BPA s HERMES Project: a Multi-objective, Multi-user Approach to Reservoir Optimization

Similar documents
olumbia River Treaty The Columbia by Steve Oliver, Vice President, Generation Asset Management, Bonneville Power Administration 16 Oct

Hydropower as Flexibility Provider: Modeling Approaches and Numerical Analysis

Tim Magee CEATI Fall 2016: Optimizing Hydropower Operations Mathematical Modelling Tools November 4, 2016

Albeni Falls Operations Meeting 2015

Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Newsletter

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bonneville Power Administration Review

Columbia River Drainage

For Bandon Utilities Commission

Daily River Operations Model (DROM) River Operations Center (ROC) Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA)

RiverWare Model and Analysis Tools for River System Planning and Management

NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT

Status Report. Work to Date on the Development of the VARQ Flood Control Operation at Libby Dam and Hungry Horse Dam. January 1999.

Center for Advanced Decision Support for Water and Environmental Systems (CADSWES)

Columbia River Treaty

2014/2024 Review Columbia River Treaty

BC Hydro Generation system operation Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee

LCRA Water Supply Operations Basic Concepts

Columbia River Treaty Review: Iteration #2 Results, and Next Steps

JUVENILE SALMON MIGRATION SECTION 5. blank page

2014/2024 Review Columbia River Treaty

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

Appendix I. Dworshak Operations

The Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study. World Water Week Stockholm 2017 August 27 September 1

Treaty History & Requirements

Overview of Columbia River System Operations for Hydropower and Fish Passage

Columbia River Operations

COE Flood Control. Design and development of enhancements to support modeling of COE flood control releases in RiverWare

Columbia River Treaty Review. PNWA Summer Meeting LaConner, WA June 24, 2013

Overview of Columbia Basin Water Management

Columbia Basin Operations and Flood Risk Management

Optimizing BC Hydro Generation Assets Using an Iterative Approach Based on System Marginal Prices. Tim Blair System Optimization, BC Hydro

Managing Idaho Power Company s Hydro Projects During Drought Conditions The Benefits of Communication and Collaboration

Columbia River Treaty

white paper JANUARY 2015 Powel Smart nergy Empowering smart decisions

Columbia River Operations Summary

Opportunity-cost-pricing of reserves for a simple hydropower system

2015 Restoration Allocation and Default Flow Schedule January 20, 2015

NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT JIM GASPARD

Canadian Entity s Preliminary View of Columbia River Treaty Post-2024 Called Upon Procedures. BC Hydro and Power Authority

Introduction to Bonneville Power Administration

November 6, SUBJECT: Streamflow and Temperature Projections of the Latest Climate- Change Datasets for the Columbia River Basin

INTEGRATED FORECAST AND MANAGEMENT IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INFORM A Demonstration Project

Northwest Power and Conservation Council

Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Potential and Renewable Energy Integration in the Northwest

Impacts of climate change on water management in the state of Washington

APPENDIX 9.2 Description of SPLASH Model

RELIABILITY AND SECURITY ISSUES OF MODERN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS WITH HIGH PENETRATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

IEA Task 24 Integration of Wind and Hydropower Systems

Appendix B. Operations on the Columbia River - Relationship between Columbia River Treaty, Non Treaty Storage Agreement, and Water Use Plans

Implementation of the Truckee River Operating Agreement with the RiverWare Modeling Platform

Balancing New Renewables in Europe - Norwegian Contributions and Research Challenges

Wind Integration Study Report

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Wind Integration Project. Update on BC Hydro s Activities. December 4, 2007

Relicensing Planning for Hydroelectric Watersheds

Climate Change in the Columbia Basin. Stephanie Smith Manager of Hydrology, BC Hydro

November 7, SUBJECT: Power System Value of Conserved Irrigation Diversions

2012 Integrated Resource Plan. Appendix. Wind Integration Study Phase II

Application of Enemble Streamflow Forecasts for Decisionmaking

Chapter 2: Inputs. Chapter 3: Inputs

Columbia River Treaty Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Quantification of Short-term Hydropower Generation Flexibility

Off-Channel Storage Modeling in the Lower Colorado River. Steve Setzer Hydros Consulting Inc. August 27, 2013

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY Assured Operating Plan and Determination of Downstream Power Benefits for Operating Year

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY Assured Operating Plan and Determination of Downstream Power Benefits for Operating Year

US Columbia Operations Overview. Columbia Basin Advisory Committee

Appendix D. System Model & Assumptions. 1.0 BC Hydro System Modelling for Columbia Alternatives

Recent RiverWare and RiverSMART applications on the Colorado River Basin RiverWare User Group Meeting August 24, 2016

