Allegheny County Health Department

Similar documents
Enclosure 1. Bureau of Air Quality Department of Environmental Protection

Allegheny County Health Department. Air Quality in Allegheny County. GWC Workshop No. 9 August 27, 2015

PM2.5 Designations: Evaluating Contribution of Multiple Pollutants Using the Weighted Emissions Score

Pittsburgh Modeling for the PM 2.5 NAAQS EPA Regional/State/Local Modelers Workshop. May 2, 2012

ENCLOSURE 3 Pennsylvania s April 8, 2013 Letter Regarding 1-hour SO 2 Designations ALLEGHENY COUNTY

Ambient Air Quality Update for Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee June 15, 2017 Harrisburg, PA

Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) and Ozone (O 3 ) Air Quality in Western Pennsylvania in the 2000s

Current State of Air Quality in PA. January 16, 2018 Citizens Advisory Council

Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 Standards. Paul T Wentworth, P.E. EPA Region 3 October 31, 2007

NO2, SO2, PM2.5, Oh my!?! Information Session EPA R/S/L Modelers Workshop May 10, 2010

Appendix G. Precursor Demonstration

Air Quality Update on the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee January 27, 2016 Harrisburg, PA

Air Quality Program Update. SWEP Regulatory Update Meeting Harrisburg, PA November 5, 2015

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)

Analysis of Insignificance of Mobile Emissions

AIR DISPERSION MODELING

Understanding the NAAQS and the Designation Process

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE COLUMBUS ANNUAL PM 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA

Implementation Issues for the PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards PM 2.5 NAAQS

EPA Regional Modeling for National Rules (and Beyond) CAIR/ CAMR / BART

Applications of Source Contribution and Emissions Sensitivity Modeling to Assess Transport and Background Ozone Attribution

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE COLUMBUS ANNUAL PM 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE OHIO PORTION OF THE STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON OH-WV 24-HOUR PM 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE OHIO PORTION OF THE HUNTINGTON-ASHLAND, OH-KY-WV ANNUAL PM 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA

OVERVIEW of SIP for Annual PM2.5 Standard MWAQC December 12, 2007

COMMENTS OF THE GROUP AGAINST SMOG AND POLLUTION ( GASP ) REGARDING THE ALLEGHENY COUTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S 2015 AIR MONITORING NETWORK PLAN

Eight-Hour Ozone SIP Development Issues in DFW Air Quality Planning Section

APPENDIX E EMISSIONS ESTIMATE FOR GENERAL CONFORMITY

Modeling the Clear Skies Act. STAPPA/ALAPCO July 30, 2003

PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation & Permitting in Georgia

Fine Particles in the Air

Implementing the NAAQS and Regional Haze Program

Long-Term Strategy for Regional Haze

U.S. EPA s s Clean Air Gasification Initiative

Air Quality Rules Update: CAIR CAMR

Dick Sch u t tt EPA Region June 25, 2008

Proposed Revision to the Allegheny County Portion of the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan

AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS of the 2015 CLRP Amendment and the FY TIP

Draft 10/28/13. Guidance for 1-Hour SO 2 Nonattainment Area SIP Submissions October 2013

Emission and Air Quality Trends Review

Moving Forward. the challenges to attaining clean air DAN BROWN, FAIRBANKS PM PROGRAM MANAGER OFFICE OF AIR & WASTE, EPA REGION 10

Agenda. Background PM2.5 Attainment Plan Public Workshop

New 2015 Ozone Standard and Implications. July 2016

MARAMA Agency Roundtable Annual Monitoring Committee Training Workshop April 12-13, Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD)

VISTAS Highlights. November 10, 2005

Reducing Air Pollution Protecting Public Health. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation

PM2.5 Implementation Rule RACT/RACM. Tim Smith, EPA/OAQPS Presentation to Chicago PM2.5 Workshop June 20, 2007

from Portland Cement Manufacturing

NSR Program for PM-2.5 NAAQS. Overview of Potential Proposal

State Implementation Plan

Implementation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS): Opportunities for Public Participation

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE CANTON-MASSILLON, OH ANNUAL AND 24-HOUR PM 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA

MPCA Citizens Board. Michael Sandusky Director Environment Analysis and Outcomes Division

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

8-Hour Ozone. Implementing Current 2008 Standard Proposed New 2015 Standards. Denver Regional Council of Governments Board Meeting July 15, 2015

Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions. Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007

Pima Association of Government s Air Quality Forum June 23, 2015

Comments on ADEQ s NAAQS SIP/Minor NSR Permitting Guidance Document

2010 Sulfur Dioxide Summary

Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories. Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )

North Central Indiana Air Quality Update

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE CINCINNATI-HAMILTON, OH-KY-IN 8- HOUR OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA

Update on Ozone Air Quality Planning. 14 th Annual Regulatory Update Conference Air & Waste Management Association Trenton, NJ November 20, 2015

AIR POLLUTION. History of Clean Air Act Clean Air Update The Role of APCD

O3/PM2.5/Regional Haze Modeling Guidance Summary. Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS Western Met, Emissions, and AQ Modeling Workshop June 22, 2011

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - August 2015

How much does Kansas rangeland burning contribute to ambient O 3 and PM 2.5?

