Runoff Hydrographs. The Unit Hydrograph Approach

Similar documents
Module 3. Lecture 6: Synthetic unit hydrograph

Module 3. Lecture 4: Introduction to unit hydrograph

Rainfall - runoff: Unit Hydrograph. Manuel Gómez Valentín E.T.S. Ing. Caminos, Canales y Puertos de Barcelona

Engineering Hydrology. Class 16: Direct Runoff (DRO) and Unit Hydrographs

Introduction to Hydrology, Part 2. Notes, Handouts

1. Stream Network. The most common approach to quantitatively describing stream networks was postulated by Strahler (1952).

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

Engineering Hydrology Class 3

Peak discharge computation

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:

FAST WATER / SLOW WATER AN EVALUATION OF ESTIMATING TIME FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF

Norman Maclean Snowmelt Flow rate Storm flows fs (c flow m a tre S

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

What is runoff? Runoff. Runoff is often defined as the portion of rainfall, that runs over and under the soil surface toward the stream

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Chapter H. Introduction to Surface Water Hydrology and Drainage for Engineering Purposes

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

Modeling the Hydrologic Impacts of Control Structures Utilizing LiDAR, ICPR, and GIS Technologies

Basic Hydrology Runoff Curve Numbers

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

San Francisco State University Site 1 Vegetated Infiltration Basin Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Runoff Processes. Daene C. McKinney

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Utah State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering CEE 3430 Engineering Hydrology Test 2. Date: 3/31/2014

Introduction, HYDROGRAPHS

Detention Pond Design Considering Varying Design Storms. Receiving Water Effects of Water Pollutant Discharges

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

DETENTION BASIN DESIGN USING RATIONAL HYDROGRAPHS

Stream hydrographs. Stream hydrographs. Baseflow. Graphs of river stage or discharge at a single location as a function of time

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

HERPIC County Storm Drainage Manual

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Unit 2: Geomorphologic and Hydrologic Characteristics of Watersheds. ENVS 435: Watershed Management INSTR.: Dr. R.M. Bajracharya

5/25/2017. Overview. Flood Risk Study Components HYDROLOGIC MODEL (HEC-HMS) CALIBRATION FOR FLOOD RISK STUDIES. Hydraulics. Outcome or Impacts

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

I(n)Kn. A Qp = (PRF) --- (8) tp Where A is the watershed area in square miles and PRF is the unit hydrograph peak rate factor.

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA AND DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL

Stormwater Management Impacts Resulting from the Volumetric Abstraction of Runoff from Frequent Storms per PADEP CG-1. Geoffrey A. Cerrelli 1, P.E.

Autumn semester of Prof. Kim, Joong Hoon

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Emerging Planning Approaches and Control Technologies

5/11/2007. WinTR-55 for Plan Reviews Small Watershed Hydrology Overview

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

CVEN 339 Summer 2009 Final Exam. 120 minutes allowed. 36 Students. No curve applied to grades. Median 70.6 Mean 68.7 Std. Dev High 88 Low 24.

ENGN.4010 ENGINEERING CAPSTONE DESIGN Watershed Analysis. CiA

IJSER. within the watershed during a specific period. It is constructed

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

Hydrologic Calibration:

Example 1: Pond Design in a residential development (Water Quantity calculations for a Wet Pond and Wet Extended Detention Pond)

Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) Sunil KUMAR Director, National Water Academy

Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Composite CN or Not? Treatment Volume: Curve Numbers. Treatment Volume: Calculation. Treatment Volume: Calculation

RUNOFF CALCULATIONS RATIONAL METHOD. To estimate the magnitude of a flood peak the following alternative methods are available:

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Modeling Infiltration BMPs

Chapter Introduction. 5.2 Computational Standard Methods HYDROLOGY

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

2

SAN GORGONIO PASS CAMPUS - PHASE I

Computation of excess stormflow at the basin scale. Prof. Pierluigi Claps. Dept. DIATI, Politecnico di Torino

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

HYDROLOGY WORKSHEET 1 PRECIPITATION

APPENDIX K OPERATIONS AND FINAL COVER SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:

Stormwater Review Part 2. Rainfall and Runoff. Tom Seybert, PE and Andy Bennett, PE. Pennsylvania Surveyors Conference 2019

Cumulative Precipitation

Engineering Hydrology

HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF URBANIZATION: WHITE ROCK CREEK, DALLAS TEXAS. Julie Anne Groening Vicars, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of

HYDROLOGY CHECKLIST FOR LAND DISTURBANCE PERMITS

Tom Ballestero, Rob Roseen, James Houle, Tim Puls, Federico Uribe, Josh Briggs

Water Quality Design Storms for Stormwater Hydrodynamic Separators

EXPLICIT FUNCTIONS FOR IMPLICIT RESERVOIR ROUTING

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

Calibration of Hydrologic Design Inputs for a Small Urban Watershed

Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC TABLES AND CURVES

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

Section 2: Hydrology. Introduction. What is the Return Period? Intensity-Duration-Frequency Data. Generating a runoff hydrograph 85 Minutes

