ZEM ds : Case studies

Similar documents
ZEMedS: Case studies

ZEMedS ds: Case studies

ZEMedS ds: Case studies

ZEMedS: Implementation

ZEMedS: Implementation

Imp ementation Case:

Imp ementation Case:

Imp ementation Case:

Imp ementation Case:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Best practices and lists of technologies to refurbish buildings & Proposed packages of measures

Efficient and smart climate shell. refurbishment of residential buildings PART OF SMART SOLUTION 1: EFFICIENT AND SMART CLIMATE SHELL REFURBISHMENT

Efficiency house. Building description

Potential of ventilative cooling in German residential buildings

2000 Antwerp, terraced house

BPE Case study of Pippin Close and Barnlea Close

School Tito Maccio Plauto Cesena (IT)

Engineers Ireland Cork Region CPD lecture series

EVALUATING THE ENERGY SAVINGS OF HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDING ENCLOSRE RETROFITS Brittany Hanam, MASc, P.Eng. Graham Finch, MASc, P.Eng.

Koniklecová 4, Brno-Nový Lískovec

Healthy Buildings 2017 Europe July 2-5, 2017, Lublin, Poland

Energy-Efficient Passive House using thermal mass to achieve high thermal comfort

The main mode of air change of rooms is Ventilation. Ventilation and Energy maybe not that irreconcilable. articles

Passive House Object Documentation

Passivhaus Projects and Benefits

Minimum Energy Consumption 84% energy heating savings*

Passive houses for the Northern climate

Project Description. Projected build start date 03 May 2010 Projected date of occupation 06 Aug

Built examples and project certification. Zeno Bastian, Passive House Institute

EuroPHit. Outlines for training modules for designer

Modeling and Simulation of Energy Use and Indoor Thermal Environment of Highly-Insulated Buildings

BUILDING DESIGN AND THERMAL INERTIA: WHEN, WHY, WHERE

Defining a Fabric Energy Efficiency Standard for zero carbon homes

Energy Audit of two Apartment Buildings in Cagliari using Energy Simulation

PASSIVHAUS Designed for you to enjoy maximum comfort with minimum energy.

Project Description. Projected build start date 15 Aug 2011 Projected date of occupation 19 Dec Existing external wall construction

INNOVATIVE METHODS TO ENCOURAGE BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN FRANCE Francis Allard LaSIE, University of La Rochelle/CNRS

> Performance requirements: Part L UK vs Energiesprong vs Passivhaus.

EDEM detail description part 1: inputs and outputs

The Effects of Set-Points and Dead-Bands of the HVAC System on the Energy Consumption and Occupant Thermal Comfort

The Elithis Tower is an experimental and demonstration. Elithis Tower in Dijon, France. nzeb case studies

Energy efficiency of buildings from Europe to Slovakia

NCC 2019 Proposed Provisions Insights from Case Study

Project Description. Projected build start date 01 May 2010 Projected date of occupation 01 Nov Belfast, County Antrim, Northern Ireland

AM-55, AM-56) B U I L D I N G P A R T N E R S H I P S F O R E N E R G Y S E C U R I T Y

D3.9_Overall Refurbishment Plan DRAFT CS03. Hotel Restaurant Valcanover

Advanced Ventilation Technologies

ENERGY EFFICIENT RETROFIT OF A HIGH-RISE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING

The Net-Zero building Solar 2002

Pilot project: DUTH Student residences, Komotini, Greece. Detailed technical and financial action plans for each individual building block

Verified net Zero Energy Building with air source heat pumps for SME

Near zero energy building with steel solutions case study. Jyrki Kesti, Technology Director, Ruukki Construction

Results from the Application of the Maltese Energy Performance Rating of Dwellings in Malta EPRDM Software to a New Block of Apartments

D3.9_Overall Refurbishment Plan DRAFT CS15. André Tournon-sur-Rhône

OPTIMIZATION OF THE REFURBISHMENT OF THE ENVELOPE THROUGHOUT ITS LIFE CYCLE

Project name Gentoo Retrofit Bid 1 Project summary Refurbishment of 2no. Semi Detached houses using Passivhaus principles

PHPP Report. Beattie Passive Inchkeith Drive

TREES Training for Renovated Energy Efficient Social housing. Section 1 Techniques 1.2 Replacement of glazing

