How to Select the Appropriate Pavement Rehabilitation Option. David Rettner, PE American Engineering Testing, Inc.

Similar documents
Airport Pavement Rehabilitation 2015 Minnesota Airports Conference

Roadway Base Stabilization Current Practice

Pavement Rehabilitation Selection Understanding the Problem

What is it? What is Granular Base Stabilization ti (GBS)? Emulsion Full Depth Reclamation Process

Full Depth Reclamation

Full Depth Reclamation

U.S. National Overview Cold-In Place- Recycling. Laramie, Wyoming 18 th July 2013

FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION. FDR Candidates STABILIZER DESIGN. Benefits. Benefits LOCAL ROADS PROGRAM What is Full Depth Reclamation (FDR)?

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

Stephanie Drain, P.E Midwestern States Regional In-Place Recycling Conference Schaumburg, IL September 11, 2013

Cold-in-Place Recycling

Full-Depth Reclamation with Cement

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

Mix Design Issues for. In-Place Recycling Products

Pavement Rehabilitation Options in Indiana. Dave Holtz Tommy E. Nantung Lisa Egler-Kellems Indiana Department of Transportation

Design Criteria and Testing for Cold In-Place Recycling. Todd Thomas Technical Services Engineer Colas Solutions, Inc.

FULL - DEPTH RECYCLING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS WITH PORTLAND CEMENT

by Michael H. Fleming, ISMF LLC

Puerto Rico. Pavement Preservation Conference and Technology Implementation. US. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

Renae Kuehl, PE, SRF Consulting Group Dan Wegman, PE, Braun Intertec Corporation November 2, 2017

Advantages of Full Depth Recycling

Reclamation Guidelines

Rehabilitation Recommendations for FM 97 in Gonzales County

Cold In-Place Recycling with Expanded Asphalt B-335 COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING WITH EXPANDED ASPHALT OPSS 335

MATERIALS DIVISION MEMORANDUM SIGNATURE:

2014 International & Western States In-Place Recycling Conference. Denver, Colorado August 5-7, 2014

August 5, Roy D. Rissky P.E.

FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION

VDOT Pavement Recycling Initiative. Andy Babish, P.E. State Materials Engineer

ITEM 252 IN-PLACE FULL DEPTH COLD FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT RECYCLING

FULL-DEPTH RECLAMATION WITH EXPANDED ASPHALT STABILIZATION

Guide to the Investigation and Remediation of Distress in Flexible Pavements

BASE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS A Aggregate

Cold In-Place Recycling

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLED MIX

Project Selection for In-Place Recycling and CRAB. Types of Cold Recycling

COLD-IN-PLACE RECYCLING

LONG TERM PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE PROGRAM DIRECTIVE. Program Area: General Operations Directive Number: GO-09. Date: September 14, 1998 Supersedes: S-2

THE CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS OF USING RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (RAP) MATERIAL

Webinar on: Concrete Overlay Design Details and Joints. Dale S. Harrington P.E. March 5, 2015

Extraction and Sieve Analysis ( µm minus) Forming Marshall Specimens, Field Method

Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers

FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION FOR CITIES AND COUNTIES. OTEC - October 27, 2015

COLD-IN-PLACE PAVEMENT RECYCLING

Integrated Pavement Solutions

Incorporating Recycling into Pavement Design Where does it Fit?

