City of White Plains Westchester County, NY. Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Similar documents
Hamilton Green. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)

PROJECT DESCRIPTION...

WAL-MART EXPANSION STORE NO , WARSAW, NY

52 North Broadway DEIS Scoping Outline

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND DRAFT SECTION

San Ramon City Center Draft Subsequent EIR

STAFF REPORT. Planning Commission. Anjanette Simon, Associate Planner

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7047) City Council Staff Report

Medical Oriented District (MOD) Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DGEIS)

VOLUME 1 Foreword...F-1 Executive Summary... S-1

Traffic Impact Study Requirements

California State University Stanislaus Physical Master Plan Update. Program Environmental Impact Report

City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft EIS

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR WOODLAND RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PARK SPECIFIC PLAN FOCUS OF INPUT NOP RESPONSES

5.0 ALTERNATIVE VARIATIONS

LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD EXPANSION PROJECT FROM FLORAL PARK TO HICKSVILLE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Capital Facilities Element

TABLE OF CONTENTS Watson Ranch Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report

SECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Section 2.0 Introduction and Purpose

A. INTRODUCTION. NO ACTION Alternative 1: No Action (Future Without the Proposed Action)

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

Table of Contents. Green Line Extension Project. Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation

DRAFT SCOPE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Green Line extension Project Fall 2009

City of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Feasibility Study: Reuse of the Former White Plains Linen Complex. City of Peekskill, NY. Stakeholder Workshop #1

Appendix G Analysis of Project Impacts Compared to Existing Conditions

Mobility Management STAFF SUMMARY REPORT

Table of Contents. City of Redlands - Redlands Crossing Center

Downtown Estes Loop Project Frequently Asked Questions

H. LAND USE City of Los Angeles L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide 2006

August 3, The proposed action thus includes Site Plan approval for the Fire Department and Amended Site Plan approval for the Ambulance Corps.

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Facebook Campus Project. City Council Study Session January 31, 2012

Final Environmental Impact Statement

900 King Street Redevelopment DRAFT DEIS Scoping Outline

5 CEQA Required Conclusions

Wyandanch Intermodal Transit Facility

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Volume 1. NBC Universal Evolution Plan ENV EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO Council District 4

COMMERCIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STUDY VOLUME III CONVERTED MARINE TRANSFER STATIONS - Commercial Waste Processing and Analysis of Potential Impacts

1.0 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT EIR 1-1

Final Environmental Impact Report San Marcos General Plan

1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENDED USES OF THIS DRAFT EIR

CITY OF TEHACHAPI GENERAL PLAN Draft Environmental Impact Report

SECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project

Special Use Permit Application Martin Street Property

Page EIR COVER I. Executive Summary I-1

County of El Dorado. El Dorado Hills Apartments Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. SCH No Prepared For: Prepared by:

SECTION 5: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

LEAD AGENCY S FINDINGS STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO ADOPTION OF

BCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Northeast Interstate Logistics Center

Amador County General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report

2. Introduction. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code Section et seq.)

Pacific Wind Energy Project Draft Environmental Impact Report

LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD EXPANSION PROJECT FROM FLORAL PARK TO HICKSVILLE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis

OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Town of Queen Creek

A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS B. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 275

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX Mixed Use District the following uses are permitted:

SECTION 9.0 Effects Found Not To Be Significant

Corridor Planning Standards + Potential Performance Measures

City of Bishop. Environmental Checklist Form

LOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

Draft Environmental Impact City of Daly City General Plan Update. Sacramento, California, May

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

wheaton s future Wheaton s Role in the County

CITY OF LOS ANGELES SAN PEDRO COMMUNITY PLAN

Transportation Impact Fees (TIF)

TABLE OF CONTENTS ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

11 Joint Development Regulatory Context and Methodology

LOWE S HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Cypress Waters TIF District Final Plan and Phase I Development Agreement

Woodlake General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report

5. OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

TOWN OF MOORESVILLE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL TOWN OF MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

2017 Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Transportation Plan. Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume

City of Malibu. Whole Foods and the Park Shopping Center Draft Environmental Impact Report Volume I. Prepared For: Prepared by:

