EVENT-BASED PATHOGEN ASSESSMENT IN A DEGRADED CATCHMENT. Heidi Josipovic. North East Water

Similar documents
Pathogens in Water. Monitoring, Control and Technologies Available for Treatment. Prepared by; Paul O Callaghan M.Sc. Dr.

Module 6 Water Quality for Domestic and Human Drinking Water Supplies. Water Quality for Domestic and Human Drinking Water Supplies

Index. AWWA see American Water Works Association AWWARF see American Water Works Association Research Foundation

Development of a utility-based strategy for achieving microbiologically safe drinking water

Guidance on the Use of the Microbiological Drinking Water Quality Guidelines

Drinking Water Disinfection For Operators, Town Councils, and LSD Committees

TRIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH BASED TARGETS. Dr Marty Hancock. Tweed Shire Council

CLASS A APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE WODONGA WATER RECYCLING SCHEME. Ian Reimers. North East Water

Microbiological Quality: Understanding Drinking Water Quality and Management

TRIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH BASED TARGETS

TRIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH BASED TARGETS

FNQ Water Conference Michael Lever

Waterborne disease in Sweden. Risk and adaptation

As part of its program to help protect the quality of urban waterways and Lake Erie, the

Health Based Targets Application of Log Reduction Values. Phillip Fasham Manager Water Quality Regulations and Verification

Quantitative Microbial Risk Estimates as a Function of Treatment Performance

2014 Ontario Water Works Conference May 4-7 th, 2014 London, Ontario. Methods for evaluating pathogen log removal in a water treatment plant

Relationship Between Land Use and Water Quality

Evolution of the Turbidity Fact Sheet in the ADWG and its link to the management of Cryptosporidium risk

Rainwater Harvesting. Adam Scheuer (250)

Monitoring of parasitic protozoans in effluent of wastewater treatment works. Presenter: Thandubuhle Gonose

Microbiological Aspects of Drinking Water Treatment. CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology Tim Ellis October 12, 2006

Lesson Overview. Overview Continued. ENVSC 296: Lesson No. 9. Part I: Drinking Water. Lesson 9: Water & Wastewater January 31, 2005

Drinking Water Treatment Overview Filtration and Disinfection

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

Issues. Issues (cont.) A multiple barriers approach is required to provide potable water

customer confidence report

10 Small Water Supplies, Alternative Compliance Criteria

City of Ashland 2018 Water Quality Report

Water quality sampling at Tomahawk Creek

2017 Water Quality Report

Water Pollution. Chapter 20

Treatment of all source water influent & effluent for user application, be it commercial, industrial, domestic, to defined & required standards.

Characterization and Quantification of Microbial Risks: Rainwater/stormwater

2009 Summary Report for Municipalities

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 631. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

Meeting the recycled water challenge for Sydney

Scavenger2000 s Technology

DISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Introduction. 2 Existing Legislation and Guidelines

Gertjan Medema KWR Watercycle Research Institute NL. Delft University of Technology NL. WHO Collaborating Centre for. Water Quality & Health

System Assessment Reports Information Sessions. January 2013

OPERATION OF AN STP FOR RECYCLED WATER PRODUCTION PLANT. Iain Fairbairn. Iain Fairbairn, Plant Manager, Sydney Water

Introduction; Objectives; m,,^ Work Plan; [ H0 «fljaim «BW»* * Analytical Schedule; Evaluation Criteria.

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Desoto County Utilities, PWS #

Chlorate Working Group

Quantitative microbial risk assessment of waterborne infectious diseases

Drinking Water Supply and

Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BACKGROUND 1 Water System Background 1 3 WATER TREATMENT 3 Existing Water Systems 3 Water Quality Regulations and Treated

Applied Environmental Microbiology. Copyright McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC. Permission required for reproduction or display.

WATER QUALITY REPORT

Skyhydrant. Membrane filtration. Project in cooperation with Norplan And Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation Department

INFILTRATION OF FECAL BACTERIA THROUGH SOILS: TIMING AND TILLAGE EFFECTS by M.S. Coyne, C.S. Stoddard, J. H. Grove, and W.O. Thom

A Framework on How to Prepare and Develop Public Health Risk Management Plans for Drinking-water Supplies

Physical water/wastewater treatment processes. Week 2: Overview

Multi-barrier approach and Havelock North in August 2016

Reclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology

2017 JEFFERSON PARISH WATER QUALITY REPORT

Procedure For Disinfection Of Drinking Water In Ontario

The Basics: Water supply

PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF APPLYING UV TECHNOLOGY FOR REUSE WATER DISINFECTION. Wayne Lem. Trojan Technologies