Project name SOLAR HOUSE 80/50 Project summary

Residential buildings retrofit: the role of solar technologies

Modeling Energy Consumption Effects of Glazing

Single family semi-detached four-bedroom home in London, England

BUILDING ENERGY SYSTEMS

Adaption of the passive house concept in northern Sweden - a case study of performance

PassiveDesign.org. Principles of Passive Design

Nocturnal natural ventilation for low and zero energy office buildings in Central Chile

Passivhaus Introduction

Passiv Haus Institut. Certification as "Quality Approved Passive House" Criteria for Non-Residential Passive House Buildings

Kindergarten Vejtoften, Høje-Taastrup, Denmark

SUMMER THERMAL COMFORT IN TYPICAL FRENCH RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS: IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF BUILDING ENVELOPE INSULATION ENHANCEMENT

Dienstleistung. Certification as "Quality Approved Passive House" Criteria for Residential-Use Passive Houses

Project Description. Projected build start date 24 Dec 2004 Projected date of occupation. Energy target. Existing external wall construction

Building Performance Evaluation

Frequently Asked Questions: Existing Houses/Buildings

Nearly Zero Energy Building in Lecco Modern technological building compared to an ancient Villa

Active solar heating system with concrete plate heating analysed with dynamical thermal simulations

5 social row houses (Wachtebeke)

Cost optimality and nzeb target in the renovation of Portuguese building stock. Rainha Dona Leonor neighborhood case study

Energy Analysis of Using Thermal Mass in a Hot Humid climate

Student Modeling Competition

Project Description. Projected build start date 01 Feb 2010 Projected date of occupation 31 May Queenborough and Rushenden, Kent, England

Bruck an der Mur. Project summary. Energy concept: Background for the renovation reasons

Passive House: Overview

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Dwelling Retrofit Options

The BIG Energy Upgrade Energy Innovation for Retrofitting Deprived Community Housing in the UK

Passive House: Overview

SURNA Grow Facility: Systems Comparison - IEA

Single family low energy house, Herselt, Belgium

PV Generation Potential 17.1 kbtu/ft2/yr 15.4

Ulvøya, Oslo, Norway. One Stop Shop Demonstration Project 1. OVERVIEW

Primary School Retrofit Project

Q-Air unique selling propositions in detail

BPE Case Study - Lyndhurst Crescent, Swindon

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 48 (2014 )

71 kwh/(m²a) Project Documentation. 1 Abstract. Single family house in Bellbrae, Victoria, Australia. 1.1 Data of building. Year of construction

Case Study. Review of control strategy for a primary school built to PassivHaus standard

Single family house in Herselt BE

SOLAR XXI: A Portuguese Office Building towards Net Zero-Energy Building

CCHVAC REHVA Workshop in CLIMA nzeb experiences in South Europe and Mediterranean Climate

The Importance of Slab Edge & Balcony Thermal Bridges

I n te rv e n tio n s fo r th e S u sta i na ble D e v e lo pm e nt. o f A rc hi te c tu ra l H e ri tage

Transcription:

ZEMedS: Case studies

Case study: Salamanque Group school, Montpellier, France The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. August 2015

General data 3 Name of the school Salamanque Group school Type of school Pre school and Primary school (3 12 years old) Number of pupils Primary building 320 Pre school building Location Montpellier, France Public Owner Year of construction The year of construction is 1965. y Las t energy upgrade in 2010.

General data 4 Building typology 2 buildings Heated area m2 2303 m 2 Primary: 3 floor building Pre school: 1 floor building with a recent extension. The buildings are constructed of metal structure (posts and beams). The slabs are concrete slab and walls made of non insulated panels. Climate Site Mediterranean. Climate class H3 in French Regulation. Heating degree days (base 18)*: 1718 Cooling degree days (base 26)*: 65 * http://www.degreedays.net/ Medium density Pre school Urban Primary

Current situation 5 Renovation needs Very low comfort in summer season. Upgrading required for these buildings that are at end of cycle. High reproducibility: 30 schools of the same type in Montpellier. Building use Primary: Weekdays, except Wednesday: 7h45 9h: extra school time (20% of pupils) 9h 12h: class 12h 13h45: cantine (40% pupils) 13h45 16h45: class 16h45 18h45: recreation activities (15% pupils) Wednesday: 7h45 12h & 13h45 18h45: recreation activities (15% pupils) and 12h 13h45: cantine Pre school: Weekdays, except Wednesday: d 7h45 12h & 13h30 18h15. Wednesday: 7h45 12h. Utilization rate Standard use of 145 school days a year with 320 pupils attending classes. Urban and mineral area. Building surroundings Wednesdays and during all summer season, 20% of pupils attending classes. No shadows over the buildings.

