LABORATORY 10 SOIL FERTILITY. Objectives

Similar documents
Nutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.

Nutrient Management Certification Calculation Review and Practice Sheet

UNDERSTANDING A TURF FERTILIZER LABEL

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

Soil Testing and Using Fertilization Recommendations Age: years old (grades 5-6), but can be adapted for all youth 5-19 (grades K-12)

Determining Fertilizer Formulations

ARE ALL fertilizers the same? Of

IRON (Colorimetric) 2. Muffle Furnace: Equipped with pyrometer and capable of operating at controlled temperatures up to 600 C

Gravimetric Analysis: Determination of % Sulfur in Fertilizer

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Approved for NPDES (Editorial Revision 1978) Silica, Dissolved (Colorimetric)

Pop-up and/or Starter Fertilizers for Corn

EXPERIMENT 5. Molecular Absorption Spectroscopy: Determination of Iron with 1,10-Phenanthroline

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

Fertilizing High Producing Alfalfa Stands

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Dynamic Soil Systems Part B

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Nutrient Management Field Record

Capturing Manure s Value. March 2008

Experiment 18 Determination of Iron by Visible Spectrophotometry

Preparing Mixed Fertilizers on the Golf Course

MANAGING FERTILITY FOR PROTEIN IN SMALL GRAINS

Do not oven-dry the soil

Soil Fertility Management for Forage Crops: Maintenance

Available nitrogen and phosphorus in soil

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

Analysis of dissolved nitrite (NO 2- )

MU Guide PUBLISHED BY MU EXTENSION, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension

BUYING FERTILIZERS FOR TURF

WQ221 Spreading Poultry Litter With Lab Analysis but Without Soil Tests...

Mineral Assimilation of Sugar Beets 1

Determination of the Mass Percentage of Copper in a Penny

Clovers.. 75 pounds of "N" per acre

General Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

1998 Fescue Fertilization Demonstration Plots

SUMMARY OF STANDARDS FOR WATER ANALYSIS ON COURSE WAT-E2120 SPRING 2017

Forage Fertilization Based on Yield and Management Goals

FERTILIZER AND FERTILIZATION LECTURE 3

The Agronomics of Land Application. Jim Friedericks Outreach and Education

Fertilizer Management

Soil Fertility Briefs. Carrie Laboski & John Peters Soil Science Department University of Wisconsin-Madison

Spectrophotometric Determination of Phosphates in Water

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET

Key Components of CNMP for Poultry Producers

Grades of Fertilizers for Corn and Cotton

Recommended Soil Sulfate-S Tests

INTERDISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION (IDI)-LAB LABORATORY HANDOUT

Effect of Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Potatoes in the. Willamette Valley AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Method 3.8 Juices: phosphates (P 2 O 5 )

Bulk Blend Quality Control Manual. Canadian Fertilizer Institute

The Application of Petiole Analyses to Sugar Beet Fertilization

CHAPTER 16: Fertigation

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing

SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF IRON

Pasture Management- Fertility. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO

Fertilizer Urea - Specification

Saving on Nitrogen Costs with Forages. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist

OBSERVATIONS OF AN OPERATOR IN THE LAB IMPROVING LABORATORY RESULTS. Shane Jordan-Hill. Merck Millipore

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Soil Health and NPK. Rick Haney PhD, USDA ARS, Temple, TX

Soil Fertility Management

Figure 3. Nutrient recommendation scheme for phosphorus and potassium.

CHM111 Lab Redox Titration Grading Rubric

The Use of Limestone in Mixed Fertilizers

COPPER CYCLE EXPERIMENT 3

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

Guidelines for Safe Rates of Fertilizer Placed with the Seed

Soil Testing for Soil Health. Rick Haney PhD, USDA ARS, Temple, TX

Organic Fertilizer Calculator

EFFECTS OF LIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOLIDS CONTENT IN GARLIC CLOVES

Fertilizer Calculation Basics for Hydroponics

Effect of Industrial Effluent on Soil Characteristics

Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University, John E. Sawyer Iowa State University,

PHOSPHORUS, REACTIVE (0.00 to 5.00 mg/l PO 4

Experiment #8. Redox Titration

Method 108C - Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples From Nonferrous Smelters (Molybdenum Blue Photometric Procedure)

MATERIAL AND METHODS. The present investigation entitled Integrated Nutrient Management Studies on

Hydroxyl Radical Antioxidant Capacity [HORAC] Assay

The BIG Phosphorus Conference & Exhibition Removal and Recovery 4-5 July, Old Trafford, Manchester. Cohen, Y. 1 and Enfält, P. 1

The Enigma of Soil Nitrogen George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Haney Test and PLFA. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE Guiding Producers Today to Feed the World Tomorrow

Whole Soil Fertility Step-by-Step

METHOD #: Approved for NPDES and SDWA (Issued 1974) Mercury (Manual Cold Vapor Technique) ANALYTE: CAS # Hg Mercury

Partly O-(2-hydroxyethylated) cellulose. It may contain suitable ph-stabilisers such as phosphates.

