Corridors of Statewide Significance: Eastern Shore Corridor

Similar documents
VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Eastern Shore Corridor

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Eastern Shore Corridor (D)

Corridors of Statewide Significance

Statewide Multimodal Networks

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Coastal Corridor (A)

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Western Mountain Corridor (L)

U.S. 13 Multimodal Corridor

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor

AGENDA ITEM #17: VIRGINIA S 2025 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND HB2: OIPI CONSULTANT

U.S. 220 Multimodal Corridor

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Heartland Corridor (E)

Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force

U.S. 17 Multimodal Corridor

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North-South Corridor (G)

COMMERCE CENTER HAMPTON ROADS

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

Chapter 4: Developing the Recommendations

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment Washington to North Carolina Corridor (K)

PPTA Project Pipeline

VMTP 2025 Needs Assessment

Transportation Committee DRPT Presentation

Chapter 1: The 2035 Virginia Surface Transportation Plan 1. Challenges & Opportunities 2 VTrans2035: The Precursor 2 The VSTP and VTrans2035 2

Kevin Abt Chief Engineer Virginia Port Authority

REPORT. Freight Physical Infrastructure Profile May 11, Submitted to: Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission (RRRC)

U.S. 29 Multimodal Corridor

Project Overview. A Collaborative Effort

Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. Hampton Roads Passenger Rail Study Data Collection. Phase 2A. Presentation To.

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

Report to Governor-elect Northam From Transition Policy Council on Transportation

Peninsula Widening. Project Description. Overview of Project Status. Estimated Total Project Cost $4.7 - $7.3 Billion

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD

Future of Transportation in Florida

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Introduction... 1 Florida s Rail System... 1 Rail Freight... 3 Rail Passengers... 5 Conclusions... 9

Long Bridge Project. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Revised Purpose and Need

VDOT and DRPT MPO and PDC Winter Meeting Amy Inman Planning & Mobility Programs Administrator Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

GREATER CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

Chapter 1: 2035 Virginia Surface Transportation Plan

VTrans2040. VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan (VMTP) Regional Network 2025 Needs Assessment. HRTPO TTAC July 1, 2015

VTrans2040 Multimodal Transportation Plan Corridors of Statewide Significance Needs Assessment North Carolina to West Virginia Corridor

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

2. Goals and Objectives

TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN AND COUNTY REGULATIONS VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROAD NETWORK SECTION 7

Northern Virginia Region Draft Needs Summary

P4.0 Highway Quantitative Scoring Workgroup Recommendations

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

House Select Committee on Strategic Transportation Planning and Long Term Funding Solutions. March 28, 2016

Chapter 5 VTrans2035 Investment Priorities

DRAFT NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION FREIGHT PLAN. July 2016

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

VTrans2040 VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan 2025 Needs Assessment. November 2017

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

Chapter 1 Introduction

Transportation Update

INLAND DISTRIBUTION LOGISTICS PRESENTATION TO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES

FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL SYSTEMS

TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES IN AGRIBUSINESS

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

The Alliance Vision/Purpose

NEED ECONOMIC TRANSPORTATION LOCATIONS EXAMPLE

Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com

West Piedmont Planning District Commission

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

Freight Handler to the Nation. Freight Planning in the Chicago Metropolitan Area

CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

Summary of the Final Report

TRI-CITIES AREA YEAR 2031 TRANSPORTATION PLAN. June 2008 TRI-CITIES AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

U.S. 58 Multimodal Corridor

Chapter 9: Vision Plan. Chapter 9. Vision Plan. Lake Loveland. Image 179 Credit: City of Loveland

2018 Spring AICP Exam Review. AREAS OF PRACTICE PART 2 Claudia M. Bilotto, AICP

2017 Spring AICP Exam Review. AREAS OF PRACTICE PART 2 Jamie Cochran, FAICP Georgia Department of Transportation

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Economic Development Planning, Summary 30

American Association of Port Authorities Spring Meeting March 24, 2009

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

CHAPTER 3.0 CIRCULATION ELEMENT

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS IN HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA

Kentucky River Area Development District

Freight Plans Planning, Preparing Staying Ahead. MAASTO July, 2013

EXISTING AND FUTURE FREIGHT GOODS MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT

Chapter 8 - The Decision-Making Process

Delmarva Freight Plan

SECTION 5. Existing Conditions TRANSPORTATION NETWORK TRANSPORTATION

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

Executive Summary. of VTrans2035 Report

Executive Summary. of VTrans2035 Report

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Grottoes. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Transcription:

Virginia s Long-Range Multimodal Transportation lan Corridors of Statewide Significance: Eastern Shore Corridor repared for: Commonwealth Transportation Board repared by: Office of Intermodal lanning and Investment March 2010

