RTI/Eastman Warm Syngas Clean-up Technology: Integration with Carbon Capture Raghubir Gupta, Brian Turk, and Markus Lesemann Center for Energy Technology RTI International Research Triangle Park, NC Presented at the 2009 Gasification Technologies Conference October 4-7, 2009 RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute
RTI International Established 1958 as collaboration between state government, area universities and business leaders Mission: to improve the human condition by turning knowledge into practice One of the world s leading research institutes FY2008 Revenue: $710 million Staff : 4000+ Notable Achievements: Taxol and Camptothecin Cochlear ear implants Wind shear avoidance system 2
Warm Syngas Clean-up Technology Modular Approach Gasifier Quench Water Power Sour Shift SO x < 1.4 lb SO x /MWh gross NO x < 1.0 lb NO x /MWh gross PM < 0.0071 lb/mmbtu Hg > 90% removal Desulfurization CO 2 Removal Multi-contaminant Control Chemicals/Fuels Sulfur Recovery Sulfur CO 2 Recovery CO 2 for use/sequestration Sulfur < 0.05 ppmv HCl < 10 ppb NH 3 < 10 ppm CO 2 > 90% removal [NETL 2007] As < 5 ppb Se < 0.2 ppm Cd < 30 ppb Hg < 5 ppbw 3
Warm Syngas Clean-up Technology Platform Unique Features Operating temperatures > 450ºF Pressure independent Effective for both H 2 S and COS Fully compatible with conventional and warm CO 2 capture Flexible modular approach meets Power specifications Chemical production (methanol, SNG, FT, ) specifications 4
Installed Pilot Plant Systems Eastman s Kingsport, TN, Coal Gasification Facility ZnO + H 2 S ZnS + H 2 O ZnO + COS ZnS + CO 2 (600-1000ºF) (300-600 psig) CLEAN SYNGAS ZnS + 3/2O 2 ZnO+SO 2 (1200-1400ºF) (300-600 psig) SO 2 / N 2 TO DSRP REGENERATED SORBENT REGENERATED SORBENT TO ABSORBER MIXING ZONE RAW SYNGAS N 2 /O 2 RTI Eastman High Temperature Desulfurization Process 5
Eastman Gasification Plant RTI Field Test Systems 6 6
Technology Development Extensive pilot plant tests completed at Eastman Chemical Company with coal-derived syngas. High Temperature Desulfurization Process (HTDP) >99.9% total sulfur removal (H 2 S and COS) for >3,000 hours Low attrition rates ~31 lb/million lb circulated Pressure, psig 300 450 600 Inlet Concentration, S ppmv 8,661 7,023 8,436 Effluent Conc. S ppmv Range 5.9 0.4 9.3 10.7 2.4 20.6 5.7 3.3 18.1 S Removal, % 99.93 99.82 99.90 More than 3,000 hours of syngas operation 7
Technology Development (Cont.) Direct Sulfur Recovery Process (DSRP) Fixed bed catalytic process for conversion of SO 2 into S >98% SO 2 conversion demonstrated in integrated mode Ammonia/HCN removal (~400 F) Fixed-bed regenerable adsorbents >90% ammonia and HCN removal demonstrated Hg, As, and Se removal (~400 F) Disposable fixed-bed sorbents >90% Hg, As, and Se removal demonstrated HCl removal using disposable sorbents Effluent HCl concentrations <50 ppbv Concentration (ug/g) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Tail Gas SO2 and H2S, ppm 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 Analyzer Drift p Analyzer on Cal Gas Analyzer Zeroed 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 % SO2 in ROG ph 1 (Top) 2 3 0 9/10/2007 0:00 9/10/2007 12:00 9/11/2007 0:00 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (Bottom) 9/11/2007 12:00 9/12/2007 0:00 9/12/2007 12:00 Bed Position 9/13/2007 0:00 9/13/2007 12:00 Tail Gas SO2 Tail Gas H2S SO2 in ROG ph 9/14/2007 0:00 0.0 9/14/2007 12:00 8
Summary of Techno-Economic Evaluation for Power Applications Comparison of RTI/Eastman Warm Gas Clean-Up technologies with conventional syngas clean-up technologies performed by Nexant 600 MW case study GE Reference plant as a base case Increase efficiency by 3.6 points HHV Dispatch 56 MWe more power Reduce CAPEX by $264/KW Reduce COE by 0.69 /kwh Reduce makeup water consumption by 25% Reduce wastewater by 60% Independent analysis performed by Noblis confirmed these results (http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/ coalpower/gasification/pubs/market.html) 9
CFD Modeling for Transport Desulfurizer Collaborative model development with DOE/NETL Model includes Absorption transport reactor Recycle loop Regeneration loop Regeneration transport reactor Model validation with RTI bench-scale and Eastman pilot plant results Validated model will be used for design scale-up of 50 MW demonstration unit clean syngas ZnS(s) + ZnO(s) ZnO(s) N 2 + SO 2 Dirty syngas Air O 2 -enriched 10