Current situation 6 Primary Walls Cinderblock walls without insulation, U = 3.1 W/m2K. Panels walls without insulation, U = 2.7 W/m2K. Flat roof with insulation, U = 0.19 W/m2K. Primary Roofs Facade east Facade west Primary Groundfloors Primary Windows and exterior doors 20 years old double glazing windows and exterior doors 4/6/4 Ug = 3.3 W/m2K with aluminium frame with no thermal bridge. Existing exterior roller shutters for solar protection. Groundfloor without insulation, U = 2.2 W/m2K. Exterior floor on yard with insulation, U = 0.24 W/m2K. 5 years old low e double glazing windows and exterior doors 4/16/4 Ug = 1.9 W/m2K with aluminium frame with thermal bridge. Existing exterior roller shutters for solar protection. 20 years old windows 5 years old window Note: values of U don t include possible thermal bridges. Windows in non insulated panels Windows in cinderblock walls

Current situation 7 Pre school Walls Panels walls without insulation, U = 2.7 W/m2K. Cinderblock walls with internal insulation, U = 0.23 W/m2K. Pre school Roofs Flat roof without insulation, U = 3.2 W/m2K. Facade west (panel walls) Facade west (cinderblock walls) Pre school Groundfloors Groundfloor without insulation, U = 2.2 W/m2K. Pre school Windows and exterior doors 20 years old double glazing windows and exterior doors 4/6/4 Ug = 3.3 W/m2K with aluminium frame with no thermal bridge. Existing exterior roller shutters for solar protection. 5 years old low e double glazing windows and exterior doors 4/16/4 Ug = 1.9 W/m2K with aluminium frame with thermal bridge. Existing exterior roller shutters for solar protection. Façade east Note: values of U don t include possible thermal bridges.

Current situation 8 East facades of primary school East facades of pre school West facades of primary school East facades of pre school (new building) Library in primary school Classroom in pre school

Current situation 9 Airtightness: No measurements in any of the buildings (poor performance) Heating and cooling: 2 natural gas boilers (230 kw each) situated in the primary school feeds pre school. Mon Thu Thu Fri : start heating 4am and 6pm total shutdown. Not maintaining the temperature at night. Wed : start heating at 4 am and 3pm total shutdown. Same program for all heating network. The new radiators are equiped with thermostatic valves. Electric fans are installed in some spaces.

Current situation 10 Ventilation: No mechanical ventilation systems, except on toilets and kitchen. Lighting: Primary school: T8 fluorescents 18Wx4 and T8 fluorescents 36Wx2 in classrooms. T5 fluorescents 14Wx3 in offices. T8 fluorescents 36Wx2 in corridors, staircases and toilets. Pre school: T8 fluorescents 18Wx4 in classrooms and corridors. LBC 15Wx1, LBC 15Wx2 in offices and toilets. High infiltration in façade T8 Fluorescents 18Wx4 in classroom in pre schhol T8 fluorescents 36Wx2 in corridor in primary building

Current situation 11 Appliances: Primary: 2 printers/copiers, 27 computers (1 computer/classroom) Pre school: 1 printers/copiers, 9 computers (1 computer/classroom) DHW: Primary: 2 electric heaters of 75L (teacher room) and 300L (kitchen) Prte school: 1 electric heater of 200L No data of energy consumption for DHW. Cooking/kitcken: Primary: Just catering. 1 electric oven of 6kW, 1 refrigerator of 150W, 1 dishwasher of 10kW. Pre school: no cooking service