STATUS REPORT ON THE UPDATE TO THE NORTH SAN JOSE AREA DEVELOPMENT POLICY

S-09: Auburn Station Access Improvements

Article 16 Traffic Impact Analysis

Introduction. Comprehensive Plan

6. Cumulative Impacts

Inglewood Oil Field Specific Plan Project Draft Environmental Impact Report

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

3.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Elements of an Effective Local Comprehensive Plan

SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT SCOPE. City of New Rochelle, New York

VALLECITOS WATER DISTRICT

Therefore, each of the alternatives to the Specific Plan addressed in this EIR were selected based on the following factors:

Transcription:

60 South Broadway Rezoning Project City of White Plains Westchester County, NY Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement July 2, 2014

60 SOUTH BROADWAY CB-3 REZONING AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DGEIS) Submitted: May 21, 2014 Accepted: July 7, 2014

Cover Sheet DRAFT GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DGEIS) 60 SOUTH BROADWAY CB-3 REZONING AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS 60 South Broadway City of White Plains, Westchester County, New York 10601 Lead Agency: City of White Plains Common Council City of White Plains 255 Main Street White Plains, NY 10601 Contact: Hon. Thomas M. Roach, Mayor (914) 422-1411 Applicant: Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. 321 Railroad Avenue Greenwich, CT 06830 Contact: John Cannon (203) 863-8200 Prepared by: See following page Date DGIES Submitted: May 21, 2014 Date DGEIS Accepted: July 7, 2014 Date of Public Hearing: August 4, 2014 Closing Date of Comment Period: August 15, 2014

Cover Sheet LIST OF PREPARERS Planner BFJ Planning 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 (212) 353-7474 Contacts: Frank S. Fish, FAICP, Principal Sarah K. Yackel, AICP, Associate Principal Michael Keane, AICP, Senior Planner Isabel Aguirre-Martinez, Planner Georges Jacquemart, PE, AICP, Principal Alireza Rabiee, Senior Transportation Planner Lauren Rennée, Planner Legal Counsel Cuddy & Feder LLP 445 Hamilton Avenue, Fourteenth Floor White Plains, New York 10601 (914) 761-1300 Contact: William S. Null, Esq. Architect Perkins Eastman 422 Summer Street Stamford, CT 06901 (203) 251-7400 Contact: Stuart Lachs, Principal Socioeconomic Consultant Urbanomics 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 (212) 353-7462 Contact: Tina Lund, AICP, Senior Associate Civil Engineer The Chazen Companies 21 Fox Street Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 (845) 454-3980 Contact: Chris Lapine

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1-1 1.1 Introduction... 1-1 1.2 Proposed Action... 1-3 1.3 Alternatives... 1-9 1.4 Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures... 1-9 1.5 Involved and Interested Agencies... 1-27 1.6 Required Reviews and Approvals... 1-27 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION...2-1 2.1 Project Purpose, Needs, and Benefits... 2-1 2.2 Project Location... 2-2 2.3 Existing Zoning and Land Use... 2-2 2.4 Description of the Proposed Action... 2-7 2.5 DGEIS Analysis Framework... 2-12 2.5.1 Maximum Worst-Case Development Scenarios... 2-13 2.6 Future Site-Specific Action... 2-16 2.7 Involved and Interested Agencies... 2-16 2.8 Required Review and Approvals... 2-17 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES...3-0 3.1 Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy...3.1-1 3.1.1 Existing Conditions... 3.1-1 3.1.1.1 Land Use... 3.1-1 3.1.1.2 Zoning... 3.1-6 3.1.1.3 Existing Public Policy and Planning Context... 3.1-11 3.1.2 The Future Without the Proposed Action... 3.1-14 3.1.3 The Future With the Proposed Action... 3.1-15 3.3.1.1 Land Use... 3.1-15 3.3.1.2 Zoning... 3.1-21 3.3.1.3 Impacts on Public Policy... 3.1-28 3.1.4 Mitigation Measures... 3.1-30 3.2 Visual and Community Character...3.2-1 3.2.1 Existing Conditions... 3.2-1 3.2.2 The Future Without the Proposed Action... 3.2-10 3.2.3 The Future With the Proposed Action... 3.2-11 3.2.4 Mitigation Measures... 3.2-17 3.3 Transportation and Parking...3.3-1 3.3.1 Existing Conditions... 3.3-1 3.3.1.1 Study Area... 3.3-1 3.3.1.2 Existing Traffic Volumes... 3.3-2 3.3.1.3 Intersection Level of Service Definitions... 3.3-7 3.3.1.4 Existing Traffic Conditions Scenario A: Existing Building/Partial Occupancy.. 3.3-8 3.3.1.5 Existing Traffic Conditions Scenario B: Westchester Pavilion Fully Occupied 3.3-11 3.3.1.6 Parking... 3.3-19 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS i

