CENTRAL ASIA CROSS BORDER WATER MANAGEMENT EXCHANGE VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA

Similar documents
2014/2024 Review Columbia River Treaty

Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty to Address the Needs of a 21 st Century Transboundary Watershed

olumbia River Treaty The Columbia by Steve Oliver, Vice President, Generation Asset Management, Bonneville Power Administration 16 Oct

Columbia River Treaty

2014/2024 Review Columbia River Treaty

Overview of Columbia Basin Water Management

Columbia River Treaty Review. Water Resources Commission Meeting November 15, 2012 Ruben E. Ochoa, Water Policy Analyst

Introduction to Bonneville Power Administration

Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Newsletter

Columbia River Treaty Review. PNWA Summer Meeting LaConner, WA June 24, 2013

Columbia River Treaty

Columbia River Treaty Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

JUVENILE SALMON MIGRATION SECTION 5. blank page

Columbia River Operations Summary

The Columbia River and The Columbia River Treaty

LEARNING FROM OUR PAST TO SHAPE OUR FUTURE. Robert W. Cromwell, Jr. Director, Power Contracts and Resource Acquisitions

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty

For Bandon Utilities Commission

Columbia River Basin Reservoir Operations

Columbia River Treaty

Overview of the Bureau of Reclamation. Michael L. Connor Commissioner Bureau of Reclamation

Federal and State Water Law. Jennifer Gimbel, CSU Grad592 October 29, 2018

Draft AGENDA Richland, WA. Friday July 5 th, Saturday July 6, 2013

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bonneville Power Administration Review

Columbia Basin Operations and Flood Risk Management

Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review Paul Lumley, CRITFC Executive Director Yakama 1

Overview of Columbia River System Operations for Hydropower and Fish Passage

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Notice of Intent to Prepare the Columbia River System Operations Environmental

I. INTRODUCTION PURPOSE BASIN DESCRIPTION WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT TYPES OF RESERVOIR PROJECTS ANNUAL REGULATION CYCLE

Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty D.R. Michel, Executive Director, Upper Columbia United Tribes Jim Heffernan, Policy Analyst, Columbia River

BPA s HERMES Project: a Multi-objective, Multi-user Approach to Reservoir Optimization

Pacific Northwest Challenges and Opportunities

Water/Energy Symposium

DRAFT. 9:00 am - 12:00 Noon Executive Committee Meeting- Review PNWER priorities

IDAHO WATER USERS ASSOCIATION Quarterly Newsletter September 2014

Columbia River Treaty

July 1, Jim Ruff -- Manager, Mainstem Passage and River Operations

New Science Requirements in Support of a Modernized Columbia River Treaty Prepared by the UC Berkeley Columbia River Treaty Science Advisory Group

Columbia River Treaty Review: Iteration #2 Results, and Next Steps

Willamette Water 2100 Stakeholder Learning Action Network (SLAN) Upper Willamette Water System. Field Trip. Leaburg Dam Willamette Valley Farmland

The Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study. World Water Week Stockholm 2017 August 27 September 1

Treaty History & Requirements

Managing Idaho Power Company s Hydro Projects During Drought Conditions The Benefits of Communication and Collaboration

Taking Your Ethics Program to the Next Level

Yale Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No APPLICATION FOR NEW LICENSE FOR MAJOR PROJECT Volume I

International and Intergovernmental Relations

MAINTAINING AGING INFRASTRUCTURE

Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013

Canadian Entity s Preliminary View of Columbia River Treaty Post-2024 Called Upon Procedures. BC Hydro and Power Authority

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

RS 2. Bridging Science and Policy. SS 13: Towards a special issue of Water International on the OECD Principles on Water Governance

[RR , XXXR4079V4, RX ] Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of Public

OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

Welcome to the Joint WRP Energy Committee and WRP GIS Support Group webinar on the Energy Zones Mapping Tool We look forward to your input on this

WikiLeaks Document Release

Notice of Intent to Accept Proposals, Select Lessee(s), and Contract for Pumped-Storage

January 28, James Ruff -- Manager, Mainstem Passage and River Operations. Panel discussion of federal agencies quagga and zebra mussel actions

DID YOU KNOW THAT the federal

INAGAKI Fumiaki. Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance Keio University, Japan

aka the basin study Eric Kuhn General Manager 2013 Upper Colorado River Basin Water Conference Colorado Mesa University November 7, 2013

Missouri River Basin Water Management

CEDER THE SNAKE RIVER DAMS: ANALYSIS OF COST CLAIMS. Center for Economic Development Education and Research

CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

July 28, OVERVIEW: Lower Clearwater Exchange Project (Idaho)