Asphalt Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies

Application of Laboratory Asphalt Cracking Tests to Cold In-Place Recycled (CIR) Mixtures*

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLED MIX

Maine s s Experience Utilizing Full Depth Reclamation with Foamed Asphalt. NESMEA 2004 Portsmouth, NH

BOCA Project Suitability, Design and Construction

GET IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME:

Special Provision No. 399F02 January 2017 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR TEMPORARY HOT MIX PAVEMENT

Beneficial Use of Coal Combustion By-products in the Rehabilitation of Failed Asphalt Pavements

PERPETUAL PAVEMENTS. Rebecca S. McDaniel, PE, PhD Technical Director North Central Superpave Center Purdue University

Initial Evaluation of Foamed Asphalt Stabilization Using Modified Asphalt Cement

2010 Midwestern Pavement Preservation Partnership Conference

Protect Your Pavement Asset Like the Rest! Is Pavement on your Radar Screen? Parking Lots & Low Volume Facilities

Road Rehabilitation Using Foamed Asphalt

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) It s Easy to be Green

USE OF LIME-ACTIVATED CLASS F FLY ASH IN FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS

DESIGN BULLETIN #77/2013 AMENDMENTS TO PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL. Re: Updated Requirements for Agency Practice, Design Inputs and Design Report Contents

Full-Depth Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using Lime-Activated Class F Fly Ash: Structural Monitoring Aspects

Asphalt Pavement Forensics: Understanding the Problem to Better Determine the Solution

SECTION ASPHALT PAVING AND SURFACING

INDOT Thin Concrete Overlay Initiatives. Tommy E. Nantung INDOT Division of Research and Development

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING

Streets Evaluation Manual

Soil-Cement Technology for Pavements: Different Products for Different Applications

PROJECT INFORMATION EVALUATION PROCEDURES

ARRA Semi-Annual Meeting Minneapolis, MN October 16-19, 2017

Pavement Management Systems

Thinlay Asphalt for Pavement Preservation

COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING

RECONSTRUCTION OF DISTRESSED PAVEMENTS Full-Depth Rehabilitation (FDR) (Portland cement)

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Full Depth Reclamation versus Traditional Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies

Comparing 10 Year Performance of Cold In-Place Recycling (CIR) with Emulsion versus CIR with Expanded Asphalt on Highway 7, Perth, Ontario

Recycled Base Aggregates in Pavement Applications

ASPHALT MIX DESIGNER

550 Surface Treatments

2016 FDR Symposium. Sustainability of FDR and ARRA Resources. Macon, Georgia May 15-16, 2018

Effective Efficient and Elegant Pavement Widening with Full Depth Reclamation

7.1 Flexible Pavement Design. 7.2 Rigid Pavement Design TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENGINEERING 1, 61360

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT 2011

Full Depth Pavement Reclamation

Pavement Management 101 White Paper

Use of High Contents of Reclaimed Asphalt (RAP) in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Pavements

Thin Lift Overlays. Pavement Preservation 2/13/2013. Definition. A Maintenance Alternative

Performance of Thin Bituminous Treatments for Low-Volume Roads. Greg Johnson Minnesota Department of Transportation June 25, 2003

GOODHUE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

Long-Term Performance of Failed Flexible Pavements Stabilized with Cement

Andrew Hipolit, PE, PP, CME. What s New in Paving? 14 th Annual Public Works Continuing Education Conference

Annual Costs Any costs associated with the annual maintenance and repair of the facility.

Nova Scotia 2009 Pavement Preservation. Jim Chisholm Highway Construction Services

Pavement Preservation and Thin Lift Asphalt NCAUPG and Illinois Bituminous Paving Conference February 3, 2015

Pavement Preservation with Thin Lift Concrete Overlays. Dale Harrington, P.E. Representing the National Concrete Pavement Technology Center

Asphalt Pavement Recycling: US Experience. PSWNA Meeting Warsaw, Poland October 28, 2011

History, Performance and Benefits of Cold Recycling. Stephen A. Cross, Ph.D., P.E. Technical Director Asphalt Recycling & Reclaiming Assoc.

Session TH83. Using In-Place Recycling Technologies to address the needs of the Owner Agencies FHWA and ARRA Advances 2014

Transcription:

1 How to Select the Appropriate Pavement Rehabilitation Option David Rettner, PE American Engineering Testing, Inc.

2 Pavement Rehabilitation Selection Understanding the Problem

3 Pavement Assessment Pavement assessment is the first step in making good decisions. The condition of the existing pavement is assessed through: Pavement History Pavement Condition/Distress Survey Pavement Strength Evaluation Surface, Base and Subgrade Analysis Surface and Subsurface Drainage Review Others?