3.3.1.7 Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure... 3.3-19 3.3.1.8 Transit... 3.3-23 3.3.2 Future Conditions Without Action... 3.3-23 3.3.2.1 Vehicular Traffic... 3.3-23 3.3.2.2 Parking... 3.3-31 3.3.2.3 Transit, Pedestrians and Bicycle Infrastructure... 3.3-31 3.3.3 Future Conditions With Action... 3.3-32 3.3.3.1 Vehicular Traffic... 3.3-32 3.3.2.2 Parking... 3.3-55 3.3.2.3 Transit, Pedestrians and Bicycle Infrastructure... 3.3-55 3.3.2.4 Mitigation Measures... 3.3-55 3.4 Air Quality...3.4-1 3.4.1 Existing Conditions... 3.4-1 3.4.2 Potential Impacts... 3.4-3 3.4.3 Mitigation Measures... 3.4-7 3.5 Noise...3.5-1 3.5.1 Existing Conditions... 3.5-1 3.5.2 Potential Impacts... 3.5-8 3.5.3 Mitigation Measures... 3.5-9 3.6. Socioeconomic and Fiscal Conditions...3.6-1 3.6.1 Existing Conditions... 3.6-3 3.6.2 The Future Without the Proposed Action... 3.6-20 3.6.3 The Future With the Proposed Action... 3.6-24 3.6.4 Mitigation Measures... 3.6-35 3.7 Community Facilities and Services...3.7-1 3.7.1 Existing Conditions... 3.7-1 3.7.2 The Future Without the Proposed Action... 3.7-15 3.7.3 The Future With the Proposed Action... 3.7-17 3.7.4 Mitigation Measures... 3.7-26 3.8 Public Infrastructure, Sanitation Services and Utilities...3.8-1 3.8.1 Water Supply... 3.8-1 3.8.1.1 Existing Municipal Water System Capacity... 3.8-1 3.8.1.2 Existing Water Consumption... 3.8-1 3.8.1.3 On-site Infrastructure and Connections to Public Water Mains... 3.8-2 3.8.1.4 Projected Water Demand... 3.8-3 3.8.1.5 Existing Water Pressures and Flows... 3.8-4 3.8.1.6 Preliminary Hydraulic Analysis... 3.8-4 3.8.1.7 Preliminary Fire Flow Analysis... 3.8-4 3.8.1.8 Analysis of Municipal System... 3.8-6 3.8.2 Sanitary Sewer... 3.8-6 3.8.2.1 Capacity Receiving Wastewater Treatment System Capacity and Existing Sanitary Sewer Conveyance System... 3.8-6 3.8.2.2 Proposed On-site Infrastructure and Connections to Public Sewer System... 3.8-8 3.8.2.3 Existing Wastewater Flows... 3.8-9 3.8.2.4 Projected Waste Water Demand for Wastewater Flows... 3.8-9 3.8.2.5 Recommended Sanitary Sewer System Improvements... 3.8-10 3.8.3 Solid Waste... 3.8-11 3.8.3.1 Existing Conditions... 3.8-11 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS ii

