Median Value for Nitrates (mg/l)

Similar documents
2016 National Water & Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative (NWWBI)

Public Health and Safety

Defining Levels of Service for Performance Based Regulation. Alida Cameron, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Manager, Asset Management Office EPCOR Water Canada

ONTARIO CENTRE FOR MUNICIPAL BEST PRACTICES 200 University Ave., Suite 801, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3C6. BEST PRACTICE SUMMARY REPORT February, 2008

2015 Annual Report. Magic Lake Estates Water and Sewer Services Annual General Meeting August 13, 2016

BRACEBRIDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT

BRACEBRIDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT 2016 SUMMARY REPORT

Business Plan: Drinking Water Supply

: Performance for Customers

CWWA Drinking Water Conference Gatineau, Quebec October 27, Partnership for Safe Water Halifax Water s Experience

QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT 4 th Quarter, April June 2018 WASTEWATER PERMIT COMPLIANCE. Page 1 INFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE EFFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE

Benchmarking Case Studies for Water and Wastewater Facilities

Canadian Utilities Learn to Fly through Benchmarking of Water Loss Management

Benchmarking, Metrics Assessments, and Gap Analyses for Water and Wastewater

ITEM TYPE OF USER FEES AMOUNT. (16 mm -19 mm) (25 mm) (32 mm) (38 mm) (50 mm) (75 mm) (100 mm) (150 mm) (200 mm) (250 mm)

Siddhipur Water Treatment Plant Lalitpur, Nepal

2. Reporting Requirements under Section 11 O. Reg. 170/03

Wawa Drinking Water System

Bracebridge Wastewater Treatment 2017 Summary Report

Lansdowne Drinking Water System

SCHEDULE 18 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

2.3.3 Defining Metrics Refining Survey Questions Arranging Data in a Matrix Reviewing Performance Indicators 18

EPA / WERF/ WaterRF Framework

TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH. Reducing Water Waste During Unidirectional Flushing Operations

Measure Type Description Objective Comment. Efficient general government supporting local services

Figure 2.01 Hoodsport Rural Activity Center (RAC) Figure 2.01

City of Leadwood Wastewater System Engineering Report

DEEP BAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL WATER SYSTEM REPORT Mountainview Road Phone/Fax:

Appendix A Fees, Charges and Rates

Kohalpur Small Town Drinking Water Supply Project Kohalpur, Banke, Nepal

BENCHMARK RESULTS CONTENTS

2013 Annual Water Report

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

Water for All. Waterworks Office Seoul Metropolitan Government. Contents. Kevin Young June Choi. Waterworks System in Korea

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

A Submerged Attached Growth Bioreactor (SAGB) And Membrane Filtration For Water Reuse

The Plant s mailing address is PO Box 944, Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, S6H 2V2. The telephone number is

Empowering Collaborative Energy Management

Water and Wastewater Technician POA (2011) Subtask to Unit Comparison

URBAN WATER AND SEWERAGE AUTHORITY

Council Minutes November 23, Minute No. 63 Report - Standing Policy Committee on Infrastructure Renewal and Public Works - November 8, 2005

District of Peachland Annual Drinking Water Report 2017

MassDEP. Groundwater Permit Program. Requirements

Bowen Island Municipality

Review of on-site and communal water and sanitation systems for remote communities

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

Asset Management Key Concepts

Meridian s Class A Recycled Water Program

OPERATOR EDUCATION PROGRAM COURSE CATALOGUE

Expectation of Water Works Association in Lao PDR International Water Forum: MDGs to SDGs - Sustainable water environment and Stable water supply

Bowen Island Municipality

TALBINGO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE. Kay White

Partnership for Safe Water: Distribution System Optimization Program. Adam Feffer San Jose Water Company November 8, 2017

DRINKING WATER SYSTEM. Summary Report toronto.ca/water

City of Morden Public Water System Annual Report 2016

SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. Comprehensive Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Rate Study

2016 EHS REPORTING CRITERIA

B. All new water mains and temporary pipelines shall be disinfected prior to connection to the District s existing system.