Pavement Assessment Pavement History 4 Historic or existing information for the pavement should be gathered and assessed, including: Original design information As-built/constructed data Quality Control/Quality Assurance construction data Pavement Management System (PMS) data Maintenance activity records

Pavement Assessment Pavement Condition/Distress Survey 5 What is a pavement condition survey? A detailed visual inspection which rates all of the surface irregularities, flaws and imperfections found in a given area A link to key insights into the causes of deterioration Project level versus network level

Pavement Assessment Pavement Condition/Distress Survey 6 Bituminous Pavement Distresses

Pavement Assessment Pavement Condition/Distress Survey 7 Concrete Pavement Distresses

Pavement Assessment Pavement Strength Evaluation 8 Evaluation of the structural capacity of an existing pavement can be determined by destructive or non-destructive methods Non-destructive testing methods include Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Proof-rolling granular surfaces only Destructive testing methods include soil borings, probe holes, test pits and coring

Pavement Assessment Pavement Strength Evaluation 9 FWD Testing Data used to calculate pavement strength, capacity and remaining life

Pavement Assessment Pavement Strength Evaluation 10 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Data Provides a picture of pavement structure Used for FWD Analysis

Pavement Assessment Pavement Strength Evaluation 11

Pavement Assessment Pavement Strength Evaluation 12 Coring Data Pavement layers (surface, base and sub-base) are measured, classified and photographed Asphalt cores are measured and analyzed for stripping/segregation Data used to calibrate GPR data

Pavement Assessment Surface, Base and Subgrade Analysis 13 Coring Determination of pavement thickness, layering, condition of each layer, bonding between layers, presence of materials related to distress and strength Soil Borings/GPR Thickness, type or classification, moisture content, contamination, strength determination

Pavement Assessment Surface and Subsurface Drainage Review Visual inspection for presence of: Curb and gutter Ditches Subsurface drainage installed Is it working? Soil borings: Base material type Subgrade material type 14

Pavement and Materials Assessment Approximate Costs 15 Coring - $1,000 to $1,500 (per project < 2 miles) Soil / pavement borings ~$1,000 (per mile) FWD w/ analysis - $1,000 to $3,000 (per project < 2 miles) Sampling & subgrade testing - $1,500 (per project < 2 miles) DCP - equipment costs $1,500 (per project < 2 miles) Costs will vary depending on many factors, especially mobilization and traffic control

16 Pavement Rehabilitation Selection Choosing Rehabilitation Techniques

Bituminous Pavement Rehabilitation Techniques 17 Overlays Bituminous Concrete Mill and Overlay Mill and Inlay Recycling Options Cold In-place Recycling Full-Depth Reclamation Pulverization Stabilization including subgrade stabilization

Overlays 18 Overlay Wearing Surface Layers Base Subbase Subgrade Fill or Natural Soil

Overlays What is an Overlay? 19 Placement of a new course of pavement on the remaining pavement structure Bituminous or Concrete Mill and Overlay/Inlay

Bituminous over Bituminous Overlays What is a BOB Overlay? 20 A new bituminous surface is paved over an existing bituminous pavement. Can be a non-structural or structural overlay: Non-structural overlay Generally used as a short-term fix Structural overlay Thicker mat that will increase pavement strength

Bituminous over Bituminous Overlays Fundamentals of BOB Overlays 21 Direct Placement or Milling Direct placement when all the following are true: Additional structure is necessary No issues with existing pavement materials No vertical limitations Mill when one or more of the following is true: Adequate structure in existing pavement Problems with existing pavement materials Vertical limitations exist