Contents Corridor Overview... 1-1 1.1 Transportation Facilities... 1-1 Corridor Functions... 1-1 2.1 Corridor Functions in Virginia... 2-1 2.2 Freight Movement Link between Hampton Roads and Eastern Shore... 2-1 2.3 assenger Link between Hampton Roads and Eastern Shore/Main Street through Eastern Shore... 2-5 2.3.1 opulation rojections... 2-5 2.3.2 Levels of Service... 2-9 2.3.3 High-Crash Rate Areas... 2-12 2.4 Access to Assateague, Chincoteague, Tourist Areas, and NASA Wallops Island... 2-12 Corridor Strategies... 3-1 3.1 Strategies for Eastern Shore Corridor... 3-3 3.2 Strategies vs. VTrans2035 Goals... 3-4 Table of Contents ii

List of Tables Table No. Description age Table 1 Eastern Shore Corridor Airport Facilities... 1-6 Table 2 opulation rojections to 2035... 2-6 Table of Contents iii

List of Figures Figure No. Description age Figure 1 Eastern Shore Corridor National Context Map... 1-2 Figure 2 Eastern Shore Corridor Map... 1-3 Figure 3 Total Freight Tonnage and Value by Mode... 2-2 Figure 4 U.S. AADT and Truck ercentages... 2-3 Figure 5 Freight Tonnage and Value by Direction... 2-4 Figure 6 opulation Density 2010 rojections U.S.... 2-7 Figure 7 opulation Density 2035 rojections U.S.... 2-8 Figure 8 Eastern Shore Corridor Existing Levels of Service... 2-10 Figure 9 Eastern Shore Corridor Future Levels of Service... 2- Figure 10 Eastern Shore Corridor High Crash Rate Locations Map... 2- Figure Eastern Shore Corridor Tourist Areas Map... 2-14 Figure 12 Eastern Shore Corridor Strategies vs. Functions Matrix... 3-2 Figure Eastern Shore Corridor Strategies vs. Goals Matrix... 3-5 Table of Contents iv

1 Corridor Overview 1.1 Transportation Facilities The Eastern Shore Corridor is mostly defined by U.S. Highway, which is a highway running north-to-south for over 500 miles in the eastern United States; running from the northeast suburbs of hiladelphia, ennsylvania to Fayetteville, North Carolina. U.S. also travels through Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Figure 1 shows the entire U.S. corridor throughout the Eastern Seaboard. In Virginia, U.S. serves as a connector between the Hampton Roads area and Virginia s Eastern Shore, part of the Delmarva eninsula, providing the only direct connection to the eninsula without leaving the state. U.S. crosses the Chesapeake Bay at its mouth via the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, a 20-mile long combination facility. The corridor provides access in the Hampton Roads area to the Cities of Suffolk, Chesapeake, Virginia Beach, and Norfolk, following a portion of the Military Highway through the Hampton Roads area, where U.S. overlaps with the Military Highway. Figure 2 illustrates the Eastern Shore Corridor in Virginia and shows all modal facilities. The Eastern Shore Corridor passes through the Hampton Roads and Accomack-Northampton lanning Districts. It passes through four cities in the Hampton Roads area and through both Accomack and Northampton Counties along the Virginia eninsula. U.S. Highway acts as the major corridor along the eninsula, linking many smaller towns and other communities in Accomack and Northampton Counties. U.S. also provides indirect access in the Hampton Roads area to the three major Virginia orts, located in Newport News, ortsmouth, and Norfolk. In addition, the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel was constructed over two major shipping channels that provide access to the ort of Virginia. U.S. begins in Virginia at the North Carolina border in the City of Suffolk, and travels through four cities in the Hampton Roads lanning District, most of which also operates as the Hampton Roads MO. Through this area, U.S. serves primarily as a local access corridor, one of many in the Hampton Roads area, connecting Suffolk to ortsmouth and Chesapeake to the east. North of Virginia Beach, it enters the Chesapeake Bay-Bridge Tunnel, connecting to the Eastern Shore. Eastern Shore Corridor Jurisdictions City of Suffolk City of Chesapeake City of Virginia Beach City of Norfolk Northampton County Accomack County Corridor Overview 1-1

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan 380 287 46 180 280 478 678 278 78 684 219 22 80 99 ENNSYLVANIA 76 283 30 222 6 422 476 202 322 276 676 5 NEW JERSEY 195 70 15 83 MARYLAND 795 695 68 40 270 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 595 50 DELAWARE 66 WEST VIRGINIA 301 3 VIRGINIA 895 6 1 4 4 95 85 52 421 NORTH CAROLINA 440 2 73 1 70 277 401 40 485 74 \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-national-context-ortrait.indd p6 77 20 0 20 40 Miles 95 SOUTH CAROLINA 76 FIGURE 1 Eastern Shore Corridor National Context Map

