REGIONAL AND GLOBAL SPACE ORGANIZATIONS AND THE LAW ITSO, IMSO AND EUTELSAT: THE HISTORY, THE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND THE LEGAL CHALLENGES

Similar documents
Article 14 (Peaceful adjustment of situations) 141

2. Resolved to establish a global network for the Resource Efficient and Cleaner Production (RECPnet); and

REPORT ON THE OPERATIONS OF THE THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY

Constitution of the African Civil Aviation Commission

DRAFT PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY

CONSTITUTION OF THE ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION FOR FOOD SECURITY ASSEMBLY

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/55/L.92 and Add.1)]

AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION COMMISSION 30 th AFCAC PLENARY SESSION (LIVINGSTONE, ZAMBIA, 4 5 DECEMBER 2018)

CHARTER OF THE REGULATORY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR THE GLOBAL LEGAL ENTITY IDENTIFIER (LEI) SYSTEM

CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL THROUGH RAILWAY TRAFFIC

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION (UNESCO) AND THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AFRICA

Charter of the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG)

GEF/C.51/11 October 04, st GEF Council Meeting October 25 27, 2016 Washington, D.C. Agenda Item 14

Proactive Release Under the Official Information Act

TREATY OF IZMIR (14 September 1996)

SADC PROTOCOL ON MINING

Practice of States and international organizations in registering space objects: Elements of conclusions of the Working Group

DECISION RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE YAMOUSSOUKRO DECLARATION CONCERNING THE LIBERALISATION OF ACCESS TO AIR TRANSPORT MARKETS IN AFRICA

I.T.U. Council information meeting (Geneva, 13 October 2011)

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 9 April [without reference to a Main Committee (A/68/L.37)]

PRINCIPLES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/65/L.79 and Add.1)]

CHARTER OF THE GLOBAL JUDICIAL INSTITUTE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

RESOLUTION THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WASHINGTON, D.C. Monday, May 1, unanimously

ASEAN Regional Forum Seminar on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Manila, 8-9 March 2011

Corporate Governance Principles. As Amended June 7, 2017

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL SUPPORTING FAIR TRIAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Energy Community Secretariat Proposed Treaty Changes For the Ministerial Council in October 2016

Agreement between the United Nations and the World Tourism Organization

SIGNIS Civil Statutes Revised and Updated 2017 Approved by Assembly of Delegates, Québec, June 22 nd Statutes 2017

OF THE DRAFT DECISION ON TOE LIBERALIZATION OF ACCESS TO AIR TRANSPORT MARKET IS AFRICA

ICAP Governance Framework

ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003

DANUBEPARKS Danube River Network of Protected Areas. Statutes of the Association DANUBEPARKS

Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal

North Atlantic Treaty

ANNEXURE 2 TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA AND

BOTSWANA ACCOUNTANCY OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY (BAOA)

LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY

Routeing measures other than Traffic Separation Schemes (TSSs) were also agreed and listed here.

Application of King III Corporate Governance Principles

2.2. Attendance: Others may be invited by the Chair to attend all or part of any meeting (but they will not be entitled to vote).

APPLICATION OF KING III CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES 2016

ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED Registration No. 1944/017354/06 ( AGA or the Company ) REMUNERATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

1.1. Formation Agreement

THORNEY OPPORTUNITIES LTD ACN AUDIT & RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER

Community legal framework for a

GLOBAL SERVICES COALITION POSITION PAPER ON THE TRADE IN SERVICES AGREEMENT (TiSA) September 2014

SIGNIS will collaborate regularly with the Secretariat of State in matters concerning its activities in relation to international organizations.

ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED Reg No: 1944/017354/06 BOARD CHARTER

Comment on the Commission Communication of 27 May 2009 on European financial supervision

Petersberg Declaration made by the WEU Council of Ministers (Bonn, 19 June 1992)

Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements. Accordingly, the, two sides agree to the following principles:

The 7th Eilene M. Galloway Symposium on Critical Issues in Space Law. Global and Regional Space Organizations and the Law

Western European Union Council of Ministers Petersberg Declaration

TEXTS ADOPTED. Negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union

1966 (999 UNTS 171), OXIO

DRAFT CHARTER FOR CARIBBEAN PUBLIC SERVICES

ADJUSTMENTS APPROPRIATION BILL

BC-10/3: Indonesian-Swiss country-led initiative to improve the effectiveness of the Basel Convention

OPTINOSE, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE CHARTER ( the Charter )

The State and the Supranational Orders

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ( IIROC ) BOARD CHARTER

Risk Committee Charter ISSUE DATE: 15 NOVEMBER 2018 RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER. ISSUE DATE 15 NOVEMBER 2018 PAGE 1 OF 7

DIRECTIVE 2002/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 7 March 2002

Charter On Cooperation To Achieve The Coordinated Use Of Space Facilities In The Event Of Natural Or Technological Disasters Rev.3 (25/4/2000).