Windsor Utilities Commission 3665 Wyandotte Street East Windsor, ON N9A 5T7

Uni-Directional Flushing Program Planning, Development, and Implementation. July 12, 2018

Partnership for Safe Water Distribution System Optimization Program. Barbara Martin, AWWA

Water Treatment Plant Year-end Report for 2014

Progress Report for the Drinking Water Management Plan

TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER MIDHURST - WATER, WASTEWATER & TRANSPORTATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PHASE 3 & 4

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

MUNICIPALITY OF BOISSEVAIN-MORTON. Public Water System Annual Report

FAIRYVIEW HUNTSVILLE WATER SUMMARY 2016 REPORT

2017 Annual Performance Report

QUARTERLY OPERATIONS REPORT 3 rd Quarter, January March 2018 WASTEWATER PERMIT COMPLIANCE. Page 1 EFFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE INFLUENT MONTHLY AVERAGE

Saskatoon Water and Wastewater Utilities

APPENDIX A: EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN TEMPLATE

Virginia Department of Health Office of Drinking Water (ODW)

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 3. EXISTING FACILITIES AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

Environmental Engineering-I

Drinking-Water Systems Regulation O. Reg. 170/03

Executive Summary Introduction Five Year Goals Performance Measure Types Performance Plan Logic Model Benchmarking, Strategic Planning, Performance

System Assessment Reports Information Sessions. January 2013

Summary of 2015 Municipal Performance Measures

Integrated Water Resources Plan

RE: Annual Report Requirement Section 11, Reg. 170/03 and Summary Report Requirement Schedule 22, Reg. 170/03

Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

Rocky View County October 29, Avenue NE N:\22\85\016\04\2018 Off Site Levies\L Calgary, Alberta T2E 6X6

Ensuring a nuclear power plant s safety functions in provision for failures

RESTRICTED URBAN REUSE OF KONYA (TURKEY) MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENTS VIA RECLAIMED WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Annual Customer Seminar. Water and Waste Department Tuesday, January 26, 2010

AL-KAWTHER INDUSTRIES LTD

ELLIOT LAKE WATER TREATMENT PLANT SUMMARY REPORT FOR MUNICIPALITIES: Municipal Large Residential

New Mexico Environment Department

January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017

CHAPTER 4 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS WASTEWATER FLOWS

O.Reg 170 SECTION 11 ANNUAL REPORT

SMELT BAY PROVINCIAL PARK Overflow Parking ANNUAL REPORT April 2015 to September BC Parks

Bowen Island Municipality

CITY OF SUTTER CREEK SEWER COMMITTEE AGENDA MONDAY, August 20, :00 P.M. Sutter Creek Community Center 33 Church Street

Decentralized wastewater reclamation systems in Beijing

OPERATOR PERSPECTIVES OF THE FABRIC MEDIA FILTRATION TRIAL AT CRAIGIEBURN STP. Bob McAlister. Yarra Valley Water

Achieving Distribution System Control SFPUC and Wholesale Customers Annual Water Quality & Technology Workshop November 8, 2017

Water Utility Billing Adjustment Process and Wastewater Rate Report

RATE SETTING OVERVIEW. City of Richmond, VA Department of Public Utilities

Sewage Treatment Plant Performance Report

Transcription:

Appendix A - How to Read Min.-Max. Results WTP MIN-MAX Results System: Water Utility = Water Treatment & Distribution Water Distribution WTP = Water Treatment Plant WWTP = Wastewater Treatment Plant.2.4.3.1 Water Filtration Plants 3.1 KPI Measured 3.7 3.6 3.7 Final Graphs Protect Public Health and Safety - Value for Nitrates (mg/l) Attempt to normalize data by combining like systems. 213 212 211 21 29 4.6 3.14.26.33.32.33.26.26.26.3.3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Group Target <1mg/L Target set during the annual workshop by members. Not all metrics have a Group Target National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 215 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs Ensure Adequate Capacity - # of Hours of Treated Water Storage Capacity at Average Day Demand 2 All Water Utilities 214 213 212 211 21 1 8 87 86 95 94 16 16 16 29 29 3 31 29 28 28 2 4 6 8 1 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs $.15 $.21 $.33 $.33 $.33 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 1 Cost of Water Quality Monitoring / Population Served Integrated System Utilities 214 213 212 211 21 $5.87 $5.61 $5.6 $5.38 $6.77 $1.76 $1.74 $1.7 $1.87 $1.54 $1.18 $1.9 $1.7 $1.84 $1.2 $ $2. $4. $6. $8. Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs Protect the Environment - 1 Cost of Water Conservation Program / Population Served All Water Utilities $ $ $ $ $ 214 213 212 211 21 $2.94 $11.19 $11.4 $12.91 $14.45 $.51 $.34 $.43 $.36 $.5 $.53 $.39 $.74 $.77 $2.13 $ $3. $6. $9. $12. $15. $18. Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs # of Days of Water Restrictions All Water Utilities Protect the Environment - 2 214 213 212 211 21 365 365 365 365 365 64 76 116 12 122 1 2 3 4 5 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs Protect the Environment - Per Capita Average Day Consumption for Residential Customers (lpcd) 153 15 16 138 149 Water Distribution and Integrated Utilities 214 213 212 211 21 3 541 575 584 652 636 18 185 199 197 27 166 17 184 17 176 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs Have Satisfied and Informed Customers - # of Water Quality Customer Complaints / 1, People Served Water Distribution and Integrated Utilities 1.1.1 214 213 212 211 21 3.7 4 7.4 15. 36.5.3.3.4.6.1.2.5.2 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs Protect Public Health and Safety - Connections Affected by Boil Water Advisory / 1 Service Connections All Water Utilities 1 5.2 214 213 212 211 21 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Negative Values - no data available Note: This graph is based on the new metric - no historical data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Utility Min-Max- Results Final Graphs Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace 1 4% Distribution of Workforce by Age All Water Systems Group 33% 32% 3% 27% 22% 25% 22% 2% 1% 11% 11% 11% 6% % 2-3 Years 31-4 Years 41-5 Years 51-6 Years 61-7 Years Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report All Water Systems Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 1 5 Year Running Average Capital Reinvestment / Replacement Value.2% % % %.7% 214 213 212 211 21 6.82% 1.34% 13.51% 15.25% 18.17%.87% 1.2%.85%.91% 1.15% 1.56% 1.83% 1.45% 1.39% 1.31% % 4% 8% 12% 16% 2% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 2 Unscheduled Maintenance Hours / Total Maintenance Hours All Water Systems % % % % 2% 214 213 212 211 21 22% 39% 51% 6% 6% 5% 9% 8% 9% 13% 1% 1% 2% 5% 17% % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Average Day Demand / Existing Water Licence Capacity All Water Systems Ensure Adequate Capacity - 1 13% 13% 14% 13% 13% 214 213 212 211 21 66% 67% 65% 68% 72% 37% 38% 36% 32% 32% 26% 28% 29% 29% 29% % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report # of Days the Plant Operated at >9% Capacity Water Filtration Plants Ensure Adequate Capacity - 2* 214 213 212 211 21 7. 15. 13. 35. 64..4.7 1.6 2.6.3 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 2 Total FTEs / 1, ML Treated Membrane Filtration Plants.4.18.16.19.17 214 213 212 211 21 1.33 1.47 1.76 1.91 1.89.45.3.39.33.37.73.73.68.69.7.5 1. 1.5 2. 2.5 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 3 O&M Cost / ML Treated Membrane Filtration Plants $6 $4 $39 $44 $73 214 213 212 211 21 $244 $318 $348 $429 $459 $143 $128 $115 $145 $181 $143 $153 $148 $182 $213 $ $5 $1 $15 $2 $25 $3 $35 $4 $45 $5 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 5 Energy Consumed in kwh / ML Treated Membrane Filtration Plants 48 5 92 353 449 214 213 212 211 21 929 885 1,361 1,728 1,892 464 448 615 556 774 732 878 837 874 885 2 4 6 8 1, 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 2, Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Membrane Filtration Plants Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - Chemical Cost / ML Treated 6 $3.2 $3. $3. $3.2 $6.3 214 213 212 211 21 $8.5 $12.1 $14.2 $24.7 $26.6 $6.3 $6. $6.8 $1.8 $12.5 $8.8 $9.1 $8.5 $12.1 $14.2 $ $5 $1 $15 $2 $25 $3 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Average Value for Turbidity (NTU) Water Filtration Plants Protect Public Health and Safety - 1.13.2.11.14.14 214 213 212 211 21.21.32.383.5.53.5.52.52.54.5.4.4.4.34.43.2.4.6.8 1. Negative Values - no data available Group Target <.3 NTU National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Protect Public Health and Safety - 2 # of Occurrences of Total Coliforms Water Filtration Plants 214 213 212 211 21 1. 