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan W E S T V Key I R GLocation I N I A Map Legend US Airport Metrorail US Metrorail Station VIRGINIA Railroad VRE Station Greyhound Terminal Amtrak Station LANCASTER ark and Ride ACCOMACK ort County Line MO Area Accomack County Airport lanning District MIDDLESEX MATHEWS OQUOSON NEWORT NEWS HAMTON Newport News Marine Terminal TOWN OF SMITHFIELD ISLE OF WIGHT Norfolk International Terminal ortsmouth Marine Terminal ORTSMOUTH Bypass Holland Road Magnolia Suffolk Municpal Airport SUFFOLK Hampton Roads Airport HAMTON ROADS MO Reon Road Sam s Club Greenbrier Mall Silverleaf Station VIRGINIA BEACH CHESAEAKE NORTH CAROLINA YORK SURRY NORTHAMTON WILLIAMSBURG GLOUCESTER \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-multimodal-corridor-study-maps-ortrait.indd p3 0 4 8 Miles FIGURE 2 Eastern Shore Corridor Map

The Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel is a 20-mile-long facility, with the above-water portions at four lanes, while the tunnel portions are two-lane facilities. This facility is operated by the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel Commission. There are four manmade islands along the Bridge-Tunnel that act as portals for the facility. The Bridge- Tunnel spans two major widely spaced shipping channels, as freight is moved to the ort of Virginia in the Hampton Roads area. U.S. runs concurrently with U.S. Highway and U.S. Highway 4, both Corridors of Statewide Significance, between Suffolk and Chesapeake. U.S. and U.S. 4 split off at either end of this link between the two cities. In Suffolk, U.S. runs concurrently for a short stretch with Virginia Route 32 and runs concurrently for a small stretch in Chesapeake with Virginia Route 191. In Norfolk, U.S. overlaps with Virginia Route 165 for half a mile, and in Norfolk and Virginia Beach, it overlaps with Virginia Route 166 for two miles. Along the Virginia eninsula, U.S. runs concurrently with Virginia Route 180 for a half-mile in the Town of Keller. There are no true parallel facilities to U.S. Highway. However, it accesses other major corridors, especially within the Hampton Roads area, where it accesses Interstate and its auxiliary routes, including I-6, the Hampton Roads Beltway, and I-2 in multiple locations. It also accesses U.S., U.S. 4, and U.S., all components of Corridors of Statewide Significance. The corridor does not run concurrently with any interstate in Virginia. The corridor is also served by multiple transit facilities. The Hampton Roads area is served by Hampton Roads Transit (HRT), which provides bus service as well as Metro Area Express (MAX) service throughout the region, particularly from Suffolk to Norfolk and between the Norfolk Naval Air Station and Greenbrier. None of the bus routes access the Eastern Shore or Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel. The MAX bus offers service along the U.S. corridor within Hampton Roads from Suffolk to ortsmouth. U.S. Transit Facilities Multiple park and ride lots are available in the Hampton Roads area as well, including three in Suffolk and five near where U.S. runs parallel to I- through Chesapeake and Virginia Beach. Shore Transit and Rideshare (STAR) offers bus service along four lines on the Eastern Shore, though there is no connection to the Hampton Roads area. Greyhound offers service in the Hampton Roads region. There are multiple stations in this area, including ones in Suffolk, directly along the Eastern Shore Corridor, in Newport News, Hampton, and Norfolk. Greyhound provides service to both North Carolina and Maryland from these stations as well as to other cities in Virginia. In addition, Greyhound service is available along the Eastern Shore, as there are stations in Exmore and Oak Hall, near the Maryland border, providing a bus connection between Hampton Roads and the northern Eastern Shore. While U.S. does not directly access the ort of Virginia, the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel was constructed to allow for two major shipping channels into these Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) Metro Area Express (MAX) Shore Transit and Rideshare (STAR) Greyhound Corridor Overview 1-4

ports with little to no disruption of shipping or vehicular traffic. The ort of Virginia s facilities can be accessed indirectly in the Hampton Roads region from the Eastern Shore Corridor. In addition, Norfolk Southern operates freight rail lines from the ort of Virginia in Chesapeake and Suffolk and out of the Hampton Roads area. CSX operates rail lines that travel along the Eastern Shore Corridor in Chesapeake and Suffolk and to the remainder of Virginia and North Carolina. While Amtrak has stations in the Hampton Roads area, the tracks along the Eastern Shore Corridor are not utilized for passenger rail. In addition, the Chesapeake and Albemarle Short- Line Railroad operates from Norfolk south to North Carolina, using Norfolk Southern rail lines. Norfolk Southern lines run along the Eastern Shore of Maryland but do not run into Virginia. The Bay Coast Railroad runs along the Eastern Shore from Maryland and crosses the Chesapeake Bay via rail ferry barge across 26 miles of water to access Norfolk. It is the most direct rail route from the Northeast to Norfolk, and can ort: U.S. Rail and ort Facilities Newport News Marine Terminal ortsmouth Marine Terminal Norfolk International Terminals Chesapeake Bay Navigational Channels Freight Rail: Bay Coast Railroad Norfolk Southern CSX Chesapeake and Albemarle Railroad assenger Rail: Amtrak accommodate larger loads than most Virginia railways. It interchanges with Norfolk Southern rail lines in both Norfolk and in Maryland. In addition to access to the ort of Virginia, the Chesapeake Bay Navigational Channels and Inland Waterway are both located in this region. Barge transport between the ort of Virginia and Baltimore, MD as well as the ort of Richmond and the ort of Alexandria also is available. Also, cruise ships operate between the Northern Neck, the Maryland Eastern Shore, Tangier Island, and the Virginia Eastern Shore, offering access between the various localities. Commercial air service is available at both Norfolk International Airport and Newport News Williamsburg Airport in the Hampton Roads region. In addition, there are two reliever facilities that offer limited commercial service. On the Eastern Shore, there is no commercial service available, except to the north along Maryland s Eastern Shore at the Ocean City/Salisbury Airport. However, there is a general aviation facility and air access to Tangier Island. Table 1 lists the airport facilities along the Eastern Shore Corridor, including the location and the Virginia Air Transportation System lan (VATS) designation. Corridor Overview 1-5