Current situation 12 Current final energy consumption kwh/m2 conditioned area: electricity kwh/m2 y; 18 natural gas kwh/m2 y ; 81 Total energy consumption (bill 2012): 227,091 kwh/year, 99 kwh/year m2 conditioned area Running cost: electricity /y ; 5,631 natural gas /y ; 11,299 Energy (bill 2012): 11,299 /year (natural gas), 5,631 /year (electricity). VAT included. Water: no data Maintenance: no data

Current situation 13 Health and comfort: Winter and summer comfort: Winter comfort is right unless when it is very cold and windy due to air infiltration and cold effect. No mechanical ventilation in classrooms. Ventilation is by opening windows at the discretion of users. The building is not sealed so no major health problem but thermal discomfort. Discomfort problems in summer due to overheating, so the shutters are often closed all day requiring artificial lighting. Interior air quality: No studies carried out of indoor quality. High air infiltration through envelope. Visual comfort: Glare problems observed as classrooms are oriented east and west.

nzeb renovation 14 Design approach: Deep renovation towards ZEMedS nzeb Schools requeriments. ZEMedS Goals: Requeriment 1: C PE Prod RES 0 Primary energy consumption yearly y( (heating, cooling, ventillation, DHW and lighting) g) is produced by local renewable energies. Requeriment 2: C FE 25 kwh/m2 y FE consumption yearly (heating, cooling, ventillation and lighting)per conditioned area Requeriment 3: Indoor air quality guaranteed (CO 2 1000 ppm) and temperature above 28ºC 40 hours yearly during occupancy National lfactors for conversion in energy and dco 2 have been taken into account (data 2014). Methodology in energy simulations: Steps considered: First step: 3 proposals (variant A, B and C) in envelope renovation: from less insulated to more insulated Second step: 1 proposals in lighting replacement in pre school (no saving observed in primary school) Third step: mechanical ventillation installation and PV system installation to cover lighting, ventillation and DHW

nzeb renovation 15 First step: 3 proposals (variant A, B and C) in envelope renovation: from less insulated to more insulated. Current regulation relative to the thermal characteristics and energy performance of the existent buildings is refered by variant A. Variant A Variant B Variant C Decreasing % window area on classrooms in primary school and pre school Step 1 Uwindows and exterior doors 1.8 1.5 1.4 Solar protection current Replacement of existing 20 years old windows and exterior doors for: Variant A: low e double glazing, 16mm(air) and aluminum frame (with thermal break). Ug=1.6 Uf= 2.2 Variant B: low e double glazing, 16mm(argon) and aluminum frame (with thermal break). Ug=1.3 Uf= 2.2 Variant C: low e double glazing, 16mm(argon) and wooden frame. Ug=1.3 Uf= 1.8 Uroof and Ufloor in contact with exterior air 0.3 0.22 0.15 Ventilated roof with insulation system in pre school roof Paving concrete slabs in primary roof Ventilated facade with insulation system (except the Uwall 0.4 0.3 0.2 north façade in primary school and the renovated façade in pre school) Ugroundfloor current

nzeb renovation 16 Second step: replacing lighting in the classrooms of pre school Third step: installation of mechanical ventillation to improve air quality of spaces and PV systems to cover primary energy consumption of heating, lighting, ventilation and DHW Variant A Variant B Variant C Step 2 Lighting replacing T8 tubes for T5 tubes in classrooms of pre school with 6.3 W/m2 There is no saving in electricity consumption when replacing lighting in primary school Step 3 Mechanical ventilation Heating system DHW Cooling system PV system mechanical ventilation 6,5l/per sec in classrooms and offices current current no cooling system 42 kwp / 243 m2 PV panels

nzeb renovation 17 Energy simulations: Building simulation softwares DesignBuilder v.4 and EnergyPlus Weather files and main parameters for energy simulations: Weather data provided of the site of Montpellier in EnergyPlus weather format. Setpoint temperature for heating: 20ºC. Thermal bridges considered in building envelope. Main occupancy rates: classrooms (0,44 per/m2), offices (0,21 per/m2), corridors (0 per/m2), wc (0 per/m2), dinning room (1 per/m2). Infiltration rate of 30 m3/h m2 at 50 Pa simulating the exisiting building and 6 m3/h m2 at 50 Pa simulating renovated buildings. Natural ventilation for opened windows (5 ACH) 15 minutes during break times and half an hour during cleaning tasks. Considered 2 l/person day for the demand of DHW, including restoration (catering).

