Wind Tunnel Applications for Buildings

Similar documents
Wind Tunnel Applications for Buildings

Relationship between importance of wind and height. Importance of wind loads. Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat.

Megacities Building Sway Considerations in Elevators Design for Mega Tall Buildings

WIND LOADS ON BUILDINGS MWFRS (ENVELOPE PROCEDURE)

Integrated Performance Based Design of Tall Buildings for Wind and Earthquakes

S T R U C T U R. A Joint Publication of NCSEA CASE SEI. July 2016 Form follows Physics

Effect of Wind and Structural Parameters on Wind-Induced Acceleration of RC Building

S T R U C T U R. Practical Solutions. magazine. Supplemental Damping and Using Tuned Sloshing Dampers. Tuned Sloshing Dampers

WIND TUNNEL STUDIES AND THEIR VALIDATIONS WITH FIELD MEASUREMENTS FOR A SUPER-TALL BUILDING

Dynamic optimization for the wind-induced response of a tall building

R. J. McNamara, S.E.

Benchmark Buildings for an International HFBB Comparison

Full Paper Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Civil Engineering 2012

Fluid Viscous Dampers to reduce Wind-induced Vibrations in Tall Buildings

Impact of C&C loads due to ASCE/SEI Overview Revised 3/23/2017

Analysis of Wind Loads on Buildings and Signs: A Computer Program Based on ASCE 7

ASCE 7-10 Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions

Adapting Skybridge Design, Construction, and Programming to Accommodate Wind Demand. Anton Davies, Principal, RWDI

Patio Cover Manufacturers and other Interested Parties

16.4 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE BUILDING

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

Aeroelastic Wind-Tunnel Testing Technique Revisited

Strategies for mitigation of progressive collapse of corner panels in reinforced concrete buildings

0306 SEISMIC LOADS GENERAL

Wind Impact on Textile Structures

2012 Wood Frame Construction Manual: Wind Speed and Design Pressure Determination According to ASCE 7 10

Tests and Analysis on Vertical Vibration of Long-Span Prestressed Concrete Floor Sysstem Abstract: Keywords: INTRODUCTION Corresponding Author:

Executive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13

THE PREDICTION OF WIND LOADS ON BUILDING ATTACHMENTS

BUILDING MOTION CONTROL: SUPPLEMENTARY DAMPING SYSTEMS FOR TALL & SLENDER BUILDINGS

WIND CODE EVALUATION. COLOMBIA Evaluation conducted by Guillermo Santana

DYNAMIC WIND LOADING OF H-SHAPED TALL BUILDINGS

Mastering the Challenges: Lessons from the Recent Past. Chris Harris, Operations Manager, Turner International Middle East Ltd

Optimization of Wind Loads Affecting Skyscrapers using ANSYS

Pioneering China s Tallest: Form and Structure of the Ping An Finance Ce nter

Addition. Wind Loads on Rooftop Solar Panels , At a Glance Standard. Wind Loads on Rooftop Solar Panels

ctbuh.org/papers New CTBUH Monograph on Building Motion, Perception and Mitigation Title:

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

2012 International Building Code Errata (Portions of text and tables not shown are unaffected by the errata)

WIND LOADS ON BALUSTRADES. Antonios W. Rofail a, Christian Mans a

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 5, Issue 04, 2017 ISSN (online):

5 Load Determination and Structural Design Criteria

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

SE APPRENTICE. Stephen Metz PE, LEED AP. Today s Speakers. Company Overview. Company Overview 10/13/2015. SE Apprentice. Who We Are.

PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF TALL BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO WIND AN INDIAN SCENARIO

ASCE 7-16: Changes to Wind Calculations for Rooftop Solar

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

ctbuh.org/papers Friend or Foe - Wind at Height Title: Peter Irwin, President, RWDI John Kilpatrick, Head of Structures, RWDI Andrea Frisque, RWDI

ES DEPT OF BLDGS Job Number Scan Code

Torsional and Seismic Behavior of Shear Wall Dominant Flat Plate Buildings

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

CTBUH Technical Paper

Experimental Study on the Outrigger Damping System for High-Rise Building

CTBUH Height Criteria

Introduction to Substation Design TADP 542

Technical Report #3. Matthew R Peyton

Performance-Based Seismic Evaluation of Wind-Impacted Tall Buildings

School of Engineering and Applied Science Building Miami University, Oxford, OH Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF TUBE-IN-TUBE STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