Table 1 Eastern Shore Corridor Airport Facilities Airport Type Location Norfolk International Commercial Service City of Norfolk Newport News Williamsburg Commercial Service City of Newport News Hampton Roads Executive Reliever City of Chesapeake Chesapeake Regional Reliever City of Chesapeake Suffolk Municipal General Aviation Regional City of Suffolk Accomack County General Aviation Regional Accomack County Tangier Island General Aviation Community Accomack County Corridor Overview 1-6

2 Corridor Functions 2.1 Corridor Functions in Virginia The Eastern Shore Corridor provides a direct connection between the Hampton Roads region and Functions of U.S. the Eastern Shore and offers an important connection Link between to Virginia and North Carolina beaches from northern Hampton Roads and states such as Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey. It Eastern Shore for is the shortest path from the ort of Virginia to passengers and freight northeastern markets. In addition, it provides access Main Street through to other tourist areas such as Chincoteague Island and Eastern Shore accesses NASA s Wallops Island facility, located along Access to tourist areas the Eastern Shore of Virginia. U.S. is also the main corridor through Accomack and Northampton Counties along Virginia s Eastern Shore and provides access to Maryland to the north. 2.2 Freight Movement Link between Hampton Roads and Eastern Shore The Eastern Shore Corridor is an important freight corridor, with most freight movement accomplished via trucking along the highway or along the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge, which connects rail facilities in Hampton Roads with rail facilities along the Virginia Eastern Shore via barge transport. This offers a more direct connection for freight via rail from the ort of Virginia to the northeast and is the shortest path between these two points. The railroad s route is strategically located between Norfolk Southern northern and western connections and Norfolk Southern lines and CSX lines with their southern and western connections. The railroad bypasses the congested Northeast Corridor and its restricted clearances, with the capability to handle high-roof ft. boxcars, tri-level enclosed auto racks, and over dimension shipments. The Bay Coast Railroad and Barge, like many short-line railroads in Virginia is partially subsidized by the Virginia Department of Rail and ublic Transportation. Figure 3 shows the tonnage by mode along the Eastern Shore Corridor as well as the freight value by mode. Corridor Functions 2-1

Figure 3 Total Freight Tonnage and Value by Mode Tonnage Value (Source: Statewide Freight Study) As seen in Figure 3, most freight is transported by truck despitee the presencee of the rail lines and the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge. Water transport of freight represents over 7 percent of the total freight movement by volume through the Eastern Shore Corridor, and rail transport accounts for over 22 percent. Truck transport along the highway facilities accounts for virtually all of the total freight value (over 97 percent). Figure 4 shows that trucks account for anywhere between 1 and 7 percent of the total traffic along U.S.. While it is not as heavy a freight corridor as some other corridors in Virginia, there is substantial truck traffic through the Eastern Shore and especially through the City of Suffolk as U.S. travels south into North Carolina. As expected, traffic flow is heavier in Hampton Roads than it is on the Eastern Shore. Corridor Functions 2-2

Figure 4 U.S. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) and Commercial Unit (CU) Truck ercentages 50,000 8.0% 45,000 7.0% 40,000 6.0% 35,000 30,000 5.0% 25,000 4.0% Weighted AADT Total CU Truck % 20,000 3.0% 15,000 10,000 2.0% 5,000 1.0% 0 Accomack County Northampton County City of Virginia Beach City of Norfolk City of Chesapeake City of Suffolk 0.0% (Source: Statewide Freight Study) Corridor Functions 2-3

Figure 5 shows the freight tonnage and value by direction. As seen in this figure, approximately half of the total volume is inbound freight, though half of the total value is outbound freight, likely from the ort of Virginia to markets to the north of Virginia. There is some through freight along the corridor and some internal freight, though inbound and outbound freight together represent over three-quarters of the total freight movement along the Eastern Shore Corridor in Virginia. Figure 5 Freight Tonnage and Value by Direction Tonnage Value (Source: Statewide Freight Study) According to Statewide Freight Study, freight volumes along the Eastern Shore Corridor will continue to grow and will be influenced by a number of factors leading to increased transportation demand. opulation growth along the corridor will play a major role. In addition, changes in national and global logistics patterns and the corridor s evolving industry structure will lead to increased demand for freight along this corridor. There are projects that will expand capacity at the ort of Virginia, including the Norfolk International Terminals Central Rail Yard Expansion, the Craney Island expansion and rail connection, and the Norfolk/ortsmouth Beltline Railroad which will increase capacity into and out of the ort. These projects will likely lead to more freight being transferred to rail from truck. Yet, with the total amount of freight through the ort expected to increasee substantially, truck and barge transport will still be very prevalent, especially with regard to its role as an important east-coast freight corridor. With increases in freight demand, it is important that capacity to carry the expected volumes of freight will exist into the future, not only along the highway facilities but along the rail facilities as well. Corridor Functions 2-4

