Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Follow-on Biologics

Similar documents
Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Follow-on Biologics Teruhide YAMAGUCHI

Guideline for the quality, safety and efficacy of follow-on biological medicinal products

Guideline for the Quality, Safety, and Efficacy Assurance of Follow-on Biologics

Similar biological medicinal product

Regulatory Issues and Drug Product Approval for Biopharmaceuticals

Recent Regulations of Biosimilars in Japan. Teruyo ARATO, Ph.D. Review Director PMDA

Implications for Preclinical and Clinical Programs. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Oncology Business Unit June 2, 2011

Paradigm Shift in Comparability Assessment:

Guideline on similar medicinal products containing somatropin. Draft agreed by BMWP March Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation May 2005

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

FDA Public Hearing: Approval Pathway for Biosimilar. Products. November 2-3, 2010

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Biologicals 39 (2011) 312e316. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Biologicals. journal homepage:

Biosimilars, Regulatory Framework and Outcome So Far

Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. Guidance for Industry

Risk Assessments for Host Cell Protein Control Strategies: CDER Experiences

Quality of biologicals

COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CHMP)

Biosimilars Scientific Challenges and Implications

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

What next? Manufacture the biosimilar product

Immunogenicity: Impact on the Design of Clinical Trials for Biosimilars

Harmonizing clinical trials for Biogenerics. Dr. Akhilesh Sharma M.D.;C Clin. Research & P.V. (UCBC - USA & Luton - UK)

Notice Our file number:

fact sheet 3 Introduction to Biosimilars & Regulatory Requirements

Guidelines on Similar Biologic: Regulatory Requirements for Marketing Authorization in India

Medicines Agency EMA & Biosimilar update: Trends from marketing authorisation applications, scientific advice procedures and policies

Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating

Stability of Biological Products

CASSS CMC Strategy Forum Barcelona, Spain. EBE Satellite Session Comparability Concept Paper 21 st March 2011

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

The importance of interchangeability in the procurement of medications: Biosimilar case

European Experience with Similar Medicinal Biological Products

Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies: Registration Requirements. Henry M. J. Leng

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

Guidance for Establishing Safety in First-in-Human Studies during Drug Development CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION SCOPE

Assessment of Active Biopharmaceutical Ingredients Prior To and Following Removal of Interfering Excipients

Information and Submission Requirements for Biosimilar Biologic Drugs. Date Adopted Revised Date

On the Regulatory Approval Pathway of Biosimilar Products

Biosimilars Scientific and Regulatory Considerations

Regulations of Biologics in Taiwan

Baek, Kyung-min. Recombinant Protein Products Division. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use

Comparability to establish Biosimilarity

Comments and suggestions from reviewer

Ph. Eur. monographs and biosimilars

KFDA Regulatory Framework on Biopharmaceuticals - Focus on Biosimilar

参考資料. Joint MHLW/EMA reflection paper on the development of block copolymer micelle medicinal products. Draft

IPRF Biosimilars Working Group Reflection Paper on Extrapolation of Indications in Authorization of Biosimilar Products

IPRF Biosimilars Working Group Reflection Paper on Extrapolation of Indications in Authorization of Biosimilar Products

DRAFT GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS CONTAINING RECOMBINANT INTERFERON ALPHA

February 27, 2008 NOTICE. Consultation on Draft Guidance for Sponsors: Information and Submission Requirements for Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs)

Biosimilar regulation in Republic of Korea and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) developments

Vladimir Hanes, MD, USA

1225 Eye Street NW, Ste. 400 Washington, DC 20005

WHO/BS/ ENGLISH ONLY. EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION Geneva, 29 October to 2 November 2018

The United States Pharmacopeia Strategy on Biotherapeutic Products Standards. Jaap Venema, Ph.D. Chief Science Officer & Chair, Council of Experts

Biosimilars in the EU

WHO Questions and Answers: similar biotherapeutic products

Pharmacist Rana Musa Al-ali (Malkawi) MSc (Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance) Registration Department/JFDA