nzeb renovation results 18 VARIANT A FINAL ENERGY: kwh/m2 50 40 30 20 10 25 38 38 46 20 30 30 38 5 8 7 7 ZEMedS requirements (heating, cooling, vent. & lighting) Variant A Variant A & lighting 0 Total ZEMedS Heating, cooling & ventilation Lighting Variant A & lighting & mechanical vent & PV Variant A : 38 kwh/m² in final energy Ventilati on; 0 Cooling; 0 Lighting; 8 Heating; 30 Variant A & lighting : 37 kwh/m² in final energy Lighting; 7 Cooling; 0 Ventilatio n; 0 Heating; 30 Variant A & lighting & mechanical vent & PV : 45 kwh/m² in final energy Lighting; 7 Ventilatio n; 2 Cooling; 0 Heating; 36 PRIMARY ENERGY: 150 127 125 Primary Energy of existing building kwhpe/m².y (heating, 100 76 vent., light., DHW, appliances & cooking) data from bill 65 75 50 Primary Energy for non renewable energy kwhpe/m².y 50 (heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and DHW) (data from 25 simulation) 0 30 Primary Energy predicted by RES kwh/m2 y (data from 25 Existing building envelope envelope envelope & lighting simulation) 50 & lighting & mechanical ventilation Predicted RES production in kwhpe/m².y (data from 75 HR & PV simulation) 100 74

nzeb renovation results 19 VARIANT B FINAL ENERGY: kwh/m2 50 40 30 20 10 25 37 36 44 20 29 29 37 5 8 7 7 ZEMedS requirements (heating, cooling, vent. & lighting) Variant B Variant B & lighting 0 Total ZEMedS Heating, cooling & ventilation Lighting Variant B & lighting & mechanical vent & PV Variant B : 36 kwh/m² in final energy Ventilati on; 0 Cooling; 0 Lighting; 8 Heating; 29 Variant B & lighting : 36 kwh/m² in final energy Ventilatio n; 0 Cooling; 0 Lighting; 7 Heating; 29 Variant B & lighting & mechanical vent & PV : 44 kwh/m² in final energy Lighting; 7 Cooling; 0 Ventilatio n; 2 Heating; 35 PRIMARY ENERGY: 150 127 125 Primary Energy of existing building kwhpe/m².y (heating, 100 74 vent., light., DHW, appliances & cooking) data from bill 75 63 48 Primary Energy for non renewable energy kwhpe/m².y 50 (heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and DHW) (data from 25 simulation) 0 30 Primary Energy predicted by RES kwh/m2 y (data from 25 Existing building envelope envelope envelope & lighting simulation) 50 & lighting & mechanical ventilation Predicted RES production in kwhpe/m².y (data from 75 HR & PV simulation) 100 74

nzeb renovation results 20 VARIANT C FINAL ENERGY: 40 36 kwh/m2 50 30 25 20 10 36 43 20 28 28 36 5 8 7 7 ZEMedS requirements (heating, cooling, vent. & lighting) g) Variant C Variant C & lighting 0 Total ZEMedS Heating, cooling & ventilation Lighting Variant C & lighting & mechanical vent & PV Variant C : 35 kwh/m² in final energy Ven tilat Cooling; ion; 0 0 Lighting; 8 Heating; 28 Variant C & lighting : 35 kwh/m² in final energy Ventilati on; 0 Cooling; 0 Lighting; 7 Heating; 28 Variant C & lighting & mechanical vent & PV : 43 kwh/m² in final energy Lighting; 7 Cooling; 0 Ventilatio n; 2 Heating; 34 PRIMARY ENERGY: 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 127 62 Existing building envelope envelope & lighting 47 73 30 envelope & lighting & mechanical ventilation HR & PV 74 Primary Energy of existing building kwhpe/m².y (heating, vent., light., DHW, appliances & cooking) data from bill Primary Energy for non renewable energy kwhpe/m².y (heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and DHW) (data from simulation) Primary Energy predicted by RES kwh/m2 y (data from simulation) Predicted RES production in kwhpe/m².y (data from simulation)

