Project Purpose. Federal Railroad Administration

Similar documents
HUDSON TUNNEL PROJECT

Executive Summary S.1 INTRODUCTION

Chapter 4: Analysis Framework 4.1 INTRODUCTION

22.1 INTRODUCTION 22.2 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY REGULATORY CONTEXT

Public Meeting. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Section 106 Consultation. Preferred Alternative Selection November 29, 2018

THE GATEWAY PROGRAM. James Richter, P.E Dana Shaeffer, P.E. Number of words: 4006

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND DRAFT SECTION

Walk Bridge Replacement Project

Raritan River Bridge Replacement. Public Information Session September 2016

Northern Branch Corridor CLC Meeting. June 30, 2008

TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. 7. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies

University Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)

PUBLIC HEARING April 24, 2017

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/ Section 106 Public Meeting Proposed Alternatives. December 14, 2017

WELCOME The Walk Bridge Project CTDOT Project No

Indirect and Cumulative Effects

Baltimore & Potomac Tunnel Project.

Notice of Preparation For Link Union Station (Link US) Project. Joint Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report

Project Steering Committee April 14, 2015

OPTIONAL STATIONAVIATION/MANCHESTER

NJ State Rail Plan. New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Briefing September 12, 2012

2-2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND ELIMINATED

C. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF INTEREST

Media Briefing. February 7, 2011

Revised Final Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment for the Wilshire Bus Rapid Transit Project

RECORD OF DECISION OF THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION

STATUS REPORT On the

Chapter 4 Cumulative Effects

Work Breakdown Structure Element Dictionary Preliminary Engineering

Business Advisory Committee. July 12, 2016

Chapter 5B: Transportation Services 5B.1 INTRODUCTION

South Bay Metro Green Line Extension

National Environmental Policy Act ACECNJ/NJDOT/FHWA 2013 DESIGN SUMMIT

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Alternatives Development Report. June 19, 2018

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI ON FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

11 Joint Development Regulatory Context and Methodology

Indirect and Cumulative Effects

New Jersey Pennsylvania Lackawanna Cut-Off Passenger Rail Service Restoration Environmental Assessment. Appendix B

SUMMARY OF MITIGATION OF CONCERNS RAISED IN FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Transit Project Descriptions ($ millions)

Executive Summary. and appendices, as well as. can be obtained by calling (206) or by sending an e mail to

SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION ALASKA RAILROAD MOODY TUNNEL REMOVAL FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. Department of Transportation

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Resilience

D R A F T. SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION. INTERSTATE 73 From I-95 to the Myrtle Beach Region

Executive Summary. What is the I-70 East EIS project and where is it located?

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

ES.1 What is the I-70 East EIS project and where is it located?

Detroit River International Crossing Study Canadian Frequently Asked Questions. Q. Why have you decided to focus on this area of analysis?

I-69 OHIO RIVER CROSSING HISTORY AND HYDRAULIC UPDATE

State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project

Better Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA

Proposed Transmission Line Zoo to Paoli AMTRAK

Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

TIER 2 EIS SCOPING MEETING WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SCOPING MEETING

Evaluation of Alternatives

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Environmental Scoping Information Report

Cumulative and Secondary Impacts

I-84 HARTFORD PROJECT HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT SCOPING INITIATION PACKET

I-20 East Transit Initiative

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REGION 8. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Central Bus Operations and Maintenance Facility

CHAPTER 21: COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES

Better Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA

Indirect and Cumulative Effects

LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD EXPANSION PROJECT FROM FLORAL PARK TO HICKSVILLE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for High Capacity Transit

APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

L Project Update. New Design Recommendations Overall Project Update. January 15, 2019

13.1 INTRODUCTION 13.2 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

Background. Purpose of This Phase of Project Development

Appendix C Presentation Slides with Script

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. ACEforward Notice of Additional Project Element Niles Junction Connections

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

CEQA and its Role in Historic Preservation. Darcy Kremin, AICP Bay Area Environmental Practice Leader Michael Baker International, Oakland, CA

Environmental Impact Statement for the Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev (SCMAGLEV) Project, between Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Stakeholder Advisory Group March 14, 2018

NJ TRANSITGRID TRACTION POWER SYSTEM

6.0 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

Frequently Asked Questions Connecting Palo Alto

Public Meeting. SD 37 James River Bridge Beadle County P 0037(140)140 PCN 04FH. Steve Johnson, PE Chief Bridge Design Engineer.

Description of Phase 2 Modified Design

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the

A. INTRODUCTION B. LAND USE, ZONING, AND PUBLIC POLICY C. SOCIAL CONDITIONS

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

Welcome. Public Meeting. August 2, :00 to 7:00 p.m. Presentation 6:00 to 6:30 p.m.

Sorrento to Miramar 4(f) De Minimis Determination

WELCOME LOCAL SEGMENT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY RESULTS CORRIDOR EVALUATION

5.0 LONG-TERM CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Agency Scoping. May 31, :00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Environmental Impact Statement Port Columbus International Airport

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

Environmental Impact Statement for the California High-Speed Rail System Burbank to Los Angeles Section, CA

Green Line COLLEGE AVENUE TO MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY. November 20, 2017 Public Information Meeting

Port Jervis Line Service Strategy Report

Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement / South Terminal Phase III Project

Missouri River Flood Response Activity

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Draft EIS/EIR Scoping Interagency Meeting June 19, 2017

Transcription:

Project Purpose To preserve the current functionality of Amtrak s Northeast Corridor service and NJ TRANSIT s commuter rail service between New Jersey and Penn Station New York by repairing the deteriorating North River Tunnel. To strengthen the Northeast Corridor s resiliency to support reliable service by providing redundant capability under the Hudson River for Amtrak and NJ TRANSIT trains between New Jersey and the existing Penn Station New York. These improvements must be achieved while maintaining uninterrupted commuter and intercity rail service and by optimizing the use of existing infrastructure.