State of the Colorado River System: Drought and the Outlook for Floodplain Management Conference Rancho Mirage, CA September 10, 2015

OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

Tr u c ke e Planning Model

SPP Membership Update

SYSTEM DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF BANKS LAKE AND JOHN W. KEYS III PUMP-GENERATING PLANT PUMPED STORAGE OPERATIONS FOR WIND INTEGRATION

Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty to Address the Needs of a 21 st Century Transboundary Watershed

Using PLEXOS to Validate TIMES

Columbia River Treaty the setting

IDAHO WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Quarterly Newsletter September 2014

RESERVOIR YIELD : AN IMPORTANT ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETER'

Stanley J. Woodcock, Michael Thiemann, and Larry E. Brazil Riverside Technology, inc., Fort Collins, Colorado

OSAGE RIVER BASIN OPERATIONS WATER MANAGEMENT

BPA Comments on Appendix H. Pacific Northwest California Transfer Increase Informational Special Study

BPA s Asset Management NW Power & Conservation Council O&M Subcommittee

Riverware Modeling in the Deschutes Basin: An Integrated Basin Scale Opportunity Assessment

CRT Operations in Low Water Conditions

As above, this would be spread according to how the units are operated.

2017 Long-term Outlook. Information Session July 25, 2017

NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL (NERC)

Elko Project Water Use Plan. Revised for Acceptance by the Comptroller of Water Rights

Watt About Energy in the Northwest

Control Power and Variable Renewables A Glimpse at German Data

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

CENTRAL ASIA CROSS BORDER WATER MANAGEMENT EXCHANGE VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA

Water-Energy Nexus: Economics of Hydropower

Grid Integration Studies for Identifying Flexibility Solutions

Increased Capabilities for Transfers of Low Carbon Electricity between the Pacific Northwest and California Informational Study

Science & Technology Needs for Hydropower

Water Supply Risk on the Colorado River: Can Management Mitigate?

Integrated Resource Planning at Tacoma Power. Ahlmahz Negash EE 500E Energy & Environment Seminar University of Washington

Reservoir planning, design and operation

Transcription:

BPA s HERMES Project: a Multi-objective, Multi-user Approach to Reservoir Optimization Damon Pellicori and Shane Mosier BPA RiverWare User Group Meeting Boulder, Colorado August 23-24, 2016

Presentation Outline Overview of Federal Columbia River System Power/Transmission System BPA s role in FCRPS/FCRTS System Complexities Multiple sources of uncertainty Multi-reservoir system with many power and non-power constraints Derive value from the limited flexibility HERMES Application BPA s model uses Current Simulator and Optimizer products Modeling approaches within the RT and ST groups Coordination and handoffs between the RT and ST groups Questions 2

Federal Columbia River Power / Transmission System The key federal agencies: US Army Corps of Engineers Bureau of Reclamation Bonneville Power Administration The major physical assets: 31 federal hydro-electric power plants Columbia Generating Station (Nuclear Power Plant) Federal high voltage transmission system 3

Federal Columbia River Power / Transmission System The US Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation operate the federal dams for multiple purposes: Flood control Navigation Environmental - fish protection, water quality Irrigation Recreation Power production BPA s Role Markets the power produced from the federal dams within the many other non-power requirements Provides ~28% of power in Northwest Primary high-voltage transmission provider in the Columbia River Basin 4

Columbia River Basin US and Canada Physical storage: ~30% of ave. annual volume 5

Federal Columbia River Power / Transmission System 6

Modeling Challenge: Uncertainty Various types of uncertainty in power forecasting Water supply - major influence on hydro-dominated system Variable energy resources, call for balancing reserves Weather and temperature departures Mid Columbia (non-federal) shaping Demand for energy (Load) Unplanned and extended generator outages Transmission limitations Market liquidity, power prices 7

BPA Uncertainty - Streamflow 8

BPA Uncertainty - Streamflow Lower Granite Inflow Forecasts June 2-9, 2010 230 210 190 KCFS 170 150 130 ~130 KCFS 110 90 70 50 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 F2 F3 F4 F7 9

BPA Uncertainty - Load Actual forecasts from January of 2011 - the system load forecast on January 14th ranged from 6,675 MW to 9,357 MW, nearly 3,000 amw of variation in the week prior to the event. Daily System Load Forecasts January 3-12, 2011 MW 10000 9500 9000 8500 8000 7500 7000 6500 6000 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6 1/7 1/8 1/9 1/10 1/11 1/12 1/13 1/14 1/15 1/16 1/17 1/18 1/19 1/20 1/21 1/22 1/23 1/24 1/25 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 10

