For Bandon Utilities Commission

Similar documents
Introduction to Bonneville Power Administration

olumbia River Treaty The Columbia by Steve Oliver, Vice President, Generation Asset Management, Bonneville Power Administration 16 Oct

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bonneville Power Administration Review

Integrated Resource Planning at Tacoma Power. Ahlmahz Negash EE 500E Energy & Environment Seminar University of Washington

BPA s Asset Management NW Power & Conservation Council O&M Subcommittee

Columbia River Operations

Columbia Basin Operations and Flood Risk Management

CRT Operations in Low Water Conditions

Fact Sheet. A Northwest energy solution: Regional power benefits of the lower Snake River dams. CLEAN: Emission-free renewable energy

2014/2024 Review Columbia River Treaty

NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT JIM GASPARD

Fact Sheet. A Northwest energy solution: Regional power benefits of the lower Snake River dams. CLEAN: Emission-free renewable energy

Watt About Energy in the Northwest

PJM Wind Integration Initiatives

California Independent System Operator Corporation. California ISO. Import resource adequacy. Department of Market Monitoring

Eugene Water & Electric Board. The Future of Utilities in the Pacific Northwest

2014/2024 Review Columbia River Treaty

Columbia River Drainage

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY Assured Operating Plan and Determination of Downstream Power Benefits for Operating Year

US Columbia Operations Overview. Columbia Basin Advisory Committee

NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT

Maintaining Water Supply Resilience in Extreme Times

Does Water Resources Management in the Snake River Basin Matter for the Lower Columbia River? Or Is the Snake River Part of Another Watershed?

TOTAL GENERATION WHOLESALE SALES

The Texas Experience: Implications of 8,000+ MW Wind Generation Resources In ERCOT. David Campbell CEO, Luminant 2009 Summer Seminar August 3, 2009

April 30, 2013 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Gillian Charles, Power Planning Division. Update on the Region s Wind Development

Current Water Management Practices for Kerr Reservoir

Water Supply Board Briefing. Water Operations Department March 22, 2016

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. November 1, Department of Market Monitoring

Wild Horse Solar Photovoltaic Project

Columbia River System Operations Environmental Impact Statement Newsletter

Renewable Integration The California Experience

21,363 MW 22,774 MW ONTARIO ENERGY REPORT Q JULY SEPT 2014 ELECTRICITY. Electricity Highlights Third Quarter Ontario s Power Grid

Treaty History & Requirements

Wapato Access Feasibility Study

BC Hydro Generation system operation Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee

Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Potential and Renewable Energy Integration in the Northwest

System Needs: An Energy Planning Perspective. Randy Reimann

Water Infrastructure Needs in the Columbia River Basin Legislative Council on River Governance

Storage as a Transmission Asset:

Wind Update. Renewable Energy Integration Lessons Learned. March 28, 2012

Utility Scale Integration of Wind and Solar Power

Market Design and Renewables in the U.S.

John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir Virginia and North Carolina (Section 216)

Columbia River Treaty

Regional Impact of Renewables

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply

Columbia River Treaty Review. PNWA Summer Meeting LaConner, WA June 24, 2013

Hedging Coal Price Risk in a Deregulated Power Market

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. February 10, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring

Electricity Supply. Monthly Energy Grid Output by Fuel Type (MWh)

LEARNING FROM OUR PAST TO SHAPE OUR FUTURE. Robert W. Cromwell, Jr. Director, Power Contracts and Resource Acquisitions

November 7, SUBJECT: Power System Value of Conserved Irrigation Diversions

Hydropower as Flexibility Provider: Modeling Approaches and Numerical Analysis

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Albeni Falls Operations Meeting 2015

The Integration Challenge

Leading Insights into Solar

Managing Idaho Power Company s Hydro Projects During Drought Conditions The Benefits of Communication and Collaboration

2009 Integrated Resource Plan. PNUCC Board of Directors Meeting. January 7, Copyright 2010 Portland General Electric. All Rights Reserved.

Appendix D. System Model & Assumptions. 1.0 BC Hydro System Modelling for Columbia Alternatives

Energy 101. A Presentation to the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee

BPA s HERMES Project: a Multi-objective, Multi-user Approach to Reservoir Optimization

Pumped hydro Storage Plants

Los Angeles 3 rd Regional

Mid-C Seminar July 16 th, 2014

The Seventh Power Plan The Proposed Mix of Generation Resources and Strategies for the Region

Transmission Planning at the Midwest ISO. Mr. Eric Laverty Senior Manager of Transmission Access Planning Midwest ISO June 26 th, 2008

Draft 2011 Long-term Transmission Plan. Stakeholder Session June 20, 2011

Renewables Curtailment in China is there light at the end of the tunnel? Liutong Zhang

Puget Sound Energy 2016 Annual Renewable Portfolio Standard Report pursuant to RCW and WAC

Missouri River Basin Water Management Spring 2013 Public Meetings

SB 838: Oregon Renewable Energy Act Establishing an Oregon Renewable Energy Standard