NDA Advisory Services Ltd

Separation of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (repo) Using Agilent Bio SEC-3

Requirements for demonstrating biosimilarity of monoclonal antibodies

WHO/SBP_Q&A/DRAFT/DEC 2017 ENGLISH ONLY

Guidance for Industry

Joint MHLW/EMA reflection paper on the development of block copolymer micelle medicinal products

5 key characteristics

Current Regulatory Thinking The Draft Reflection Paper On Intravenous Liposomal Product Quality Issues

Comparability assessment in the development of follow-on protein products: Case studies from Omnitrope

Biosimilar regulation from a clinical point of view

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT

Joint MHLW/EMA reflection paper on the development of block copolymer micelle medicinal products

FDA recommendations for comparability studies to support manufacturing changes. Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Office of Biotechnology Products OPQ/CDER/FDA

Technical Challenges in the Development of Biosimilars. E. Morrey Atkinson, PhD Interphex May 1, 2012

Update on the new immunogenicity guideline in the EU

A FDA Product Reviewer s Perspective on Building A Quality Dossier

Paving the way for Non-Clinical Bioanalytical Partnerships Louise Angell

Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm Rockville, MD 20852

International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences Journal homepage:

Biosimilar Development Clinical Investigator Considerations

Prioritizing and Managing Key CMC Elements

Nomenclature for Biological and Biotechnological Substances, including Biosimilars/Generic Biopharmaceuticals

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Guide. recombinant DNA proteins. for the elaboration of monographs on synthetic peptides and. European Pharmacopoeia

Panama City, Panama April, 12-15, Marcelo Mario Matos Moreira. The Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA)

Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products

CMC Strategy Forum Japan November Piyanan Boonprasirt Bureau of Drug Control Thailand Food and Drug Administration

Biosimilars : Simnilarities and Differences

ACG Public Forum. Join ACG, the FDA, and EMA for a discussion on biosimilars and IBD. Monday, 12:45 pm 2:15 pm

What do physicians expect from a new drug?

Critical Quality Attributes for Biotechnology Products: A Regulatory Perspective

BIOSIMILARS OF PROTEIN BASED DRUGS: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

PMDA Perspective on Specifications for Biotechnological Products

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND BIOSIMILARS production, naming, pharmacovigilance and other pharmaceutical quality aspects

Your bridge to. better medicines

Reflection Paper. The Role of Product-specific Monographs for Biotherapeutic Products in Pharmacopoeias

EUROPEAN GENERIC MEDICINES ASSOCIATION

FDA s Implementation of the Legal and Regulatory Framework for Biosimilars

Regulatory Considerations on. Office of Biotechnology Products

A Regulatory Perspective on Characterization and Control of Process-Related Impurities

Transcription:

Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Follow-on Biologics Teruhide YAMAGUCHI Division of Biological Chemistry and Biologicals National Institute of Health Sciences 2009.9.28 London Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Follow-on Biologics Current situation of follow-on biologics/biosimilar and Key issues to be discussed Key points to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of Follow-on Biologics 1

Regulatory Topics on Follow-on Biologics "Guidelines for the Quality, Safety and Efficacy Assurance of Follow-on on Biologics (Yakushoku shinsahatu 0304007 by MHLW / March 4, 2009) Revision of marketing approval application (Yakushoku shinsahatu 0331015 by MHLW / March 4, 2009) Nonproprietary name and brand name of Follow-on Biologics (Yakushoku shinsahatu 0304011 by MHLW / March 4, 2009) Development of Follow-on Protein (Biosimilar Medicines) Products in Japan (Sep. 2009) Approved Reference Biosimilar Company products products Somatropin Genotropin Omnitrope Sandoz 2009 Under reviewing Epoetin kappa Jepo JCR Under development Follitropin alpha Filgrastim Insulin Interferon a Interferon b 2