22 Bituminous over Bituminous Overlays Applications for Non-structural BOB Overlays Good Candidates include pavements with: Good subgrade, base and cross-section Adequate strength Where a short term fix is acceptable Poor Candidates include pavements with: Poor subgrade and/or base support Significant surface distresses

Bituminous over Bituminous Overlays Applications for Structural BOB Overlays Good Candidates include pavements with: Good subgrade and base, but inadequate thickness Marginal structure, but cannot be closed to traffic Poor Candidates include pavements with: Poor subgrade and/or base support that cannot be overcome with a thick overlay Frost issues 23

24 Concrete over Bituminous Overlays What is a COB Overlay? A new concrete surface is paved over an existing bituminous pavement Typically used as an unbonded overlay ( 4 ) Can be bonded or unbonded For unbonded overlays, degree of bond is not considered in design

25 Concrete over Bituminous Overlays Fundamentals of COB Overlays 1. Pavement Evaluation 2. Resurfacing Design Resurfacing Thickness Typically 6 11 inches on high volume roads Minimum of 4 inches on low volume roads Mixture Design Joint Design Drainage Design Edge support considerations

26 Concrete over Bituminous Overlays Considerations for COB Overlays Original roadway width Vertical clearance Number of culverts and bridges Drainage Materials Schedule Traffic

27 Concrete over Bituminous Overlays Applications for COB Overlays Good Candidates include pavements with: Adequate subgrade support, but inadequate pavement structure Poor Candidates include pavements with: Vertical geometry restrictions Significant frost issues Cannot be closed to traffic

28 Mill and Overlay Generally used with vertical restrictions or to correct severe surface defects Mill and overlay may increase the overall pavement height slightly i.e. Mill 3, Overlay 4

29 Mill and Inlay Also used with vertical restrictions or to correct severe surface defects Maintains the same overall pavement height i.e. Mill 3, Overlay 3 Keep existing shoulders and/or curb

Recycling FHWA - 2002 Recycled Materials Policy 30 Recycled materials should get first consideration in materials selection Recycling engineering, economic & environmental benefits Review engineering & environmental suitability Assess economic benefits Remove restrictions prohibiting use of recycled materials without technical basis

Recycling Why Recycle? 31 Improve serviceability of aged, deteriorated pavements Reduce raw material costs Level deformations & re-establish crowns Retain overhead clearances

Recycling Why Recycle (Cont)? 32 Minimize lane closure time, user delays Public acceptance of recycling Recycled pavement can be recycled itself

Recycling When to Recycle? 33 Pavement at end of its serviceable life Fatigue (alligator) cracking Oxidized Raveling of thermal cracks - potholes Low clearances under bridges

Recycling Options Bituminous 34 Mill, haul and recycle at HMA plant Cold In-place Recycle (CIR) Conventional Engineered Hot In-place Recycle (HIR) Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Pulverization Stabilization

In-place Recycling Bituminous Recycling Options 35 Cold In-Place Recycling Full Depth Reclaimation

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) 36

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) What is Cold In-place Recycling? 37 CIR is the on-site rehabilitation of asphalt pavements without the application of heat during recycling. CIR interrupts the existing crack pattern and produces a crack-free layer for the new wearing course.

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) The Train Machine Concept 38 Used when the Engineer s design requires milled material needs to be screened, be of a uniform size and fully mixed in a pugmill

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) Fundamentals of CIR 39 Analyze existing structure & conditions Understand causes for distress Correct any drainage or base problems Two options: Conventional Engineered design process

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) Fundamentals of CIR 40 Comparison of Conventional and Engineered CIR Conventional No mix design 2% Emulsion QC requirements Two gradations per day 100% passing 1-1/2 90-100% passing 1 Control strip Engineered Defined sampling protocol Engineered design Performance-related specs Early strength & long term durability

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) Fundamentals of CIR 41 Mix design Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) crushed to defined gradations Emulsion formulated Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) mixes at field moisture content Performance-related tests

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) Mix Design 42 RAP/Base Analysis Foamed Asphalt, Engineered Emulsion and Fly Ash Field cores crushed to 3 gradation bands A design made for at least 2 gradations % Passing 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Blue Earth County, MN Fine Gradation Medium Gradation Coarse Gradation No. 30 3/8 in. Sieve Sizes 1 in.

