AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 3D FEM Analysis Tutorial Steel Diaphragm and Lateral Bracing Specification Checking Example

Similar documents
AASHTOWare BrDR D FEM Analysis Tutorial. Curved Steel Multi-Span 3D Example

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Steel Tutorial Steel Plate Girder Using LRFR Engine

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial ADJ1 Analysis with Routine Traffic in Adjacent Lane

AASHTOWare BrDR Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tutorial PS15 - Two Span PS Adjacent Box With Straight Strands

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Steel Tutorial STL6 Two Span Plate Girder Example

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL9 Curved Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.5)

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Feature Tutorial 2016 BrDR User Requested Enhancements

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC5 Schedule Based Tee Example

Prestress Superstructure Tutorial

Substructure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS7-3 Stem PS Bridge Example

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrD/BrR Prestress Tutorial 1 Simple Span Prestressed I Beam Example

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating/DesignTraining. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrR/BrD 6.4)

Elevation. Typical Section

AASHTOWare BrR/BrD 6.8 Reinforced Concrete Structure Tutorial RC2 Reinforced Concrete Slab Example

T4 Floor Truss Example. AASHTOWare BrR 6.8 Truss Tutorial

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Solid Shaft Pier Example

MDOT Camelback Bridge Example

CURVED STEEL I GIRDER BRIDGES RAMP GH OVER THE ERIE CANAL INTRODUCTION BEHAVIOR OF CURVED BRIDGES DIFFERENCES FROM STRAIGHT BRIDGES

AASHTOWare BrR 6.8. Truss Tutorial. T5 - Truss Enhancements

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Modify Footing Example

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 Prestressed Concrete Design Tool Getting Started

Cross Frame Design for Curved and Skewed Bridges

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Pier Drilled Shaft Example

Design and Rating of Steel Bridges

Inspection of Steel Girder Bridges

Whose responsibility is it? Design Responsibility. Steel Joist Institute. Standard Assumptions. Common Pitfalls in Steel Joist Specification

For Two Steel Bridges

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8. BrR and BrD Tutorial. PS12 - Three Span Prestressed I Beam Stirrup Design Example

Lesson 16: Masonry Walls; Wind (Spandrel) Beams:

2015 Mini, Small, Medium and Large Estimates

Lesson 7 The Focus of this Lesson is:

Chapter 3: Designing Steel Bridges Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E. July 2006

Guidelines for Checking Final Design Bridge Plans

PENNDOT e-notification

Check the strength of each type of member in the one story steel frame building below.

MIDAS Training Series

May 26 th, MWF Truss. User Guide

AISC Live Webinars. Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please standby.

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

CASE STUDY OF LONG SPAN STEEL BRIDGE STABILITY DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Table of Contents. What's New in Steel Structure Designer 2017 INTRODUCTION... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. NEW... 5 IMPROVEMENTS...

ERRATA for G12.1, Guidelines to Design for Constructability, 2016 Edition

Structural Breadth. Landmark Façade

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

Presented by: Taya Retterer BRG Webinar July 30, 2012

The MnDOT Bridge Load Rating Manual Scope of Work and Deliverables

TECHNICAL REPORT 2 BUILDING CODES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOADS

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

Wall bracing panel requirements

STRUCTURAL STEEL INSPECTION

Retrofit Measures for Superstructures, Bearings, and Seats

WRA has been instrumental in improving society's quality of life with cleaner water, improved roads, bridges and railroads, state-of-the-art

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.5.1

Slab Bridge Designer 2.1 Help: Example Analysis

Potential Solutions- Background: Current Designs. Potential Solutions. Goals for Design What are we concerned about?

Creative Approaches to Truss Analysis Using BrR

Live-load Distribution Factors: A Parametric Study

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Analysis of a Severely Skewed Prestressed Concrete Beam Bridge

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE DESIGN GUIDES TABLE OF CONTENTS

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating Design Update AASHTO SCOBS. T-19 Saratoga Springs, NY April 20, 2015

DIAPHRAGM ACTION AT THE ROOF LEVEL: USE OF STEEL DECK IN LATERAL LOAD RESISTING SYSTEM AND THE ROLE OF DIAPHRAGM. By Pierre Gignac, P.Eng.