50 MW WGC Demonstration at Tampa Electric Company s Polk Power Station Objectives Design, construct, commission, and operate a warm syngas cleaning demonstration system with real syngas Establish relevant commercial operating experience Establish RAM (reliability, availability and maintenance) targets Mitigate design and scale up risk for commercial plant 11
Block Flow Diagram for 50 MW WGC Demonstration Project COS Hydolysis Warm CO 2 Capture CO 2 HTDP Multi-contaminant Removal DSRP Sulfur Sulfuric Acid Plant 50 MW Demonstration Project 12
Specific WGC Demonstration Goals Technology Size Operation Performance HTDP 50 MWe 1 5,000 h Total sulfur < 5 ppmv DSRP 5 tpd sulfur (25% of HTDP off-gas) 5,000 h >95% SO 2 Conversion Trace Contaminants (Hg, As and Se) 5 MWe 5,000 h >90% Removal CO 2 Removal 0.5 MWe 5,000 h >90% Removal 1 50 MWe is equivalent to 2,000,000 scfh of syngas on dry basis 13
50 MW WGC Demonstration Project Schedule 14
Integration of Carbon Capture Technology WGC can be readily integrated with existing CO 2 capture technology Cost and performance advantages from dedicated separation Several warm CO 2 capture options are in development pipeline Regenerable CO 2 sorbents WGC and hydrogen/co 2 membrane separation CO 2 separation with chemical looping 15
Integration of Carbon Capture Technology Conventional low temperature CO 2 and sulfur removal Raw Syngas Water Gas Shift Reactor Cooling COS Hydrolysis Low Temperature Gas Cooling Activated MDEA Sulfur Removal Product Sulfur Product Syngas Product CO 2 Warm Syngas Clean-up with conventional low temperature CO 2 removal Raw Syngas Water Gas Shift Reactor Warm Gas Clean-up Cooling Activated MDEA Product CO 2 Product Sulfur Product Syngas 16
Integration of WGC and Carbon Capture and Storage at Polk Power Station Source: Tampa Electric Company 17
Advantages of Integration of WGC and CO 2 Conventional Capture Technology Ultra-Low Emission Profile Sulfur in syngas Sulfur in sequestered CO 2 CO 2 recovery Conventional Technology < 5 ppmv < 100 ppmv ~75% WGC and conventional CO 2 capture < 1 ppmv < 35 ppmv > 80% Improvements in Cost, Thermal Efficiency, Operability, and Reliability Fewer Processing Steps Conventional : 6 (Shift, COS hydrolysis, S / CO 2 removal, CO 2 cleanup, 2 stages of cooling) WGC +CCS : 4 (Shift, WGC, CO 2 removal, 1 stage cooling) Fewer heat exchangers (Shift reactor exit temperature is good match for WGC) Operating pressure optimized for performance (Pressure not dictated by AGR) Source: Tampa Electric Company 18
DOE Gasification Roadmap Impact of Advanced Technology (Noblis Analysis) IGCC/CCS Technology Dry coal feed pump Impact Increases cold gas efficiency Efficiency Increase* (% points) 1.0 TPC Reduction* ($/kw) Efficiency down >5 pts, TPC up >$500/kW, COE up 2.5 /kwh -19.0 COE Reduction* ( /kwh) -0.08 Gasifier materials & instrumentation Increases on-line time 0.0 0.0-0.39 Warm gas cleanup Eliminates cold gas cleanup thermal penalties and reduces capital cost 2.0-319.0-0.96 Advanced syngas turbine (AST) Increases power output and allows air integration 0.9-73.0-0.25 ITM plus AST (2010) Eliminates ASU thermal penalty and auxiliary load and reduces capital cost 0.0-118.0-0.33 ITM plus AST (2015) Combination of increased power output and efficient, cheaper ASU 2.1-89.0-0.29 Advanced sensors and controls Increases on-line time 0.0 0.0-0.26 IGCC/CCS Pathway Impact 5.9-618.0-2.6 IGFC/CCS Pathway Impact Efficient conversion of chemical energy to power and reduces capital and operating costs 23.7-716.0-3.1 *as compared to IGCC with conventional CCS technology Source: Klara, ICEPAG 2009 19
Summary Warm Gas Clean-up Technology: Offers significant capital cost and efficiency advantages over Selexol for power applications Rectisol for chemical applications Represents potential enabling technology for carbon capture and storage including Conventional technologies High temperature membranes and sorbents 50 MW WGC Demonstration Project: Is being hosted at Tampa Electric Company s Polk Power Station Has an aggressive schedule Feed package Completed: June 2010 Environmental permitting Completed: Oct. 2010 Construction, commissioning and shakedown Completed: Early 2012 Demonstration testing Completed: Late 2013 Will support commercial offering of WGC technology in 2014 20
Acknowledgements DOE/NETL for financial assistance Gary Stiegel Jenny Tennant In-house CFD modeling team Eastman Chemical Company Tampa Electric Company Nexant Noblis 21