WIND AND TALL BUILDINGS: NEGATIVES AND POSITIVES

Tall buildings. wind engineering & architectural aerodynamics. London Hong Kong Kuala Lumpur Abu Dhabi Dubai Shanghai Houston

Case Study: Challenges of a Single-layer Reticulated Dome

Comparative study of wind tunnel test results to international and Egyptian design codes

Chapter 13 SEISMICALLY ISOLATED STRUCTURE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

ANALYSIS OF WIND & EARTHQUAKE LOAD FOR DIFFERENT SHAPES OF HIGH RISE BUILDING

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLEDGE

5-story Residential Building

DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL EQUIREMENTS

How Beams Work, I. Statics and Strength of Materials

Pre-schematic Considerations. Who. What. Where

Multi-Story Solid Tilt-Up Wall Panel Analysis and Design (ACI 551)

Comparative Study on Dynamic Analysis of Irregular Building with Shear Walls

September 26, 2014 Dr. Linda Hanagan Lhanagan.engr.psu.edu

CE 3150 Reinforced Concrete Design Design Project

Recent Applications of Damping Systems for Wind Response

Wind Analogue or Digital?

Comparative Analysis and Design of Flat and Grid Slab System with Conventional Slab System

boundary layer wind flow. Measured wind pressures were expanded from limited measurement points to all the structural nodes using the orthonormal coor

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

The designer shall also submit additional information required by the University as described and underlined below.

ISSN: International Journal Of Core Engineering & Management (IJCEM) Volume 3, Issue 4, July 2016

Performance Based Design, Value Engineering and Peer Review

WIND FLOW IN THE RECESSED CAVITIES OF A TALL

Association of Caribbean States 2003

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat

Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10

EARTHQUAKE RECORDS OBSERVED IN TALL BUILDINGS WITH TUNED PENDULUM MASS DAMPER

Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting

The requirements set forth in this Section shall govern the construction and/or installation of all Renewable Energy Systems:

Framing & Building Basics. Architectural Drawing & Interior Design

Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

CFD/FEM Based Analysis Framework for Wind Effects on Tall Buildings in Urban Areas

Structural Performance Assessment and Control of Super Tall Buildings During Construction

sixteen seismic design Earthquake Design Earthquake Design Earthquake Design dynamic vs. static loading hazard types hazard types: ground shaking

Integrated Design: Everything Matters The Development of Burj Dubai and The New Beijing Poly Plaza

Earthquake Resistant Design. Dr. S. K. PRASAD Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering, Mysore

A. Are Plan Reviews Important? B. Statement of Special Inspections C. Deferred Submittals D. DFCM Requirements

Structural System of North-East Asia Trade Tower in Korea

La Jolla Commons Office Tower. Appendix Slides. Architecture Breadth. Dual Systems Check. Lateral System. Shear Wall Modeling. Verification.

Transcription:

Wind Tunnel Applications for Buildings Presented by: Jim Swanson, Halvorson and Partners Donald Scott, PCS Structural Solutions Jon Galsworthy, RWDI Add Company Logo Here

Outline 1. Introduction 2. ASCE7 Wind tunnel code requirements 3. Types of wind tunnel testing 4. Input requirements for tests 5. Climate study

Outline (cont d) 6. Model construction 7. Understanding the Report 8. Occupancy comfort thresholds 9. Improving building performance

Introduction Advantages to use of Wind Tunnel Studies: Wind loads cannot be accurately determined by code prescribed methods for all building geometries. Building cost and safety depend on good knowledge of the wind loading and its associated response. Building profiles can be formed to reduce wind loads with the aid of wind tunnel tests. Evaluation of motion

Introduction Buildings Benefitting From Wind Tunnel Studies: Tall or slender structures. Buildings with irregular geometries. Long span, light weight roof structures.

Introduction Slender Buildings and Motion Perception:

Introduction Irregular Geometries:

Introduction Building Appendages:

Introduction Accuracy of Cladding Pressures: Damage following Hurricane Wilma

ASCE7 10 Section 27.1.3 Limitations (MWFRS Directional) The provisions of this chapter take into consideration the load magnification effect caused by gusts in resonance with along wind vibrations of flexible buildings. Buildings not meeting the requirements of Section 27.1.2, or having unusual shapes or response characteristics shall be designed using recognized literature documenting such wind load effects or shall use the wind tunnel procedure specified in Chapter 31.