Lesson 6 The Focus of the Lesson is: Use other predefined shapes. Have Multiple Frames Types at same Frame Line. Open a wall for material not by VP.

MWF Pro Truss. User Guide. Last Updated on November 9 th 2015

BENCHMARK PROBLEMS TASK 7 REPORT. Prepared for NCHRP Transportation Research Board of The National Academies. Project No. NCHRP COPY NO.

High Bridge Re-Deck Project

Photo here Todd Thompson, Chair Eric Christie, Vice Chair Spokane, WA

Modeling and Design of Bridge Super Structure and Sub Structure

COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL STEEL LATERAL FORCE RESISTING SYSTEMS FOR A THEORETICAL HOSPITAL GRID SYSTEM GRANT BUELL. B.S., Kansas State University, 2009

SE APPRENTICE. Today s Speakers. Lateral Load Systems. Lateral Loads

Case Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed.

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Bridge over I-90

MANUAL OF THE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

JAMES DEAN BAKER ALCOA CORPORATE CENTER STRUCTURAL OPTION 201 ISABELLA STEET

3.0 TEMPORARY DETOUR BRIDGES

Typical Deck. CONSTRUCTION TIP SHEET 5 Basic Decks w/ 60 psf Live Loading

Thesis Proposal. Office Building. Sayre, PA. Faculty Advisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby Revised: January 9, 2013

Thesis Proposal. Office Building. Sayre, PA. Faculty Advisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby Revised: April 1, 2013

Advanced Wind Mitigation Methodologies, Pt. 1- Internet Course (5th Edition)

Typical Deck. CONSTRUCTION TIP SHEET 5 Basic Decks w/ 60 lb Live Loading

Half through bridges No. 1.10

UTrAp 2.0. Analysis of Steel Box Girders during Construction. developed at. The University of Texas at Austin

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY COMPOSITE BUILDING

DIAPHRAGM BEHAVIOR OF DECONSTRUCTABLE COMPOSITE FLOOR SYSTEMS

SHEAR STRENGTH OF DETERIORATED STEEL GIRDERS IN MULTI-GIRDER BRIDGES

DESIGNING TWIN TUB GIRDER BRIDGES TO BE NON-FRACTURE CRITICAL. Twin Tub Task Group (T3) Texas Steel Quality Council

tab, specify the default connection type for the three connections tab, specify the design code and steel, bolt and weld types.

LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

AREMA 2008 Annual Conference. LOW PROFILE RAILROAD BRIDGE Steve K. Jacobsen, PE NNW, Inc. Rochester, Minnesota

A 2" MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 1" (Min.) \ Bracket to \ bottom chord. 24-3" (Max.) 45 (Typ.) * W40 x 149. or l5 x 5 x 1/2 (see

INTRODUCTORY WEBINAR:

Tekla Structural Designer 2017

Behavior and Analysis of Horizontally Curved Composite Steel Girder Bridge System

Steel Expansion. Located along the Grand River in

Transcription:

AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8 3D FEM Analysis Tutorial Steel Diaphragm and Lateral Bracing Specification Checking Example

BrD and BrR Training 3DFEM1 - Steel Diaphragm and Lateral Bracing Specification Checking Example Topics Covered Steel Diaphragm Connection Data Entry Bracing Deterioration Bracing Specification Checking This example describes data entry and specification checking for a steel diaphragm. Bottom flange lateral bracing members have the same features as diaphragms. Import the 3DFEM1 - Diaphragm Spec Checking.xml file into BrDR. Click OK to close the Bridge window. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 1 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Connectors have been moved up in the Bridge Workspace tree and are now located below the Bridge instead of under a particular superstructure definition. This was done to allow bolts to be assigned to Diaphragm Definitions. Open the higlighted bolt definition to review the bolt to be used in the diaphragms. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 2 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

The following sketch illustrates the intermediate diaphragm that will be described for this example. Double-click the Diaphragm Definitions folder and create the following diaphragm definition: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 3 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

The following sketch from the Help illustrates the Section Location selection. The Diaphragm: Connections tab is a new tab in BrDR 6.8. Enter the following data to describe the bolts in the diaphragm. Description of the Work Point Offset: A B Work Point Offset for Member AE, Connection A Y (typ) E C Dashed lines show the member lengths as computed based on the girder spacing and Y offsets entered by the user. The user can enter the Work Point Offset shown to reduce the length of member AE used in the slenderness ratio (Kl/r) calculations. D Last Modified: 8/12/2016 4 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