BPA Uncertainty - Wind Integration BPA integrates approximately 4,500 MW of non-federal wind generating capacity using the flexibility of the power and transmission system. BPA provides balancing reserves to multiple wind entities. 11

BPA Uncertainty - Wind Integration When wind generation differs from what is scheduled BPA balances the scheduling error with reserved hydro generation. This image shows an observed 16 hour period from April 2015. BPA was providing +900 upwards and -900 MWs downwards of balancing reserves. 12

Modeling by BPA s Power Services Two groups share models at BPA Short-term Planning 2-3 week planning study Pre-schedule and day-ahead marketing studies More marketing focused Real-time Hydro-Scheduling Current day studies Planning for next shift(s) and non-business day periods More operations focused as load is mostly set during planning horizon Both Groups: optimize value of generation within remaining flexibility and uncertainty Given complexity, changing conditions, and multiple sources of uncertainty, BPA needed to enhance its modeling capabilities 13

Enter HERMES - Hydro Reg. Model System Models to solve complex uncertainty and flexibility problems High performance - fast run times High resolution - hourly time steps Multiple models and model objectives more tools in toolbox Accommodates ensemble modeling for streamflows, loads, etc. High quality diagnostic information to troubleshoot model behavior Central platform for Real Time and Short Term Planning groups Manage user inputs/constraints Receive and send data from other systems Execute multiple models within platform Customize display of model results Customize all data transfers, including model inputs and results Ability to add new models without changing user interface Archive 14

HERMES - Models HERMES is a FEWS-based platform with multiple models Current models in HERMES RTC Tools Deltares Optimizer RiverWare CADSWES Rule Based Simulator (RBS) Optimizer RTC Tools and RiverWare models both have multiple model objectives Real Time and Short Term groups run different scenarios and utilize separate constraint sets Able to run different models for different parts of the basin Stitch results from multiple models into one continuous data set 15

Design Criteria Constraints and Logic BPA-Specific Water routing lag times Conditional constraints Reserves project and system level Feasible reserves content, head, and ramp-based Spill obligations - % and flat spill requests Spill priorities lack of load conditions References a user-maintained table of spill levels Redistributes generation and spill according to table Minimize/maximize generation Moderate operations logic Fixed vs float options 16

Design Criteria - Model Inputs Expected streamflows Expected loads Unit outage schedules Non-allocator project schedules Serve federal load but have rigid schedules Observed data Estimated uncertainty load adjust System-level constraints Project and system-level constraints 17

BPA Real Time / Short Term Dynamic Current Day 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks Real Time Short Term Real Time Group Manage hourly generation and marketing for current day, create generation setpoints for 10 major hydro projects Short Term Planning Group Plan operations and marketing for 2-3 week period Group Coordination Model input/assumptions must be aligned between the two groups Model output from each group becomes input to the other Results from both groups feed other data consumers 18

Real Time Group Real Time typical range: Day 0 preschedule days Mostly use simulator Expected case Inflow to LCOL is largely set, less flow uncertainty Often most marketing volume is performed day ahead Hourly constraints entered to utilize safe amount of flexibility Enter constraints to load factor (often HE6 and HE22 values) Operations are generally well defined via constraints Primary run objectives Fixed load Evaluate marketing via load adjust Float projects to balance load Fixed Operations Uses markets as necessary 19

Short Term Planning Group Planning studies utilize optimizer models More ability to shape water within the longer study period Often greater ability to market day ahead than in the hour-ahead markets Perform a 2-3 week planning study and min/max marketing studies as appropriate Constraints are generally weekly targets More uncertainty Generally shape generation to price profile associated with heavy and light load hours Primary objectives Maximize generation value Maximize or minimize generation by specified hours 20

Data Sharing and Handoffs Both groups maintain separate constraint sets Planning group runs upstream basins to produce inflows to downstream models Real-time runs Big10 model which provides starting conditions for Planning s Big10 studies Planning produces 2-3 week study Results are stitched and published to downstream consumers 21

HERMES Design in FEWS Streamflow Forecast Load Forecast Unit Outage Forecast Observed Data Hydro Models RTC Tools RiverWare RT/ST Shared Inputs RT User Constraints ST User Constraints Model Input Model Output FEWS Model Input FEWS Model Output FEWS Model Input FEWS Model Output Model Adapter RT Model Results ST Model Results Publish Publish Merged Data Set FEWS

HERMES Display Model Results Custom button panel Change or add time series attached to each button Ideal for ad hoc displays and comparison of model input/output 23

HERMES Display Solution Path Solution Summary Display Efficient way to view constraint behavior (binding, violations) Display is linked to time series plots with more information 24

Questions? 25