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) Environmental Benefits of CIR 43 No heat is used during the process thereby reducing the use of fossil fuels and also reducing air pollution. Since the existing aggregate and asphalt cement is reused, the need for virgin aggregate and asphalt cement are reduced or eliminated. 40% to 50% energy savings can be achieved using this process versus conventional approaches

Cold In-place Recycling (CIR) Applications for CIR 44 Good candidates include pavement with: At least 4 of hot mix Adequate base and subgrade Severe pavement distresses Poor candidates include pavements with: Inadequate base or subgrade support Inadequate drainage Paving fabrics or inter-layers

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) 45

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) What is FDR? 46 The full thickness of the asphalt pavement and a predetermined portion of the base, subbase and/or subgrade is uniformly pulverized and blended to provide a homogeneous material. If new material is not a sufficient base for a new surface course, the reclaimed materials are stabilized by mechanical, chemical or bituminous means.

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) What is FDR? 47 Bituminous pavement needing repair FDR Example Overlay 6-10 inches stabilized material Granular base Soil

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Types of FDR 48 Mechanical stabilization - FDR without addition of binder (Pulverization) Chemical stabilization - FDR with chemical additive (Calcium or Magnesium Chloride, Lime, Fly Ash, Kiln Dust, Portland Cement, etc.) Bituminous stabilization - FDR with asphalt emulsion, emulsified recycling agent, or foamed/expanded asphalt additive

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Types of FDR 49 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2% Additives Used in Recycling 5% 6% 11% 16% 20% 40% Foam Fly Ash Other Lime Emulsion Cement None (Kiln dust /CaCl2) (dry)

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Keys to Success 50 Stabilization Considerations Surface Flexible Granular Stiff Organic Clay Subbase/Subgrade

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Keys to Success 51 Stabilization Considerations Flexible Granular Stiff Organic Clay

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Keys to Success 52 Stabilization Considerations Fly Ash or Cement Stabilization Mill to 3 - material Can incorporate some plastic subgrade soils Cement addition rate of 2-4% by weight, fly ash addition rate of 6-10% by weight Short working time due to hydration Specific design for each project Higher stiffness, lower flexibility

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Applications for FDR 53 Good Candidates include pavements with: Need for upgrading, widening or rehabilitation Bituminous surface on compacted base that: Has sufficient depth to accommodate reclamation process (at least 2" greater than reclamation depth) Exception: Compatible native materials meeting P200 & SE requirements Generally has up to 20% fines (P200)

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Applications for FDR 54 Good Candidates (Continued): High severity distresses Ruts Base problems Cracks Edge failures Potholes Good drainage or drainage to be corrected

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Applications for FDR 55 Poor Candidates include pavements with: Clay-like native soils Exception- can be stabilized with fly ash or lime/cement Doesn t meet P200 criteria & can t or won t accept added rock Drainage problems Including ditch & regional flooding problems

Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Summary 56 Builds structure down into pavement Site assessment, sampling & mix design key to success Performance-related design tests & specs improve reliability & performance Early Strength Cured Strength Cracking Resistance Moisture Resistance QA / QC

57 CIR and FDR Differences CIR and FDR Considerations: What is the depth of my existing pavement? CIR is best for pavements at least 5 thick FDR is for any depth Is the pavement thickness consistent or variable? FDR is better for variable thickness pavements

CIR and FDR Differences 58 CIR and FDR Considerations (Continued): What is the condition and strength of the pavement base and subbase? CIR requires base support for the heavy train equipment FDR will break up cracking patterns in the base What is the required ease of construction? CIR is all done at once FDR has greater difficulty in getting material placed