Bay Area Hydrology Model

Similar documents
Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) Software Introduction. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

SDHM 3.1 User Workshop Morning Session. Instructor: Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

San Diego Hydrology Model (SDHM 3.0) Reviewer Workshop. Doug Beyerlein, P.E., P.H., D.WRE Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, Washington

Hydromodification Computer Modeling

INFILTRATION FACILITY MODELING

HMP 101 Hydromodification Management Plan for Santa Clara Valley Guidance for Local Implementation

The Bay Area Hydrology Model A Tool for Analyzing Hydromodification Effects of Development Projects and Sizing Solutions

Bay Area Hydrology Model. User Manual

Watershed Modeling of Copper Loads to San Francisco Bay

Tualatin River Urban Stormwater Tool (TRUST) User Manual

Bay Area Hydrology Model User Manual

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

WWHM4 MODELING USING NATIONAL MAP

GROUNDWATER RECHARGE. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., 2010

Krista Reininga, PE Hydromodification and What it Means for the Design of Stormwater Facilities

Low Impact Development in Western WA Municipal Stormwater Permits

Appendix J: The Project Stormwater Control Plan by Lea & Braze Engineering, Inc.

Effectiveness of Non-Structural Measures in Watershed Restoration

Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3.0. User Manual

June 2017 C.3 Workshop Sizing Example. Section II.B Sizing Volume-Based Treatment Measures based on the Adapted CASQA Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach

FORT COLLINS STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Hydrology Standards (Ch. 5) 1.0 Overview

Water Balance Methodology

Permeable Pavement Hydrologic Modeling

Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

Provision C.3 in MRP 2 The Future is Here! An Update on New Stormwater Permit Requirements

LID & Detention Pond Sizing Tool to Address Hydromodification and Water Quality in Clackamas County

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Guidance on Determining Feasibility and Sizing of Rainwater Harvesting Systems

San Francisco State University Site 1 Vegetated Infiltration Basin Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

REBECCA DUGOPOLSKI, PE KRISTEN MATSUMURA

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

10/16/2013. The Big Picture of LID and Green Infrastructure. Learning Objectives

SWMM5 LID Control for Green Infrastructure Modeling

Guidance on Determining Feasibility and Sizing of Rainwater Harvesting Systems

L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation

Determining the Feasibility/Infeasibility of Infiltration, Evapotranspiration and Rainwater Harvest and Use

Porous Pavement Flow Paths

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Update: Base Strategy and Methodology to Address Hydromodification Impacts

A Case for the Design and Modeling of BMP Infiltration and LID Techniques. By: Bob Murdock

WinSLAMM v 10 Theory and Practice

Hydrologic Modeling for Green Roofs, Rainwater Harvesting and LID Foundations

DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREAS AS MAJOR SOURCES OF URBAN STORMWATER QUALITY PROBLEMS-EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH FLORIDA

Chapter 3 Dispersion BMPs

Planning Considerations for Stormwater Management in Alberta. R. D. (Rick) Carnduff, M. Eng., P. Eng. February 20, 2013.

Stakeholder Meeting #1

Green Infrastructure. Jesse Schomberg University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program

2008 AWRA Spring Specialty Conference March 17-19, 2008

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Section 1 - Introduction

c h a p t e r 4 d e s i g n e x a m p l e s f o r s a n m a t e o c o u n t y Options for New Development

Stormwater Bio-Infiltration Pilot Project Concept Proposal Submitted by

PRESENTATION TO APWA MPAC COMMITTEE

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

Effective Impervious Area Lake Minnetonka

MEMORANDUM. BMP O & M Verification Work Group. Paul Randall and John Fusco, Program Staff. September 24, 2003 [FINAL]

GreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance

Appendix F. Flow Duration Basin Design Guidance

Evaluating the Feasibility of Infiltration and Rainwater Harvesting and Use

The Source Loading and Management Model (SLAMM)

EFFECT OF UPSTREAM DEVELOPMENT ON THE CLEAR CREEK AREA

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. Stream processes are strongly related to the physical conditions of the

A Modeling Framework for Linking Urban Stormwater Load Allocation, Implementation Plan, and BMP Design. Sen Bai, PhD, PE Jon Ludwig

AWRA 2008 SPRING SPECIALTY CONFERENCE San Mateo, California

Incorporating Restoration Planning and Transportation Controls into the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan

LID PLANTER BOX MODELING

Environment, Energy, Security & Sustainability (E2S2)

DUBUQUE COUNTY SMART PLAN Watershed Management

Watershed Modeling of Copper Loads to San Francisco Bay

Using AGWA and the KINEROS2 Model to Assess Green Infrastructure Designs

ORDINANCE APPENDIX C RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS AND CURVE NUMBERS

Queenston Manor Apartments Part II LID Hydraulic Impact Analysis

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

Continuing Education Course #209 Green Irrigation Fundamentals Balancing Aquifer Recharge and Withdrawal

APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ESTIMATING RUNOFF FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS

The Use of WinSLAMM in the Selection, Design and Placement of Stormwater BMPs. Stephen J. Souza, Ph.D. Jacob E. Helminiak, P.E. Princeton Hydro, LLC

Section 3 General Development Policies

Stormwater Treatment Measure Sizing and Design Considerations SMCWPPP C.3 Workshop June 21, 2017

ARANSAS COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) INFEASIBILITY WORKSHEET FOR ON-SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Analysis of Runoff Reduction and Hydrologic Cycle Utilizing LID Concepts

Hydrology Study. Ascension Heights Subdivision Ascension Drive at Bel Aire Road San Mateo, California (Unincorporated)

Effective Impervious Area for the City of Minnetonka

Updates on EPA Stormwater Program

Sustainable Water Resource Practices

Background / Regulatory Requirements

CCSD#1 Stormwater Standards

CENTRAL COAST POST-CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE SERIES 1

SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JOSE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN UPDATE

Review of State and Federal Stormwater Regulations November 2007

Hydrology for Drainage Design. Design Considerations Use appropriate design tools for the job at hand:

Design Example Residential Subdivision

Anacostia River Watershed Restoration Plan. Paint Branch Subwatershed Provisional Restoration Project Inventory

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

Sunset Circle Vegetated Swale and Infiltration Basin System Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County

Revised Technical Memorandum. HSPF Hydrologic Modeling and SUSTAIN Stormwater Modeling of the Gorst Creek Watershed

Modeling the Urban Stormwater (and the rest of the watershed) Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Transcription:

Bay Area Hydrology Model Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. www.clearcreeksolutions.com

Bay Area Hydrology Model This introductory presentation was given at BAHM workshops held in November 2006 at: San Jose, CA San Mateo, CA Hayward, CA

Bay Area Hydrology Model Developed for: Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program

Presentation Introduction BAHM Background and Theory BAHM and HSPF BAHM Application BAHM Demo Questions & Answers

Introduction BAHM software platform was originally developed for the State of Washington Department of Ecology. Project Manager: Dr. Foroozan Labib Department of Ecology PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504 360.407.6439 email: flab461@ecy.wa.gov

BAHM Background and Theory Flow duration standard: based on erosive flows.

BAHM Background Flow Duration Analysis: Percent of time the flow exceeds a specific value. Requires continuous simulation hydrology to compute flow duration.

BAHM Background Single event modeling doesn t work because: Single-event flow frequency standards are based on inappropriate assumptions. Single-event modeling cannot compute flow durations (percent of time flows exceed a specific value). For BAHM the flow duration range of concern is from 10% of the 2-year to 10-year flow event.

BAHM Background Continuous simulation hydrology models the entire hydrologic cycle for multiple years. Stormwater runoff = surface runoff + interflow.

100% Where the rain goes: Evapotranspiration Interflow Surface Runoff 0% Forest Groundwater/Base Flow Land use development Impervious

BAHM Capabilities BAHM uses continuous simulation hydrology to compute stormwater runoff for both pre and post development conditions. Pre-project Post-development

BAHM Capabilities BAHM continuous simulation computations from HSPF (included in BAHM software). HSPF runs in the background with calibrated parameter values and local meteorological data. HSPF sponsored and funded by EPA and USGS.

How HSPF works Drainage areas are divided into pervious land segments based on soil, vegetation, and land slope and impervious land segments. Pervious and impervious segments are linked to conveyance pathways (pipes, ditches, ponds, streams, rivers, lakes, etc.) Historic rainfall and evaporation are used as input.

How HSPF works The entire water cycle is modeled on an hourly or shorter time step for multiple years. The model computes changes in soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and runoff every time step. Three types of runoff: surface runoff interflow groundwater/base flow

How HSPF works Pervious and impervious parameter values are calibrated using observed streamflow data. Calibration uses multiple years of observed flow data so that the model is calibrated for both dry years and wet years.

How BAHM works Calibrated parameter values are built into BAHM (different calibrated parameter values are used for different counties). Local precipitation and evaporation data are included in BAHM.

How BAHM works HSPF model construction/calibration/parameterization Castro Valley Creek, Alameda County Alameda Creek, Alameda and Santa Clara counties Ross Creek, Santa Clara County

How BAHM works Meteorological data: Santa Clara County San Jose Morgan Hill

How BAHM works Meteorological data: San Mateo County San Francisco

How BAHM works Meteorological data: Alameda County Berkeley Newark Livermore

How BAHM works User locates project on county map, inputs pre-project and post-development land use, and proposed mitigation measure(s). Pre-project and mitigated flows are compared at Point of Compliance (POC). Mitigated flows are not allowed to exceed flow duration standards.

How BAHM works User outputs report file and project file. Output files can be submitted to the permitting agency for approval. Permitting agency can load project file and rerun analysis, if needed. Report file summarizes input data and output results.

How BAHM works Guidance/help is provided by User Manual Training Workshops CCS Project Book

BAHM Application: Example: Convert undeveloped land to suburban residential housing.

BAHM Application: Step 1 User selects land development location and places red dot on map.

BAHM Application: Step 2 User inputs pre and post development land use. Pre: grassland & pavement Post: urban landscaping, roof, street, sidewalk, driveways, & pond

BAHM Application: Step 2 cont d. User inputs initial pond specifications or uses AutoPond to optimize pond size.

BAHM Application: Step 3 BAHM computes and compares pre and post development (Mitigated) routed runoff statistics. Flow frequency (2 to 100 year):

BAHM Application: Step 3 cont d. BAHM compares pre and post development (Mitigated) routed runoff statistics Flow duration (10% of 2 year to 100% of 10 year):

BAHM Application: Step 3 cont d. Flow duration criteria can be changed: % of lower limit, 10% Lower limit, 2-yr Upper limit, 10-yr

BAHM Application: Step 3 cont d. BAHM computes the pond drawdown/retention depth (stage) for 1 to 5 days:

BAHM Application: Step 4 BAHM output summarizes statistics and whether or not the facility meets the jurisdiction s standards:

BAHM: LID Options BAHM includes the following LID options: Dispersion of impervious surface runoff on adjacent pervious surface (example: roof runoff to lawn) Infiltration of impervious surface runoff on adjacent pervious surface (soil dependent) Bioretention/rain gardens/landscape swales to retain and infiltrate stormwater

BAHM Questions? Contact: Doug Beyerlein 425.892.6454 beyerlein@clearcreeksolutions.com Joe Brascher 360.943.0304 brascher@clearcreeksolutions.com