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at 30. Rule of Law over the Seas and Oceans

Establishment of the Asian and Pacific Training Centre for Information and Communication Technology for Development

Contribution to: Liber Amicorum for Ulf Franke:

Copenhagen Declaration

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE KING III COMPLIANCE REGISTER 2017

THE BIDVest GROUP LIMITED

DRAFT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES AND THE THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Helsinki European Council (10-11 December 1999) Presidency Conclusions. Introduction

Statutes for the Association DESERTEC University Network, DUN, for the geographical Region of The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Europe

NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK. Principles governing the negotiations

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

PROTOCOL. reinforcing the capacities and independence of the Parties cultural industries; promoting local/regional cultural content;

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY BOARD OF DIRECTORS HR AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER

(15 August to date) INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS FRAMEWORK ACT 13 OF 2005

The Statutes of the Gunter Grass Society of Gdansk

COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT. between ERISSA YONG WILSON INC. represented by THE COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES EMPLOYERS ASSOCIATION. and the

The Foschini Group Limited Remuneration Committee Charter

KING III CHECKLIST. We do it better

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC)

(e) Airworthiness of aircraft;

gvsig ASSOCIATION REGULATION

AFRRCS Agency Handbook

Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee

Ethical leadership and corporate citizenship. Applied. Applied. Applied. Company s ethics are managed effectively.

Non-exclusive right to handle the marketing and distribution for sale of reference materials from the JRC world-wide

B.1 Corporate Governance report

The Institute of Directors of South Africa ( IoDSA ) is the convener of the King Committee and the custodian of the King reports and practice notes.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR CATEGORY 2 INSTITUTES AND CENTRES APPROVED IN 33 C/RESOLUTION 90 OUTLINE

B&M EUROPEAN VALUE RETAIL S.A. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE

Guide to Good Governance THIRD EDITION

Economic and Social Council

In carrying out the responsibilities and powers set out in this Charter, the Board of Digital CC Limited (Company):

Transcription:

REGIONAL AND GLOBAL SPACE ORGANIZATIONS AND THE LAW ITSO, IMSO AND EUTELSAT: THE HISTORY, THE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND THE LEGAL CHALLENGES ITSO 1 I. THE HISTORY OF ITSO, IMSO AND EUTELSAT The International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (ITSO) monitors and interfaces with Intelsat, Ltd., the commercial telecommunications entity it supervises, to ensure the availability of international public telecommunications services to all countries in the world. Previously known by the acronym "INTELSAT", the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization is an intergovernmental organization, established in 1964, that ensures that communications by means of satellites are available to nations of the world on a global and non-discriminatory basis. The creation of the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization resulted from the efforts of a group of nations to join the United States in 1964 to establish a global communications satellite system. The International Telecommunications Satellite Organization is an intergovernmental organization that incorporates the principle set forth in Resolution 1721 (XVI) of the General Assembly of the United Nations, which establishes that communication by means of satellites should be available to the nations of the world as soon as practicable on a global and non-discriminatory basis. It also incorporates the principle embedded in the "Outer Space Treaty," which states that outer space shall be used for the benefit and in the interest of all countries. The Organization underwent an important restructuring in 2001 in order to secure the long-term viability of its communications system in a market that is characterized by increasing competition, fast-paced innovations and rising capital costs, and in order to attract private investments. The Assembly of Parties, the highest decision-making body of the Organization, approved in 2000 the legal instruments and framework necessary to create a commercial and pro-competitive company named "Intelsat, Ltd.," to operate the satellite system and provide space segment capacity in a manner consistent with the core principles of global coverage and connectivity, lifeline connectivity and nondiscriminatory access. For this purpose, ITSO transferred its global satellite system, including the geostationary-orbital locations, "landing rights" and the brand-name of "Intelsat," to Intelsat, Ltd. Since its establishment, the Organization has proved to be an efficient catalyst for global cooperation in satellite communications. It has promoted cross-border flows of information that are vital to business, trade and peace, and it has been instrumental in linking the developing countries to the global economy and enhancing the competitiveness of their economies. 1 For further information about ITSO, see www.itso.int.

