Rio Grande LNG Project and Marine Considerations Marine Technology Society Houston Section August 24, 2017

Similar documents
Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT

AGENCY: Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers; and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

JACKSONVILLE HARBOR DEEPENING MAYOR S TASK FORCE

B.C. TOWBOAT INDUSTRY CONFERENCE

Woodfibre LNG Limited Response to SIGTTO LNG Ports and Risk Reduction Options

GALVESTON DISTRICT DREDGING CONFERENCE

Project Overview. Northwest Innovation Works LLC and the Port of Kalama propose to develop and operate

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT

Appendix L. Plan Formulation. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas Channel Improvement Project Cameron County, Texas

ICL Strategy March 2018

Massachusetts Port Authority Subordinated Obligations, Crane Financing and Commercial Paper Notes

Investor Presentation

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment [ESIA] for Proposed Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project at Tema in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana

SHELL FLNG TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH AND INNOVATIVE APPLICATION OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES

Dominion Cove Point Export Project Platts 16 th Annual Liquefied Natural Gas February 9, 2017

Leading the Second Wave of US LNG Exports & Challenging the Traditional LNG World Paradigm

New Haven Harbor, Connecticut Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement

Appendix A: Project Characteristics

American Patriot Holdings LLC & PPHTD Creating Inland Marine Innovation

REUSE OF DREDGED SEDIMENTS

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 SUBMITTED TO: STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Coastal Science and Engineering Collaborative (CSEC) Overview

Unit 4: Oil and Gas Development

Bayport, Texas August 27, 2012

Leading the Second Wave of US LNG Exports & Challenging the Traditional LNG World Paradigm. Langtry Meyer Founder & Chief Operating Officer Texas LNG

NEW HAVEN HARBOR CONNECTICUT NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT

LNG Impact on U.S. Domestic Natural Gas Markets

Significant prevention measures in place for each LNG carrier *

HGAP. Haynesville Global Access Pipeline. Tellurian Midstream Group April 2018

Ports and LNG as Maritime Fuel

Liquefied Natural Gas Limited

Liquefied Natural Gas Limited

APPENDIX E: RIVERFRONT ACCESS, DREDGING AND MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT REPORT

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

The case of Poseidon Med, LNG Bunkering Challenges at Port

Substantial Changes Ahead for MISO North Michigan Impacts 2018 MMEA Fall Conference

FIRST QUARTER RESULTS 2016 INVESTOR PRESENTATION

The Role of Gas in Decarbonizing Europe. Keith Martin, Chief Commercial Officer, Uniper SE The European Gas Conference, Vienna January 31 st, 2018

Charleston Harbor Post 45 Draft Integrated Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary

Q /11/17. Jon Skule Storheill. Øyvind Ryssdal

Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals Services and solutions

Q /08/18. Jon Skule Storheill. Øyvind Ryssdal

V International Seminar on Port Engineering, Concepción, Chile. Site Selection & Design of Marine Terminals

Floating LNG What are the key business development risks and mitigation strategies in a FLNG project?

Corporate Presentation. December 2017 NASDAQ NEXT

Cowen. Future of the Consumer Conference. april 2018

LNG from Western Canada: developing a new supply hub

Natural Gas Market Outlook FGU Conference, June 2017 Shelley Corman

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS LBC SHIP DOCK 5 PROJECT SWG HARRIS COUNTIES, TEXAS

LNG The Roadmap. Martin Houston LNG Asia - Singapore - 14 th February 2017

HAMBURGER HAFEN UND LOGISTIK AG COMPANY PRESENTATION

CONCESSION OF GENERAL SAN MARTIN PORT TERMINAL( PISCO) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PRIVATE INVESTMENT PROMOTION AGENCY

House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation and Long Term Funding Solutions. November 6, 2017

Q1 17 Revenue. Michel Denis, President & CEO Hervé Rochet, Chief Financial Officer

Strengthening the experience and embracing the shift

FERC PDF (Unofficial) 10/08/2014. Environmental Impact Statement ES-1 Corpus Christi LNG

Pivotal Energy Development. Dana Grams President, Pivotal Energy Development

North American Gas: A dynamic environment. Josh McCall BP North American Gas and Power November 16, 2011

Deepening/Dredging Impact on Navigational Efficiency in the Delaware River Main Channel

Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site

The Shale Invasion: Will U.S. LNG Cross the Pond? New terminals ramp up exports.