1. 2. 3. 7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Group Target Occurences National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Protect Public Health and Safety - Value for Nitrates (mg/l) Water Filtration Plants 3.2.4.3 214 213 212 211 21 3.7 3.6 3.7 4.6 7.3.29.23.3.33.34.2.26.26.26.3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Group Target <1mg/L National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 1 # of O&M Accidents with Lost Time / 1, Labour Hours All Water Systems 214 213 212 211 21.42.9.226.31.32.5.1.15.2.25.3.35 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 2 # of Lost Hours due to O&M Accidents / 1, Labour Hours All Water Systems 214 213 212 211 21 2.5 22.3 22.3 16.9 18. 5 1 15 2 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 3 # of Sick Days Taken per O&M Employee All Water Systems.9 1.5 2. 2. 2.1 214 213 212 211 21 12.1 17.9 18. 22.6 22.8 7.5 8. 6.8 7.1 6. 5. 5.1 6.9 7.3 22.8 5 1 15 2 25 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Total Available O&M Hours / Total Paid O&M Hours All Water Systems Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 4 63% 73% 73% 68% 71% 214 213 212 211 21 93% 92% 92% 88% 91% 8% 81% 81% 83% 84% 76% 83% 83% 83% 82% % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% No Value - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 5 Total Overtime O&M Hours / Total Paid O&M Hours All Water Systems 1% 1% % 2% 1% 214 213 212 211 21 17% 17% 16% 24% 29% 6% 7% 6% 8% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5% % 5% 1% 15% 2% 25% 3% 35% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Protect the Environment - 1* % of Water Wasted During Treatment Process Water Filtration Plants.2% % % 2.7% 3.5% 214 213 212 211 21 11.1% 1.2% 12.9% 13.3% 14.7% 3.7% 5.8% 5.8% 7.5% 9.% 5.8% 7.% 7.% 7.1% 1.2%.% 2.% 4.% 6.% 8.% 1.% 12.% 14.% 16.% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 1 # of Main Breaks / 1 km Length Water Distribution & Integrated Systems.7 1.8.8 1.9 214 213 212 211 21 13.6 23.5 24.5 27.6 31. 7.3 6.9 6.5 6.4 6.9 5.1 4.5 5.7 4.5 9.7 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - % of Valves Cycled Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 2 1% % % 9% 8% 214 213 212 211 21 99% 96% 95% 95% 112% 24% 25% 19% 24% 31% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 3 % of Inoperable or Leaking Valves Water Distribution & Integrated Systems % % % % % 214 213 212 211 21 2.1% 2.6% 2.4% 3.7% 4.8%.5%.4%.4%.4%.3%.1%.4%.5%.4%.3% %.5% 1.% 1.5% 2.% 2.5% 3.% 3.5% 4.% 4.5% 5.% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Non-Revenue Water (L/connection/day) Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - Water Distribution & Integrated Systems with Universal Metering 4* Minimu m 2 32 56 73 214 213 212 211 21 Maximu m 383 386 44 44 46 172 169 184 151 152 147 163 27 198 239 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - % of Hydrants Inspected and Winterized Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 5 2% 28% 37% 25% 34% 214 213 212 211 21 286% 298% 352% 451% 543% 13% 125% 121% 184% 16% 142% 196% 211% 36% 277% % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs % % % % % Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - % of Inoperable or Leaking Hydrants Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 6 214 213 212 211 21 5.33% 6.92% 1.98% 22.1% 22.75% 1.53%.93% 1.39%.99%.87%.42%.42%.51%.34%.35% % 5% 1% 15% 2% 25% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs % % %.4% Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 7 # of Emergency Service Connection Repairs & Replacements / # of Service Connections Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 214 213 212 211 21.35%.57%.64%.59%.81%.13%.15%.11%.11%.14%.6%.5%.4%.6%.13% %.1%.2%.3%.4%.5%.6%.7%.8%.9% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - # of Unplanned System Interruptions / 1km Length Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 8 2.6.9 1.8 214 213 212 211 21 36.1 48.4 5.5 56.3 74.4 12.6 11.5 9.3 1.4 9.1 8.3 1.8 8.3 17.4 64.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - Total Customer Days without Service / Total # of Service Connections Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 214 213 212 211 21.37 9..2.5.1.15.2.25.3.35.4 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 5 Year Running Average Capital Reinvestment / Replacement Value %.14%.1%.17% Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 214 213 212 211 21 1 1.35% 2.77% 2.45% 2.51% 2.64%.71%.58%.56%.43%.48%.25%.3%.34%.43%.52% %.5% 1.