Irrigation Workshop. Brad Rathje, AquaSpy Inc

Similar documents
Economics of Irrigation Ending Date for Corn 1

ECONOMICS OF IRRIGATION ENDING DATE FOR CORN: USING FIELD DEMONSTRATION RESULTS

PivoTrac Website shows 3 GPM field in green; degrees, 4GPM field in light blue; degrees, 5 GPM field in dark blue; degrees.

Improving Nutrient Management through Advanced Irrigation Management

2008 Best Management Practices Workshop Irrigation scheduling methods and tools: Enhancing efficiency of water and fertilizer delivery

Rainout Shelter: A Tool for Understanding the Link between Soil Water, Irrigation, and Corn Yield

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

Soil Moisture Sensor Data Interpretation and Applications

Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

Irrigation Scheduling Using Crop Water Use Data

Utilizing farmers changed nitrogen application technologies to demonstrate improved nutrient management practices year 2

Cotton - Field to Gin

Agronomic Management for Optimizing Corn Yields

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key March 30, 2007

Conservation Through Innovation. Calvin Perry. Superintendent

Managing fertilization and irrigation for water quality protection

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

Cotton Irrigation in Kansas

Water. You can t grow without it. V

Monsanto Learning Center at Scott, Mississippi

Corn Response to Timing of Water Application

INFLUENCE OF NOZZLE PLACEMENT ON CORN GRAIN YIELD, SOIL MOISTURE AND RUNOFF UNDER CENTER PIVOT IRRIGATION

Corn Residue Removal by Grazing and Effects on Grain Yield. Introduction

Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing

IRRIGATION WATER CONSERVING STRATEGIES FOR CORN

Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in Wheat Production, Yuma

Tillage and Crop Residue Removal Effects on Evaporation, Irrigation Requirements, and Yield

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Soybean Irrigation Management

Virtual Optimizer Quick Guide

Irrigation Strategies for Water-Short Years or Efficient Water Use

WHAT IS SUMAGROW? IT S ABOUT RAISING YOUR BOTTOM LINE THE BENEFITS OF SUMAGROW ADVANTAGES AND BENEFITS INCLUDE

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RESEARCH PROBLEM

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

Interpretation of Soil Moisture Content to Determine Soil Field Capacity and Avoid Over Irrigation in Sandy Soils Using Soil Moisture Measurements

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

Basic Irrigation Scheduling Tools & Irrigation System Evaluation

Nitrogen BMPs for horticultural crop production Tim Hartz UC Davis

Predicting the Last Irrigation of the Season using Watermark Soil Moisture Sensors

1. Potassium deficiency in corn and soybeans 1 2. Residue treatment in continuous no-till wheat systems 3

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

FDACS Contract No Deliverable Report #3: Corn Fertility Trials Report. January 12, 2016

Irrigation Scheduling. Irrigation Scheduling Checkbook Method. Think of your soil as a bank. www. msu.edu

Between a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability

Irrigation Scheduling: Sensors, Technical Tools, and Apps

Non-irrigated Irrigated Difference. Early 27.1 bushels per acre 33.8 bushels per acre 6.7 bushels per acre

2015 Vegetable Fertility Management Trial

CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM PRODUCTION WITH LIMITED IRRIGATION

Supplement to the article by Julia Rodriguez. Cotton Yields Not Impacted by Decreased Irrigation during the Early Season.

Corn and Soybean Irrigation Guidelines

E-book. Six ways to conserve irrigation water & pumping costs

(PREP REQUIRED AHEAD OF TIME) -Show youth three potted plants (healthy, flooded, drought) Try to not let youth see soil conditions.

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT ON A FIELD SCALE

Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Horticultural Crops. Tom Obreza and Jerry Sartain Soil and Water Science Dept.

Estimating Irrigation Water Requirements to Optimize Crop Growth

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

Irrigation Water Management and Scheduling

Getting the Most out of Your Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Brent Bean 1 and Mark McFarland 2

Termination of Irrigation on Corn. Jos. C. Henggeler 1 ABSTRACT

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Research Report to Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission ( ) H. J. Mack and J. R. Stang, Horticulture. Request will be made for continuation.