Alfalfa Fertility. Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

Sampling, Nutrient Analysis, and Recommendations

Nutrient management. Cassava

CHM Gravimetric Chloride Experiment (r7) 1/5

Chemicals for Fertigation

Land Application of Biosolids Rules, Regulations and Benefits EPA regulations, under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503 (40 CFR 503) -

Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solutions for Tomato and Pepper Production in Florida George J.

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

MS20 Laboratory: Physical and Biological Factors Affecting Oxygen in Sea Water

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Transcription:

LABORATORY 10 SOIL FERTILITY I Objectives Learn a method for measuring extractable soil P. Make fertilizer recommendations for a crop. Gain experience with calculations involving inorganic fertilizer materials. II Introduction Fertilizer recommendations based on soil tests are fairly straightforward in concept but a lot of work has gone into developing these recommendations. Basically, results of a chemical analysis for concentration of a nutrient in a soil are statistically related to crop yields on that soil. This takes years of field experiments to cover the range of variability in weather conditions during the growing season. These experiments must also be conducted on different soils. Furthermore, the correlation between nutrient concentration in a soil and crop yield depends on the specific methodology used to extract the nutrient from the soil. The extracting solution should provide a good correlation with yields for all soils within a limited geographic region like Louisiana. In this laboratory you will chemically extract P from your soil, analyze its concentration and use this and previous K data to make fertilizer recommendations for several different crops. You will also calculate what amounts (lbs / acre) of different fertilizer compounds would be needed to meet your recommendations and estimate costs. A little background information on fertilizers is needed. Organic and inorganic materials may be used to supply essential elements. Organic fertilizers such as manures and sewage sludge are generally not as highly valued as inorganic fertilizers because these have lower nutrient content per unit mass. Thus, organic fertilizers must be applied in relatively large amounts and high transportation costs are incurred. Furthermore, since the nutrient composition of organic fertilizers is highly variable, addition of precise amounts of nutrients is not possible. On the other hand, organic fertilizers offer the advantage of supplying organic matter to the soil. In contrast, inorganic fertilizers (whether mined or manufactured) have fairly exact composition. For example, ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ) or monocalcium phosphate (known as concentrated superphosphate, CSP, Ca(H 2 PO 4 ) 2 H 2 O) obviously contain a certain fraction N or P per unit mass of ammonium nitrate or monocalcium phosphate. The compound in which a nutrient occurs is called the fertilizer carrier. Fertilizers, whether consisting of a carrier of a single nutrient, a carrier of more than one nutrient 1

(like diammonium phosphate, DAP) or a combination of carriers for different nutrients are identified by a fertilizer grade that gives the percentage of each of the nutrients. The percentage content of N is given directly, however, the percentages of P and K are given as percentages of the corresponding oxides, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O (these oxides, however, are never actually in the fertilizer). For example, if the grade of a fertilizer is 18-46-0, it contains 18 % N, the same percentage of P as would be found if it actually contained 46 % P 2 O 5 but no K, as implied by 0 % K 2 O. It=s a simple matter to convert from % P 2 O 5 or % K 2 O to actual % P or % K, just take the % P 2 O 5 and multiply by (2 x atomic weight of P / molecular weight of P 2 O 5 = 0.44) or the % K 2 O and multiply by (2 x atomic weight of K / molecular weight of K 2 O = 0.83). Some major fertilizer carriers and their grades include urea ([H 2 N] 2 CO, 45-0-0), ammonium nitrate (34-0-0), ammonium sulfate ([NH 4 ] 2 SO 4, 21-0-0), concentrated superphosphate (0-46-0) and muriate of potash (KCl, 0-0-60). However, due to impurities, percentages N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O are somewhat lower than would be calculated for pure carrier substances. A fertilizer that contains all three nutrients, N, P and K, such as 13-13-13, is called a complete fertilizer. To make a low grade fertilizer from high analysis carriers (high concentration of nutrient) requires addition of a filler (usually a lime material). On the other hand, it is impossible to make a high grade fertilizer from low analysis carriers. Now, a few relevant calculations. First, to calculate the appropriate rate of a fertilizer to apply in order to add the recommended amount of a nutrient lbs of carrier / acre = (recommended rate [in lbs / acre] x 100 %) / % nutrient in carrier Assume you want to use urea to supply N at the rate of 90 lbs / acre, then lbs of urea / acre = (90 lbs / acre x 100 %) / 45 % = 200 lbs of urea / acre To calculate fertilizer cost per acre using different fertilizers, just multiply the cost per ton of carrier by lbs / acre, then divide by 2000 lbs carrier cost / acre = (cost / ton) x (lbs of carrier / acre) / (2000 lbs / ton) Assume urea costs $ 360 / ton, then cost of urea / acre = ($ 360 / ton) x (200 lbs / acre) / (2000 lbs / ton) = $ 36 of urea / ac 2