Biotechnological Products Have Complex Structure aspirin human Growth Hormone N primary / secondary / tertiary / quaternary structure heterogeneity molecular size, charge posttranslational modification such as glycosylation heterogeneity in bioengineered structure such as pegylation biological activity immunogenicity 100 94 92 Helix Ⅱ 106 Helix Ⅲ 9 Helix Ⅰ 128 34 184 C189 Helix Ⅳ 155 C165 C182 72 C53 38 70 47 64 C Some Biotechnological Products Have Multiple Domains Each domain has its own function. A set of relevant functional assays are required. FN domain EGF domain Kringle domain Kringle domain tissue Plasminogen Activator (t-pa) Active center Plasminogen binding domain Serine protease domain 3

Biotechnological Products Consist of Multiple Components Important Issues in Characterization of Follow-on Biologics Desired Product heterogeneity (e.g. glycosylation) Product-related substances deamidated d products oxidized products N/C terminal deleted products Product-related impurities -aggregates -degradation products Process-related impurities -host cell proteins - serum components - infectious agents - purification-process related impurities Can Q5E apply the comparability study of follow-on biologics? Clone selection Seed cell A Banking Production process of reference product is in Black box. How should we evaluate the quality and safety of follow-on products including impurity profile? Characterizations Product A? Follow-on product for Product A Manufacture process change in a single manufacturer Development of follow-on products 4

Innovator s Products with Multi-indications Human Growth Hormone (INN: somatropin) Brand Name Indications /Cell Substrate Dwarfism, Turner's s, Prader-Willi, hgh- Weightsyndrome syndrome, deficiency, loss (HIV) Genotropin /E.coli Norditropin /E.coli Humatrope /E.coli Saizen /CHO cell Growject /E.coli Key issues: Can follow-on biologics be approved for the multi-indication? Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Follow-on Biologics Current situation of follow-on biologics/biosimilar and Key issues to be discussed Key points to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of Follow-on Biologics 5

Dossiers of Follow-on Biologics to be Submitted Dossiers of the innovator product Manufacturing Process Characterization of Quality Attributes Dossiers of the biosimilar product Manufacturing Process To establish stable and robust manufacturing process Characterization of Quality Attributes To analyze the quality attributes individually Non-clinical study Clinical study Non-clinical study Clinical study Comparability study + Individual study + Information Guideline on Follow-on Biologics: Quality, Safety and Efficacy Issues Published by MHLW March 4, 2009 6

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Scope (Well-characterized recombinant protein products) 3. General principles i for the development of follow-on biologics 4. Manufacturing process and quality characterization 5. Comparability studies on quality attributes 6. Specifications 7. Non-clinical studies 8. Clinical studies 9. Post-marketing surveillance 10.Glossary Definition of Follow-on Biologics A follow-on biologic is a biotechnological drug product developed by a company to be comparable to an approved dbiotechnology-derived i d product (hereinafter original biologic ) of a different company. A follow-on biologics can generally be developed on the basis of data that demonstrates comparability between the two biologics with respect to quality, safety and efficacy, or other relevant data. It is recommended to adopt the manufacturing processes which potentially improve safety of the product. 7

Scope of Follow-on Biologics (1) The guideline applies to recombinant proteins and polypeptides, their derivatives, and products of which they are components, (e.g., conjugates). These proteins and polypeptides are produced from recombinant cell-culture culture expression systems and can be highly purified and characterized using an appropriate set of analytical procedures. Scope of the guideline (2) Decision Products Reasons Notes Yes Recombinant plasma proteins There is no reason to exclude recombinant plasma proteins from the scope, even though some Some patients might prefer nonrecombinant products. Blood product supply might be affected, even though proteins have highly complicated overlapped product development ensures structure. the consistent supply. No Recombinant vaccines PEGylated recombinant proteins Synthetic peptides Well characterized recombinant vaccine can be possibly developed as follow-on biologics. Conjugates are in the scope as is in ICH Q6B. Impurity profile is different from that of recombinant proteins. Vaccine is administrated to healthy humans. Lot-to-lot variation of adjuvant activity is relatively large. Development of PEGylated protein as follow-on biologics might be difficult due to the structural complexity. Synthetic peptides can be generic drugs, because desired product can be easily defined by structural analyses. Case by case Polyglycans Characterization is difficult. Several polyglycan products have been approved as generic drugs in Japan. Nonrecombinant proteins* Proteins that are highly purified and characterized could be developed as follow-on biologics. * e.g. proteins such as isolated from tissues or body fluids Several urine-derived protein products have been approved as generic drugs in Japan. 8