nzeb renovation 21 Global cost and paybacks for the renovation scenarios: Global cost and paybacks for the renovation scenarios: Calculations based on: Average yearly increase in gas price*: 6.9 % (data from 2003 to 2014) Average yearly increase in electricity price**: 2.9 % (data from 2003 to 2014) Overall cost of gas: 11,229 /year (VAT included) Overall cost of electricity: 5,631 /year (VAT included) Considered dan overall maintenance cost of the renovation scenarios (yearlypercentage of the total t cost of the renewals) )in 05%( 0.5% (envelope measures), 2%(PV) Replacement assumed in lighting (15 years lifetime) and inversors of PV system (15 years lifetime) Average inflation considered in 1.5% (data from 10 years average) All construction costs with prices at 2015, VAT included. Assembling, disassembling and daily amortization of scaffold are included in façade renovation costs. *Source: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=ten00117&plugin=1 ** Source: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=ten00118

nzeb renovation 22 Paybacks for the renovation implemented in steps (every 4 years): var A envelope var B envelope var C envelope variant A lighting variant B lighting variant C lighting variant A MVHR & PV variant B MVHR & PV variant C MVHR & PV Expected savings in gas Expected savings in electricity Overall cost of gas /year Overall cost of electricity /year Investment in 66% 0% 3842 5631 469182 Overall maintenance cost /year Cost of replacement in Items to be replaced 68% 0% 3616 5631 506223 0 0 25 Payback (years) 24 69% 0% 3503 5631 562541 26 1% 5% 4620 5998 40320 lighting T5 tubes >50 1% 5% 4620 5998 40320 403 42794 (15 20 years lifetime) >50 1% 5% 4620 5998 40320 >50 19% 90% 7179 672 143123 >50 inversors PV (15 21% 90% 7300 672 143123 1073 8043 >50 years lifetime) 21% 90% 7300 672 143123 >50 Total payback (envelope+ lighting + MVHR &PV) in all variants is > 50 years.

nzeb renovation 23 Paybacks for the renovation implemented in steps (every 4 years): Values in m2 conditioned area var A envelope var B envelope Expected Expected Overall cost Overall cost Overall Cost of savings in savings in of gas /m2 of electricity Investment maintenance replacement Items to be Payback gas electricity year /m2 year in /m2 cost /m2 year in /m2 replaced (years) 66% 0% 2 3 217 24 68% 0% 2 3 235 0.0 0 25 var C envelope 69% 0% 2 3 261 26 variant A lighting 1% 5% 2 3 19 lighting T5 tubes >50 variant B lighting 1% 5% 2 3 19 0.2 20 (15 20 years >50 variant C lighting 1% 5% 2 3 19 lifetime) >50 variant A MVHR & PV 19% 90% 3 0 66 >50 inversors PV (15 variant B MVHR & PV 21% 90% 3 0 66 0.5 4 >50 years lifetime) variant C MVHR & PV 21% 90% 3 0 66 >50 Total payback (envelope+ lighting + MVHR &PV) in all variants is > 50 years.

nzeb renovation 24 In graphics, global cost of step 1 (envelope measures): 300 0 Maintenance costs /m2 year Global costs en /m² ye ear 250 200 150 100 50 0 Existing building var A envelope var B envelope var C envelope 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Confort Energy price (electricity) /m2 year Energy price (gas) /m2 year Cost of replacement /m2 Investment /m2 Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) As an average, in primary school there are around 30 hours/y with more than 28ºC in west orientation after the renovation measures of step 1 as some classroom of primary school under the roof in west orientation can reach around 80 hours/year. In pre school building after step 1 is not expected to reach more than 40 hours with 28ºC.

nzeb renovation 25 In graphics, global cost of step 2 (renovation in lighting g system in pre school classrooms): Global costs s en /m² year 350 0 Maintenance costs /m2 year 300 250 50 100 Energy price (gas) /m2 year 150 200 Cost of replacement /m2 200 150 Investment t /m2 250 100 300 50 350 0 400 Existing building variant A lighting variant B lighting variant C lighting façade east) Co onfort Energy price (electricity) /m2 year Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) After step 2, the hours decrease to 25 hours/y with more than 28ºC. In pre school building after step 2 is not expected to reach more than 40 hours with 28ºC.