Written Testimony Submitted to the Water and Power Subcommittee Committee on Natural Resources U.S. House of Representatives

Grafton Hydro, LLC. 55 Union Street, 4 th Floor Boston, MA, USA Tel: Fax: October 9, 2015

Development of Business Standards and Deployment of MXES 6.2 at the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Presented by Ken Maxey Manager, Maintenance Services

May 1, SUBJECT: Update on Habitat monitoring and evaluation strategy

Northwest Power and Conservation Council

Phase 1 - Technical Assessment Kettle River Watershed Management Plan. Request for Proposals

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reservoir Operations Maria Placht, Institute for Water Resources, USACE 49

DECISIONS on operating transfer limits and transmission

Columbia River Treaty the setting

Hydropower as Flexibility Provider: Modeling Approaches and Numerical Analysis

The Drainage Basin. From Peaks of Colorado to Mexico 1,400 miles Drains 242,000 square miles of Western US Colored River because of sediments

III. Recommendation summary and synthesis:

Water and the Watershed

Western Governors Analysis and Recommendations

NEWS RELEASE. Province opens doors to Asian investment in LNG

Center for Advanced Decision Support for Water and Environmental Systems (CADSWES)

Fact Sheet. A Northwest energy solution: Regional power benefits of the lower Snake River dams. CLEAN: Emission-free renewable energy

Fact Sheet. A Northwest energy solution: Regional power benefits of the lower Snake River dams. CLEAN: Emission-free renewable energy

April 28, 2017 Berkeley, California USA

RECORD OF DECISION MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE

C-1. Received DC Office August 17/16. Hello,

U.S. Benefits from the Columbia River Treaty Past, Present and Future: A Province of British Columbia Perspective. BC Ministry of Energy and Mines

LESLIE JAMES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION (CREDA)

ASEM SEMINAR ON URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT. Concept Paper October 2016, Changsha, China. I. Background

Conflict Management Training Course: Pre-training Questionnaire Responses Managing Water Conflicts, UC Region and Denver TSC

Prepared by: Diana Castillo, Lisa Marie Izquierdo, Gloria Jimenez, Mari Stangerhaugen, Robert Nixon. Advisor: Ambassador Rafat Mahdi

Market Design and Renewables in the U.S.

July 2, PROPOSED ACTION: Approve the Framework for the Wildlife Crediting Forum

A Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership

Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District Overview

NORTHWEST DEFENSE AGAINST MUSSELS (NDAM) DECLARATION OF COOPERATION JUNE 2013

February 6, 2018 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Update on Albeni Falls Settlement Agreement BACKGROUND:

THE IMPACT OF THE LOSS OF ELECTRIC GENERATION AT GLEN CANYON DAM Overview of Study Findings

Transcription:

FINAL AGENDA CENTRAL ASIA CROSS BORDER WATER MANAGEMENT EXCHANGE VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA Objective: Portland, Oregon To offer exposure to the U.S. and Canadian experience in negotiating trans boundary water relations through a close examination of the Columbia River Treaty. The Columbia River Treaty parallels the most prominent features of trans boundary water contention in Central Asia in a great many respects. The Columbia River Treaty was originally enacted in 1961 to address a significant increase in electric power demand in the Columbia River Basin and the subsequent demand on water resources in the U.S. and Canada. The agreement is implemented by the Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Corps of Army Engineers in the U.S. and by B.C. Hydro in Canada. The treaty is formally set to end in 2024 but there is a provision stating that either entity must give advance notice of their intention to terminate the treaty by 2014 (ten years before the official end of the treaty). The program will provide a 360 degree overview of the Columbia River Treaty including the negotiations and collaborative studies originally undertaken to enact the treaty, the roles and responsibilities of both the U.S. and Canadian lead entities; and the current reviews being conducted by both the U.S. and Canada to determine if they will continue the treaty after 2024. These reviews are taking into consideration the substantial environmental and wildlife impacts which were not originally envisioned at the time of the treaty. Participants Kazakhstan 1. Shakhrat Nurishev, Ambassador at large, Kazakhstan Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2. Darkhan Nursadykov, First Secretary, Central Asia Department, Kazakhstan Ministry of Foreign Affairs 3. Saghit Ibatullin, Chairman, Executive Committee of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea, Correspondent Member, Kazakh Academy of Agricultural Sciences 4. Deputy Chairman, Executive Committee of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea; Director, Agency for the Implementation of the ASBP Page 1