Since 18 July 2001, ITSO has been restructured as follows: IMSO 2 At the intergovernmental level: Assembly of Parties: is the governing body of the Organization, currently comprised of the 149 member countries of ITSO, and meets normally every two years in ordinary Assemblies. The Assembly of Parties elects a Panel of Legal Experts that resolves disputes in connection with the Agreement between two or more member countries, or between ITSO and one or more member country. Executive Organ: is headed by the Director General, who is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the legal representative of ITSO, and is responsible to the Assembly of Parties. The Director General supervises and monitors Intelsat, Ltd.'s provision of public telecommunications services. An Advisory Committee comprised of representatives of 23 member countries provides consultative advice to the Director General on any matters requested. The International Mobile Satellite Organization (IMSO) is the intergovernmental organization that oversees certain public satellite safety and security communication services provided via the Inmarsat satellites. These public services include: services for maritime safety within the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) distress alerting search and rescue co-ordinating communications maritime safety information (MSI) broadcasts general communications aeronautical safety AMS(R)S services through compliance with the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) The establishment of the Organization was based on two international public law instruments developed under the auspices of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). These are: (a) Convention on the International Maritime Satellite Organization (Inmarsat) between States Parties to the Convention; and (b) Operating Agreement between telecommunications entities public or private (one per Party) called Signatories designated by a State. Both instruments entered into force on 16 July 1979. The purpose of Inmarsat was to make provision for the space segment necessary for improved maritime communications and, in particular, for improved safety of life at sea communications and the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS). This purpose was later extended through amendments to the Convention and Operating Agreement to provide the space segment for land mobile and aeronautical communications, and the name of the organization was changed to the International Mobile Satellite Organization to reflect the amended purpose. 2 For further information about IMSO, see www.imso.org.

After twenty years of successful operation, Member States and Signatories of the intergovernmental organization Inmarsat decided to challenge rapidly growing competition from private providers of satellite communications services and pioneered the first ever privatization of all assets and business carried on by the intergovernmental organization while adhering to the continuous provision of the public service obligations and governmental oversight as a pre-requisite of the privatization. At its Twelfth Session in April 1998, the Inmarsat Assembly adopted amendments to the Inmarsat Convention and Operating Agreement which were intended to transform the Organization s business into a privatised corporate structure, while retaining intergovernmental oversight of certain public service obligations and, in particular, the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS). The Assembly and Council of Inmarsat subsequently decided to implement the amendments as from 15 April 1999, pending their formal entry into force. In doing so, it was recognised that early implementation of the new structure was needed to maintain the commercial viability of the system in a rapidly changing satellite communications environment, and thereby ensure continuity of GMDSS services and other public service obligations, namely: peaceful uses of the system, non-discrimination, service to all geographical regions and fair competition. The restructuring amendments entered into force on 31 July 2001 and became binding upon all Parties and the Operating Agreement terminated on the same date. The Organization operates through: the Assembly of Parties, integrated by its 94 member States, which generally meets every two years; the Directorate, headed by the Director General who is the Chief Executive Officer and legal representative of IMSO; and an Advisory Committee, comprising a number of Member States, appointed by the Assembly, which meets regularly. EUTELSAT 3 The European Telecommunications Satellite Organization, EUTELSAT, was created in 1977 by 17 European countries, members of the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations, the CEPT, with the purpose of operating a European telecommunications satellite system. Its constitutive text, the EUTELSAT Convention, was opened for signature in July 1982 and entered into force on 1 September 1985. By 2001, 48 European States were Parties to the EUTELSAT Convention. EUTELSAT established the first telecommunications satellite system in Europe. The Organization started by providing space segment capacity for basic telecommunications and audio-visual services to Europe and expanded its activities to the provision of all types of analogue and digital television and radio broadcasting services, business telecommunications services, multimedia communications, messaging and positioning services and access to broadband internet. Its satellite fleet provides coverage for Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia and the east coasts of North and South America. 3 For further information about EUTELSAT, see www.eutelsatigo.int.