% 1.5% 2.% 2.5% 3.% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs % Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - Total Corrective Maintenance Hours / Total Maintenance Hours 23.1% 17.6% 25.3% 25.9% All Water Systems 72.7% 74.5% 69.% 79.7% 68.5% 1.% 1.% 1.% 95.% 1.% 214 213 212 211 21 11 % 92.2% 91.9% 91.9% 91.1% % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs 2.45 1.39 1.63 1.82 1.47 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - # of O&M FTEs / 1km Length Water Integrated Systems 214 213 212 211 21 1 7.5 6.99 6.53 5.81 15.36 3.39 3.45 3.8 3.4 3.18 3.83 3.18 3.85 3.23 2. 4. 6. 8. 1. 12. 14. 16. 18. The values include contracted staff where data was provided National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - Total # of FTEs / 1km Length Water Integrated Systems 3.9 2.62 3.19 2.78 2.43 2 214 213 212 211 21 6.88 6.58 8.1 7.78 8.73 3.97 4.58 4.34 4.3 4.47 4.45 4.52 5.11 5.14 6.37 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1. The values include contracted staff where data was provided National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - # of Inhouse Metering O&M FTEs / 1 Meters Water Distribution & Integrated Systems with Universal Metering 3*.2.21.31 214 213 212 211 21.119.163.219.28.355.7.68.68.66.95.1.11.12.96.17.5.1.15.2.25.3.35.4 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs $2.9 $3.2 $3.9 $3.6 $4.4 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - O&M Cost (') / km Length Water Integrated Systems $1.4 $9.8 $9.7 $11.8 $14.1 4 214 213 212 211 21 $8.3 $7.4 $7.9 $7.3 $9.1 $4.5 $3.9 $3.6 $5.9 $6.2 $ $2 $4 $6 $8 $1 $12 $14 $16 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs $2.53 $1.89 $2.6 $2.3 $2.7 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - Pipes O&M Cost (') / km Length Water Integrated Systems $8.16 $8.39 $7.92 $7.5 $1.67 6 214 213 212 211 21 $4.99 $5.78 $5.71 $4.29 $7.44 $2.88 $2.6 $2.3 $4.2 $3.95 $ $2. $4. $6. $8. $1. $12. National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 7 Metering O&M Cost / # of Meters Water Distribution & Integrated Systems with Universal Metering $.9 $2.5 $3.9 $3.1 $4.1 214 213 212 211 21 $34.2 $5.5 $53. $99.6 $15.5 $13.8 $13.3 $12.6 $12. $12.6 $4.1 $2.5 $4.3 $7.2 $13.7 $ $2 $4 $6 $8 $1 $12 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs $16 $9 $9 $9 $32 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - Cost of Fire Hydrant O&M / # of Fire Hydrants Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 214 213 212 211 21 9 $157 $154 $162 $183 $268 $8 $79 $79 $91 $84 $86 $99 $17 $154 $268 $ $5 $1 $15 $2 $25 $3 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs All Water Systems Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - # of O&M Accidents with Lost Time / 1 O&M Labour Hours.27.3.24.43.58 214 213 212 211 21 1.3.2.2.1.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - # of Lost Hours due to O&M Accidents / 1 O&M Labour Hours All Water Systems 214 213 212 211 21 2 12.8 47.5 73. 74.7 122.5.3.5.9.7 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - # of Sick Days Taken per O&M Employee All Water Systems 1.4 1.5 2.7 1.1 214 213 212 211 21 3 14.6 2.4 18.3 22.6 47.9 6.3 5.5 5. 8.4 9.8 8.9 9.2 9.8 12. 11.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs All Water Systems Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - Total Available O&M Hours / Total Paid O&M Hours 66% 66% 61% 72% 214 213 212 211 21 4 83% 77% 8% 82% 81% 81% 81% 81% 83% 81% 82% 1% 96% 94% 94% % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - Total Overtime O&M Hours / Total Paid O&M Hours All Water Systems 1.3%.3% 1.2%.1% 214 213 212 211 21 5 14.6% 17.9% 18.6% 29.% 35.4% 8.5% 5.6% 5.1% 6.3% 4.7% 5.3% 3.5% 5.3% 6.7% 9.8% % 5% 1% 15% 2% 25% 3% 35% 4% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Water Distribution & Integrated Systems Have Satisfied and Informed Customers - # of Water Pressure Complaints by Customers / 1, People Served 1.4.6.1 214 213 212 211 21.87 1.1 1.16 1.1 1.12.28.47.35.41.43.4.4.8.4.22.2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs % of Cumulative Main Length Cleaned Protect Public Health and Safety - 1 % % % % % 1% 1% 12% 1% 214 213 212 211 21 125% 9% 13% 12% 2% 22% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% 14% National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Average Value for Turbidity (NTU) Water Distribution & Integrated Systems Protect Public Health and Safety - 2.1.1.1 214 213 212 211 21.53.69.67.73 1..19.19.27.17.23.2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 Group Target < 1 NTU National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Protect Public Health and Safety - # of Days with Total Coliforms Water Distribution & Integrated Systems 3 214 213 212 211 21 7 1 13 24 26 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 Group Target occurrences National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