5. Murat Bekniyazov, Representative, Republic of Kazakhstan, Executive Committee of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea Tajikistan 6. Yunusov Toliboy, Post Deputy Head, Information and the Press, Foreign Policy Analysis and Planning, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, First Secretary of Tajik MFA Law Department 7. Anvar Kamolidinov, Leading Scientific Expert, Tajik Branch, Scientific and Information Center of the Interstate Commission for Water Coordination (SIC ICWC) Uzbekistan 8. Dinara Ziganshina, Deputy Head, Scientific and Information Center, Interstate Commission for Water Coordination 9. Timur Rakhimov, Head of Division, Department for USA and America Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uzbekistan 10. Rakhmatulla Nurimbetov, Head of Section, Department for Cooperation with structures of CIS, CSTO and SCO, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uzbekistan Program Saturday, January 26, 2013 PM Delegates arrive Portland, Oregon Met at airport by Albert Doub, Deputy Program Manager, United States Energy Association (USEA) Travel to Hotel: Embassy Suites Portland Downtown Hotel 319 SW Pine Street Portland, Oregon, 97204 2726, USA Tel: +1 503 279 9000 Sunday, January 27, 2013 Morning: 10:00am Breakfast is included in the hotel and is available beginning at 7:00 a.m. Meeting with USEA in Hotel: Review agenda for the week Distribute Per diem and other relevant documents Discuss plans for the remainder of the day Page 2

Monday, January 28, 2013 7:45 a.m. Meet in hotel lobby to travel to the Northwestern Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 8:30 a.m. Meeting with the Northwestern Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Schedule: The USACE serves as one of the two U.S. lead entities for the Columbia Water Treaty. The Northwestern Division is one of nine U.S. Army Corps of Engineers divisions. Its jurisdiction includes 77 dams and reservoirs, 29 hydropower plants, and 1,600 miles of navigable channels covering 14 states and two of the country s longest rivers the Missouri and Columbia. Its primary civil works missions encompass flood control, navigation, hydropower, fish and wildlife, water quality and irrigation, recreation, and disaster response. General overview of USACE USACE responsibilities under the Columbia River Treaty Overview of the Columbia Water Treaty History o Background and impetus for the treaty o International Joint Commission Studies leading up to the treaty Negotiation process and the mutually accepted principles that were applied Treaty provisions o General provisions o Infrastructure and governance o Power coordination agreements o Electric Power production Increase in power production in downstream facilities Assured winter flows for power production o Flood control o Canadian entitlement and other economic considerations Timeline and key dates of the treaty Challenges and successes of the treaty to date 8:30am 8:45am 8:45am 9:45am Introductions and Overview of the schedule for the week Jim Barton, Chief of Columbia Basin Water Management Division Transboundary Water Cooperation In Central Asia Saghit Ibatullin, Chairman, Executive Committee of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea Page 3

9:45am 10:00am 10:00am 11:00am 11:00am 12:00pm 12:00pm 1:30pm 1:30pm 2:00pm Break Introduction to U.S. Corps of Engineers, Columbia Basin Water Management Jim Barton, Chief of Columbia Basin Water Management Division Columbia Basin Treaty Overview, History, and Challenges Dick Mittelstadt, former Treaty Permanent Engineering Board Engineering Committee U.S. member, former Technical Manager of Hydropower Analysis Center, Corps of Engineers Lunch Deputy Commander's Welcome and Overview of Northwestern Division COL. Robert Tipton, Deputy Division Commander, Northwestern Division, US Army Corps of Engineers 2:00pm 3:20pm Columbia Basin Treaty Review Impact Assessments and Studies Challenges Ahead and Resources Required Dave Ponganis, Senior Executive Service, Regional Director of Programs Northwestern Division, U.S Entity Coordinator 3:20pm 3:30pm 3:30pm 5:00pm Break USACE Headquarters overview of organization; responsibilities under treaties (including boundary waters), interaction with U.S. Department of State (Presented by Jim) Jerry Webb, Treaty Permanent Engineering Board Secretary, PEB Engineering Committee Chair, Principal Hydrologic & Hydraulic Engineer, Hydrology, Hydraulics & Coastal Community of Practice Leader Tuesday, January 29, 2013 Full Day Site Visit to Bonneville Dam The USCORE operates and maintains Bonneville Lock and Dam for hydropower production, fish and wildlife protection, recreation and navigation. The facility includes two power houses totaling 1,084.2 MW. The first powerhouse has 10 generators with a total capacity of 660 MW; the second powerhouse has 8 generators with a total capacity of 558 megawatts MW. The power is marketed by the Bonneville Power Administration. Page 4