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

CCA Pilot Project Update

Effects of projected climate change on energy supply and demand in the Pacific Northwest and Washington State

The Future of Electricity: A Market with Costs of Zero? Marginal

Columbia River Treaty

CCA Pilot Project Update

Columbia River Treaty the setting

Columbia River Basin Reservoir Operations

The Future of Electricity: A Market with Costs of Zero? Marginal

THE VALUE OF THE FEDERAL COLUMBIA RIVER POWER SYSTEM

Northwest Hydropower and Columbia Basin River Benefits Fast Facts

OVERVIEW OF WATER RESOURCE ISSUES IN THE CARSON RIVER WATERSHED EDWIN JAMES, P.E. CWSD GENERAL MANAGER 2016

MEMORANDUM UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. DATE: August 2, 2017

OVERVIEW OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONS AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

Northwest Power and Conservation Council

MISSOURI RIVER BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT SPRING 2018 PUBLIC MEETINGS

Solar, Wind and Market Power in the New Zealand Electricity Market (and hydro lake dynamics) Mina Bahrami Gholami and Stephen Poletti

Wind Workshop. Technical Characterization: Dependable Capacity & Firm Energy 10:00-10:30am

Warm Springs Hydro LLC 5203 South 11 th East Idaho Falls, ID

Lower Columbia River Pile Dike Assessment

Columbia River Treaty

EAGLE MOUNTAIN Hydro Electric Pumped Storage Project

D R A F T. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD NO Integrated Resource Plan through 2037

Keeyask Generation Project. Public Involvement. Supporting Volume. Environmental Impact Statement

Exploring the Impacts of California s Renewable Portfolio Standard

Transcription:

For Bandon Utilities Commission July 12, 2017

Profile BPA, a component of the U.S. Department of Energy, is a non-profit and self-funded power marketing administration in the Pacific Northwest. Congress created BPA in 1937 to deliver and sell the power from the Bonneville Dam. Today BPA markets wholesale electrical power from 31 federal hydroelectric dams located in the Northwest, one nonfederal nuclear plant, and several small nonfederal power plants.

Mission The BPA s mission as a public service organization is to create and deliver the best value for our customers and constituents as we act in concert with others to assure the Pacific Northwest: An adequate, efficient, economical and reliable power supply. A transmission system capable of integrating and transmitting power from federal and nonfederal generating units, providing service to BPA s customers, providing interregional interconnections, and maintaining electrical reliability and stability. Mitigation of the Federal Columbia River Power System s impacts on fish and wildlife. BPA is committed to cost-based rates and public and regional preference in its marketing of power.

Agenda CONTRACT, RATE AND BANDON SPECIFICS

The Federal Columbia River Power System

Generation Resources Hydro generation is largely controlled by the need to move water for nonpower purposes- mainly fish operations and flood control Most hydro projects are interdependent, inflows and outflows must be coordinated with the owners of several non-federal dams in the Columbia River and Snake River basins Nonfederal nuclear plant provides baseload energy Renewable wind helps customers meet state RPS goals Contract purchases cover any shortfalls to ensure reliable service

BPA System Fuel Mix in CY 2016

Water Year Runoff Varies Widely Runoff 1981-2016 Volume (MAF) Average Water Year Oct - Sept 132 Maximum Water Year Oct Sept 1997 194 Minimum Water Year Oct Sept 2001 82 The firm critical output of the FCRPS is based on the record low runoff observed in 1937 the Critical Water Year at 69.4 MAF. Firm critical output is reduced further by specific fish spill operations required in the operating year. FCRPS Tier 1 sales are limited to firm critical output.

Water Year Runoff Varies Widely

Annual Water Supply Forecast Uncertainty Oct-Dec: Most Uncertainty in water supply forecast Jan-Mar: more data on snowpack conditions, forecast uncertainty begins to decrease Apr-May: Annual water supply uncertainty is lower but the shape of the spring runoff is still uncertain

Critical Water vs Average Water Secondary energy sales are made from water inventory above Critical Water.

Turning Runoff into Energy Limitations on generation output: Water supply is limited Water takes time to move through the system Generators in planned or unplanned maintenance reduce capacity Navigation requirements limit out flows fish operations can require increases or decreases to out flows Recreation needs set water elevation targets at projects with reservoirs The machine capacity of the FCRPS is 22,458 MW. This is the maximum potential generation if there were no operating restrictions and unlimited water supply. IN FY-18 the FCRPS is planned to generate 6,550 Annual amw of energy under 1937 critical water year conditions. 6,550 Annual amw * 8,760 hrs = 57,378,000 MWh of energy The FCRPS peaking capacity for 60 minutes is 13,599 MW

System Shaped Load vs Customer Load BPA uses water from storage and makes market power purchases to serve loads when the customer s load shape is greater than the FCRPS System Shaped Load When customer load is less than System Shaped Load BPA can sell power into the market

