CHAPTER 2 WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE?

Similar documents
With the challenges facing Washington s transportation

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Title Performance Subtitle Management: Advancing a National Meeting Transportation System Date

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

WTP 2035 DRAFT STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Title Subtitle. Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium Session 1-D, Asset Management Meeting and Performance Measures I August Date 19, 2015

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan

Chapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies

FHWA TPM Framework and Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

Washington State Association of Counties. County Overview: WTP Advisory Committee County Transportation Overview

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION PLAN, PHASE 2 IMPLEMENTATION

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

2017 Freight System Plan

Implementation of Transportation Performance Management Title Program Subtitle

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Transportation Performance Measures Safety Target-Setting

ONE NEVADA TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Nevada Department of Transportation s Long-Range Transportation Plan

I-270 NORTH EA PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN NEPA

Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2. October 21, 2015

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017

Let s Keep Moving 2036: Policy Plan

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

A more detailed description of Transportation, and its programs and initiatives can be found at

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

FTP Implementation Element Worksheet

Table of Contents PERMIAN BASIN MPO TIP 2

PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING

2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Asset Management and Pavement Performance Measures The 30, mile view.

Chapter 1 Introduction

USDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING (PBPP)

2. Establish an Office of Capital Program and Performance Measurement. 3. Retain planners and capital program planning in modal offices

Chapter 5 - Transportation

APPENDIX D TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 FOCUS AREAS AND SCENARIO PLANNING

Section 5: Performance-Based Planning

Caitlin Hughes Rayman Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations May 2013

Performance Measures National Best Practices Spencer Stevens MI Transportation Planning Association August 8, 2014

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

CHAPTER 6 PERFORMANCE PLANNING. Performance-Based Planning and Programming

Designing the Future of NMDOT

IDOT s Long Range Vision and Plan: Transforming Transportation for Tomorrow Performance Management background Tracking & Monitoring performance at

Appendix S. Monitoring Performance. Monitoring Performance. Appendix Contents

SAFETY TARGETS AND THE STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN (SHSP)

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

Performance Planning Target Setting Procedures

MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress Title in the 21 st Century Subtitle

What Does the FHWA Rulemaking on Bridge Performance Measures Mean to You?

2040 U P DAT E TO THE STREET/HIGH WAY ELEMENT

Regional Transportation Performance Measures

Legislating Geotechnical Asset Management: Lessons Learned

MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress Title in the 21 st Century Subtitle

RESOLUTION NO

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Performance Measures & Asset Management Plan - Key Implementation Dates

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5

Washington State DOT: Pavement and Bridge Performance NPRM Comments for federal docket,

AGENDA ITEM #13: MAP-21/FAST ACT SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Keith Nichols, HRTPO

Public Open House and Stakeholder Meeting Summary

Chapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, October 24-25, Donna Brown-Martin, Director Bureau of Planning and Economic Development

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Incorporating TMS into Planning. Jianming Ma, Ph.D., P.E.

Return on Investment for State Highway Projects. 25 th Annual Transportation Research Conference May 22, 2014

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

Framework for ADOT Asset Management System. Jean A. Nehme, PhD, PE Arizona Department of Transportation

20-Year State Highway Investment Plan. Appendix C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY APPENDIX C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY PAGE C-1

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Business Plan for FY14 FY15

Chapter IX Regional Performance

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mission, Roles and Responsibilities. Presentation to Eastside Transportation Association April 26, 2011

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

SCOPM Performance Measures Webinar

Performance Measures for Freight Transportation

Transportation Performance Measures Safety Target-Setting

MTP VISIONS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Sustainable Safety at WSDOT

Performance Measures Target Setting Regional Transportation Council

Transcription:

