xsi PV Technologies: Status and Outlook of Passivated Contacts and Rear Contacted Solar Cells Thematic session 4 Bart Macco, Jimmy Melskens, Bas van de Loo, Lachlan Black, Willem-Jan Berghuis & Erwin Kessels 1
Status and Outlook of Passivating Contacts Passivating contacts: Why and what? Requirements for passivating contacts Current status of various contacts Passivating contacts in TKI projects Outlook & Future trends 2 2
54% 52% 50% 49% 48% 49% 49% 50% 50% 48% 48% 48% 50% 48% 48% Average price ( /Wp) 61% 60% 62% 63% 61% 60% 56% 54% 56% 46% 48% 50% 51% 52% 51% 51% 50% 50% 52% 52% 52% 50% 52% 52% 63% 64% 67% 39% 40% 38% 37% 39% 40% 44% 46% 44% 69% 70% 71% 70% 70% 72% 74% 71% 72% 73% 74% 72% 37% 36% 28% 33% 31% 30% 29% 30% 30% 28% 26% 29% 28% 27% 26% Why passivating contacts? 5 4 Balance of system (BOS) (Inverter, cabling, labor,...) Module 3 2 1 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year Balance of system is becoming dominant in PV system cost, strong driver to increase efficiency @ low complexity Source: Fraunhofer report, 2016 3 3
Why passivating contacts? SiN x From Al-BSF towards higher efficiencies: c-si(p) Al-BSF n + Si Al-BSF Al SiN x SiN x TCOs: In 2 O 3 :H, IZO c-si(p) Al 2 O 3 /SiN x n + Si Local BSF SiO 2 /SiN x p + n + Si n + p + n + p + c-si(n) a-si:h (i/p) a-si:h (i/n) Al PERC Trina, Hanwha Q-Cells, Interdigitated back contact Sunpower, TCOs: doped ZnO Si heterojunction Panasonic, Kaneka, Tesla, 4 4
The passivating contact cell A simple concept: Just depositing stacks of thin films on silicon c-si(n or p) Hole contact (Stack of) thin films c-si Electron contact SiO x TiO x Many new materials: Doped poly-si, metal oxides, metal fluoriudes, organics, 5 5
Cell efficiency (%) Why passivating contacts? Steady increase of conventional technologies 28 24 25% UNSW PERL (1998) IBC 20 a-si:h (HIT) PERC n-pert 16 12 8 Homojunctions: Interdigitated Back Contact (IBC) PERC (monocrystalline) n-pert Heterojunctions: a-si:h 4 0 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year Source: PhD thesis Bart Macco, 2016 6 6
Cell efficiency (%) Why passivating contacts? Steady increase of conventional technologies Rapid increase new contacts: Doped poly-si Already at 25.7%! 28 24 25% UNSW PERL (1998) IBC poly-si 20 a-si:h (HIT) PERC n-pert 16 12 8 4 Homojunctions: Interdigitated Back Contact (IBC) PERC (monocrystalline) n-pert Heterojunctions: a-si:h poly-si 0 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year Source: PhD thesis Bart Macco, 2016 7 7
Cell efficiency (%) Why passivating contacts? Steady increase of conventional technologies Rapid increase new contacts: Doped poly-si Already at 25.7%! Novel materials, >22% MoO x, TiO 2, PEDOT, fluorides, 28 24 20 16 25% UNSW PERL (1998) IBC poly-si a-si:h (HIT) PERC n-pert MoO x 12 8 4 0 Homojunctions: Interdigitated Back Contact (IBC) PERC (monocrystalline) n-pert Heterojunctions: a-si:h poly-si PEDOT-based contacts MoO x -based contacts TiO x -based contacts TiO x 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Year PEDOT Source: PhD thesis Bart Macco, 2016 8 8
Why passivating contacts? High voltages (~750 mv) Fully passivated surfaces No highly-doped region Auger Full area contacts No patterning steps 1-D transport high FF Bifacial c-si(n or p) Hole contact Electron contact Source: PhD thesis Bart Macco, 2016 9 9
What is a passivating contact? Back to basics for a second Light absorber c-si Electron membrane n-type Si a-si:h(n) poly-si(n) TiO 2,. Metal 10 10
What is a passivating contact? Light absorber c-si Electron membrane n-type Si a-si:h(n) poly-si(n) TiO 2,. Metal 11 11
What is a passivating contact? I. Interface passivation characterized by J 0 Light absorber c-si Electron membrane Metal 12 12
What is a passivating contact? I. Interface passivation characterized by J 0 II. Good e-conductivity characterized by ρ c Low R n Light absorber c-si Electron membrane Metal 13 13
What is a passivating contact? I. Interface passivation characterized by J 0 II. Good e-conductivity characterized by ρ c Low R n High R p Light absorber c-si Electron membrane III. Poor h-conductivity otherwise increase in J 0 Metal 14 14
Requirements of a passivating contact Stack of thin films Majority carrier extraction Low ρ c Well-passivated, selective layer Low J 0 c-si(n or p) Requirements: 1. Low recombination current J 0 2. Low contact resistance ρ c 16 16
Requirements of a passivating contact Lateral conductivity, R sheet Stack of thin films c-si(n or p) Requirements: 1. Low recombination current J 0 2. Low contact resistance ρ c 3. Lateral conductivity, R sheet 17 17