BPA Customers Publicly Owned Utilities Entitled to a statutory preference and priority in the purchase of available federal power Northwest Regional Municipalities Public Utility Districts Cooperatives Tribal Utilities Investor Owned Utilities Entitled to the Residential Exchange Program that effectively provides an offset to IOU residential and small farm customers rates Includes Portland General Electric, Puget Sound Energy, PacifiCorp, Avista, NorthWestern Energy, and Idaho Power. Direct Service Industries BPA is not required to, but may sell power for direct consumption to a limited number of existing industrial companies in the Northwest Aluminum Smelters (e.g. Alcoa, Columbia Falls Aluminum) Chemical and paper, and other metal industries (e.g. Port Townsend Paper Corporation) Sales outside the Northwest Public and investor owned utilities in the Southwest and California Sales, purchases, and exchanges of power via the Southern Intertie Transmission Services Network and point-to-point transmission services for transmission customers Generation integration services for renewable and thermal resources Conservation and environmental impact analysis services

Operating Revenues BPA Revenues FY2016 1% 2% 1% 1% 26% 69% Power Sales Power Bookouts Miscellaneous Power Transmission Sales U.S. Treasury Fish Credits Miscellaneous Transmission

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BPA is at the forefront of promoting energy efficiency a key tool to meeting future customer demand for electricity through 2035. BPA and regional energy efficiency programs provide guidelines and funding to support utility-run programs that achieve electrical energy savings for commercial, industrial, agricultural, and residential consumers. BPA s energy efficiency programs include smart grid, demand response, and distributed energy resources. These programs offer additional tools to help manage peak load and congestion.

OPERATIONAL FOCUS ON FISH SURVIVAL

PROTECTING AND IMPROVING FISH HABITAT

BPA TRANSMISSION SYSTEM MAP

BPA TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BPA owns and operates 75% of the Pacific Northwest s high voltage electrical transmission system. BPA s system includes more than 15,000 miles of transmission line and 285 substations. The system enables a peak loading of about 30,000 MW and generates more than $700 million a year in revenues from transmission services. BPA s Transmission Services operates under an Open Access Transmission Tariff based on FERC s pro forma tariff as a nonjurisdictional entity. Transmission service is offered to public utilities, investor owned utilities, direct service industries, and power marketers

Power Contract, Rates and Bandon Specifics

Tiered Rates and Regional Dialogue Contracts BPA has significant fixed capital investment in the FCRPS with net utility plant assets valued at $18.3 billion in FY2016; debt on these assets is $18.1 billion Tiered Rates Methodology (TRM) and 20-year Regional Dialogue contracts established in FY2012, valid through September 30, 2028 Tier 1 power rates recover the costs of the FCRPS, energy efficiency, fish and wildlife Each customer has a contract high water mark (CHWM) which is the amount of Tier 1 System Firm Critical Output they can purchase based on their historical loads Tier 2 power rates cover the cost of new resources needed to meet customer load growth. Customers may elect to serve Tier 2 load with Load Growth Rate, Short Term Rate, Vintage Rates, or Non-Federal Resources

Rates Low in BPA Served States

Specifics About Bandon s BPA Contract The City of Bandon purchased 7.4 amw from BPA in CY 2016 at an average cost of 40 per MWh. Currently Bandon is entitled to 7.75 amw of Tier 1 power from BPA. BPA/Bandon s joint forecast calls for about 0.25% load growth to 7.6 amw in 2028. In the event that loads exceed Tier 1 entitlement, Bandon has elected to have BPA acquire all additional energy from the market, and pass through costs (referred to as the Load-Growth Rate). Contract in effect through September 2028. Current projections are for a 5.5% rate increase for Bandon s power costs (two year cycle).

Bandon s BPA Purchases CY 2016 MWh amw Power Cost Transmission Cost Total Cost Cost per MWh Jan-16 6,797 9.1 $ 250,422 $ 44,239 $ 294,661 $ 43 Feb-16 5,885 8.8 $ 221,448 $ 49,140 $ 270,588 $ 46 Mar-16 6,054 8.1 $ 199,598 $ 39,201 $ 238,799 $ 39 Apr-16 4,898 6.8 $ 189,222 $ 25,261 $ 214,483 $ 44 May-16 4,639 6.2 $ 127,422 $ 24,610 $ 152,032 $ 33 Jun-16 4,378 6.1 $ 152,160 $ 25,915 $ 178,075 $ 41 Jul-16 4,510 6.1 $ 161,553 $ 25,919 $ 187,472 $ 42 Aug-16 4,635 6.2 $ 160,288 $ 26,169 $ 186,457 $ 40 Sep-16 4,530 6.3 $ 175,865 $ 25,990 $ 201,855 $ 45 Oct-16 5,082 6.8 $ 161,924 $ 33,626 $ 195,550 $ 38 Nov-16 5,575 7.7 $ 164,598 $ 40,056 $ 204,654 $ 37 Dec-16 8,060 10.8 $ 251,891 $ 52,777 $ 304,668 $ 38 65,041 7.4 $ 2,216,391 $ 412,903 $ 2,629,294 $ 40

Questions