General Principles for the Development of Follow-on Biologics (1) As with new biotechnological products, establishment of the well-defined manufacturing process, and extensive characterization studies to reveal the molecular and quality attributes of the follow-on biologics are required. Demonstration of the high similarity in quality attributes with the reference medicinal product is also required. Comparability between the follow-on biologics and reference medicinal product should be evaluated based on the data from non-clinical and clinical studies in addition to the data of quality characteristics. General Principles for the Development of Follow-on Biologics (2) The objective of ICH Q5E guideline is to provide the principles for assessing the comparability of biotechnological /biological i l products where changes are made on manufacturing processes. Manufacturers can compare the both products head-to-head in such a case. Since the information of innovator s products are generally not disclosed, approaches by ICH Q5E can not always be applied to the evaluation of follow-on on biologics. Based on the concept of Q5E, sponsors intending to develop the follow-on biologics should consider the comprehensive approach including comparability studies and other approaches that utilize public information or existing experiences. 9

Development of Manufacturing Process It is necessary to establish the highly consistent and robust manufacturing process. If the host cell line used for the production of reference medicinal product is disclosed, it is desired to use the same cell line. For the establishment and characterization of the cell banks, ICH Q5A, Q5B, Q5D guidelines should be referred. It is recommended to adopt the manufacturing processes potentially improve the safety of the product insofar as these do not affect efficacy. Optimization of manufacturing process according to the comparability studies (1) IEF Profiling of sugar chain RBP 100 10 Some differences Candidate A of FBP Candidate B of FBP 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 1200 1250 1300 10 0 1200 1250 1300 m/z Time (min) 10

Optimization of manufacturing process according to the comparability studies (2) Characterization of eluted fractions RBP Optimization of chromatography RBP Drug Product Design In principle, it is necessary for the dosage form and route of administration to be the same as that of reference medicinal product. Provided that safety and efficacy are not affected, it is not essential for the follow-on biologics to have the same formulation as the reference medicinal product. 11

Stability Testing Long-term, real-time, real-condition stability studies are required. The expiration dating of follow-on on biologics should be determined based on the data of real-time/real-temperature studies. Since identical storage condition and storage period to the reference medicinal product are not prerequisite, a comparison of stability with reference medicinal product therewith will not necessarily be required. These stability tests should follow the ICH Q5C Guideline. Comparability Studies on Quality Attributes In addition to elucidating the quality attributes of the follow-on on biologics, comparability exercises about quality attributes between the follow-on biologics and the reference medicinal product should be conducted. For example, comparability exercises are conducted to examine the following aspects: (1) Structural characterization and physicochemical properties (2) Biological activities (3) Others 12

Quality Attributes of Biologics Desired Product Product-related impurity Product Related Substances HCP etc. Infectious Agents Evaluation of extraction method on active ingredient from product RBP from market Analysis of formulation ingredient mannitol buffer salt pi DS of SBP on method A Extracti on method B Extracti Manufacturing of drug products similar to RBP Drug substance of FBP candidate mannitol buffer salt 5.0 4.0 13

Immunogenicity Non-clinical study can not fully predict immunogenicity of follow-on biologics in human. Comparative study on immune-reactivity during the repeated toxicity study will provide useful information as follows; Difference of quality attributes Effect of antibody production on data interpretation of toxicity and pharmacological studies Impact of antibody on clinical studies Specifications Setting of specifications is required principally based on the results of characterization and lot analyses. It also be considered to reflect the results of the comparability studies between follow-on biologics and reference medicinal product appropriately. For this it may be useful to conduct comparability studies using several lots of the products if applicable. In setting the specifications, the ICH Q6B guideline should be followed. 14