Until 2 July 2001, the main purpose of the Organization was the design, development, construction, operation and maintenance of the space segment of the European telecommunications satellite system or systems. In this context, the prime objective of the Organization was the provision of the space segment required for international public telecommunications services in Europe. On 2 July 2001, all assets, operational activities and related obligations and liabilities of the Organization were transferred to Eutelsat S.A., a company established for this purpose and operating under French law. The Intergovernmental Organization was maintained to ensure that Eutelsat S.A. observes the following basic principles: - Public service/universal service obligations - Pan-European coverage by the satellite system - Non discrimination - Fair competition To fulfill its role, the Intergovernmental Organization EUTELSAT consists of the following organs: the Assembly of Parties, composed of all States, Parties to the EUTELSAT Convention, which holds ordinary meetings every second year.; the Secretariat, headed by an Executive Secretary, is appointed by the Assembly of Parties for a four year mandate. As the legal representative of EUTELSAT, the Executive Secretary acts under the direction of the Assembly of Parties and is directly responsible to it for the performance of all functions of the Secretariat. The Assembly is assisted by an Advisory Committee. ITSO II. THE MAIN LEGAL INSTRUMENTS ITSO Agreement 4 o The ITSO Agreement includes the amendments to the Agreement approved by the Twenty-Fifth (Extraordinary) Assembly of Parties in Washington, D.C., on 17 November 2000. o It establishes the restructured International Telecommunications Satellite Organization which then becomes known as ITSO. o It has 21 Articles dealing with a range of issues such as: Main Purpose and Core Principles of ITSO Supervision of Intelsat Financial Principles Structure of ITSO Role, powers and responsibilities of the Assembly of Parties Role, powers and responsibilities of the Director General Rights and obligations of the Parties Frequency Assignments and the role of notifying administrations Privileges, exemptions and immunities 4 See Annex I.

Withdrawal Amendment Settlement of disputes Duration, among others Public Service Agreement o The Public Services Agreement (the PSA ) was entered into on July 18, 2001 by and between ITSO and Intelsat S.A. to ensure that Intelsat fulfils its Public Service Obligations, namely, to provide on a commercial basis, international public telecommunications services, in order to (i) maintain global connectivity and coverage; (ii) serve its lifeline connectivity customers; and (iii) provide non-discriminatory access to the Intelsat system. o It has 8 Articles dealing with: Intelsat s obligations to honor the Public Service Obligations The supervisory role of ITSO Governing law and dispute resolution; among others. Assembly of Parties Rules of Procedure o It includes the amendments to the Rules of Procedure approved by the Thirty-Fourth Assembly of Parties in Washington DC on 24 June 2010. o It has 17 rules covering for example: Documentation Representation Officers and Election of officers Quorum Voting IMSO IMSO Convention 5 o At its Twelfth Session in April 1998, the Inmarsat Assembly adopted amendments to the Inmarsat Convention and Operating Agreement which were intended to transform the Organization s business into a privatised corporate structure, while retaining intergovernmental oversight of certain public service obligations and, in particular, the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS). o It established IMSO to ensure the provision, by each Provider, of maritime mobile satellite communications services for the GMDSS according to the legal framework set up by IMO. o In 2008, the IMSO Convention was amended by the Twentieth session of the Assembly. o It has 22 Articles dealing with a range of issues such as: Purpose and functions of IMSO Oversight of the GMDSS Structure of the organization Role, powers and responsibilities of the Assembly of Parties Role, powers and responsibilities of the Director General 5 See Annex II.

Costs Settlement of disputes Amendment Withdrawal, among others Public Service Agreement o The PSA between IMSO and Inmarsat was entered into in 1999. o It has 17 articles covering for example: Public service obligations International standards and regulations Remedies Governing law and dispute resolution Rules of Procedure of Assembly o It has 34 rules covering for example: Sessions Participation Agenda and documentation Officers and election of officers Advisory committee Voting, among others Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of IMSO o It entered into Force on 30 July 1983 and has been revised as at 15 April 1999. EUTELSAT The EUTELSAT IGO Convention 6 o The amendments to the Original EUTELSAT Convention, which established the restructured EUTELSAT IGO, were approved by the EUTELSAT Assembly of Parties in May 1999. They were applied on an accelerated (provisional) basis as from 2 July 2001 in accordance with a Resolution to this effect adopted by the EUTELSAT Assembly of Parties also in May 1999. o It entered into force on a definitive basis on 28 November 2002. o It has 21 Articles dealing with a range of issues such as: Establishment of EUTELSAT and the Company Eutelsat S.A. Purposes of EUTELSAT Costs Structure of EUTELSAT Composition and meetings, procedure and functions of the Assembly of Parties The Secretariat Rights and obligations of the Parties Privileges, Exemptions, Immunities Withdrawal Amendments and Termination Settlement of Disputes, among others. 6 See Annex III.