Techneau, 08. December Nanofiltration as a treatment barrier against pathogens

FORM TITLE - Request for Project Funding Management of Burkholderia pseudomallei

Rawal Lake Water Treatment Plant Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Microbiological risk assessment: a scientific basis for managing drinking water safety from source to tap. Pathogens in source water

NZQA registered unit standard version 2 Page 1 of 5. Describe drinking-water contaminants of public health significance

City of Redding Water Utility 2006 Consumer Confidence Report

Small Drinking Water Systems Risk Assessment Guideline, 2018

2012 Greater Vernon Water Master Water Plan Technical Memorandum No.7. Water Treatment

DBO : AN IN-HOUSE SUCCESS AT ESKDALE. Jason Mullins. North East Water

The Application of Flat Ultra-Filtration for Rainwater Reuse

AMHERST COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY P.O. Box 100 Madison Heights, VA Phone: (434) Fax: (434) Water Quality Report

MEMCOR MEMBRANES FOR DRINKING WATER APPLICATIONS

Effect of physical and chemical parameters on water treatment plant effluent quality (particle count and particle size)

2017 Drinking Water Quality Report City of Watford City, ND Watford City * 213 2nd St., NE PO Box 494 Watford City, ND Ph.

RECYCLED WATER AT SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK. Andrzej Listowski SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK AUTHORITY

City of Greenvil e Drinking Water Consumer Confidence Report For P a g e

LifeStraw Community. Safe water for schools, health facilities, community settings and for emergency response

Water Safety Plans for developing countries

Drinking Water. Charles J. Devine, III, MD

To understand how runoff water can be polluted if land uses are not properly managed

Concerns about ranching and

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Water Quality Parameters

Prevention and Mitigation: On-site treatment, in-field die-off and other hazard reduction strategies

Water collection tanks and safe household water

Session 11 The Incomplete Coliform Rule Maine Water Utilities Association February Show

U.S. NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY NAPLES GAETA OLDE MILL INN 2017 DRINKING WATER CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT

HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS FOR WATER SUPPLIES. Kevin Hellier. Melbourne Water Corporation

PATHOGENS IN MANURE MANAGEMENT Is Your Liquid Gold Safe?

Fresh Water Purification for Municipal Systems Global s Unique Modular Platform Systems

Safe Drinking Water Program. Surface Water Identification Protocol (SWIP) May 17, 2016 Tom Yeager, P.G.

City of Enderby Water Treatment Plant

DRINKING WATER TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION. PROF. A.O. OLANIRAN F Department of Microbiology University of KwaZulu-Natal Westville Campus

Reference Guideline #1. Hydrogeological Impact Assessment

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Beau Chêne Water System Public Water Supply ID: LA June 14, 2017

Sawyer PointONE Filter

OPERATORS FRIEND, STREAMING CURRENT DETECTOR. Shane Dunne. Cassowary Coast Regional Council

Sources and microbial quality of irrigation waters and waters used in post-harvest processes

THE TREATMENT OF RAINWATER FOR POTABLE USE

City Of Mt. Pleasant ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

Transcription:

EVENT-BASED PATHOGEN ASSESSMENT IN A DEGRADED CATCHMENT Paper Presented by: Heidi Josipovic Author: Heidi Josipovic, Systems Optimisation Project Officer, North East Water 77 th Annual WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference and Exhibition Bendigo Exhibition Centre 2 to 4 September, 2014 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 22