The following sketch describes the bolt entry fields. For this example, 1 longitudinal bolt line that contains 2 bolts per line is described. The following new fields were added to the Superstructure Definition: Analysis tab to control the bracing specification checking. 3D Bracing Member End Connection Analysis allows the user to specify what forces should be used when connection specification checking is implmented in the future. The LRFR factor data selected here will be used for all bracing members unless the bracing member has different factor data entered on the Bracing Deterioration window. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 5 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

The finite element analysis can now consider wind load applied to the FE model. Open the Load Case Description window and add the following load case for the wind load: Open the Framing Plan Details: Diaphragms tab and assign the diaphragm definitions to the interior diaphragm locations for all 3 girder bays: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 6 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

The Framing Plan Schematic displays the location labels for the bracing members: The new Bracing Deterioration window allows the user to describe deterioration on the bracing members. Doubleclick the Bracing Deterioration label in the BWS tree and create a new deterioration description for the diaphragm assigned to location 1-2 in Bay 1: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 7 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Enter the following values for section loss on Member AB. This section loss will be used in rating, not in design review. The superstructure definition LRFR condition factor can also be overriden for this particular member on this tab. The Bracing Specification Check Selection window allows the user to select which diaphragms and lateral bracing should be specification-checked: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 8 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Open the Superstructure Loads: Wind tab to enter the following information. Note that wind is only considered in an LRFD design review, not in a rating. The wind load path data only applies to line girder analysis where the wind load is approximated on the exterior girder. Since wind is a horizontal load that is now being considered, at least 2 bearings should be constrained in the Z direction for at least 1 girder. The following is the Supports: 3D General tab for G1: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 9 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Open the Analysis Settings window and select the following setttings for a 3D LRFD design review. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 10 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Select the name of the superstructure definition in the Bridge Workspace tree and click Analyze. In this example, only the selected diaphragms will be analyzed and specification checked. None of the girder members have member alternatives marked as Existing (E), so they are not included in the analysis. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 11 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

After the analysis completes, open the Tabular Results window while the superstructure definition is selected to see the bracing member results: The wind load results can also be viewed in this window: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 12 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Specification check details can be viewed for the bracing members: The following specification article illustrates how the wind load is combined with the live load: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 13 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

The following new output files are available: Wind load is calculated based on the projected area of the superstructure elevation. Wind load on the barrier, deck and ½ the girder depth (as measured between the top flange and bottom flange nodes in the FE model) is applied to the top flange node in the windward side exterior beam. Wind load on the bottom ½ the girder depth is applied to the bottom flange node in the windward side exterior beam. W1 ½ beam depth + deck + barrier W2 ½ beam depth Last Modified: 8/12/2016 14 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

For curved structures, wind is applied along the chord length. This is done by adjusting the user input wind pressure by the ratio of the chord length divided by the arc length. For curved girder systems with superelevation, wind load is also computed for the additional height of exposed barrier and additional exposed beam depth. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 15 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

A summary of the bracing specification check results is also available: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 16 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

In a similar manner, an LRFR or LFR rating can be performed. Note that wind is not included in the rating analysis but section loss is. The section loss that was entered for member AB in Diaphragm 1-2 is considered. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 17 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

If the user wants to change a piece of data that does not directly impact the FE analysis or results, such as the bolt details in a diaphragm, the Analysis Settings window allows the user to process just a specification check without redoing a full analysis. The following shows the details for Article 6.8.2 for Member EB in the diaphragm 1-2. Note the net area. Open the Diaphragm Definition window for the Type 2 diaphragm and modify the bolt details for Member EB by adding an extra line of bolts: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 18 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

Open the Analysis Settings window and select just a Specification Check. Click OK and run the analysis again. Last Modified: 8/12/2016 19 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8

BrDR will regenerate the FE Models and compare them to the previously generated FE models. Since the models are the same, the previous FE results are re-used and the specification checking considers the revised details: Last Modified: 8/12/2016 20 AASHTOWare BrDR 6.8