Requirements of a passivating contact Transparent front side Stack of thin films c-si(n or p) Requirements: 1. Low recombination current J 0 2. Low contact resistance ρ c 3. Lateral conductivity, R sheet 4. Transparency 5. Manufacturability Goal: To develop materials & processes to fulfill these 5 requirements Where are we now? 18 18
Current status of various contacts Recombination current J 0 and contact resistivity ρ c Kaneka a-si:h HIT 25.1% ANU TiO 2 21.6% IMEC npert 22.8% F-ISE Poly-Si 25.7% ISFH PEDOT 20.6% UNSW PERL 25.0% pperc 20.7% ECN n-pasha 21.0% ANU MoO x a-si:h - Excellent J 0 & ρ c Poly-Si - Excellent J 0 & ρ c TiO 2 - Good J 0 & reasonable ρ c MoO x - Reasonable J 0 & excellent ρ c - Often use a-si:h passivation layer B. Macco, B.W.H. van de Loo, W.M.M. Kessels, Atomic Layer Deposition for High Efficiency Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells, Wiley, 2017. 19 19
Absorption coefficient (10 4 cm -1 ) Photon flux (ma/m 2 /ev) Maximum J sc (ma/cm 2 ) Current status of various contacts Transparency 120 50 44 100 AM 1.5g solar spectrum 40 43 TiO 2 80 60 40 20 0 a-si:h poly-si TiO 2 MoO x 0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Photon energy (ev) 30 20 10 MoO x 42 poly-si 41 40 a-si:h 39 = typical minimal thickness 38 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Layer thickness d (nm) Metal oxides highly transparent Poly-Si data: Feldmann et al., SOLMAT 159, 265-271 (2017) 20 20
Current status of various contacts Exploring new materials Requirement a-si:h (HIT) Poly-Si TiO 2 MoO x J 0 ++ ++ + - ALD ZnO:Al, Nb 2 O 5, AlF, novel tunnel oxides ρ c + ++ - + Transparency -- - ++ ++ R sheet -- + -- -- Improving existing materials poly-sio x, poly-sic x, TiO 2 :Nb Note: Putting pluses and minuses can be subjective 21 21
COMPASS: The moly-poly cell Transparent front contact: MoO x hole contact High mobility TCOs Ag NW meshes n-poly rear Exploring PLD 22 22
Miracle: Si(n + ) or ALD TiO x front electron-contact Poly-Si (p) rear hole-contact 23 23
RADAR: Materials for bifacial pass-con cell WP 3 Cell and module integration, metallization ECN, TUD, Levitech, Solmates, AMOLF Industrial and economic assessment Levitech, Solmates, ECN WP 4 WP 1 Doped metal oxides ALD: TU/e, Levitech PLD: Solmates PVD: TUD WP Supporting layers 1&2 Transparent conductors Interface layers Capping & stability ALD: TU/e, Levitech PLD: Solmates Sputtering: TUD Transparent poly-sio x /SiC x PECVD: TUD WP 2 LPCVD: TUD Interface characterization Passivation: TU/e, TUD Contact resistance: TU/e, TUD Fixed charge: DST Wafer preparation: ECN WP 1,2 & 3 Develop novel material (combinations) that combine excellent selectivity, transparency & conductivity 24 24
Future trends Si passivating contact cells & perovskites are very alike Same nanomaterials in use! MoO x, TiO x,. Hole-selective contacts Electron-selective contacts Transparent conductors 25 25
Future trends Passivating contact Si cell + perovskite tandem! UV/VIS tuned perovskite with high IR transparency IR tuned Si cell Efficiency potential of ~30% 26 26
Outlook The Netherlands: A great eco-system for the ultimate passivating contact cell Material innovations Cell implementation c-si(n or p) Equipment manufacturers Efficient, lean processing, bifacial & NL-inside 27 27
Thank you for your attention! 28 28
Hierna extra slides 29 29
RADAR: Materials for bifacial passcon Among others: TU Eindhoven: Dope ALD TiO 2 with Nb Increase conductivity, reduce ρ c TiO 2 Nb TU Delft: Alloying poly-si with oxygen and/or carbon to enhance transparency 30 30
Opportunities for passivating contacts Novel materials Advanced materials Alloys, doping, ultrathin tunneloxides 31 31
Opportunities for passivating contacts Novel materials Advanced materials Alloys, doping, ultrathin tunneloxides Deposition techniques ALD, PLD Soft deposition! Manufacturers in NL! 32 32
How to make a passivating contact? How to achieve asymmetry in electron-hole conduction 33 33
How to make a passivating contact? How to achieve asymmetry in electron-hole conduction 34 34
35 35
Maximum J sc (ma/cm 2 ) 44 43 42 41 TiO 2 MoO x poly-si 40 a-si:h 39 = typical minimal thickness 38 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Layer thickness d (nm) 36 36
Absorption coefficient (10 4 cm -1 ) Photon flux (ma/m 2 /ev) 10 AM 1.5g solar spectrum 40 8 ITO 30 6 4 2 free carrier absorption In 2 O 3 :H 20 10 0 0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Photon energy (ev) 37 37
Kaneka classical SHJ 25.1% ANU TiO 2 21.6% IMEC npert 22.8% F-ISE TOPCon 25.7% ISFH PEDOT 20.6% NREL SiO 2 /ITO UNSW PERL 25.0% pperc 20.7% ECN n-pasha 21.0% ANU MoO x 38 38