EVENT-BASED PATHOGEN ASSESSMENT IN A DEGRADED CATCHMENT Heidi Josipovic, Systems Optimisation Project Officer, North East Water ABSTRACT Assessment of source water pathogen contamination is the first step to quantitative microbial risk assessment of drinking water. It is well known that outbreaks of disease caused from drinking water have occurred as a result of extreme events, such as heavy rainfall, which lead to high loads of pathogens washed into the source water. North East Water conducted a project to determine the level of microbial risk in a degraded catchment. Due to extensive cattle, dairy, and sheep farming as well as the presence of septic treatment systems, the King River was selected for this assessment. In September 2013, sampling was conducted immediately after a rain event at the raw water offtakes of Whitfield, Moyhu and Oxley Water Treatment Plants (WTP). The monitoring program included the selected pathogens Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Campylobacter, Enterovirus, Norovirus, faecal indicators (E. coli, and, total coliforms) as well as physico-chemical characteristics. Results indicated that the King River is highly contaminated with Cryptosporidium, Giardia and very high concentrations of E. coli were recorded. From the results there was also an evident rise in E. coli and coliforms in parallel with heightened river turbidity and flow. This event-based data is important information, as it assists in the determination of appropriate treatment barriers and processes at WTPs that draw directly from similar degraded catchments. KEY WORDS Catchment, Pathogen, Risk, Water Quality. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Assessment of source water pathogen contamination in normal and worst case conditions is the first step to quantitative microbial risk assessment of drinking water. It is well known that outbreaks of disease from drinking water have occurred as a result of extreme rainfall events, which lead to high loads of pathogens washed into source waters. Cryptosporidium and Giardia are parasitic disease causing protozoan organisms, found commonly in the environment. There are many species, however not all pose a risk to human health. A multiple barrier approach for water treatment is preferred for decreasing the number of these organisms. This can be achieved with the normal WTP processes of coagulation, flocculation, clarification and filtration, but effective removal is only assured if the processes are fully optimised. The inactivation of protozoan cysts can be achieved with various chemicals and UV treatment. Again, optimisation of these processes is critical. The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (2011) do not set out quantitative treatment requirements for potable water supplies regarding Cryptosporidium or Giardia. However they do promote a catchment to tap multiple barrier risk management system. This catchment assessment was conducted to provide North East Water with a better understanding of the microbial risks present in one of the potentially highest contaminated raw water sources. The King River supplies raw water for three of North East Waters WTPs; namely Whitfield, Oxley and Moyhu. 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 23

Oxley and Moyhu source raw water directly from the river and treat it via coagulation and flocculation aided by Aluminium Chlorohydrate and then passed through pressure filtration vessels, followed by disinfection by chlorine gas. Whitfield sources its raw water from a shallow bore fed directly off the King River, the water quality from this bore was also analysed and proved a lot better than the sample that was taken directly from the River at Whitfield. The Whitfield WTP consists of coagulation/flocculation, Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF), and filtration; disinfection is achieved by UV and hypochlorite. This project was conducted during a high rainfall event in the middle of spring. The monitoring program included the selected pathogens Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Campylobacter, Enterovirus, Norovirus, faecal indicators (E. coli, and, total coliforms) and physico-chemical characteristics of the source water (turbidity, conductivity, temperature, and ph). River height data was also monitored at the time of sampling to determine the stage of the rivers hydrograph. To determine whether the water quality deteriorates or improves throughout the rivers hydrograph during a rain event, samples were taken from the raw water at the Oxley WTP throughout the event, during the rise, peak and fall of the rivers hydrograph. These samples were analysed for faecal indicators (E. coli and coliforms) and several physical parameters. A positive correlation with high levels of faecal indicators and increased river turbidity was evident. The ability of pathogens to persist in surface water is variable. In general, survival is prolonged when water temperature is low. Other factors that influence survival include sunlight/uv intensity and the presence of aquatic microorganisms that may predate on the pathogens. Pathogens ability for adsorption to particles also facilitates survival. 2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 Methodology To provide a representative worst case scenario of this catchment, this project was planned and conducted mid-september during a rain event after a period of dry weather. It was conducted in Spring during the calving season as higher pathogen loads are expected, as calves are a known vector for protozoan oocysts. Sampling was conducted during the first flush of the rain event as more pathogens are released during the first runoff as river levels were starting to rise and before the river turbidity got too high for Cryptosporidium analyses and for the Oxley WTP to run. 50 NTU was the pre-determined turbidity cut off level. Due to all the variables that dictated the success of this project it had to be carefully planned and staff available at short notice. Sampling was conducted at the source water sites directly from the river at Whitfield, Moyhu and Oxley, on 17 September between 8:30 and 9:30 AM; 45mm of rain was recorded in the catchment at this time. Three 10 litre samples were collected from the King River at each of the three WTP offtakes, for analyses by an external laboratory. The samples were immediately chilled to below 10 degrees Celsius. The quality of this shallow bore was also analysed for faecal indicators (E. coli and Coliforms) and physical parameters to determine if there was any difference in quality. A treated water sample was also taken from the Oxley WTP. To get results that represent treatment plant performance the Oxley WTP needed to be running and it was ensured that paired samples were collected for the feed and final samples. To do this a rough estimate was calculated for the time it takes the water to get from the feed to final disinfection and then the samples stratified to get a true paired sample. The three raw water samples and the treated water paired sample for Oxley WTP were 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 24