2.3 assenger Link between Hampton Roads and Eastern Shore/Main Street through Eastern Shore The Eastern Shore Corridor connects the Delmarva eninsula to Hampton Roads for passenger traffic as well as through freight via the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, which spans 20 miles and includes over-water sections of four-lane bridges as well as underwater sections of two-lane tunnels. This is the quickest connection from southern Virginia and points south to the Eastern Shore, which continues into Maryland and Delaware and provides further access to New Jersey, New York, and the northeast. After crossing the Chesapeake Bay via the Bridge-Tunnel, U.S. also acts as the main access through the Eastern Shore of Virginia, providing access to numerous small towns and communities in Northampton and Accomack Counties where it is mostly a four-lane facility. It is the only major north-south corridor through this region, so it carries virtually all of the through traffic and much of the local traffic traveling between communities. 2.3.1 opulation rojections The Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC) completed a report as part of VTrans2035, detailing population and employment trends and projections to 2035 for these socioeconomic factors. Increases in population will impact the amount of traffic on the roadway, impacting both local traffic and through traffic through the Eastern Shore and in Hampton Roads, and it will impact both passenger and freight traffic along the highway. Table 2 details the population projections for 2010 and 2035 based on two different sources, one a private vendor (NA Data Associates) and one a public source (Virginia Employment Commission - VEC). rojections by both these sources only extended to 2030, so linear regression was used by VTRC to project to 2035. The data was organized by lanning District. There are two very disparate lanning Districts along the Eastern Shore Corridor. The Hampton Roads DC is a very densely populated, mostly urban region, while the Accomack-Northampton DC is a mostly rural region. Figure 6 illustrates the population density projections for the year 2010 at the lanning District level along the U.S. corridor. Figure 7 illustrates the density projections for the year 2035 and the increase in population density from 2010 to 2035. Corridor Functions 2-5

Table 2 opulation rojections to 2035 DC (Number) 2010 Value Midpoint 2035 Forecast ercentage Increase Annual Effective Growth Rate VEC NA VEC NA VEC NA VEC NA Hampton Roads 1,662,480 1,652,080 1,977,027 2,0,7 18.9% 24.7% 0.7% 0.9% Accomack-Northampton 54,235 52,550 61,636 56,093.6% 6.7% 0.5% 0.3% Statewide Totals 8,010,340 8,057,350 10,278,943 10,926,1 28.3% 35.6% 1.0% 1.2% Source: Virginia Transportation Research Council As seen in the table and in the graphics, the increases in population between 2010 and 2035 in the Hampton Roads region are expected to be fairly large, while the growth along the Eastern Shore is expected to be smaller, though not unsubstantial. However, the total population increase along the Eastern Shore is only expected to be a few thousand residents over the twenty-five year time span, so considering it is currently a sparsely populated, mostly rural area, it will continue to be so into the future with no substantial development expected. According to the VTRC Trends Report, between 76 and percent of the total population increase in Virginia will take place in four lanning Districts (Northern Virginia, Richmond Regional, Hampton Roads, and the George Washington Regional Commission). Most of the increase in population, and therefore traffic, will happen in the Hampton Roads region, where U.S. acts as one of many local arterials. The transportation infrastructure along U.S. in Hampton Roads will need to keep up with the expected increase in traffic. Corridor Functions 2-6

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan Legend lanningdistrictsop opulation / Square Mile OHIO X010OS MARYLAND 0-40 36.145-40.00000 40-75 - 75.00000 40.00001 50 75.00001 75-100 - 100.00000 37 100.00001 100-250 - 250.00000 55 250.00001 250-500 - 500.00000 WASHINGTON D.C. 50 66 55 66 50 55 500.00001-3000.00000 500 + 66 95 Corridor Highlight 50 1 DELAWARE 1 WEST VIRGINIA 250 301 250 Chesapeake Bay 95 252 250 250 1 250 301 95 252 250 301 250 \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-opulation-maps-statewide.indd p 4 KENTUCKY 1 4 4 4 4 52 4 4 4 77 52 95 1 77 52 4 4 301 4 1 95 301 NORTH CAROLINA 0 15 30 Miles FIGURE 6 opulation Density 2010 rojections - Eastern Shore Corridor