Need for the Project Both tubes of existing North River Tunnel were inundated during Superstorm Sandy and the tunnel was closed for 5 days The tunnel is safe for use, but storm damage continues to degrade tunnel systems photos courtesy of Amtrak Inundation of tunnel during Superstorm Sandy

Need for the Project The existing rail tunnel is safe for use but requires ongoing and emergency maintenance which disrupts rail service Long-term, the storm damage can only be addressed through a comprehensive reconstruction of the tunnel Existing train service (approximately 450 trains per day) must be maintained while reconstruction is under way Monitoring and repairs are continuously necessary photos courtesy of Amtrak

Project Goals and Objectives 1: Improve service reliability and upgrade existing tunnel infrastructure in a costeffective manner. Reduce infrastructure-related delays due to poor condition of the North River Tunnel following Superstorm Sandy. Rehabilitate the North River Tunnel to modern system standards. 2: Maintain existing NEC service, capacity, and functionality by ensuring North River Tunnel rehabilitation occurs as soon as possible. Optimize use of existing infrastructure. Use conclusions from prior planning studies as appropriate and to the maximum extent possible. Avoid regional and national economic impacts associated with loss of rail service. 3: Strengthen the NEC s resiliency to provide reliable service across the Hudson River, facilitating long-term infrastructure maintenance and enhancing operational flexibility. Construct additional tracks to allow for continued Northeast Corridor rail operations during maintenance periods and unanticipated human-caused and natural events. 4: Do not preclude future trans-hudson rail capacity expansion projects. Allow for connections to future capacity expansion projects, including connections to Secaucus Junction Station in Secaucus through to the Portal Bridge over the Hackensack River, and connections to station expansion projects in the area of Penn Station NY. 5: Minimize impacts on the natural and built environment. Avoid/minimize adverse impacts on communities and neighborhoods. Strive for consistency with local plans and policies. Preserve the natural and built environment.

New Tunnel Alignment (Plan and Profile): New Jersey

New Tunnel Alignment (Plan and Profile): Hudson River and New York

What is an Environmental Impact Statement? Document that evaluates a project s impacts on the natural and built environment Includes impacts of the completed project and its construction impacts Identifies measures to avoid and mitigate impacts Considers alternatives to avoid or reduce impacts Reflects input received through public review opportunities EIS ANALYSIS AREAS Transportation Social & Economic Conditions Property Acquisition Parks and Recreational Resources Visual & Aesthetic Resources Historic & Archaeological Resources Air Quality Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Resilience Noise & Vibration Ecology Contaminated Materials Environmental Justice Secondary & Cumulative Effects Section 4(f) Evaluation (parklands, protected wildlife areas, & historic structures/sites)

DEIS Conclusions: Construction Impacts Temporary but multi-year disruption from: traffic, noise, visual disruption; temporary impacts to wetlands and aquatic resources Measures to reduce impacts include: Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) plans; Neighborhood outreach program to coordinate and manage disruption for affected residences and businesses; Noise mitigation Rehabilitate Existing Tunnel Existing NEC Tunnel Portal New Fan Plant New Surface Tracks (Embankment) Staging Areas New Tunnel Portal Hard Rock TBM Ventilation Shaft, Fan Plant, Staging Area SEM w/ Ground Freezing Tunnel Box Existing NEC New Surface Tracks (Viaduct) Ventilation Shaft, Fan Plant, Staging Area Mixed-Face TBM In-Water Ground Improvement New Surface Tracks (Retained Fill)

DEIS Conclusions: Permanent Impacts New fan plants at Hoboken/ Weehawken border and at 12 th Avenue (Manhattan) Permanent loss of wetland areas (Meadowlands and Hoboken) Measures to Reduce Impacts: Fan plants to be designed to be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods in consultation with community Purchase of wetland credits from a mitigation bank Hoboken Fan Plant 12 th Avenue Fan Plant

Historic Resources/Section 106 Adverse effects on architectural resources that are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): Northeast Corridor and North River Tunnel NY Hudson River Bulkhead Potential for accidental construction damage to NRHP-Eligible architectural resources Potential for archaeological resources to be present in construction zone that could be affected by construction Draft Programmatic Agreement details measures to mitigate impacts

Section 4(f) Evaluation Section 4(f) regulations prohibit use of publicly owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or historic sites unless there is no feasible and prudent avoidance alternative Section 4(f) Resource PARKS NJ: Parks in Weehawken and Hoboken (near construction) NY: High Line (near construction) NY: Hudson River Park (temporary construction in park) HISTORIC RESOURCES North River Tunnel and Northeast Corridor NY Hudson River Bulkhead Conclusion No use No use No use Exempt Use; no prudent and feasible avoidance alternatives; measures to minimize harm established in Draft Programmatic Agreement

Project Schedule 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Environmental Documentation in compliance with NEPA Preliminary Engineering Permits ROW Acquisition Contract Packaging and Procurement Final Design and Construction of New Tunnels Final Design and Rehabilitation of Existing Tunnel

Review of DEIS DEIS available for review on Project Website: www.hudsontunnelproject.com/deis.html Submit comments until August 21, 2017: On the Project website: www.hudsontunnelproject.com/contact.html By email: comment@hudsontunnelproject.com By postal mail: Hudson Tunnel Project c/o Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. 11 Hanover Square, 3 rd Floor New York, NY 10005

Gateway Program Gateway Program: A Long-Term Plan to Increase Capacity on the Northeast Corridor