analysed for the following indicator species as well as several physical parameters Protozoa Giardia, Cryptosporidium parvum Bacteria Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, Coliforms Viruses Enterovirus, Norovirus Physicals Turbidity, conductivity, ph and temperature. The rainfall event can be recognisable by the rapid rise in river level (Figure 1). Response time to runoff is of the order of four to six hours after rainfall; more rapid for Whitfield situated further upstream of the catchment and a longer duration for Oxley further down the catchment. To determine if the water quality changes throughout the hydrograph (rising limb > peak > falling limb) of the river, samples were taken at different stages of the hydrograph and analysed for faecal indicator species (E. coli and Coliforms) and physical parameters (turbidity, conductivity, ph and temperature). From these results it was assumed that protozoan and viruses would behave in a similar manner. Percent recovery and accuracy of analyses for Cryptosporidium, Giardia and viruses is affected by increased turbidity. Due to the nature of the King River system and its history of high turbidity following rainfall events Cryptosporidium, Giardia and viruses were not analysed in these samples. Figure 1 shows the height of the King River from the Docker road monitoring station at the time of sampling. Figure 1: King River water level (meters) at the time of sampling. Image sourced from the Department of Environment and Primary Industries. 2.2 Results Results are provided in the tables below. Table 1 outlines the faecal indicator and physical parameter results from the raw water samples taken at the Oxley water treatment plant at different stages of the hydrograph from the 17 September 2013 to 19 September 2013. The > values resulted from insufficient sample dilution during testing. This was due to an under estimation of the rivers contamination, hence these results would have been a lot higher. Table 1: Faecal indicator results taken at different stages of the King River 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 25

hydrograph throughout the rain event. Site Sample Date Sample Time Turbidity Coliforms (orgs/100ml) E. Coli (orgs/100ml) Oxley source 17/09/2013 9:45 50 >24000 12000 Oxley source 17/09/2013 15:40 38 >24000 >24000 Oxley source 18/09/2013 8:20 36 69000 9600 Oxley source 18/09/2013 15:00 34 37000 8600 Oxley source 19/09/2013 13:00 28 24000 3300 Table 2: Faecal indicator and physical parameter results from the three raw water samples as well as the Oxley treated water and Whitfield bore water samples. Site Turbidity Coliforms (orgs/100ml) E. Coli (orgs/100ml) Whitfield River 7.2 13000 2000 Moyhu River 42 >24000 >24000 Oxley River 50 >24000 >24000 Oxley Treated 0.2 0 0 Whitfield bore 1.7 20 0 Table 3 provides the Cryptosporidium and Giardia results for the three source water samples and the Oxley WTP treated water sample. This table also indicates the percent recoveries for each of the analyses and number of oocysts per a litre of sample. From other similar studies, analysed environmental flood waters tend to have poor recovery of Cryptosporidium. It is believed that this is due to the increased turbidity and interference with the immunomagnetic capture of the Cryptosporidium oocysts as well as the comparatively small size of the oocysts through shielding. Table 3: Cryptosporidium and Giardia results from the three raw water samples and the treated Oxley WTP sample. Site Whitfield source Moyhu source Oxley source Oxley treated 2.3 Discussion Volume analysed # Crypto # Giardia % recovery Crypto % recovery Giardia 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 26 Total Crypto # Crypto per 1 Lt Total Giardia # Giardia per 1 Lt 20 8 1 12 88 67 3.35 9 2.22 8 6 2 19 77 32 4 3 0.38 8 3 1 28 83 11 0.72 1 0.13 20 Not detected Not detected (* note Crypto = Cryptosporidium, and # = number) 62 91 0 0 0 0 Sources of pathogen presence in the King River catchment may include sewage contamination and livestock wastes applied to land; animal faeces deposited on land by grazing animals (cattle and sheep); discharges from septic tank systems; and defecation by indigenous fauna. Agricultural practices are most likely the highest contributing factor to the high level of