3.8.3.2 Potential Impacts... 3.8-13 3.3.3.3 Solid Waste and Recycled Material... 3.8-16 3.3.3.4 Capacity to Serve the Project... 3.8-17 3.8.3.5 Mitigation Measures... 3.8-17 3.9 Stormwater Management...3.9-1 3.9.1 Analysis... 3.9-1 3.9.1.1 Methodology... 3.9-1 3.9.1.2 Description of Design Points... 3.9-1 3.9.1.3 Rainfall Data... 3.9-1 3.9.2 Hydrologic Characteristics... 3.9-2 3.9.2.1 Pre-Development Hydrologic Characteristics... 3.9-2 3.9.2.2 Post-Development Hydrologic Characteristics... 3.9-3 3.9.2.3 Groundwater... 3.9-3 3.9.3 Performance Summary... 3.9-3 3.9.4 Stormwater Management Planning for Redevelopment Projects... 3.9-4 3.9.4.1 Water Quality Treatment Objective For Redevelopments... 3.9-4 3.9.4.2 Water Quality Treatment Volume (WQv)... 3.9-6 3.9.5 Potential Stormwater Management Measures... 3.9-7 3.9.5.1 Peak Rate Control Measures... 3.9-7 3.9.5.2 Qualitative Control Measures... 3.9-7 3.9.6 Stormwater Treatment Practices Feasibility... 3.9-10 3.9.7 Mitigation Measures... 3.9-11 3.9.8 Future Site Plan Development... 3.9-11 3.10 Neighborhood Character...3.10-1 3.10.1 Urban Design and Visual Character... 3.10-1 3.10.2 Land Use... 3.10-5 3.10.3 Socioeconomic Conditions... 3.10-9 3.10.4 Transportation... 3.10-11 3.10.5 Noise... 3.10-15 3.10.6 Conclusion... 3.10-17 4.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...4-1 4.1 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts... 4-1 4.2 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources... 4-1 4.3 Growth-Inducing, Cumulative and Secondary Impacts... 4-2 4.4 Short-Term and Long-Term Impacts, Cumulative Impacts and Other Associated Impacts... 4-3 4.5 Effects on the Use and Conservation of Energy... 4-4 5.0 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES...5-1 5.1 Alternative 1: No-Action Alternative...5-1 5.1.1 Land Use, Public Policy and Zoning... 5-4 5.1.2 Urban Design and Visual Character... 5-6 5.1.3 Transportation and Parking... 5-6 5.1.4 Air Quality... 5-7 5.1.5 Noise... 5-7 5.1.6 Socioeconomic and Fiscal Conditions... 5-7 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS iii

5.1.7 Community Facilities and Services... 5-11 5.1.8 Public Infrastructure, Sanitation Services, and Utilities... 5-13 5.1.9 Stormwater... 5-13 5.1.10 Neighborhood Character... 5-14 5.2 Alternative 2: Build-Out Under Current B-6 Zoning...5-14 5.2.1 Land Use, Public Policy and Zoning... 5-14 5.2.2 Urban Design and Visual Character... 5-14 5.2.3 Transportation and Parking... 5-15 5.2.4 Air Quality... 5-15 5.2.5 Noise... 5-16 5.2.6 Socioeconomic and Fiscal Conditions... 5-16 5.2.7 Community Facilities and Services... 5-17 5.2.8 Public Infrastructure, Sanitation Services, and Utilities... 5-20 5.2.9 Stormwater... 5-20 5.2.10 Neighborhood Character... 5-21 6.0 FUTURE ACTIONS...6-1 LIST OF APPENDICES (Under Separate Cover) Appendix A: Adopted DGEIS Scope Appendix B: Traffic and Parking Appendix C: Community Facilities Correspondence Appendix D: Water Supply Appendix E: Sanitary Sewer Appendix F: Sanitation Services Correspondence Appendix G: Stormwater Management Attached CD includes PDF copies of DGEIS Chapters and Appendices 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS iv