Non sustainable irrigation practices Water and plants

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board

Purpose and Introduction:

VALUE OF CROP RESIDUE FOR WATER CONSERVATION

IRRIGATION SCHEDULING IN LONG-TERM BURIED DRIP

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

Corn Stand Establishment

FIELDNET ADVISOR TM IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT TOOL THE SMARTEST IRRIGATION SOLUTION

2009 Crop Management Diagnostic Clinics Response of Corn Water Use to Limited Water Bill Kranz, UNL Extension Irrigation Specialist

gr4 Pur chased by fhe O. S. Departmenf of Agriceltuf$ For Official Use

Nitrogen Dynamics Feeding the Crops that Feed Us

Corn Silage for Beef Cattle

Corn Agronomy Update

Irrigating for Maximum Economic Return with Limited Water

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn

4.3 Irrigated corn best practice guide

Sidedressing Potassium and Nitrogen on Corn Evaluations made on yield effects.

KanSched An ET-Based Irrigation Scheduling Tool for Kansas Summer Annual Crops

Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management

NITROGEN AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN ONION PRODUCTION UNDER DRIP AND FURROW IRRIGATION

Two on farm irrigation water management of corn demonstrations were conducted in Colorado County in 2011 with:

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

4.2 Irrigated sorghum best practice guide

CONVENTIONAL, STRIP, AND NO TILLAGE CORN PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION CAPACITIES

2017 Farm Management Competition Banquet Report

NITROGEN VALUE OF POTATO AND ONION SLUDGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION

Rick Mascagni and Kylie Cater

Managing Nitrogen for Corn. Jim Camberato Dan Emmert Bob Nielsen Brad Joern

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

Chan Mazour Manager, Monsanto Learning Center, Gothenburg, NE. The Gothenburg Learning Center Team. Monsanto Technology Development

Sampling Soil and Crop Tissue

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

4. For increasing the effectiveness of inputs: Increased productivity per unit of input used indicates increased efficiency of the inputs.

Overview of the Sod Based Rotation Using Conservation Techniques

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

CENTRAL OREGON POTATO NITROGEN FERTILIZER TRIALS Progress Report. Alvin R. Mosley, Shelton C. Perrigan and Steven R. James'

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT USING REDUCED RATES OF POLYMER COATED UREA IN CORN

Transcription:

Irrigation Workshop Brad Rathje, AquaSpy Inc. brathje@aquaspy.com, 402-740-3687

Capacitance Probes Capacitance Sensor measures the surrounding soil as a capacitor. The sfu ( scaled frequency unit) changes as the moisture and air levels in the surrounding soil changes. Measures dielectric constants Pure water 80 sfu s Soil Solids 3-7 sfu s Air 1 sfu Size Matters: Larger diameter sensors have larger spheres of influence

Proven capacitance technology Sensor every 4 inches 20 / 40 / 60 Probe lengths Continuous data graphs Turn-key managed solutions

Apply water based on Crop Use Potatoes

Sugar Beet Water Use Curve

Strategic Irrigation Management Over Irrigation Poor root structure Less able to handle stress Under Irrigation Potential Yield loss Poor quality Corn water use curve Common grower practice By overwatering in the early part of the season, the plant root system does not develop adequately to keep up with water use requirements during peak demand.

Crop Dynamics Waterlogging Peak Water Use Day Night Day Night Stepping shows daily plant water use. Lower stress level from too little water than too much water Moisture Stress

Nebraska Corn

Agronomic Impact GOAL: Match plant available water with crop water need to develop maximum root zone UNDERSTAND IRRIGATION EFFECT: Optimize applications, to provide potential for reduction in irrigation events MONITOR WATER USE: More water is available in deeper root zone reservoir LET S USE IT!! Bottom Line: Typically experience $3-$4k per Center Pivot A SMARTER WAY TO GROW

Precise Information for each location Agronomic information based on current crop stage Depth of active Root Zone Soil Moisture levels at 4 increments

Consistent Sensor Spacing provides: Accurate understanding of active root zone Which depth moisture is being pulled How much more depth is available to grow Timely information on soil moisture levels Provides understanding of soil moisture dynamics Remaining Soil Moisture

Irrigation Management Tools Separate Layer Graph Drainage & Infiltration rates Root Activity Moisture Stress by Layer Summed Graph When To Irrigate How Much Daily Water Use Rate Irrigation Effectiveness Upper & Lower Limits

