36 0:00 Time

Influent Monitoring Temperature Changes Microrganisms are highly sensitive to temperature Daily Influent Temperature Readings Recommended Spring & Fall Foaming Events High Runoff Events- Snowmelt Industrial Dischargers

Process Monitoring & Control Dissolved Oxygen F:M SVI

Process Monitoring & Control Dissolved Oxygen Aerobic heterotrophs (BOD 5 removal) and autotrophs (nitrification) require oxygen to respire Rule of thumb 2.0 mg/l Lower concentrations can cause low DO Bulking Competition for limited oxygen-filaments vs Rotifers Filaments will outcompete

Process Monitoring & Control Dissolved Oxygen In Plug Flow Processes monitor DO residual along length of aeration tank- create DO profile. Focus at head of tank where demand is highest Not true for CSTR process- DO should be nearly the same at all points in tank Monitor during peak loading periods

Process Monitoring & Control F/M (Food to Microorganism Ratio) Key parameter for maintaining normal operation Plug Flow Process 0.2-0.4/day CSTR Process 0.05-0.3/day

Process Monitoring & Control F/M (Food to Microorganism Ratio) Low F/M is common- Why? Engineers are conservative Facility designed for future conditions Designed to handle peak conditions Tends to be oversized for normal conditions

Process Monitoring & Control F/M (Food to Microorganism Ratio) Problems Associated with Low F/M Sludge Bulking Foaming - Nocardia

Process Monitoring & Control F/M Calculation High F/M Problems not as common (my experience) Typically found at industrial WWTF s or Industrial discharges to municipal WWTF s High F/M problems similar to low F/M Sludge Bulking (Filamentous & NonFilamentous) Viscous Bulking Foaming

Process Monitoring & Control F/M Calculation Food= lbs of BOD 5 per day into process Microorganism= lbs of microorganisms in the process F/M= lbs BOD 5 /day lbs MLVSS

Process Control F/M Calculation A WWTF has an influent flow of 5.5 MGD with a BOD 5 concentration of 200 mg/l. The aeration tank has a volume of 3.2 MG and an MLSS concentration of 2,800 mg/l. Assume the MLSS volatility is 85%. What's the F/M for the plant? Food= 5.5MGD * 200mg/L * 8.34lb/gal = 9,174 lb BOD 5 /day Microorganism = 3.2MG * 2,800 mg/l *.85 * 8.34lb/gal = 63,517 lb MLVSS F/M = 9,174/63,517 = 0.144/day

Process Monitoring & Control MCRT Mean Cell Residence Time Measure of how long microorganisms stay in the system Key operating parameter Plug Flow Process CSTR Process 5-15 days 10-30 days Longer MCRT s tend to be more susceptible to bulking & foaming

Process Monitoring & Control MCRT Mean Cell Residence Time MCRT (days) = Total Solids in System (lbs) Solids Removed From System (lbs/day) Total Solids- Can include solids in clarifier blankets Solids Removed- WAS + TSS in effluent

Process Monitoring SVI- Sludge Volume Index Measure of how well sludge settles and compacts Accounts for MLSS (compared to just SV30 test) SVI <100 Good SVI 100-150 OK SVI >150 Bulking

Process Monitoring SVI- Sludge Volume Index SVI= SV 30 (ml/l) MLSS (g/l) An SV 30 test settled to 450ml in a 1L settleometer in 30 minutes. The MLSS was 3,200 mg/l. What s the SVI? SVI = 450 ml/l = 140 ml/g 3.2g/L

Process Control Nitrification Autotrophs- Slow Growers, Primary Requirements Carbon INORGANIC- NOT BOD! Oxygen (4.6 parts/ part NH4-N oxidized) Alkalinity (7.2 parts/part NH4-N Oxidized) ph > 7 (7.5-7.8 best)

Questions?