Cost of different fertilizers is variable. Since fertilizers are priced by the ton and different materials contain different amounts of nutrients, it is important to compare fertilizer costs per pound of nutrient, not per ton of carrier. It is the amount of nutrient supplied by the fertilizer that is important. Generally, higher analysis fertilizers cost more per ton than do lower analysis fertilizers but because the concentration of nutrients is higher, the cost per pound of nutrient is usually lower. To calculate the cost per pound of nutrient in a fertilizer, divide cost per ton by pounds of nutrient per ton cost / lb = (cost of carrier / ton) x 100 % / (% nutrient in carrier x 2000 lbs / ton) Again, using the urea example cost N / lb = ($ 360 urea / ton) x 100 % / (45 % N in urea x 2000 lbs / ton) = $ 0.40 / lb N III Procedure A Extraction of Soil P 1. Weigh 1 g soil (oven-dry equivalent) into a large disposable test tube and add 20 ml of extracting solution (0.10 N HCl + 0.03 N NH 4 F). 2. Shake for 1 min and syringe-filter more than 5 ml into a second, smaller tube. 3. Pipette 5 ml of filtrate to a third test tube. B Preparation of Curve and Analysis of Extract A single set of standards and standard curve will be used by the entire class. The standards are provided, pre-poured into test tubes. Their concentrations are: 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 μg P / ml (ppm) and there are 5 ml each of them. 4. To each add 0.8 ml of reagent (sulfuric acid, ammonium molybdate, potassium antimony tartrate and ascorbic acid), which reacts with phosphate to give a depth of blue color (light absorbance) proportional to phosphate concentration. 5. Also add 0.8 ml of mixed reagent to the 5 ml of filtered extract. 6. Let stand for 12 min but no more than 30 min then measure absorbance of each P solution at 880 nm and record in Table 1. 3

7. According to Beer=s Law, concentration is directly proportional to absorbance. Therefore, prepare a standard curve by plotting P concentration (Y axis) versus absorbance (X axis) and draw a visual best-fit straight line through these data. This is the standard curve from which measured absorbance is used to estimate extractable P in your soil. 8. Determine P concentration (μg / ml) in the extract from the standard curve. Calculate concentration of P in the soil as μg P / g soil = 20 x concentration in extract (μg / ml) If absorbance is out of the calibration range (too high, too much P in extract), dilute an aliquot of the extract with extracting solution. Note the dilution factor (= [ml filtrate + ml extracting solution] / ml filtrate) and proceed as above. In this case, μg P / g soil = 20 (dilution factor) x concentration in extract (μg / ml). 9. Convert from μg P / g soil (ppm) to lbs P / acre assuming 2 million lbs per acre to 6 inches depth. Record in Table 2. lbs P / acre = 2 x μg P / g soil C Making Recommendations Based on Soil Test Results Use K concentration from earlier data, together with P concentration, to make recommendations for P and K fertilizer requirements for a Louisiana crop of your choice. Recommendations of the sort you are about to make were once made just this way but now are computerized. To convert earlier K data (from LSU AgCenter Soil Testing and Plant Analysis Lab in part per million, ppm, in solution) to units of lbs K / acre use lbs K / acre = 20 x ppm K Record in Table 2. Recommendations in Louisiana depend on crop (and specific use or condition such as bermudagrass on athletic fields, cut for hay or grazed), soil type (texture and alluvial or upland origin) and whether the site is irrigated. See notebooks that give for recommendations for a dozen different crops. You make recommendations for a crop among those given. Record in Table 3. 4

IV Worksheet and Questions A P Curve and Extractable P and K 2.0 1.6 Absorbance 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P Concentration (mg L -1 ) Table 1. Solution μg / ml Absorbance Unknown Table 2. Nutrient P K lbs / acre 5

B Fertilizer Recommendations (lbs / acre) for Crop Table 3. Crop N Add P Initial P Add K Initial K Add C Questions 1. Estimate costs of recommended N, P and K (part B, above) based on costs of urea, concentrated superphosphate and muriate of potash given below. Carrier Grade Cost / ton Urea 45-0 - 0 $ 360 Concentrated superphosphate 0-46 - 0 $ 480 Muriate of potash 0-0 - 60 $ 480 Nutrient Lbs / acre Lbs carrier / acre Cost / acre N P K 2. Compare the cost of N per pound in urea and ammonium sulfate ($ 210 / ton). 3. If one wanted to supply 90 lbs of N per acre using manure that contained 2 % N by weight, how much manure is needed? 6