CHAPTER 2 WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE? VISION After significant public outreach and coordination with numerous agencies, organizations, and individuals, Phase 1 established a vision for transportation in Washington State. The vision moves our state in the direction of a multimodal, coordinated, cost-effective, safe, and low-carbon transportation system. It also highlights what transportation does for the people of Washington: more than just movement. FOCUS AREAS Of the numerous topics that state policies and plans address, the four focus areas of Phase 2 encompass the unresolved statewide policy issues that are the most crucial for accomplishing the vision. Washington faces challenges and needs on other transportation topics, such as safety and environment, but already has plans and policies in place for these matters. The Phase 2 focus areas serve as the pillars of the plan to organize and prioritize the policy recommendations from Phase 1 that move Washington State toward the vision. Each focus area has associated action items, which are displayed in brief below and explained in detail in Chapter 5. WTP VISION FROM PHASE 1 By 2035, Washington s transportation system safely connects people and communities, fostering commerce, operating seamlessly across boundaries, and providing travel options to achieve an environmentally and financially sustainable system. 15

Maintain and Preserve Assets: There is inadequate funding to both maintain and expand the transportation system. Manage Growth and Traffic Congestion: Past practices have led to congestion and inefficiency across the transportation network. MP MG Enhance Multimodal Connections and Choices: Unreliable travel times and poor connections between different travel modes exist throughout the state and local jurisdictions. Align the Funding Structure with the Multimodal Vision: Transportation funding is frequently divided into silos that cause confusion for users and make investments in the transportation network challenging. EC FS 16

Figure 3: Vision, Focus Areas and Action Items THE VISION By 2035, Washington s transportation system safely connects people and communities, fostering commerce, operating seamlessly across boundaries, and providing travel options to achieve an environmentally and financially sustainable system. FOCUS AREAS Maintain And Preserve Assets Manage Growth and Traffic Congestion Enhance Multimodal Connections and Choices Align the Funding Structure with the Multimodal Vision ACTION ITEMS MP1 MG1 EC1 FS1 Maintain, preserve, and operate assets to meet desired performance on multimodal transportation systems before funding expansion projects Promote transportationefficient communities by coordinating state agency technical assistance to enhance planning s link to land use at all levels of government, the private sector, and other organizations Work to achieve better travel time reliability and door to door multimodal connections for people of all backgrounds and abilities through continued application of practical solutions Support funding flexibility to reduce barriers to creating an integrated multimodal system that achieves performance objectives MP2 MG2 EC2 FS2 Support ways to help jurisdictions, transportation asset owners, and transportation service providers prepare for, respond to, and become resilient to emergencies and disasters Prioritize access for people and goods instead of throughput for vehicles to improve multimodal options, livable communities, and economic vitality for people and businesses Provide transportation facilities and services to support the needs of all communities, including populations with specialized needs, those in rural areas, and those who are under-represented, under- served, or disproportionately affected Work to diversify and strengthen transportation revenue sources without compromising existing indebtedness MG3 EC3 FS3 Research, evaluate, adapt to, and deploy technologies and innovations in all modes; share best practices Adopt metrics for all modes to align with performance objectives Address the constraints and opportunities for public-private partnership programs 17

RESILIENCY GIVEN UNCERTAINTY Another key point for Phase 2 is acknowledging uncertainty in the future of transportation. Recent years have seen incredible advances in transportation technology with many more in development. Climate change and natural disasters are likely to cause more frequent and severe disruptions to our transportation system. Between 2017 and 2040, major disruptions may occur that will affect the demand for travel, the design and construction of infrastructure, and the way that we pay for transportation, among many other things. Where many long range plans identify a desired future or analyze alternatives to reach a desired goal, Phase 2 acknowledges that the future is uncertain for transportation and embraces this uncertainty as part of the planning process. Borrowing an approach from the business world, Phase 2 undertook a scenario planning effort that fully explores the consequences of uncertainty in technology and climate. This approach ensures that Phase 2 is a resilient plan. Chapter 5 provides more detail on how resiliency is built into the action items. Figure 4: Six Uncertainties 18