Air Quality Assessment of Ozone, Particulate Matter, Visibility and Deposition - Program 91

Wildfires: Smoke Impacts and Public Health Protection

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - July 2014

Allegheny County Health Department Proposed Revision to the Allegheny County Portion of the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan

Discussion of the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Guidelines and BART Modeling

Air Permi>ng: A Major Piece of the Puzzle or Trying to Keep All of

High time resolution measurements of PM 2.5 and PM 10 using X-ray fluorescence. David Green Cambridge Particle Meeting 23 rd June 2017

Review of GHD s Modeling Assessment and Analysis of the Coal-fired Power Stations in the Latrobe Valley. Dr. H. Andrew Gray Gray Sky Solutions

EPA Primary. (mg/l as CaCO3) (mg/l as CaCO3)

Investigation of Fine Particulate Matter Characteristics and Sources in Edmonton, Alberta

SOURCE ALLOCATION AND VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT IN TWO CLASS I AREAS WITH POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION

Model Evaluation and SIP Modeling

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE DAYTON-SPRINGFIELD ANNUAL PM 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREA

Regional Photochemical Modeling - Obstacles and Challenges. Extended Abstract No Prepared By:

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - September 2013

2006 Sulfur Dioxide Summary

Emission and Air Quality Trends Review

Update on USEPA Actions to address Climate Change. Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division US EPA Region IX June 10, 2010

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE CINCINNATI-HAMILTON, OH-KY-IN 8- HOUR OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREA

State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Protection Laboratory Scope of Accreditation

Washington County, MD PM 2.5 State Implementation Plan and Base Year Inventory. SIP Number: 08-05

6.0 STATE AND CLASS I AREA SUMMARIES

SIP Modeling Updates for Allegheny County, PA

OZONE TRANSPORT COMMISSION Ali Mirzakhalili, P.E. Stationary and Area Sources Committee OZONE TRANSPORT COMMISSION

SILLIKER, Inc. Southern California Laboratory 6360 Gateway Drive, Cypress, CA Tel. 209/ Fax. 714/

Chapter 5 FUTURE OZONE AIR QUALITY

Chemical Speciation of Ultrafine Particulate Matter

Golden Sunlight Mine Bio-Treatment of Acid Producing Waste. By Rory Tibbals Operations Superintendent

RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 25 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Effects of Shut Down of Two Ohio Nuclear Power Plants on Ozone Concentrations using Available Information

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - January 2012

Water Monitoring - Teralba Quarry EPA Point No.4 - Adit Overflow

REQUEST FOR REDESIGNATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR OZONE ATTAINMENT IN THE EIGHT-HOUR OZONE BASIC NONATTAINMENT AREA

Transcription:

Allegheny County Health Department Roger Westman,, Ph.D Manager, Air Quality Program April 29, 2005

PM 2.5 Nonattainment Areas Western PA LAWRENCE BEAVER BUTLER ARMSTRONG Pittsburgh Beaver Valley Area (regional transport + urban excess) ALLEGHENY WESTMORELAND Liberty Clairton Area WASHINGTON (regional transport + urban excess + localized impact) FAYETTE GREENE

Liberty/Clairton PM 2.5 Area Includes: City of Clairton Glassport Borough Liberty Borough Lincoln Borough Port Vue Borough

FRM PM 2.5 Trends, Annual Averages 25 20 Liberty '00-'02 DV = 21.4 Concentration µg/m³ 15 10 5 Lawrenceville '00-'02 DV = 16.0 Lawrenceville Liberty Standard 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year

FRM PM 2.5 Trends, 98-percentile 24-Hour Values 70 60 Liberty '00-'02 DV = 62.7 Concentration µg/m³ 50 40 30 20 10 Lawrenceville '00-'02 DV = 39.1 Lawrenceville Liberty Standard 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year

PM 2.5 - Average Major Chemical Species 6 5 Concentration (µg/m³) 4 3 2 Lawrenceville Liberty 1 0 Nitrate Sulfate Ammonium Organic Carbon Elemental Carbon Crustal Component Other Species Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Jan. 2005

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Lawrenceville PM 2.5 - Major Species by Time Nitrate Sulfate Ammonium Organic carbon Elemental carbon Crustal component Other Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Jan. 2005 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004 12/6/2004 1/6/2005 Date Concentration (µg/m³)

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Liberty PM 2.5 - Major Species by Time Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Jan. 2005 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004 12/6/2004 1/6/2005 Date Nitrate Sulfate Ammonium Organic carbon Elemental carbon Crustal component Other Concentration (µg/m³)

Lawrenceville & Liberty Hourly Peaks, High Day

SIP Submittal Due April 5, 2008 Final SIP Guidance expected Spring 2006 Attainment dates Classifications PM 2.5 precursors NSR RACT RACM RFP

Attainment Dates Attainment by April 2010 Based on 3 calendar years of data: 2007-2009 Schedule overlaps/inconsistencies? Extensions?