nzeb renovation 26 In graphics, global cost of step 3 (installation of mechanical ventilation and PV system): Global cos sts en /m² year 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Existing building variant A MVHR & variant B MVHR & variant C MVHR& PV PV PV 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Confort Maintenance costs /m2 year Energy price (electricity) /m2 year Energy price (gas) /m2 year Cost of replacement /m2 Investment /m2 Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) After step 3, decrease to 23 hours/y with more than 28ºC in primary school. In pre school building after step 3 is not expected to reach more than 40 hours with 28ºC.

nzeb renovation 27 Paybacks for the renovation implemented all at once (step 1 + step 2 + step 3) and implemented under current regulation: variant A envelope & lighting g & MVHR & PV variant B envelope & lighting & MVHR & PV variant C envelope & lighting & MVHR & PV Expected savings in gas Expected savings in electricity Overall cost of gas /year Overall cost of electricity /year Investment in Overall maintenance cost /year Cost of replacement in Items to be replaced 60% 84% 4520 901 652625 lighting T5 tubes 28 (15 20 years 61% 84% 4407 901 689666 1392 47970 lifetime)/inversors 29 PV (15 years 62% 84% 4294 901 745984 lifetime) 29 Payback (years) Total payback in all variants excepted to be around 28 29 years.

nzeb renovation 28 Paybacks for the renovation implemented all at once (step 1 + step 2 + step 3) and implemented under current regulation: Values in m2 conditioned area variant A envelope & lighting & MVHR & PV variant B envelope & lighting & MVHR & PV variant C envelope & lighting & MVHR & PV Expected savings in gas Expected savings in electricity Overall cost of gas /m2 year Overall cost of electricity /m2 year Investment in /m2 Overall maintenance cost /m2 year Cost of replacement in /m2 Items to be replaced 60% 84% 2,1 0,4 302,4 lighting T5 tubes 28 61% 62% 84% 84% 2,0 2,0 0,4 0,4 319,6 345,7 0,6 22 (15 20 years lifetime)/inverso rs PV (15 years lifetime) 29 29 Payback (years) Total payback in all variants excepted to be around 28 29 years.

nzeb renovation 29 In graphics, global cost of renovation all at once and global cost of renovation under current regulation: s en /m² year Global cost 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Existing building variant A envelope variant B envelope variant C envelope & lighting & MVHR &PV & lighting & MVHR &PV & lighting & MVHR &PV 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Confort Maintenance costs /m2 year Energy price (electricity) /m2 year Energy price (gas) /m2 year Cost of replacement /m2 Investment /m2 Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in primary school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade east) Confort in pre school (numbers of hours over 40 in T> 28ºC façade west) The number of hours over 28ºC is in 35 hours, altough classrooms of primary school under the roof in west orientation can reach around 80 hours/year. In pre school building after step 3 is not expected to reach more than 40 hours with 28ºC.

Summary results 30 Current situation: gas electricity consumption (kwh) Ratio (kwh/m2) consumption (kwh) Ratio (kwh/m2) Real (invoice information) 185502 81 41589 18 Simulation (Desing Builder) 184207 85 31867 15 Results of nzeb renovation under ZEMedS goals: Renovation implemented with energy efficiency measures in Energy balance in PE (kwh/m2 y) (heating, cooling, vent., DHW & lighting) and RES production (kwh and kwh/m2 conditioned area) (ZEMedS requirement 1) (simulations) Energy result in FE (kwh/m2 y) (heating, cooling, vent. & lighting) per conditioned area (ZEMedS requirement 2) (simulations) Goal of (ZEMedS requirement 3) result envelope + lighting + mechanical ventilation with heat recovery + PV system covering (heating by natural gas, lighting, ventilation, DHW by electricity) it Var A 1 Var B 0 Var C 1 Var A Var B Var C 64734/30 243 m2 surface PV panels 64734/30 243 m2 surface PV panels 64734/30/243 / 243 m2 surface PV panels 45 (60% gas saving, 84% electricity saving) 44 (61% gas saving, 84% electricity saving) 43 (62% gas saving, 84% electricity saving) indoor quality guaranteed by mechanical ventilation in primary school, the number of hours over 28ºC is predicted to be around 35 hours/y as average, as some classroom under the roof in west orientation can reach around 80 hours/year Paybacks (years) step by step implementation > 50 Paybacks (years) all at once implementation 28 29