CIVE22 BASIC HYDROLOGY Jorge A. Ramírez Homework No 7

DERIVATION AND CALIBRATION OF VOLUME-BASED RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR DENVER AREA, COLORADO

UPDATE OF ARC TP108 RUN-OFF CALCULATION GUIDELINE

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Surface Skimmer and Baffle Sediment Basins, Modeling the Benefits

DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED STEERING COMMITTEE FINAL MEMBER CRITERIA COMPARISON

June 2017 C.3 Workshop Sizing Example. Section II.B Sizing Volume-Based Treatment Measures based on the Adapted CASQA Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach

DEVELOPMENT OF PEAK RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS FOR OBA AND OTIN RIVERS IN OSUN STATE, NIGERIA

Design Example Residential Subdivision

1 n. Flow direction Raster DEM. Spatial analyst slope DEM (%) slope DEM / 100 (actual slope) Flow accumulation

Effect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

CONSISTENCY BETWEEN CUHP AND RATIONAL METHODS James C.Y. Guo, PhD, P.E., and Ben Urbonas, P.E., D.WRD 08/04/2008

Transcription:

Runoff Hydrographs The Unit Hydrograph Approach

Announcements HW#6 assigned

Storm Water Hydrographs Graphically represent runoff rates vs. time Peak runoff rates Volume of runoff Measured hydrographs are best But not often available Methods are available to develop a synthetic hydrograph Use a unit hydrograph (UHG)

Unit Hydrograph Widely used method of empirical storm flow analysis Def: Basin outflow resulting from 1 unit (in./mm/cm/etc) of direct runoff generated uniformly over the drainage area at a uniform rainfall rate during a specified period of rainfall intensity.

Unit Hydrographs Assumptions: rainfall intensity is not considered linear relationship between stormwater runoff and rainfall UHG is independent of antecedent conditions uniform rainfall distribution

Unit Hydrographs Derived from observed records extensive data requirements streamflow and rainfall record pairs generally not used for small catchments UHG represent direct surface runoff baseflow (ground water) must be removed For small catchments ==> synthetic UHG models models give ==> tp (time to peak), qp(peak flow rate and mathematical shape of curve

Duration of the Unit Hydrograph Unit hydrograph have a duration that is the same as the duration of the rainfall excess that produced it Conceptually it is possible to have an infinite # of hydrographs corresponding to different durations. Practically, unit hydrographs are limited to rainfall excesses up to 25% different than the duration of the unit hydrograph.

How is the unit hydrograph used? For a unit hydrograph of duration, D, the volume underneath the hydrograph is always 1, produced by 1 unit of excess rainfall. A hydrograph for a block of rainfall excess of any depth is obtained by multiplying the ordinates of the unit hydrograph by the depth of the rainfall excess block. The result are the ordinates of the runoff hydrograph.

Unit Hydrograph Development Approximate hydrograph using a triangle Need to find: Time to peak (t p ) Time lag (t l ) Time of the base (t b ) Peak flow (q p )

Lag time, t L SCS Equation to calculate time lag L = hydraulic length of watershed (feet) S = curve number parameter (inches) Y = average land slope of the watershed (%) t l = time lag (hours) t L L 0.8 (S 1) 1900Y 0.5 0.7 Eq. 1

Unit Hydrograph Development Equation to calculate time to peak t p = t l + D/2, ( Eq. 2), where: t l = time lag D = time increment of rainfall excess SCS Equation to calculate peak flow (q p ) q p = 484A / t p, (Eq. 3), where: A = watershed area in mi 2 t p = time to peak in hours q p = peak flow in cfs per inch of runoff*** SCS Equation for time of base (t b ) t b = 2.67t p (Eq. 4)

Example 5.10 in Text Given: 1-hr storm = 2.5 in. P = 2.5 in. 500 ac watershed = 21,780,000 ft 2 Land use = commercial business Watershed soil HSG = D Average watershed slope = 1% Hydraulic length of watershed = 6,000 ft Required: Find the storm hydrograph Use the triangular unit hydrograph method

Example 5.10 in Text Solution: HSG = D / Commercial T. 5.1 CN = 95 S = 0.53 in. S = (1000 / CN) - 10 Assume AMC = II Q = 1.96 in. of runoff Using the SCS CN method Q = (P - 0.2S) 2 / (P + 0.8S) Step #1 Find points to develop the unit hydrograph t l = 0.75 hr (45 min) Use Eq. 1 t p = 1.25 hr (75 min) Use Eq. 2 t b = 3.33 hr (200 min) Use Eq. 4 q p = 302 cfs / 1 in. of runoff Use Eq. 3 Plot unit hydrograph Check area under the triangle 1 in.