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan Legend lanningdistrictsop opulation / Square Mile OHIO X010OS MARYLAND 0-40 36.145-40.00000 40-75 - 75.00000 40.00001 50 75.00001 75-100 - 100.00000 37 100.00001 100-250 - 250.00000 55 250.00001 250-500 - 500.00000 55 500.00001-3000.00000 500 + 37.3% opulation Increase 66 95 1 DELAWARE 1 250 50 43.8% WEST VIRGINIA 66 50 55 Corridor Highlight X.X% WASHINGTON D.C. 54.8% 50 66 301 250 Chesapeake Bay 95 18.9% 252 250 250 38.2% 95 250 7.9% \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-opulation-maps-statewide.indd p14 4 3.2% 4 4 19.9% 4 77 95 1 52 24.7% 5.1% 52 4 77 7.6%.5% 301 4 5.3% 4 1 4 4.2% 6.7%.6% 4 52 35.9% 301 250 KENTUCKY 41.1% 21.9% 301 250 252 79.5% 1 1 1.0% 4 95 301 NORTH CAROLINA 0 15 30 Miles FIGURE 7 opulation Density 2035 rojections -Eastern Shore Corridor

2.3.2 Levels of Service Figure 8 shows the existing levels of service (LOS) along the Eastern Shore Corridor, with red areas indicating undesirable levels of service (i.e., LOS E or LOS F ). All areas not marked in red are where acceptable levels of service (i.e., LOS A through LOS D ) currently exist. Under existing conditions, the levels of service are acceptable along all areas of the corridor in Virginia except along three separate small stretches in the Hampton Roads region. The levels of service along the Eastern Shore of Virginia are all at acceptable levels. Figure 9 shows the future levels of service along the Eastern Shore Corridor, with the same color coding. As seen in these figures, levels of service in the Hampton Roads region will degrade somewhat as larger portions of the roadway are expected to operate at undesirable levels of service, including large sections through the City of Virginia Beach and the City of ortsmouth and a small stretch in the City of Suffolk. However, all sections of roadway along the Eastern Shore are expected to operate at acceptable and desirable levels of service in the future. The future levels of service take into account projects along the roadway that are planned by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Even with planned expansions of the roadway and other programmed improvements, the highway facilities of the corridor are expected to significantly degrade by 2035. To combat this, localities, DCs, and MOs should identify the worst areas and plan for improvements to these areas. Corridor Functions 2-9

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan W E S T V Key I R GLocation I N I A Map Legend Over Capacity County Line US MO Area VIRGINIA lanning District LANCASTER ACCOMACK MIDDLESEX MATHEWS GLOUCESTER NORTHAMTON WILLIAMSBURG YORK OQUOSON NEWORT NEWS SURRY HAMTON TOWN OF SMITHFIELD ISLE OF WIGHT \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-multimodal-corridor-study-maps-ortrait.indd p1 ORTSMOUTH Bypass Holland Road Magnolia HAMTON ROADS MO SUFFOLK Reon Road Sam s Club Greenbrier Mall Silverleaf Station VIRGINIA BEACH CHESAEAKE NORTH CAROLINA 0 4 8 Miles FIGURE 8 Eastern Shore Corridor Existing Conditions

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan W E S T V Key I R GLocation I N I A Map Legend Over Capacity County Line US MO Area VIRGINIA lanning District LANCASTER ACCOMACK MIDDLESEX MATHEWS GLOUCESTER NORTHAMTON WILLIAMSBURG YORK OQUOSON NEWORT NEWS SURRY HAMTON TOWN OF SMITHFIELD ISLE OF WIGHT \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-multimodal-corridor-study-maps-ortrait.indd p2 ORTSMOUTH Bypass Holland Road Magnolia HAMTON ROADS MO SUFFOLK Reon Road Sam s Club Greenbrier Mall Silverleaf Station VIRGINIA BEACH CHESAEAKE NORTH CAROLINA 0 4 8 Miles FIGURE 9 Eastern Shore Corridor Future Conditions

2.3.3 High-Crash Rate Areas Figure 10 illustrates areas along U.S. that have been identified as high-crash rate areas, according to the Virginia Department of Transportation. As seen in the figure, there are multiple high-crash rate areas along the Eastern Shore, through both Northampton County and Accomack County. This area has been identified as a safety concern by these jurisdictions as well. These areas should be further identified and studied to determine how to alleviate these problems. Access management issues, multiple driveways, multiple crossovers, and lack of turn-lanes have been offered by the two counties as possible reasons for high-crash rates along the Eastern Shore. In the Hampton Roads region, the only high-crash rate areas along the Eastern Shore Corridor occur at the junction point with Interstate. 2.4 Access to Assateague, Chincoteague, Tourist Areas, and NASA Wallops Island U.S. Highway provides access to the beaches along the Eastern Shore as well as to resort areas such Chincoteague, and Assateague. It also provides access to the Maryland and Delaware shore to the north where numerous beach resorts are located. In addition, NASA s Wallops Island facility, which is used primarily as a rocket launch site to support science and exploration missions for NASA and other federal agencies, is also located on the Eastern Shore, just south of Chincoteague. Also located in this vicinity is the Virginia Space ort. Figure illustrates the locations of these facilities, as well as U.S., to show their proximity to U.S. and to show that U.S. is the only major highway that provides access to these areas. Figure also illustrates other tourist facilities with access to the Eastern Shore Corridor in the Hampton Roads region. Corridor Functions 2-12