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Issued by EPA on March 10, 2005 Permanent caps on SO2 and NOx Cap & trade program States are significantly affected by each other Together with Clean Air Mercury Rule, a multipollutant strategy is created

CAIR Projections - Percentages Projections are through 2015, starting from 2003 emissions Projected for Eastern U.S: 70% reduction in SO2 60% reduction in NOx Projected for Pennsylvania: 86% reduction in SO2 (835,000 tons) 56% reduction in NOx (97,000 tons)

CAIR Projections - Areas March 2005 Ozone and Fine Particle Nonattainment Areas Projected 2015 Ozone and Fine Particle Nonattainment Areas after Reductions from CAIR and Existing Programs Nonattainment areas for 8-hour ozone pollution only Nonattainment areas for fine particle pollution only Nonattainment areas for both 8-hour ozone and fine particle pollution

New Source Review EPA interim guidance issued 4/5/05 Use PM 10 as a surrogate for PM 2.5 Same thresholds Assume all PM 2.5 is primary Precursors not addressed

Ongoing/Future Liberty Analysis Modeling CALPUFF applied in a near-field, complex terrain scenario Non-steady-state (puff) plumes should better predict in-valley flow than a steady-state model Plume rise algorithms allow for buoyancy Source Testing Emphasis on organic carbons, selected trace elements Source apportionment - what creates the excess? Meteorological Studies How different is an inversion at Liberty compared to Lawrenceville?

Emission Inventory - Criteria Pollutants

Emission Inventory - VOCs

PM 2.5 Estimation Total Number of Emission Points 1% 12% 0% 8% Emissions 13% 18% 49% 2% 2% 1% 4% 65% 5% 0% 16% 4% AP-42/FIRE - Process Specific AP-42 - Generalized Stack Test EPA Guidance Literature Value Assumed = PM10 Assumed 0.1*PM10 Engineering Estimate

PM 2.5 Estimation Uncontrolled Number of Emission Points 13% 2% 5% 18% Emissions 3% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 17% 62% 77% 0% AP-42/FIRE - Process Specific Stack Test Literature Value Assumed 0.1*PM10 AP-42 - Generalized EPA Guidance Assumed = PM10 Engineering Estimate

PM 2.5 Estimation Controlled Number of Emission Points 2% Emissions 4% 23% 26% 18% 41% 0% 14% 15% 3% 2% 0% 17% 22% 0% 13% AP-42/FIRE - Process Specific Stack Test Literature Value Assumed 0.1*PM10 AP-42 - Generalized EPA Guidance Assumed = PM10 Engineering Estimate

0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 Monitored OH Transport Varies by Pollutant Transport of Sulfur Dioxide and Ammonium Sulfate, West to East 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Quaker City, OH Sugarcreek, OH Hookstown, PA Florence, PA S. Fayette, PA McKees Rocks, PA Downtown Pgh., PA Lawrenceville, PA Monitoring Site Conc. (ppm) Conc.( µg/m³) SO2 Ammon. Sulfate

Highest Trace Elements Chlorine and Sulfur 1.8 1.6 Avg. Concentration µg/m³ 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 As PM 2.5, chlorine is localized to Liberty, while sulfur is regional Lawrenceville Liberty 0.4 0.2 0 Chlorine Sulfur Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004

Additional Trace Elements, Local to Liberty 0.018 0.016 0.014 Avg Concentration µg/m³ 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.004 Lawrenceville Liberty 0.002 0.000 Bromine Mercury Selenium Lead Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004

Regional or Urban Trace Elements 0.16 Concentration µg/m³ 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 Lawrenceville has higher concentrations of crustal elements (fine soil), as well as firework ingredients such as potassium Lawrenceville Liberty 0.04 0.02 0.00 Aluminum Calcium Iron Magnesium Manganese Phosphorus Potassium Titanium Vanadium Zinc Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 Crustal component is calculated as a weighted sum of the trace Al, Ca, Fe, Si, Ti concentrations

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total PM 2.5 by Time Liberty & Lawrenceville LV Grav. Mass Conc. LB Grav. Mass Conc. Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Organics by Time Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 LV Organic carbon LB Organic carbon Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Elemental Carbon by Time Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 LV Elemental carbon LB Elemental carbon Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Ammonium by Time Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 LV Ammonium LB Ammonium Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004

12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Other by Time 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 LV Other LB Other 11/6/ 2004 9/6/2004 10/6/ 2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 1/6/2004 12/6/ 2003 11/6/ 2003 10/6/ 2003 Concentration µg/m³

25 20 15 10 5 0 Sulfates by Time Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 LV Sulfate LB Sulfate Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004

4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Nitrates by Time Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 LV Nitrate LB Nitrate Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004

2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Crustal Component (Fine Soil) by Time LV Crustal component LB Crustal component 0 Concentration µg/m³ 10/6/2003 11/6/2003 12/6/2003 1/6/2004 2/6/2004 3/6/2004 4/6/2004 5/6/2004 6/6/2004 7/6/2004 8/6/2004 9/6/2004 10/6/2004 11/6/2004 Timeframe: Oct. 2003 Nov. 2004 Crustal component is calculated as a weighted sum of the trace Al, Ca, Fe, Si, Ti concentrations