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Regional Location Figure 1-2: Site Location Map Figure 1-3: Existing Zoning Map Figure 1-4: Proposed Zoning Map Figure 2-1: Regional Location Figure 2-2: Site Location Map Figure 2-3: Existing Zoning Map Figure 2-4: Proposed Zoning Map Figure 3.1-1: Existing Land Use Figure 3.1-2: Existing Zoning Map Figure 3.1-3: Proposed Rezoning Map Figure 3.2-1: Study Area with Neighborhood Subareas Figure 3.2-2: Existing Conditions: Neighborhood Subareas Figure 3.2-3: Building Heights (Number of Stories) Figure 3.2-4: Viewshed Key Map Figure 3.2-5: Existing Views Figure 3.2-6: Existing and Potential Viewshed Figure 3.2-7: Potential Worst-Case Build-Out CB-3 Mixed Use Development Scenario Option 1 Figure 3.2-8: Potential Worst-Case Build-Out CB-3 Mixed Use Development Scenario Option 2 Figure 3.2-9: Shadow Diagrams Option 1 Figure 3.2-10: Shadow Diagrams Option 2 Figure 3.3-1: Study Area Figure 3.3-2: Existing Conditions Scenario A (Existing Building/35% Occupancy) Traffic Volumes (November 2012/September 2013) AM Peak Hour (8AM-9AM) Figure 3.3-3: Existing Conditions Scenario A (Existing Building/35% Occupancy) Traffic Volumes (November 2012/September 2013) PM Peak Hour (5PM-6PM) Figure 3.3-4: Existing Conditions Scenario A (Existing Building/35% Occupancy) Traffic Volumes (November 2012/September 2013) Saturday Mid-Day Peak Hour (2PM-3PM) Figure 3.3-5: Commercial Drip Distribution Figure 3.3-6: Existing Conditions Scenario B (Westside Pavilion Fully Occupied) Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour (8AM-9AM) Figure 3.3-7: Existing Conditions Scenario B (Westside Pavilion Fully Occupied) Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour (5PM-6PM) Figure 3.3-8: Existing Conditions Scenario B (Westside Pavilion Fully Occupied) Traffic Volumes Saturday Peak Hour (2PM-3PM) Figure 3.3-9: Pedestrian Facilities within a Quarter-Mile from Project Site Figure 3.3-10: Existing Pedestrian Volumes (November 2012) Figure 3.3-11: Bus Routes and Bus Stops/Shelters within a Quarter-Mile from the Project Site Figure 3.3-12: Future No-Action Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour Figure 3.3-13: Future No-Action Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour Figure 3.3-14: Future No-Action Traffic Volumes Saturday Mid-Day Peak Hour Figure 3.3.15: Residential Trip Distribution Figure 3.3.16: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Mixed-Use Build-Out AM Peak Hour Figure 3.3.17: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Mixed-Use Build-Out PM Peak Hour 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS v

Figure 3.3.18: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Mixed-Use Build-Out Saturday Mid-Day Peak Hour Figure 3.3.19: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Residential Build-Out AM Peak Hour Figure 3.3.20: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Residential Build-Out PM Peak Hour Figure 3.3.21: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Residential Build-Out Saturday Mid-Day Peak Hour Figure 3.3.22: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Commercial Build-Out AM Peak Hour Figure 3.3.23: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Commercial Build-Out PM Peak Hour Figure 3.3.24: Future Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Action: Maximum Commercial Build-Out Saturday Mid-Day Peak Hour Figure 3.6-1: Primary Market Area and Study Area Figure 3.6-2: Land Uses within ¼-Mile Figure 3.6-3: Residential and Mixed-Uses within ¼-Mile Figure 3.6-4: White Plains Area Accommodations Figure 3.7-1: White Plains Emergency Services Map Figure 3.7-2: White Plains Area Open Space LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Zoning Comparison of Future No Action Scenario versus Future With Action Scenario Table 1-2: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures Table 2-1: Westchester Pavilion Mall Occupancy Table 2-2: Bulk Standards Comparison between B-6 and CB-3 Table 2-3: Comparison of Permitted Uses in the B-6 and CB-3 Zoning Districts Table 2-4: Zoning Comparison of Future No Action Scenario versus Future With Action Scenario Table 3.1-1: Existing Generalized Land Use in the Study Area Table 3.1-2: Dimension Regulations in the B-6 District Table 3.1-3: Dimensional Regulations for Districts Mapped Within Study Area Table 3.1-4: Comparison of Permitted Uses in the B-6 and CB-3 Zoning Districts Table 3.1-5: Maximum Worst-Case Development Scenarios Under Proposed CB-3 District Land Use Table 3.1-6: Zoning Comparisons between B-6 and CB-3 Table 3.1-6a: Impact of Proposed CB-3 Rezoning on Uses Table 3.1-7: Maximum Worst-Case Development Scenarios Under Proposed CB-3 District Dimensional Standards and Parking Requirements Table 3.3-1: Westchester Pavilion Existing Traffic (November 2012) Table 3.3.2: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Table 3.3-3: Level of Service Criteria for Un-Signalized Intersections Table 3.3-4: Existing Traffic Conditions Table 3.3-5: Traffic Generation of Existing Westchester Pavilion Fully Occupied Table 3.3-6: Existing Traffic Conditions with Westchester Pavilion Fully Occupied Table 3.3-7: Existing Westchester Avenue Bus Stop Daily Ridership Table 3.3-8: Traffic Generation of Future No Action Scenario (B-6 Zoning) Table 3.3.9: Existing & Future No Action Scenario Traffic Conditions Table 3.3-10: Traffic Generation of Maximum Mixed-Use Scenario (CB-3 Zoning) Table 3.3-11: Future Conditions with the Proposed Action: Maximum Mixed-Use Scenario 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS vi