contamination in this catchment. Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts may survive in water for several months, especially at lower temperatures. High levels of Cryptosporidium and Giardia were present in all three source water samples analysed for this report. As a result of highly turbid samples only 8 litres could be analysed from the Oxley and Moyhu source water samples and percent recovery of Cryptosporidium was quite low. Protozoan pathogens were of particular concern due to their resistance to chlorine disinfection, making their removal solely relied on the effectiveness of the filtration barrier at both the Moyhu and Oxley water treatment plants. In water treatment systems, the strong cell wall of the protozoan cysts protects the organisms from disinfection chemical doses (such as Chlorine) which would normally be effective for most bacteria and viruses. Giardia cysts can be inactivated by adequate chlorine doses and contact times. Cryptosporidium oocysts however are almost completely resistant to chlorine based disinfectants. From investigations based on tests for infectivity, it is evident that Ultra Violet light can affectively inactivate these oocysts. The role of filtration is to remove suspended materials from dosed water to a degree that will optimise the subsequent disinfection step and to act as a barrier to many biological hazards in particular the chlorine resistant protozoans. To put the capability of the filtration process into perspective, you must consider that a typical bacterium is the size of about 1 micron, Giardia cysts are 6 to 14 micron and Cryptosporidium oocysts are smaller at 4 to 6 micron which is several thousand times smaller than the average filter media. Therefore without an effective coagulation, flocculation and clarification process, filtration would be significantly limited in its ability to remove these pathogens and hence could not be relied on solely for pathogen removal. No Cryptosporidium or Giardia was detected in the Oxley WTP treated water sample (Table 3) indicating that the pressure filtration plant was effectively removing the pathogens at the time of sampling. 2.4 Pathogen Longevity in the Environment To determine what affects pathogens and their longevity in the environment several references were reviewed. A report by Nicholson and associates (2000) concluded that temperature is the single most important factor which determines pathogen survival times in the environment. Other factors found to affect pathogen survival include ammonia, high ph, desiccation and competition. Temperature results were taken with each of the samples taken and ranged from 12 to 15 degrees Celsius, which in accordance to evidence found by Quinton and Tyrell (2003) is just in the lower side of the survival spectrum. This could also have been a contributing factor to the high pathogen concentrations evident in the King River. Understanding the pathogen risks and the reasons for variations in source water quality is important, as it will influence the requirements of treatment (log reduction requirements), treatment efficiency and the potential resulting health risk associated with the treated water. Peak events that may have an impact on microbial catchment risk and should be taken into consideration as part of any hazardous event assessment such as this include; upstream events, waste water and stormwater discharges. Additionally, land uses such as, agriculture, forestry, and changes in land use; farming practices; different farming practices may harvest peak events must also be considered. In late winter and spring calving is at its peak in the King River catchment which adds to the protozoan risk in this particular catchment. 3.0 CONCLUSION 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 27

The pathogens analysed in this study all have high health significance. The King River catchment is highly dominated by agricultural grazing in particular dairy farming. Due to the amplification of calving in spring and the warming temperatures pathogen detection is more renown during this time of year. From other references and after analysing North East Water s past results, it is clear that there is strong seasonal variation in the occurrence of pathogens in surface waters. There are a number of factors that have been shown to influence the survival of pathogens in drinking water source waters. Percent recovery of analytical methods can be quite low and vary between samples, as seen in this report for Cryptosporidium and Giardia. It is evident that high turbidity seems to interfere with detection, making it more difficult to determine peak river events such as the one this study was based around. Turbidity also impacted the volume of sample that could be analysed; this could also lead to an over or under estimation of pathogen risk. An indication of a certain level of faecal indicator bacteria alone is not a reliable guide to microbial water safety. Some faecal pathogens, including many viruses and protozoan cysts and oocysts, may be more resistant to treatment (e.g., by chlorine) than common faecal indicator bacteria (WHO 2004). This study was an important reinforcer to North East Water, and provides valuable information and results on the evident pathogen risk present in their King River catchment. This event based data is important information for North East Water to assist in determining the adequacy of treatment barriers at WTPs that draw directly of this river system and others. It also highlights the significance of the filtration barrier at these plants, as well as the importance that they are operating efficiently as filtration is the only effective barrier to remove chlorine resistant protozoan pathogens at WTPs that only have chlorine and filtration barriers. This highlights the need for high performing WTPs and an effective multi-barrier approach to control this pathogen risk. Hence results of this study could add value to future WTP design and optimisation projects at North East Water. 4.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank to North East Water s Wangaratta Treatment Team for their assistance in sampling 5.0 REFERENCES Fout GS, Brinkman NE, Cashdollar JL, Griffin SM, McMinn BR, Rhodes ER, Varughese EA, et al. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT.qPCR. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Version 1 (2010) Nicholson FA, Hutchison MC, Smith KA, Keevil CW, Chambers BJ, and Moore A. A Study on Farm Manure Application to Agricultural Land and an Assessment of the Risks of Pathogens Transfer into the Food Chain Final Report to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2000) Tyrrel SF and Quinton JN Overland flow transport of pathogens from agricultural land receiving faecal wastes J Applied Microbiology 94:87 93 (2003) 77 th WIOA Victorian Water Industry Operations Conference & Exhibition Page No. 28