PERFORMANCE PROGRAM Currently, the Washington State Legislature requires WSDOT to adopt a performance program to track how state funded transportation investments attains the transportation system policy goals in state law RCW 47.04.280. The goals are Economic Vitality, Preservation, Safety, Mobility, Environment, and Stewardship. WSDOT reports on how these goals have been attained in biennial attainment reports submitted to the state legislature and found at in the 2016 Biennial Transportation Attainment Report 1. The 2016 Biennial Transportation Attainment Report concludes that improvements are being made, yet challenges remain. The challenges include increases in the number and rate of traffic fatalities and serious injuries, increases in traffic congestion and commuter delays, repairs needed for structurally deficient bridges and pavement. Federal law Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requires states (WSDOT) and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOS) to develop either joint or separate performance programs to track how federal transportation investments meet the national goals in U.S. Code 119 2. The national goals are similar to the state goals in RCW 47.04.280 3. MAP-21 requires WSDOT to report on federal performance according to timelines set by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The final rules for the performance measures are not adopted at the same time which means that reporting deadlines are staggered. The first reporting deadline is August 2017 for safety performance measures. The state s goals for safety performance is to reduce the number of serious injury crashes and the traffic fatality rate. WSDOT s 2016 Multimodal Safety Report 4 states that the trends for both crashes and fatality rates has increased rather than decreased from 2014 to 2015. The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Target Zero) 5 includes recommendations for how the state can meet its long term safety performance goals. The next MAP-21 reports are for how well states are meeting their targets for pavement condition on roads in the National Highway System. The first report is due January 1, 2018 for the condition of interstate pavements. The next report is due January 1, 2020 for non-interstate roads in the National Highway System. Failure to meet targets could result in a loss of federal funding. For more information on the federal performance, see FHWA s Transportation Performance Management web page 6. 1 2016 Biennial Transportation Attainment Report. http://wsdot.wa.gov/publications/fulltext/graynotebook/ar2016.pdf 2 U.S. Code 119: http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2007-08/pdf/bills/session%20laws/senate/5412-s SL.pdf?cite=2007%20c%20516%20 %203; 23 U.S. Code 119 3 RCW 47.04.280: http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2007-08/pdf/bills/session%20laws/senate/5412-s. SL.pdf?cite=2007%20c%20516%20 %203; RCW 47.04.280 4 2016 Multimodal Safety Report: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/nr/rdonlyres/55c3ac74-3be0-488b-a549-884e6907240f/0/ MultimodalSafetyReport_2016.pdf 5 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Target Zero): http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/planning/shsp.htm 6 Transportation Performance Management: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tpm/ 19

POLICY TOPICS COVERED IN OTHER PLANS Phase 2 does not offer policy recommendations for safety because they have been developed in Target Zero 7, the state s federally required Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Target Zero aims to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries to zero by the year 2030 by working with federal, state, and local agencies to implement strategies for Education, Enforcement, Engineering, Emergency Response, and Leadership/Policy. Statewide, the number of traffic fatalities and serious injuries in the first half of 2016 was stable compared to the first half of 2015. Phase 2 will coordinate with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission during implementation of both plans to support complementary efforts. Because Phase 2 does not include projects, it does not discuss environmental mitigation strategies. WSDOT and partners maintain regular contact with federal, state, and local environmental regulatory agencies to ensure proper permits and regulations are followed during the project development process. Projects that require federal approval or receive federal funding may be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 8 review process. Projects that require state approvals or permits may be subject to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 9 review process. NEPA and SEPA reviews address potential adverse impacts to the natural and built environment. The natural environment includes fish and wildlife habitat, threatened and endangered species, water quality, and air quality. The built environment includes cultural resources, historical resources, and the transportation system. WSDOT and partners engage the public on specific projects during many stages, including environmental review. 7 Target Zero: http://targetzero.com/ 8 Federal Highway Administration: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/projdev/index.asp 9 Washington State Department of Ecology: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html 20