Table 3.3-12: Traffic Generation of Maximum Residential Scenario (CB-3 Zoning) Table 3.3-13: Future Conditions with the Proposed Action: Maximum Residential Scenario Table 3.3-14: Traffic Generation of Maximum Commercial Scenario (CB-3 Zoning) Table 3.3-15: Future Conditions with the Proposed Action: Maximum Commercial Scenario Table 3.3-16: Overall Traffic Conditions Summary for 9 Intersections Table 3.3-17: Required Parking Ratios Table 3.3-18: Future Parking Requirements with Proposed Action Table 3.3-19: LOS Improvement and Downgrade Comparison Table 3.3-20: LOS Downgrade from Existing to No-Action Scenario Table 3.3-21: No-Action Scenario with Improvements-AM Peak Hour Table 3.3-22: No-Action Scenario with Improvements-PM Peak Hour Table 3.3-23: No-Action Scenario with Improvements-Saturday Mid-Day Peak Hour Table 3.4-1: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Attainment Status for Westchester County, NY (July 2013) Table 3.4-2: Traffic Generation in Comparison to Future No-Action Traffic Volumes Table 3.5-1: Common Noise Levels and Typical Reactions Table 3.5-2: Average Ability to Perceive Changes in Noise Levels Table 3.5-3: Estimated Community Response to Increases in Noise Levels Table 3.5-4: NYSDOT EPM Noise Criteria Table 3.5-5: Traffic Generation in Comparison to Future No-Action Traffic Volumes Table 3.6-1: Population Trends Table 3.6-2: General Housing Characteristics Table 3.6-3: Household Income in the Previous 12 Months in 2000 and 2007-2011 (In Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) Table 3.6-4: Employment Trends Table 3.6-5: Existing Housing Characteristics Table 3.6-6: Housing Units by Tenure & Size Table 3.6-7: Change in the Monthly Cost of Housing in Downtown & White Plains Table 3.6-8: ESRI Retail Market Place Profile for Downtown White Plains (5 mile radius around 60 South Broadway site) Table 3.6-9: Forecast of Population & Households in White Plains Table 3.6-10: Forecast of Households in White Plains by Income Bracket (in constant $) Table 3.6-11: Forecast of Households in White Plains by Tenure & Household Size Table 3.6-12: Population & School Child Estimate for Maximum Mixed Use & Maximum Residential Development Scenarios (2016) Table 3.6-13: Permanent Employment by Project Scenario Table 3.6-14: Public Revenues Generated by the Maximum Mixed Use Development Scenario - Based on FY 2013-2014 Rates (In $000) Table 3.6-15: Public Revenues Generated by Alternative Scenarios - Based on FY 2013-2014 Rates (In $000) Table 3.6-16: Public Expenditure Requirement per Annum for the Maximum Mixed Use Development Based on FY 2013-2014 Municipal Costs and FY 2012-2013 School Costs (In $000s) Table 3.6-17: Public Expenditure Requirement per Annum for Alternative Scenarios - Based on FY2013-2014 Municipal Costs and FY 2012-2013 School Costs (In $000s) Table 3.6-18: Benefit-Cost Relationship Table 3.7-1: White Plains School District Enrollment by Grade, 2003-2012 Table 3.7-2: White Plains Uniform Crime Statistics, 1985-2012 Table 3.7-3: White Plains Police Department Crime and Total Calls per Person, 2005-2012 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS vii