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan Legend W E S T V Key I R GLocation I N I A Map US Railroad High Crash Location US County Line VIRGINIA MO Area lanning District LANCASTER ACCOMACK MIDDLESEX MATHEWS GLOUCESTER WILLIAMSBURG YORK OQUOSON NEWORT SURRY NORTHAMTON NEWS HAMTON TOWN OF SMITHFIELD ISLE OF WIGHT ORTSMOUTH \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-military-installations-ortrait.indd p3 VIRGINIA BEACH HAMTON ROADS MO SUFFOLK CHESAEAKE NORTH CAROLINA 0 4 8 Miles FIGURE 10 Eastern Shore Corridor High-Crash Rate Locations Map

Virginia Statewide Multimodal Transportation lan Tourist Legend Legend W E S T V I R G Key I N ILocation A Map Janes Island State ark Chincoteague Island National ark or Forest NASA Wallops Flight Facility State ark or Forest Local ark or Recreational Area Assoteague Island National ark US VIRGINIA National Forests (Reg-Local) ocomoke Sound Airport Area Educational Institution LANCASTER Golf Course Legend ACCOMACK US Cemetery Railroad Military Installation County Line Stadium or Arena MO Area Federal or State rison lanning District Chesapeake Bay Accomack County Airport Amusement Center Government Center MIDDLESEX MATHEWS GLOUCESTER WILLIAMSBURG NORTHAMTON Yorktown Naval Weapons Station YORK Colonial National Historic ark Kiptopeke State ark Newport News ark Eastern Shore National Wildlife Reserve OQUOSON Newport News/ Williamsburg Internaional Airport NEWORT NEWS SURRY Langley Air Force Base HAMTON Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base TOWN OF SMITHFIELD Norfolk Botanical Gardens Norfolk Naval Air Station ISLE OF WIGHT Hampton Roads Airport Fort Story Norfolk International Airport ORTSMOUTH First Landing State ark Oceana Naval Air Station VIRGINIA BEACH \\vavna\projects\37975.00\graphics\figures\37975.00-tourist-areas-ortrait.indd p3 HAMTON ROADS MO SUFFOLK CHESAEAKE Suffolk Municipal Airport Dismal Swamp State Natural Area NORTH CAROLINA 0 4 8 Miles FIGURE Eastern Shore Corridor Tourist Areas Map

3 Corridor Strategies This section discusses the corridor strategies for the Eastern Shore Corridor. They have been formulated to improve safety, mobility, and capacity along the Eastern Shore Corridor. The functions of the corridor are listed below, and Figure 12 presents a matrix that shows how the strategies relate to each corridor function. Functions of the Eastern Shore Corridor Link between Hampton Roads and Eastern Shore for both passengers and freight Main street through Eastern Shore Access to beaches, Chincoteague, Assateague, NASA Wallops Island Strategies were formulated based on trends, system performance, issues/challenges, elements of the VDOT Six-Year rogram, the Constrained Long-Range lans for each Metropolitan lanning Organization, visions and plans for the various lanning Districts, and any available Comprehensive lan visions and strategies for each county and jurisdiction within each corridor. A Regional lanning Forum was held in the spring of 2009 with transportation representatives from across Virginia, including VDOT, lanning Districts and MOs, transit agencies, the Virginia Airport Authority, the ort of Virginia, and other stakeholders in the Virginia transportation system. ublic meetings were held in four locations in June and July of 2009 (Northern Virginia, Richmond, Hampton Roads, and Roanoke). Corridor deficiencies and what could be done to alleviate these deficiencies were discussed, with this information playing a major role in the formulation of these strategies. These strategies are part of a continuing planning process and are designed to be used as a guide for future transportation plans along the corridor within Virginia. They are not the explicit policy of the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB), though they are designed to assist the CTB, state and local transportation agencies, and local planning organizations in their planning efforts along the corridor. Specific corridor strategies and improvement recommendations will ultimately be developed as part of subsequent planning analyses at the State and local level. Corridor Strategies 3-1

Figure 12 Eastern Shore Corridor Strategies vs. Functions Matrix Functions Strategies Link between Hampton Roads and Eastern Shore Main Street through Eastern Shore Access to Beaches/Tourist Areas/NASA Wallops Island Improve safety and mobility along U.S. throughout the Eastern Shore. Improve safety and mobility along the Eastern Shore Corridor through land use planning by discouraging development directly along the corridor, especially strip development. Ensure continued freight movement across the Chesapeake Bay along the corridor through investment in the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge and encouraging other barge transport of freight along the corridor. Strong Correlation Medium Correlation Some Correlation