ASCE7 10 Section 31.1 Scope User Note: Chapter 31 may always be used for determining wind pressures for the MWFRS and/or for C&C of any building or structure. This method is considered to produce the most accurate wind pressures of any method specified in this Standard.

ASCE7 10 31.4.1 Mean Recurrence Intervals of Load Effects The load effect required for Strength Design shall be determined for the same mean recurrence interval as for the Analytical Method, by using a rational analysis method, defined in the recognized literature, for combining the directional wind tunnel data with the directional meteorological data or probabilistic models based thereon.

ASCE7 10 31.4.1 Mean Recurrence Intervals of Load Effects The load effect required for Allowable Stress Design shall be equal to the load effect for Strength Design divided by 1.6.

ASCE7 10 Section 31.4.3 Limitations on Loads Loads for the main wind force resisting system determined by wind tunnel testing shall be limited such that the overall principal loads in the x and y directions are not less than 80 percent of those that would be obtained from Part 1 of Chapter 27 or Part 1 of Chapter 28.

ASCE7 10 Section 31.4.3 Limitations on Loads Pressures for components and cladding determined by wind tunnel testing shall be limited to not less than 80 percent of those calculated for Zone 4 for walls and Zone 1 for roofs using the procedure of Chapter 30.

ASCE7 10 Section 31.4.3 Limitations on Loads The limiting values of 80 percent may be reduced to 50 percent for the main wind force resisting system and 65 percent for components and cladding if either of the following conditions applies:

ASCE7 10 Section 31.4.3 Limitations on Loads (cont) 1. 1. There were no specific influential buildings or objects within the detailed proximity model. 2. 2. Loads and pressures from supplemental tests for all significant wind directions in which specific influential buildings or objects are replaced by the roughness representative of the adjacent roughness conditions, but not rougher than exposure B, are included in the test results.

Wind Tunnel Testing

Wind Tunnel Testing Common Testing Options: Structural loads and motion. Exterior wall/roofing pressures. Wind induced vibrations. Pedestrian comfort. Snow loading. Ventilation.

Wind Tunnel Testing Structural Load Models: 1. High Frequency Force Balance Model 2. Pressure Integration Model 3. Aeroelastic Model

Wind Tunnel Testing Structural Load Model:

Wind Tunnel Testing Cladding Model:

Wind Tunnel Testing Pedestrian Model:

Wind Tunnel Testing Pedestrian Model:

Wind Tunnel Testing Surface Velocity Vector Test Model Snow Drift:

Input Requirements MWFRS and C&C Testing: A 3D CAD model of the development. Current architectural drawing files. Sections detailing the external characteristics of the structure. All available information regarding the surroundings within a 1800 ft radius of the site.

Input Requirements Additional for MWFRS Testing: Mass properties for each floor/story. Mode shapes and corresponding natural frequencies. Typically the first two translational modes and the first torsional mode are required. A drawing showing the origin of the structural model co ordinate system with respect to an architectural floor plan.

Input Requirements Structural Load Input Data in Excel:

Input Requirements Mode Graphics: T 1 = 5.91 sec

Input Requirements Locate Model Origin 78-9 ORIGIN 29-6

Input Requirements Additional for Pedestrian Wind Studies: Preliminary Landscaping plans. Location of pedestrian use areas of the site.

Wind Climate Study Wind Climate Modeling: Wind loads are dependent on wind climate at the project site. Wind climate for each site originates from historical data. Hurricane regions may be simulated. Wind climate expressed in form of probability of wind speed being exceeded for each direction.

Wind Climate Study Wind Climate Modeling: Probabilistic methods used to predict potential wind speeds in each direction. Values are scaled such that wind velocities for a specified return period correspond with ASCE 7 maps.