Irrigation Template - Corn Irrigation matched to growth stage Optimize rooting structure early on Manage last irrigation for optimum crop maturity V5 V10 Emergence Root Growth Tassel through Dent Maturity Seedling Establishment Save Water Maximize Root Depth Maintain good moisture levels during peak water use period Save Water

Irrigation Summary provides one view to see when each field needs to be irrigated again

Varietal Rooting Differences Active roots @ 60 on 7-Jul Corn Variety A Active roots @ 60 on 7-Aug Corn Variety B No Irrigation Rain only No Irrigation Rain only Two different corn varieties, side-byside No irrigation - Rainfall only Corn Variety B reaches 60 about 30 days earlier than Corn Variety A Corn Variety B has higher rate of root growth (deeper, faster)

Varietal Rooting Differences Dep th Day of Year 19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 24 day difference 14 day difference 24 difference ~4 stored moisture Two different corn varieties, side-by-side No irrigation - Rainfall only Corn Variety B roots down deeper, faster Variety B has access to extra 24 soil (~4 of stored moisture) during peak demand Each inch of available water could equate to 10-20 bushels (depending on timing and level of stress)

QTV: Sweet Corn in Georgia The Plots 3 Irrigation regimes varied using VRI Variable Rate Irrigation AquaSpy Managed (7.23 applied) KanSched Software Managed (8.77 applied) Grower Managed (10.10 applied) 3 Replications AquaSpy Probes in 2 out of 3 Plots All 9 Plots Field Scout Data Irrigation rates were verified with 2 separate catch cup tests Hand Harvested 100 or 200 ears per plot Weighed, sized Graded for Quality (defects)

Jun 12, 2010: System Setup to Skip AS (0%), KS (80%), Farmer (100% =0.60 ) 9 Plots, 3 trials, 3 Reps KanSched Controlled AquaSpy Controlled Other areas managed by grower AquaSpy Probes in 2 out of 3 Replications

AS Plots with minor stress Afternoon leaf roll, recovering after sunset, does not affect yield when it happens prior to Tassel (June 16, 2010)

Sum graph for entire season Leaf curl occurred during very hot period Due to VRI system not working properly, working within the grower s irrigation schedule, and rainfall, moisture levels did not reach refill level Tassel refill set to level prior to visible afternoon leaf curl (day-night steps start to flatten out)

Preliminary Results All nine plots were hand harvested on July 9, 2010. There was no significant difference in yield or quality. The AquaSpy plots received a total of almost 3 inches less irrigation (2.93 inches saved) More could have been saved had the VRI system been working properly during the entire project.

Conclusion Allowing minor stress to occur prior to Tassel does not affect sweet corn yield or quality. True Allowing minor stress to occur prior to Tassel promotes a deeper root system. No significant difference in rooting depth. (The VRI system did not work well during the entire project and allowed more irrigations on the AS plots than desired.) Georgia sweet corn growers tend to over water. True. The AS plot saved almost 3 inches of irrigation water. (More would have been saved had the VRI system worked properly.)

UNL-ARDC 2007 Irrigation Regimes Large depletion of soil moisture Drying Down Rainfall = 13.6 Rainfall = 13.6 Irrigation = 8 Wetting Up Rainfall = 13.6 Irrigation = 10 + Small depletion of soil moisture Rain Fed Controlled Irrigation Continuous Irrigation

Overwatered Irrigation Drainage & Leaching Irrigations

Controlled Irrigation Optimum Date Irrigations No Drainage 40 Active root zone

Applying More Water Doesn t Mean More Water is Utilized

Marginal water applied at proper time provides significant yield increases 150 bu Corn 5.94 in 189 bu Corn 7.11 in

Wausa NE. actual yield demonstrates results of stress 150 bu. Corn Full Line Refill Line Stress Line 189 bu. Corn Full Line Refill Line Stress Line

Reduce Leaching of Fertilizer

Fertility

Basic economics Typical irrigation cost s range from $8-12.00 per acre inch One acre in of water with 19 ppm nitrate @ 50 cents per pound equating to $13.30 per acre Each acre inch of over application results in a minimum $21.30 per acre loss

The AquaSpy Solution AquaSpy does it all Installs Maintains AquaSpy Telemetry Delivers AquaSpy Probe Irrigation Template