Exercise 14: Estimating HC Volumes

Similar documents
Tamarind Field. -Case Study- IIT-Kharagpur Prithvi-2016

The Imperial Barrel Award Committee

MACRO an innovative method to characterise Main Area Claymore remaining oil

Oil Fields & Porosity of Sandstone Algebra: Manipulation and Factoring

Adjustment to Oil Saturation Estimate Due to Various Reservoir Drive Mechanisms

Introduction to GeoX. Simplicio P. Caluyong. What is GeoX?

Maximizing the Value and Recovery of Oil and Gas Resources

E&P Geospatial Workflows: framework and business information structure

This is Reservoir Engineering COPYRIGHT. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Primary Recovery Mechanisms

For personal use only

CO 2 Geological storage - TOTAL Approach. SCA 2003 Symposium 14/12/2003

COPYRIGHT. Why Take This Module? Why Take This Module? Headlights function with two purposes: The R & R process also has two fundamental purposes:

Porosity

POSSIBILITIES OF GEOLOGICAL CO 2 STORAGE IN DEPLETED/PARTIALLY DEPLETED LAYERS OF HYDROCARBONS IN NORTH EAST SLOVENIA

Reservoir Engineering

MB for Oil Reservoirs

Storage 1- Site Selection: Capacity and Injectivity

Safety and Monitoring of CO 2 Storage Projects

New Methods and Technologies in Petroleum Geology, Drilling and reservoir Engineering. June Krynica, Poland

Cuba Block 9 Production Sharing Contract (Melbana Energy 100% # )

SONATRACH DIVISION PRODUCTION HASSI R MEL

Core Analysis of the Round Tank Queen Reservoir, Chaves County, New Mexico. By: Garrett Wilson

12 Reservoir technolgy August Classification: Internal

Geological Storage of CO 2. Tor Fjaeran President Director, Statoil Indonesia


AGR TRACS Competent Person s Report on Otakikpo Marginal Field, OML 11, Nigeria, for Lekoil

CO 2 Storage in Geological Media

David H. Johnston ExxonMobil Production Company. Time-Lapse Seismic for Optimum Reservoir Management Deepwater West Africa

Competent Person s Report on Certain Petroleum Interests of Gulf Keystone Petroleum and its Subsidiaries in Kurdistan, Iraq

Volumetric Estimation

CO2CRC Otway Stage 2: CO 2 Storage in Saline Formation

Facilities Cost Estimates Drivers in the Oil and Gas Field Development. By Ruby Aka. Independent Oil and Gas Consultant

PROSPECT - LEAD FIELD RECOVERABLE IN-PLACE TOTAL RESOURCES UNDISCOVERED RESOURCES DISCOVERED RESOURCES ESTIMATED ULTIMATE RECOVERY (EUR)

Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbon Sequestration The Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study

Unconventional Thinking AAPG Calgary Playmakers Bill Haskett Senior Principal Energy Strategy

For personal use only

Developments in the Irish Gas Industry

Erik Lindeberg and Per Bergmo. SINTEF Petroleum Research, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway

Chapter 2. Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties

Timber Creek Field Study for Improving Waterflooding

Taking on the World s Toughest Energy Challenges. TM Upstream Technology Webcast August 30, 2006

COPYRIGHT. Development of a Gas Condensate Reservoir. The Anschutz Ranch East Field: Case Study

Analysis of Proppant Hydraulic Fracturing in a Sand Oil Reservoir in Southwest of Iran

FINAL REPORT. Stratigraphic Forward Modelling Comparison with Eclipse for SW Hub

Reservoir Mechanics. Montana Law Review. Jack Tarner. Volume 17 Issue 1 Fall Article 1. July 1955

IMPROVING PROSPECT EVALUATION BY INTEGRATING PETROPHYSICAL MODELS INTO THE WORKFLOW Bob Harrison (Maersk Olie og Gas), Martin Kennedy (Enterprise Oil)

KMS Technologies KJT Enterprises Inc. Publication

Effect of Grain Size Distribution on Elastic Velocity

Dorado-1 Oil Discovery 18 July 2018

CO 2 Sequestration Market Development

INJEÇÃO DE CO 2 PARA PRODUÇÃO ACRESCIDA DE METANO DE CARVÃO EM CAMADA CO 2 INJECTION FOR ENHANCED COALBED METHANE (ECBM)

Chapter Two Reservoir Properties Porosity

Jerzy M. Rajtar* SHALE GAS HOW IS IT DEVELOPED?