Table 3.7-4: White Plains Fire Department Total Calls and Fire Calls per Person, 2005-2012 Table 3.7.a: Annual Fire Incidents Per 100 Residents: White Plains and Comparable Communities and Westchester County and New York State, 2007-2012 Table 3.7-5: White Plains Parks by Proximity to Site, Jurisdiction, Park Type and Amenities Table 3.7-6: White Plains Open Space by Proximity to Site Table 3.7-7: White Plains Open Space Ratio, Future No Action Scenario Table 3.7-8: White Plains Open Space Ratio, Maximum Residential Scenario Table 3.7-9: White Plains Open Space Ratio, Maximum Commercial Scenario Table 3.7-10: White Plains Open Space Ratio, Maximum Mixed-Use Scenario Table 3.8.1-1: Projected Domestic Demand Table 3.8.1-2: Hydrant Flow Test Results Table 3.8.2-1: Metering Site Locations Table 3.8.2-2: Existing Sanitary Sewer Conveyance System Capacity Table 3.8.2-3: Existing Westchester Pavilion Sanitary Flows Table 3.8.2-4: Projected Wastewater Flows Table 3.8.3-1: Future No Action Scenario Table 3.8.3-2: Maximum Mixed-Use Development Scenario Table 3.8.3-3: Maximum Commercial Development Scenario Table 3.8.3-4: Maximum Residential Development Scenario Table 3.8.3-5: Anticipated Total Solid Waste Generation Table 3.9-1: Rainfall Data Table 3.9-2: Summary of Pre-Development Peak Discharge Rates Table 3.9-3: Water Quality Tabulations Table 3.10-1: Required Parking Ratios Table 3.10-2: Future Parking Requirements with Proposed Action Table 3.10-3: LOS Improvement and Downgrade Comparison Table 5-1: Maximum Build-Out Comparison of Alternatives Table 5-2: Westchester Pavilion Mall Occupancy Table 5-3: Net Additional Traffic Generation Comparison between No-Action Alternative and Proposed Action Table 5-4: Permanent Employment No Action Alternative (Full Occupancy) Table 5-5: Alternative 1: No Action Alternative (Full Occupancy) Public Revenues Generated: Based on FY 2013-2014 Rates (In $000) Table 5-6: Alternative 1: No Action Alternative (Full Occupancy) Public Expenditures Requirement per Annum Based on FY2013-2014 Municipal Costs and FY2012-2013 School Costs (in $000S) Table 5-7: Alternative 1: No Action Alternative (Full Occupancy) Benefit-Cost Relationship Table 5-8: Net Additional Traffic Generation in Comparison to Alternative 2 and Proposed Action Table 5-9: Alternative 2 Permanent Employment Table 5-10: Alternative 2: Public Revenues Generated Based on FY 2013-2014 (In $000s) Table 5-11: Alternative 2: Public Expenditures Requirement per Annum Based on FY2013-2014 Municipal Costs and FY2012-2013 School Costs (in $000S) Table 5-12: Alternative 2: Benefit-Cost Relationship Table 5-13: Alternative 2 Publicly Accessible Open Space LIST OF CHARTS Chart 3.7-1: White Plains City School District Historical Enrollment and Projections Chart 3.7-2: White Plains and New York State Uniform Crime Rates, 1999-2012 Chart 3.7-3: White Plains Uniform Crime Rates and Population, 1999-2012 60 SOUTH BROADWAY REZONING DGEIS viii