Q /05/17. Jon Skule Storheill. Snorre Krogstad

Chapter 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

INFORMATION MEMORANDUM AND BINDING OPEN SEASON NOTICE

Safety of LNG-Shipping around Ports and Terminals

PUBLIC NOTICE NO. FP13-AB03-05 August 30, 2013 CESAM-PD-EC JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE

Growth In Container Volumes

Introduction Package. Macalloy and Laurel Island - Charleston, South Carolina USA

General presentation May 2016

Appendix C. Clean Water Act: Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation

Cook Inlet Navigation Channel

Jim Cleary President, El Paso Western Pipelines. Platts Conference, Rockies Gas & Oil April 25, 2008

Chevron Australasia Overview

Public Meeting June 22, :00 7:30 pm

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY GENERAL PERMIT

Sea Level Rise & Flooding

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5E

LNG as a Bunker Fuel - LNGF (3 Days)

2019 LNG as a Bunker Fuel - LNGF (3 Days)

17 th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION ON LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG 17)

Pareto. Conference Jon Skule Storheill 13/

EVALUATION OF SECTION 404(b)(1) GUIDELINES (SHORT FORM)

WA Department of Ecology SEA Program Post Office Box Olympia, WA Telephone: (360) ATTN: Federal Permit Coordinator

Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan Overview December 22, 2008

Liquefied Natural Gas Limited

Liquefied Natural Gas Limited

Honorable Louise Slaughter

Sunrise Communications AG. Sunrise ONE versus Swisscom inone - High level comparison

ANALYST DAY November 30, 2016

SWG Attachment A, Alternative Analysis Gulf Coast Ammonia, LLC 2/26/2018 Page 1 of 8

Corporate Presentation April 2018

WIND RESOURCE & ENERGY YIELD ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION

COASTAL TX PROTECTION AND RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

THIS IS NOT A PAID ADVERTISEMENT. Public Notice. Public Notice No. CENAP-OP-R February 13, 2019


Enhancing Data Resolution to Improve Maritime Safety

May 4, Applicant: Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District 150 Marine Street Lake Charles, Louisiana 70602

CELEBRATING 10 YEARS. Advancing Safety Leadership in the Dredging and Marine Construction Industry

Transcription:

Rio Grande LNG Project and Marine Considerations

Disclaimer and Forward Looking Statements The information provided in this Presentation with respect to NextDecade Corporation and its affiliates (the Company ) has been provided for informational purposes only. This Presentation shall neither constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which the offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. This Presentation relates to the business of the Company and does not contain all of the information that should be considered as, nor is it intended to provide a basis for, any investment decision or any other decision in respect of the Company. Neither the Company nor any of its affiliates or representatives makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this Presentation or any of the information contained herein, or any other written or oral communication transmitted or made available to the recipient or its affiliates or representatives. The Company and its affiliates or representatives expressly disclaim to the fullest extent permitted by law any and all liability based, in whole or in part, on this Presentation or any information contained herein and any other written or oral communication transmitted or made available to the recipient or its affiliates or representatives, including, without limitation, with respect to errors therein or omissions therefrom. This Presentation does not attempt to present all the information that prospective investors may require. Recipients should not assume that the information in this Presentation is accurate as of any date other than August 24, 2017. Nothing contained herein is, or should be relied upon as, a promise or representation as to future performance. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise this Presentation to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Presentation. Certain of the information contained herein concerning industry and market data, economic trends, market position and competitiveness is based upon or derived from information provided by third-party consultants and other industry sources. While the Company believes these sources to be reliable, none of the Company or any of its affiliates or representatives can guarantee the accuracy of such information. Further, none of the Company or any of its affiliates or representatives have reviewed or independently verified the assumptions upon which projections of future trends and performance in such information are based. Recipients should not construe the contents of this Presentation, or any prior or subsequent communications from or with the Company or its advisors, as legal, tax or business advice. Each recipient should consult its own attorney and business advisor as to the legal, business, and tax and related matters concerning the Company. Forward Looking Statements This Presentation includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding future financial performance, future growth and future acquisitions. These statements are based on the Company s managements current expectations or beliefs as well as assumptions concerning the events and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by the statements herein due to changes in economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors, and other risks and uncertainties affecting the development of the Company s business. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies include: business conditions; weather and natural disasters; changing interpretations of GAAP; outcomes of government reviews; inquiries and investigations and related litigation; continued compliance with government regulations; legislation or regulatory environments; requirements or changes adversely affecting the business in which the Company is engaged; fluctuations in customer demand; management of rapid growth; intensity of competition from other providers of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and related services; general economic conditions; geopolitical events and regulatory changes; the possibility that the proposed business combination does not close, including due to the failure to receive required security holder approvals or the failure of other closing conditions; and other factors set forth in the Company s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov. The information set forth herein should be read in light of such risks. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this document. The Company does not undertake, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise. 1