3.1 Strategies for Eastern Shore Corridor Strategy: Improve safety and mobility along U.S. throughout the Eastern Shore through better access management. Accomack County and Northampton County, both located along the Eastern Shore of Virginia and along the northern portion of U.S. through the Commonwealth, have identified poor existing access management conditions as a major issue. U.S. is the main corridor through these counties and the Eastern Shore, and as more development takes place, the corridor loses through capacity. The Regional lanning Forum has identified this as a major deficiency and called for better access management through the Eastern Shore. The counties call for consolidation of driveways, reduction in the number of median breaks, making spot improvements at high-crash areas and other deficient areas, and the possibility of local access roads in denser communities. This would improve not only capacity but safety along the Eastern Shore Corridor and allow for better access to the tourist areas. Strategy: Improve safety and mobility along U.S. through land use planning by discouraging development directly along the corridor, especially strip development. As the Eastern Shore Corridor on the Eastern Shore becomes more developed, there is a call by both counties to discourage strip development or even discourage development altogether directly along the corridor. Discouraging strip development and encouraging more clustered commercial and industrial development is important to avoid future access management issues, such as multiple driveways and median crossovers along the roadway. As this is the only major north-south corridor through this region of Virginia, this roadway needs to remain viable for through traffic and for tourist traffic. Safety should not be compromised along U.S., and capacity should be compromised as little as possible to keep traffic moving. Strategy: Ensure continued freight movement across the Chesapeake Bay through investment in the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge and encouraging other barge transport of freight. Currently, the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge moves freight to and from the ort of Virginia via barge across the Chesapeake Bay and transferring to rail on either end. This practice should continue, and increased use of barge transport should be considered. This corridor is the shortest route from the ort of Virginia to New York and other northern destination points. Considering U.S. operates as a local access road as well as a through corridor along the Eastern Shore and considering that the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, the highway connection between Hampton Roads and the Eastern Shore is only currently constructed as a two-lane facility, a minimum number of trucks should be using the highway facilities. The Regional lanning Forum identified the need for more barge transport of freight along this corridor, and while it currently takes place, it needs to continue into the future and increase if market forces allow. In addition, continued barge transport from the ort of Virginia to Baltimore, MD and other points, such as the ort of Richmond and the ort of Alexandria should continue into the future. Corridor Strategies 3-3

3.2 Strategies vs. VTrans2035 Goals The above strategies relate to the seven goals of VTrans2035, and Figure illustrates this relationship. A discussion of each of the goals is below. Goal 1: Safety and Security rovide a safe and secure transportation system. One strategy relates directly to improving safety throughout the Eastern Shore through better access management. In addition, another relates to future development and access management along the Eastern Shore, which takes safety into account. All of the strategies lead to an increase in capacity, including transporting more freight by barge, as this will remove some trucks from the roadway and the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel. Goal 2: System Maintenance and reservation reserve and maintain the condition of the existing transportation system. All of the strategies help to achieve this goal, as the existing transportation system is maintained and preserved, and in many cases, improved. It is important that the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel, a historic engineering marvel in Virginia be maintained and preserved. In addition, barge transport via the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge should be maintained and even expanded. A shift of freight from truck to barge could also reduce road maintenance costs by reducing truck travel. Goal 3: Mobility, Connectivity, and Accessibility Facilitate the easy movement of people and goods, improve interconnectivity of regions and activity centers, and provide access to different modes of transportation. All of the strategies promote increased mobility, connectivity, and accessibility. All strategies increase the capacity and therefore, the mobility, connectivity, and accessibility along the roadway in some way, whether through better access management or by expansion of rail and barge transport. Goal 4: Environmental Stewardship rotect the environment and improve the quality of life for Virginians. An increase in safety and mobility will help to achieve environmental stewardship, as vehicles travel times should decrease, which should lead to decreased emissions. In addition, movement of freight by barge helps to minimize the number of trucks and reduce emissions. Goal 5: Economic Vitality rovide a transportation system that supports economic prosperity. Increasing barge transport of freight should lead to more economic prosperity on the Eastern Shore. Encouraging smarter development along the Eastern Shore by reducing strip development in favor of clustered development is economically sound. Goal 6: Coordination of Transportation and Land Use Facilitate the effective coordination of transportation and land use to promote livable communities. Improving safety and mobility along the Eastern Shore goes hand-in-hand with better land use decisions, including discouragement of strip development along the roadway. In addition, local planning efforts should protect airspace and ensure that airports are not compromised by encroachment of incompatible land uses. Corridor Strategies 3-4

Figure Eastern Shore Corridor Strategies vs. Goals Matrix Goals Strategies Safety and Security System Maintenance and reservation Mobility, Connectivity, and Accessibility Environmental Stewardship Economic Vitality Coordination of Transportation and Land Use Improve safety and mobility along U.S. throughout the Eastern Shore. Improve safety and mobility along the Eastern Shore Corridor through land use planning by discouraging development directly along the corridor, especially strip development. Ensure continued freight movement across the Chesapeake Bay along the corridor through investment in the Bay Coast Railroad and Barge and encouraging other barge transport of freight along the corridor. Strong Correlation Medium Correlation Some Correlation