Non-clinical Studies Non-clinical studies that can ensure the safety for administration to humans should be performed and completed prior to initiation iti of the clinical studies. Both comparability assessment and individual assessment are applicable, depending the purpose of the study. For example, comparability assessment may be conducted for pharmacological activity studies, whereas individual assessment is made to address the safety issues on impurities. 20 C1 10 6 4 2 1 0.6 0.4 0.2 A3 A2 NG(1) A1 NG(2) 0.1 0.06 0.04 0.02 NG(0) A7 0 2 A5 C1; Intact erythropoietin A1~A7; Desialylated erythropoietins NG(0),(1),(2); De-N-glycosylated erythropoietins 4 6 8 10 Sialic acid (mol/mol erythropoietin) 12 N.Imai, et al; Eur.J.Biochem. 194, 457-462 (1990) 15

Follow-on biologics Effect of heterogeneity on efficacy and PK RBP pi Candidates of SBP A B C 5.0 4.0 AUC RBP A C B RBP C B A In vitro activity Difference between in vitro and in vivo activities Tissue Distribution of Radioactivity After a Single Intravenous Administration of Radioiodinated Control EPO or EPO-bi in Male Rats Plasma Bone Marrow Kidney Spleen Liver Lung Adrenal Heart EPO EPO-bi 20 min 1hr 4hr 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 Concentration of radioactivity (ng eq. /ml or g) Blood 86(1995) 16

Non-clinical Studies - impurities For product- and process-related impurities, it may be more rational to assess safety on the basis of an established manufacturing process per se and characteristics of impurities than simply to compare impurities of follow-on biologics with reference medicinal products. It may be acceptable to compare the toxicity profiles between follow-on biologics with reference medicinal products in spite of difference of impurities. Target for comparability study of Follow-on Biologics Desired Product Product-related impurity Product Related Substances HCP etc. Infectious Agents Process-related impurity could be different between FBP and the innovator products 17

Clinical Studies (1) In general, clinical studies are required in development of follow-on on biologics since the data from quality characterization and non-clinical studies will be insufficient to evaluate the comparability with reference medicinal product. Clinical studies should be designed based on the data of quality characterizations, non-clinical studies and comparability studies. Clinical Studies (2) Where the data sufficient to assure the comparability in clinical endpoint has been obtained through the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) or PK/PD studies, further clinical studies could be reduced in some cases. In general, the well-designed cross-over study should be consider to evaluate the comparability between follow-on on biologics and reference medicinal products. However, the cross-over study may not be suitable for the long half-life products or products which may cause the antibody formation. 18

Clinical Studies (3) Indications In the case of an originator biologics with more than one indication The efficacy and pharmacological effects of the follow-on have been demonstrated to be comparable to the originator biologics In certain case it may be possible to extrapolate from one indication to the other indications of the originator biologics used as the reference product. Approval of multi-indications for follow-on biologics Genotropin, Omnitrope Omnitrope Omnitrope Indications in EU in USA in Japan Growth hormone deficiency in children (CGHD), Growth hormone deficiency in adult (AGHD), Turner syndrome (TS), Chronic renal insufficiency deficiency Prader-Willi syndrome Short for gestational age 19

Post-marketing Surveillance Data from pre-authorization clinical studies normally are insufficient to identify the all potential safety profiles, post-marketing ti surveillance (PMS) of the safety profile including immunogenicity is required. The specific method and design of the PMS study and risk management plan should be discussed with the regulatory authorities and be submitted together with the application for approval. The findings of the PMS should be reported to the regulatory authorities. PMS for Omnitrope Clinical data about Turner syndrome and Chronic renal insufficiency of omnitrope are required during PMS. The sponsor should analyze adverse effects possibly due to expression of antibodies against either somatropin or host cell protein. All patient data should be collected for 2 years as PMS. 20

Thank you for your attentions! 21