Wind Climate Study Directional Distribution of Winds:

Wind Climate Study Probability Winds Will Be Exceeded:

This image cannot currently be displayed. Model Construction 1:400 Scale Model on Rotating Table:

Model Construction Wind Simulation Spire and Roughness:

Model Construction Varying Exposure Conditions:

Model Construction Structural Model Force Balance Model:

This image cannot currently be displayed. This image cannot currently be displayed. Model Construction Cladding Pressure Model:

Report Output Essential Structural Report Data: Floor by floor wind loads to be entered in structural analysis model. Directional wind load combinations. Once combined, wind loads are to be factored per ASCE Basic Load Combinations. Building accelerations, evaluated at the top occupied floor of the structure.

Report Output Floor by Floor Wind Loads: Floor Height (m) Above Base Fx (N) Fy (N) Mz (N m) Base 0.0 73900 79300 726000 1 4.1 40000 74500 567000 2 7.6 38100 87400 435000 3 11.8 41200 92600 435000 4 15.9 41000 95900 513000 5 20.0 43200 100200 602000 6 24.1 49700 104700 699000 7 28.2 55900 109100 796000 8 32.3 62300 113900 906000 9 36.4 68700 118800 1018000 10 40.5 75400 124100 1137000 11 44.6 81700 129300 1255000 12 48.7 87800 134600 1365000

This image cannot currently be displayed. Report Output Base Loads by Wind Direction: Figures indicate base forces for the design wind speed (50-yr or 100-yr) from each direction. Alternative forms include are wind load coefficients by wind direction.

Report Output Directional Wind Load Combinations: Load Case X Forces (Fx) Y Forces (Fy) Torsion (Mz) 1 +85% +30% +40% 2 +85% +30% 30% 3 +85% 55% +40% 4 +85% 55% 30% 5 100% +65% +50% 6 100% +65% 30% 7 100% 35% +50% 8 100% 35% 30% 9 +30% +100% +65% 10 +30% +100% 35% 11 +35% 90% +50% 12 +35% 90% 50% 13 60% +100% +65% 14 60% +100% 35% 15 45% 90% +50% 16 45% 90% 50% 17 +30% +70% +100% 18 +30% +50% 90% 19 +35% 35% +100% 20 +30% 60% 90% 21 60% +70% +100% 22 55% +50% 90% 23 60% 30% +100% 24 55% 60% 90% The 24 load combinations represent all the permutations with each load component maximized and minimized. Each combination is derived from the directional wind response data.

This image cannot currently be displayed. Report Output Load Combination: Example: Load Combination #5-100%, +65%, +50%; and Load Combination #13-60%, +100%, -35%. The two combinations are each derived from the responses at 120

This image cannot currently be displayed. Report Output Accelerations:

This image cannot currently be displayed. This image cannot currently be displayed. Report Output Essential C&C Report Data: Design pressures for all wall and roof surfaces. Separate diagrams required for positive and negative wall pressures.

This image cannot currently be displayed. Report Output Cladding Pressure Diagrams:

This image cannot currently be displayed. Report Output Snow Load Diagrams:

Building Motion

This image cannot currently be displayed. Comfort Thresholds CTBUH 1 Guidelines 1 Year and 10 Year: 1. Isyumov, N.I., Criteria for Wind-Induced Accelerations of Tall Buildings, Presented at Rio de Janeiro CTBUH Conference, 1993.

Comfort Thresholds ISO 2 Motion Criteria 1 Year: Peak acceleration, milli-g 25 20 15 10 5 0 Office Residential 0.1 1 Frequency, Hz 2. ISO Standard 10137

Comfort Thresholds Comparison of Predicted to Threshold Limits:

Pedestrian Comfort Thresholds

Comfort Thresholds Pedestrian Threshold Limits: No universally recognized standard for pedestrian comfort levels. Some cities have implemented standards as part of approval and permitting process Recommendations vary from firm to firm, yet should yield comparable outcomes.

Comfort Thresholds Pedestrian Threshold Limits Example 1:

Comfort Thresholds Pedestrian Threshold Limits Example 2:

Improvements Adjustments to Improve Accelerations:

Improvements Adjustments to Improve Accelerations:

Improvements Shaping Strategies:

Improvements Corner Softening Taipei 101:

Improvements Tapering, Changes in Cross Section Burj Khalifa:

Improvements Tapering, Twisting Spoilers Chicago Spire:

Improvements Vertical Ribs Break Up Vortex Shedding:

Questions? Jon Galsworthy jon.galsworthy@rwdi.com Jim Swanson jswanson@halvorsonandpartners.com