NOT Today s Objective 2

RGLNG Project Overview 3

Avoid Leisure Marine Benefits 4

Avoid Change Orders 5

Natural Gas Liquefaction vs. Typical Train Dimension 1000 x 800 6

What is LNG? Natural gas is converted to LNG by super-cooling it to -260 F At which point it becomes a liquid, reducing its volume by a factor of more than 600. LNG is an odorless, non-toxic and noncorrosive liquid LNG is not stored under high-pressure, is not flammable and is not explosive LNG does not pose a contamination risk LNG has been safely and securely shipped around the world for more than 50 years 7

Business Case Support Permian Basin Discovery 8

US Natural Gas Supply Geography Williston Opal Chicago City Gate Transco Z6 PG&E City Gate Niobrara / Wattenberg Marcellus Utica Monterey SoCal Anadarko Fayetteville Permian Barnett Haynesville Waha Eagle Ford Henry Hub Aqua Dulce RGLNG 9

US Natural Gas Pipeline Network 2009 10

Approved N.A. LNG Import/Export Terminals 11

Proposed N.A. LNG Export Terminals US may become the world s largest LNG producer 12

Location of Rio Grande LNG along BSC Port Isabel Rio Grande LNG South Padre Island Brownsville 13

Rio Grande LNG Terminal Layout INLET COMPRESSION AREA ELECTRICAL SWITCH YARD GROUND FLARE CONDENSATE STORAGE LNG STORAGE OFFICES AND ADMIN AREA TRUCK LOADING MOF LIQUEFACTION TRAINS 3-6 LIQUEFACTION TRAINS 1-2 REFRIGERANT STORAGE LNG JETTY / MARINE LOADING VESSEL TURNING BASIN 14

Marine Facilities Overview 15

LNG Shipping Double-hull Modest drafts High freeboards Expensive High Safety Stds Carrier Classes Med Max 125k 150k Flex carriers Q-Flex Capacity < 75000 m3 125k 150k m3 160k 185k m3 215k m3 Length < 220 m 250 280 m 280 300 m 315 m Beam < 35 m 40 47 m 47 50 m 52 Draft 9.5 m 11 11.5 m 11.5 12 m 12 Freeboard 13 m 16 m 17 18 m 17 m 16

Marine Facilities & Marine Scope Typical onshore oil and gas capital projects are focused inside the facility fence line; For LNG terminals, the waterfront and waterway access is a key asset to enable availability and safety of LNG loading and transport, and as a result LNG export and import terminals have extensive project scope and schedule considerations outside the terminal fence line. 17

Marine Facilities & Marine Scope (cont.) Marine berth with two (2) jetties: Recessed berth pocket to segregate moored from passing vessels Four (4) berthing dolphins per jetty Three (3) bow and three (3) stern dolphins per jetty Turning basin (~1,500 feet) Berth and turning basin dredging to -43 ft MLLW, ~6.5 MCY LNG spill containment system Storm water discharge structures Firewater intake structure Material offloading facility Separate channel deepening project by BND (Brazos Island Harbor Channel Improvement Project to -52 ft MLLW) 18