Q (cfs) 600 400 300 Volume under triangle = 1/2bh = ½(200 min x 60 sec/min)302.5 ft 3 /sec = 1,815,000 ft 3 Surface runoff depth = 1,815,000 ft 3 / 21,780,000 ft 2 = 0.0833 ft = 1.0 in. ok q p = 302.5 cfs Watershed area (A) = 21,780,000 ft 2 200 t p = 75 50 100 150 t b = 200 T(min)

Example 5.10 in Text Step #2 q p 2.5 rain = 302.5 cfs x 1.96 in. of SRO - SRO = 1.96 in. from the SCS CN Method q p 2.5 rain = 592.9 cfs Plot storm hydrograph Check area under the triangle 1.96 in.

Q (cfs) 600 q p = 592.9 cfs Volume under triangle = 3,557,400 ft 3 Surface runoff depth = 1.96 in. ok 3,557,400 ft 3 / 21,780,000 ft 2 = 0.163 ft = 1.96 in. 400 300 200 50 t p = 75100 150 t b = 200 T(min)

Example 5.11 in Text Given: Same as Example 5.10 but this time more detailed rainfall information 1-hr storm = 2.5 in. 0 15 min = 0.5 in. 15 30 min = 1.0 in. 30 45 min = 0.75 in. 45 60 min = 0.25 in. 500 ac watershed Land use = commercial business Watershed soil HSG = D Average watershed slope = 1% Hydraulic length of watershed = 6,000 ft Required: Find the storm hydrograph

Example 5.11 in Text Solution: HSG = D / Commercial T. 5.1 CN = 95 S = 0.53 in. (same as Ex. 5.10, S = (1000 / CN) - 10) Assume AMC = II Q = 1.96 in. of runoff (same as Ex. 5.10, Q = (P - 0.2S) 2 / (P + 0.8S) Find points to develop the unit hydrograph t L = 0.75 hr (45 min) (same as Ex. 5.10, t L = [L 0.8 (S + 1) 0.7 ] / [1900 x Y 0.5 ] New since D = 15 min. t p = t L + D/2 = 0.88 hr (52.5 min) New since t p = 52.5 min q p = 484(A)/t p = 432 cfs / 1 in. of runoff

Example 5.11 in Text 0 15 min P = 0.5 in. (given) Q 1 = [0.5 0.2(.53))] 2 / [0.5 + 0.8(.53)] Q 1 = 0.17 in. of runoff q p1 = 432 cfs / 1 of SRO x 0.17 = 73.44 cfs t p1 = t L + D/2 = 45 + 15/2 = 52.5 min t b1 = 2.67(t p ) = 2.67(52.5) = 140.2 min

Example 5.11 in Text 0 30 min P = 0.5 + 1.0 = 1.5 in. Q 1 + Q 2 = [1.5 0.2(.53))] 2 / [1.5 + 0.8(.53)] Q 1 + Q 2 = 1.01 in. of runoff Q 2 = 1.01 in. - Q 1 Q 2 = 1.01 0.17 = 0.84 in. of runoff q p2 = 432 cfs / 1 of SRO x 0.84 = 362.88 cfs t p2 = 52.5 + 15 = 67.5 min Shift on the x-axis by 15 min t b2 = 140.2 + 15 = 155.2 min Shift on the x-axis by 15 min

Example 5.11 in Text 0 45 min P = 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.75 = 2.25 in. Q 1 + Q 2 + Q 3 = [2.25 0.2(.53))] 2 / [2.25 + 0.8(.53)] Q 1 + Q 2 + Q 3 = 1.72 in. of runoff Q 3 = 1.72 in. - Q 1 - Q 2 Q 3 = 1.72 0.17 0.84 = 0.71 in. of runoff q p3 = 432 cfs / 1 of SRO x 0.71 = 306.7 cfs t p3 = 52.5 + 15 + 15 = 82.5 min Shift on the x-axis by 30 min t b3 = 140.2 + 15 + 15 = 170.2 min Shift on the x-axis by 30 min

Example 5.11 in Text 0 60 min P = 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.75 + 0.25 = 2.50 in. Q 1 + Q 2 + Q 3 + Q 4 = [2.5 0.2(.53))] 2 / [2.5 + 0.8(.53)] Q 1 + Q 2 + Q 3 + Q 4 = 1.96 in. of runoff Q 4 = 1.96 in. - Q 1 - Q 2 - Q 3 Q 4 = 1.96 0.17 0.84-0.71 = 0.24 in. of runoff q p4 = 432 cfs / 1 of SRO x 0.24 = 103.6 cfs t p4 = 52.5 + 15 + 15 + 15 = 97.5 min Shift on the x-axis by 45 min t b4 = 140.2 + 15 + 15 + 15 = 185.2 min Shift on the x-axis by 45 min

Y = mx + b Y = -mx + b

Y = mx + b m = (73.4 0) / (52.5 140.2) m = - 0.837 Y = -0.837X + b b = Y + 0.837X = 73.4 + 0.837(52.5) b = 117.343 Y = - 0.837X + 117.343 Incremental Hydrograph #1 Q (cfs) 400 300 200 100 0 (52.5, 73.4) (140.2, 0.0) 0 50 100 150 200 Time (min)