III. THE LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED BY ITSO, IMSO AND EUTELSAT Regional and Global Space Organizations face some legal challenges. For example, it can be rather difficult for those organizations to keep up to date with the current needs and trends of the satellite industry bearing in mind that it is very complicated to amend the ITSO Agreement, the IMSO Convention or the EUTELSAT IGO Convention. Any Party may propose amendments to the ITSO Agreement, IMSO Convention and EUTELSAT Convention by submitting their proposal to the executive organ. 7 The Assembly of Parties, which normally takes place every two years, would then consider the proposed amendment. It is also important to note that there must be a quorum for the Assembly of Parties to be able to make decisions (i.e. the majority of the parties must be represented at the meeting) which poses a further legal obstacle for the Organizations to be able to amend the Treaties. If the Assembly of Parties approves the proposed amendment, it will only enter into force after the Depository has received notice of approval, acceptance or ratification of the amendment from twothirds of the States which were Parties as of the date upon which the amendment was approved by the Assembly of Parties. This process can be very lengthy and complex in a number of Member Parties and might take up to 2 years after the country has decided to approve/accept/ratify the amendment. Another challenge faced by those organizations is that it might be rather difficult to implement treaty provisions. For example, ITSO, IMSO and EUTELSAT IGO have to supervise the private company. 8 The Treaties and the Public Service Agreement provide the tools to allow the organizations to supervise the private companies. If a dispute arises between the Organization and the private company, the disputants shall recourse to arbitration. For example, the ITSO PSA provides that the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the court of arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) whereas the IMSO PSA provides for arbitration under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Rules as in force at the time. Although decisions of arbitral tribunals are binding and final, if the private companies do not wish to collaborate, it can be rather difficult and time consuming for the Organizations to enforce the awards. Similarly, if a dispute arises between Member Parties or between Member Parties and the Organizations, the Treaties provide for arbitration 9. At ITSO, disputes that are not settled within a reasonable time shall be submitted to arbitration. At IMSO, if disputes are not settled within one year, they might go to the International Court of Justice (if the dispute is between Parties) or to arbitration. At EUTELSAT IGO, disputes that are not settled within one year shall be submitted to arbitration. If the dispute goes to arbitration, the decision of the tribunal is binding on all disputants and shall be carried out by them in good faith. If the Organization is a party to the dispute, the decisions of the arbitral tribunal shall be binding on all Parties and its expenses associated with the arbitration shall be regarded as an administrative cost of the Organization. Likewise, although decisions of arbitral tribunals are binding and final, if the losing party does not wish to collaborate, it can be rather difficult and time consuming to enforce the awards. 7 See Article XV of the ITSO Agreement, Article 20 of the IMSO Convention and Article XIV of the EUTELSAT Convention. 8 See Articles III and V of the ITSO Agreement, Articles 3 and 5 of the IMSO Convention and Article III of the EUTELSAT Convention. 9 See Article XVI of the ITSO Agreement, Article 17 of the IMSO Convention and Article XV of the EUTELSAT Convention.

The three organizations described above also face the challenge of lack a harmonized approach in their oversight function. There is no supranational body to ensure some level of harmonization. This might result in lacunas as well as in conflicting provisions, which is not ideal. Nevertheless, the three Organizations examined here have collaborated and successfully worked together to achieve their objectives and goals. Finally, the lack of international regulation of the satellite industry as a whole might be considered as another challenge, although this is not a challenge faced by the individual Organizations. The importance of broadband for generating economic growth and achieving social progress has been widely recognized as well as the role that satellite technology plays in serving remote areas, rural areas or areas with low population rates. Therefore, it might be necessary to impose obligations on other satellite providers in order to ensure the availability of satellite services on a universal basis and in a non-discriminatory manner. IV. CONCLUSION ITSO, IMSO and EUTELSAT IGO share the same history. Therefore, they have very similar legal instruments and structure and face similar legal challenges. Each of them has an important supervisory role to play and regulates the private companies to ensure the availability of international public telecommunications services on a non-discriminatory basis. The Organizations have been able to perform successfully their role despite the challenges faced by them.