LNG Jetty 19

Typical LNG Berths NorthWest Shelf LNG - Australia Pera LNG - Peru Revithousa LNG - Greece Sakhalin LNG - Siberia 20

Excavation & Dredging Boundaries 21

Dredge Material Placement Options 22

Levee Design & Shore Protection Terminal levee approximately 25,000 feet Terminal levee elevations +17 to +19 ft NAVD88 to withstand major storms 500-yr storm surge design criteria Upland dredge material placement area levee buildup per USACE Shore or slope protection along selective shoreline segments BSC currently erodes at about 10 feet per year from wake of passing vessels, and thus the need to start protecting the shoreline to cut down on maintenance dredging 23

LNG Berth with Shore Protection 24

BSC December 31, 1949 25

BSC January 31, 1995 26

BSC February 7, 2002 27

BSC November 23, 2006 28

BSC March 31, 2008 29

BSC January 13, 2014 30

BSC January 21, 2016 31

Shore Protection Examples 32

Permitting 33

Marine Permitting Requirements Federal Energy Regulatory Commission authorization to construct and operate a liquefaction facility US Department of Energy authorization to export LNG (Free Trade Agreement and non-fta) US Army Corp of Engineers permit of dredged material (404) US Army Corp of Engineers permit for construction/operation affecting navigable waters (10) US Coast Guard letter of recommendation for suitability of waterway for LNG Texas Historical Commission letter of approval regarding protection of archeological sites, e.g. shipwrecks Railroad Commission of Texas for hydrostatic discharge and surface water management 34

Marine Permitting Considerations Wetlands impacts Potential impacts on submerged aquatic vegetation Dredged material testing data Construction and operation impacts and mitigation Noise Vibration Light 35

Nighttime Terminal Rendering 36

37 Planned Channel Deepening & Cooperation with Navigation District

Channel Deepening Background 2006 BND began feasibility study with USACE; proposal approved Nov. 2014; Pres. Obama signed Water Resources & Development Act (WRDA) of 2016, authorizing BSC deepening project, called Brazos Island Harbor Channel Deepening Project (BIH); BIH calls for channel to be deepened to -52 feet from current design depth of -42 feet which is targeted to attract largest vessels which pass through Panama Canal; BIH will cause the effective channel width to increase from 250 to 300+ feet; 38

Coincident Project Considerations Permitting timeline recognition and planning Dredging activities Dredged material placement, including placement area authorization 39

Cooperation with Local Pilots & Navigation Simulations

Navigation Simulations Approach Test sensitivities of existing channel Set the limiting metocean conditions (mainly wind) for safe channel passage Set the minimum support infrastructure (i.e. no. and type of tugs) and work out the best tug deployment strategy for escorting Determine whether limiting metocean conditions for safe channel transit would be different at a greater channel width Determine what diameter would be required for the tuning and berthing area All maneuvers were conducted in a phased approach which include an initial simulation campaign performed internally, with navigation provided by a licensed pilot, and subsequently with a pilot from the Brazos Santiago Pilots Association 41

Channel Navigation Simulation Start 42

Channel Navigation Simulation Brownsville Ship Channel Entrance 43

Channel Navigation Simulation Entrance with Tug 44

Channel Navigation Simulation Entrance with Tug 45

Channel Navigation Simulation Entering BSC 46

Channel Navigation Simulation South Padre Island 47

Channel Navigation Simulation Terminal Approach 48

Channel Navigation Simulation Behind the Magic 49

50 Logistics Simulations

Validation of Capital Sequencing Logistics simulations to test the impacts of maritime limitations, such as available jetty capacities and weather induced downtimes in the ability to export target annual production capacities, and develop a feel for typical pilot-topilot vessel turnaround times that are relevant for setting commercial contracts with LNG customer and their shippers 51

Final Thought Communication is Key!

German Coast Guard 53

????? QUESTIONS?????

THANK YOU!