The Carbon Intensity of South Africa s Economy Rob Davies Coauthors: Channing Arndt, Konstantin Makrelov, James Thurlow
Introduction Other presenters in this session are looking in detail at measures to reduce emissions in South Africa I try to provide a background and broad analysis of key elements Focus on CO 2 from fossil fuel use 60% global GHGs : 80% RSA GHGs
South Africa s CC Dilemma South Africa faces enormous development challenges Unemployment +/-25% Poverty 23% (head count) Gini 0.7 (income from work, self employment and capital) but is a dirty energy user 13 th largest CO 2 emitter in absolute terms 1.4% of global emissions from 0.7% of global population Government has committed to a 42% reduction in emissions against baseline projection by 2025 But difficult to manage technically Can it be done without adding to development problems? and politically Concern from business about global competitiveness and exports Concern from labour about reduced employment Concern with impact on poor households
2007 Decomposing Aggregate Emissions CC 2 PPP = CC 2 E E GGG GGG PPP Emissions per capita (CO 2 /Pop) CO2 Intensity (CO 2 /E) Energy Intensity (E/GDP * 1000) Income level (GDP/Pop) World 4.7 2.5 184 9,506 South Africa 9.0 3.1 307 9,374 USA 18.5 2.4 177 43,710 Finland 12.1 1.7 208 33,501 Japan 9.8 2.4 127 31,660 European Union 8.0 2.3 125 28,413 China 5.2 3.5 284 5,239 Developing SSA 0.9 1.5 315 1,909
Low Carbon Development As income per head rises Energy use rises Energy emissions rise and then fall 2 RSA 4 CO2 per energy unit (log) 1 0-1 Energy per capita (log) 3 2 1 0 RSA -1-2 -2-3 5 7 9 11 13-3 5 7 9 11 13 GDP PPP per capita (log) GDP PPP per capita (log)
Decomposition Again CC 2 PPP = CC 2 E E GGG GGG PPP Development target entails raising GDP per head Therefore emissions per head must be reduced by Reducing energy intensity of production and/or Making energy cleaner This requires technical changes and/or change in composition of production To examine potential of the latter option need disaggregated analysis of carbon content of production This also helps understanding possible impacts of carbon taxes
Measuring Carbon Intensity Look at carbon use within the RSA economy Carbon content of products Carbon intensity of sectors Relationship between carbon, exports and employment Carbon consumption patterns across households Basis for border tax adjustments (BTA) Full paper: Arndt, Davies, Makrelov, Thurlow (2012) Measuring the Carbon Intensity of the South African Economy. South African Journal of Economics.
Methods and Data Capture direct and indirect carbon use Direct use of fuels (i.e., crude oil, natural gas and coal) and transformed energy (e.g., electricity and petroleum) Indirect use of carbon embodied in other inputs (e.g., plastics) Multiplier analysis using supply-use tables Carbon enters the system as fossil fuels Track all upstream and downstream product flows to determine total (net) carbon use per unit of output or final demand 2005 supply-use and energy balance tables 172 industries, 105 products and 6 household income groups
Results: Carbon Within Products Energy products are the most carbon intensive: Primary fuels : Coal (12.3), Gas (2.1) and Crude oil (1.0) Transformed energy : Electricity (3.2) and petroleum (0.67) Margins account for 7% of carbon within products CO2 mt per R1000 final demand 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Industrial processing Metal products Wood & paper Ceramics Metals mining Chemicals All sectors Trade & hotels Construction Transport Food processing Business services Other manuf. Agriculture Other services Textiles Vehicles Machinery Government Financial services Margins (trade and transport)
Results: Exports RSA is a large net exporter of carbon (2.5x imports) Large export intensive sectors are typically carbon-intensive Carbon intensity measure 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Wood Non-metals Chemicals Trade Transport Vehicles Finance Machinery Metals Other manu. Marker size = share of total export earnings Other mining 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Export intensity (%) (share of exports in total sales)
Results: Employment Carbon-intensive products tend to be: Less labor-intensive Less important for overall employment Carbon intensity measure 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Water Metals Chemicals Non-metals Wood Other mining Textiles Machinery Foods Construction Coal Business Transport Trade Finance Other services Government 2 7 12 17 Labor employment multiplier Agriculture
Results: Consumers or Households (1) Household emissions < national average, but unevenly distributed Poorest 20% = 0.3 tons of CO2 pc ( Benin) Richest 4% = 37.8 tons of CO2 pc ( Kuwait) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 4.2 Emissions share (%) Emissions per capita (CO2mt) 8.7 4.5 1.5 0.3 0.9 1.8 17.3 3.6 32.0 8.4 37.8 36.1 All 0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-96 96-100 Household per capita expenditure percentiles
Results: Consumers or Households (2) Middle-income households are most carbon-intensive Based on 2005 Income and Expenditure Survey and SUT Higher income: mainly services and electricity Lower income: foods and fuels (chemicals and coal) 0.25 Carbon intensity measure 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-96 96-100 All Household per capita expenditure percentiles Coal Petrol Electricity Agriculture Processed food Light industrial Heavy industrial Services
Conclusions Wide variation in carbon intensity across sectors/products Major exports do have high carbon contents Might justify border tax adjustments to maintain competitiveness Key employment sectors tend to be less carbon intensive Middle-income households are more carbon-intensive But high income households consume far more carbon