Estimated Proven Reserves in the Devonian Ohio/New Albany/Chattanooga Black Shale of Kentucky

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Interwell Tracer Tests: Understanding Inter-Well Connectivity Within Your Reservoir

Fundamentals of modelling CO2 movement underground

Effects of Enhanced Oil Recovery on Production Engineers, Elm Coulee Field, Bakken Reservoir, Richland County, Montana

shaker! Logging!While!Drilling!(LWD)!or! Measuremnt!While!Drilling!(MWD)! used!to!steer!deviated!wells! Mudlogging' cu8ngs! mud5loggers!!

Update of methodology of predicting gas- and aquifer pressures in the Waddenzee development area

Liability Issues Related to Geological Storage of CO 2

Estimates of CO2 storage capacity in Europe

Current Research Activities

Analogs in Resource Assessment and Beyond

Module 1: Production, present scenario and consumption pattern of fuels. Lecture 3: Production, present scenario and consumption pattern of fuels

Petroleum Resources Classification & Reserves Estimation

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Mining, Geology & Petroleum Engineering

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering ROCK AND FLUID PROPERTIES

Thermal Recovery Status and Development Prospect for Heavy Oil in China

CO2CRC Otway Stage 2: CO 2 Storage in Saline Formation

PETE 203: Properties of oil

Chapter 1: Introduction

BP Alaska Heavy Oil Production from the Ugnu Fluvial-Deltaic Reservoir*

UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage

Unconventional gas in the Netherlands

Is CCS (Geological Storage) Ready for Prime Time?

Evaluation of Western Kentucky s Heavy Oil and Bitumen Resources

FRACTURED AND UNCONVENTIONAL RESERVOIRS

Geological Carbon Storage in the Green Basin

GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT CASE EXAMPLE, OLKARIA I

January 8, 2010 SUBJECT. Middle Bakken Formation / Three Forks Formation. Daly Bakken Three Forks Pool (01 62B) Daly Field, Manitoba

ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PLANNING FOR THE LUCKEY DITCH FIELD

Coal Bed Methane (black coal, green future.)

Fossil Fuels and the environment

EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Improving Infill Development Decision Making With Interval Estimation

Chapter 5 HISTORY MATCHING OF THE J1 AND J2 SANDS AT BULLWINKLE, GREEN CANYON BLOCK 65, GULF OF MEXICO

Introduction Petroleum Exploration, Development and Production

A New Gas Injection System for Ultra-Thick Metamorphic Rock Buried Hill Reservoirs

This section presents the physics of multi-phase fluid flow in porous media.

Estimation of Uncertainles in Gas-Condensate Systems Reserves by Monte Carlo Simulation

ExxonMobil s Approach to In Situ Co-Development of Oil Shale and Nahcolite

Comparative analysis of sonic and neutron-density logs for porosity determination in the South-eastern Niger Delta Basin, Nigeria

CO 2 Sequestration in Deep Aquifers

Cooper Basin Drilling & Exploration Update. July 2012

IHS International Exploration & Production Database

Evaluation of Intelligent Dual-Lateral Well in Multi-Layered Reservoirs

Application of Inflow Control Devices in Horizontal Well in Bottom Water Drive Reservoir using Reservoir Simulation

Influence of Clay Content on Surfactant- Polymer Flooding For an Egyptian Oil Field. Prof. Atef Abdelhady, British University in Egypt

Transcription:

Exercise 14: Estimating HC Volumes Objective Calculate a first-order estimate of the volume of oil that could be contained in the Alpha and Beta prospects using a simple reservoir volume formula and typical rock and fluid properties. Part 1: Gross Rock Volume A present-day structure map for the top of the target reservoir is shown in Figure 1. Both Alpha and Beta are fault-bounded anticlines. Based on geophysical evidence, the HC-water contact in Alpha is at a depth of 2600 m; in Beta it is at 1800 m. With this map, a reservoir thickness (isopach) map, and the dip of the fault plane, we can get a fairly accurate value for the gross rock volume of the reservoir (rock + fluid volumes). For our exercise, we will assume that Alpha and Beta are simple half-cones. We will also assume a constant reservoir thickness of 100 m. We can get the gross rock volume of the reservoir by calculating the volume of half-cone formed by the top of the reservoir down to the fluid contact and subtracting the volume of the half-cone formed by the base of the reservoir down to the fluid contact. 1