Schedule: Endangered species work in the Columbia and accommodations made for fish flows Implications for Columbia River Treaty 2014 Treat Review 9:15am Arrive at dam met by Dennis Schwartz Bonneville Dam Chief Power Plant Operator Wednesday, January 30, 2013 Tour of dam, fish facilities, navigation locks, powerhouse, visitor s center Presentation on endangered species work in the Columbia and accommodations made for fish flows; implications for treaty review Rock Peters, Sr. Fish Program Manager; Dennis Schwartz, Bonneville Dam Chief Power Plant Operator 8:30am 10:00am 10:00am 10:15am 10:15am 10:50am 10:50am 11:30am 11:30am 1:00pm 1:150pm 4:45pm Fed Caucus Overview and Governance Issues/ Challenges/ Involvement Rick Mogren, Adjunct Associate Professor of Public Administration Center for Public Service, Hatfield School of Government Break Overview of the Northwest Power Pool Mike Hansen, Coordination Planning Manager, Northwest Power Pool Overview of the Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee Dick Adams, Executive Director, Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee Lunch Meeting with BC Hydro Doug Robinson, Canadian Entity Secretary BC Hydro serves as the Canadian Implementing Entity for the Columbia River Treaty. BC Hydro operates 31 hydroelectric facilities and three thermal generating plants, totaling 12,000 megawatts (MW) of installed generating capacity I British Columbia. Hydroelectric facilities provide over 95 per cent of the total electricity generated and are located throughout the Peace, Columbia and Coastal regions of B.C. Page 5

Thursday, January 31, 2013 General overview of BC Hydro BC Hydro s roles and responsibilities under the Columbia River Treaty Challenges and successes of the treaty to date Canadian perspective Future plans and the 2014 / 2024 Review Process Canadian Perspective Assessment Studies Environmental Economic Social Legal hydrological Stakeholder Review Process. Consultations and Listening Sessions with First Nations (tribes) and residents of the Columbia River Basin Community Flood Planning Interprovincial Agreements Water Allocation Plans Water Conservation Water Use Planning 8:30am 9:45 am Meeting with Bonneville Power Corporation (BPA) Greg Delwiche, Senior Vice President, Power Services of BPA, former US Entity Coordinator The Bonneville Power Administration serves as one of the U.S. implementing partners for the Columbia River Treaty. The Bonneville Power Administration is a U.S. Federal nonprofit agency based in the Pacific Northwest which markets wholesale electric power from 31 federal hydro projects in the Columbia River Basin, one nonfederal nuclear plant and several other small non federal power plants. Approximately one third of the electric power used in the Northwest comes from BPA. BPA also operates and maintains nearly three fourths of the high voltage transmission in its service territory which includes Idaho, Oregon, Washington, western Montana and small parts of eastern Montana, California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. BPA also funds regional efforts to protect and rebuild fish and wildlife populations affected by hydropower development in the Columbia River Basin Page 6

9:45am 10:00am 10:00am 11:30am Break Columbia River Treaty Joint Treaty Overview by both USACE and BPA Rick Pendergrass, Jim Barton, Columbia River Treaty Operating Committee US Section Chairs Provisions Governance Power Coordination Agreements Electric Power Production Flood Risk Management Assured Winter Flows Downstream Facilities Canadian Entitlement Key Dates 11:30am 12:30pm 12:30pm 2:00pm 2:00pm 4:00pm Panel Discussion on Treaty with all U.S. and Canadian Entities BC Hydro, USACE; BPA Lunch 2014 Columbia River Treaty Review Process Matt Rea, Nancy Stephan, Treaty 2014/2014 Project Managers Challenges and Lessons Learned 2014 review process & requirements, studies and work to date, & timeline Developing a Stakeholder Outreach Plan Regional Engagement with Sovereign and Non-Sovereign interests 4:15pm 5:00pm Sovereign Review Team Member Presentation Jim Heffernan, Policy Analyst of Columbia River Treaty, Office of the Executive Director, Columbia River Inter Tribal Fish Commission Friday, February 1, 2013 How sovereigns such as tribes or others view their participation in the Columbia River Treaty 8:30am 12:00 pm Meeting with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Christopher Cutler, Deputy Chief, Boulder Canyon Operations Office, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Page 7

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation is the largest wholesale water supplier in the U.S. and the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the 17 western states with over 600 dams and reservoirs. The mission of the Bureau is to manage, develop and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. General Overview of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Water Management Strategies Coordinating the Competing Needs of Irrigation, Municipalities, Power and the Environment Conflict Resolution among Stakeholders including States, Native American tribes, Water and Power Customers Water resources supply and demand analysis tools Planning for the future Saturday, February 2, 2013 Delegates depart Portland, Oregon for their respective home countries. Page 8