For gross rock volume, we can use the formula: V grv = ½ [ ⅓ π (r top ) 2 h top - ⅓ π (r base ) 2 h base ] or V grv = 1/6 π [ (r top ) 2 h top - (r base ) 2 h base ] 1 Estimate the gross rock volume at Alpha using these values: r top = 4.5 km r base = 3.9 km h top = 800 m = 0.8 km h base = 700 m = 0.7 km Use units of km 3 2 Estimate the gross rock volume at Beta using these values: r top = 4 km r base = 3.5 km h top = 800 m h base = 700 m Use units of km 3 Part 2: Reservoir Volume The gross rock volume contains both reservoir and non-reservoir layers. We use a parameter called Net-to-Gross (N/G) to express the percentage of the target interval that is truly reservoir quality (layers from which HCs can be can produced). The formula for reservoir volume is: V res = V grv * (N/G) 3 Estimate the reservoir volume at Alpha using a N/G of 35%. 4 Estimate the reservoir volume at Beta using a N/G of 30%. 2

Part 3: Pore Volume Reservoir volume can be partitioned into the volume of the solid grains and the volume of the space between the grains the pore volume. Porosity (φ) is the parameter that tells us what fraction of the reservoir volume is pore space where the fluids are located. The formula we use is: V pore = V res * φ 5 Estimate the pore volume at Alpha using a porosity of 25%. 6 Estimate the pore volume at Beta using a porosity of 22%. Record your result on Table 1 last page. Part 4: In-Place HCs If the target reservoir interval has been charged with HC, most but not all, of the pore space will contain oil or gas. Some of the pore space will contain residual water. Hydrocarbon saturation (S HC ) is a measure of how much of the available pore space is filled with HCs. The formula we use is: V in- place = V pore * S HC 7 Estimate the in-plase volume at Alpha using a hydrocarbon saturation of 80%. Record your result on Table 1. 3

8 Estimate the in-plase volume at Beta using a hydrocarbon saturation of 80%. Record your result on Table 1. LET'S ME OPTIMISTIC! We will assume that the reservoir is filled with oil down to the fluid contact - i.e., no free gas cap. Part 5: Converting to Barrels The unit of volume typically used for oil is millions of barrels (). We can use a simple conversion factor to go from volumes in km 3 to. (We could have done this conversion at any point after step 1). V = V km3 * 6290 9 Convert your estimate of oil in-place at Alpha to. Record your result on Table 1 last page. 10 Convert your estimate of oil in-place at Beta to. Record your result on Table 1 last page. 4

Part 6: Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) Modern production techniques can only move a small portion of the in-place oil. The oil that is moved to the surface will change volume as it is brought up. This is due to the differences in temperature and pressure conditions in the reservoir compared to at the surface. We estimate the ultimate recovery (EUR) using values for the recovery efficiency (RE) and the formation volume factor (FVF) the correction for volume change. The volume change between the subsurface and the surface is sometimes called oil shrinkage. We use the formula: EUR = V in- place * RE * FVF 11 Calculate an EUR for Alpha assuming RE= 25% and FVF =.90. 12 Calculate an EUR for Beta assuming RE= 20% and FVF =.90. 5

Part 7: Risked Volumes The EUR you calculated in part 6 is an UNRISKED number it assumes that everything in the hydrocarbon system works favorably. However, the chance that everything works is not 100%. Typically experts will estimate the chance that each component of the hydrocarbon system (source, migration, reservoir, etc.) has worked. To keep things simple, we will assume that everything will work except possibly the fault seal. We believe that there is a 62% chance that the faults will seal so that oil will be trapped in Alpha and Beta. 13 To get a risked EUR, multiply your results from Part 6 by 0.62 the COS. When performing the economic analysis, we use the risked EUR. Think about it, if 6 times out of 10 the system works, you have to base your economics on this factor. If the economic minimum for this area is 100 MOEB, what would you recommend to management about drilling these two prospects? Alpha: Beta: 6

7

ESTIMATES Alpha Beta 1. Gross Rock Volume 2. Reservoir Volume 3. Pore Volume 4. In-Place Volume km 3 km 3 km 3 km 3 km 3 km 3 km 3 km 3 5. In-Place Barrels 6. EUR Unrisked 7. EUR Risked 8