Water Distribution Systems Min-Max- Results PRELIMINARY RESULTS Draft Graphs Protect Public Health and Safety - 4 Average Value for THMs (mg/l) Water Distribution & Integrated Systems.1.1 214 213 212 211 21.6.1.12.11.245.27.28.26.27.26.27.27.3.27.26.5.1.15.2.25.3 Group Target <.8 mg/l National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide Reliable Service and Infrastructure - 2 % Reactive Maintenance All WWTPs % 3.3% % % % 214 213 212 211 21 68.8% 68.8% 67.3% 8.% 83.2% 1.1% 12.3% 1.7% 15.3% 24.5% 13.1% % % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Ensure Adequate Capacity - 1 % of Design AAF Capacity Utilized All WWTPs 22% 29% 36% 37% 38% 214 213 212 211 21 99% 17% 17% 116% 128% 7% 72% 71% 74% 71% 63% 72% 7% 17% 37% 57% 77% 97% 117% 137% Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report.2.23.14.19.21 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 1 # of O&M FTEs / 1, ML Treated Secondary and BNR WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21 2.98 2.94 19.49 19.79 21.5.64.65.63.62.58 1.18 1.28 5. 1. 15. 2. 25. Negative Values - no data available The values include contracted staff where data was provided National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 2 Total # of FTEs / 1, ML Treated Secondary and BNR WWTPs.27.27.26.25.2 214 213 212 211 21 3.2 3.18 22.27 22.62 24.57 1.14 1.2 1.1.73.7 1.35 1.6 5. 1. 15. 2. 25. 3. Negative Values - no data available The values include contracted staff where data was provided National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report $9 $11 $98 $12 $123 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 3 O&M Cost / ML Treated Secondary and BNR WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21 $813 $94 $2,68 $2,18 $2,762 $289 $311 $281 $26 $237 $482 $339 $17 $ $5 $1, $1,5 $2, $2,5 $3, Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 4 Energy Consumed (kwh) / ML Treated Secondary and BNR WWTPs 315 291 235 231 236 214 213 212 211 21 2,143 2,236 4,2 3,936 3,671 813 856 853 882 912 525 74 2,325 5 1, 1,5 2, 2,5 3, 3,5 4, 4,5 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report $9.6 $9.8 $9.3 $2.8 $8.1 Meet Service Requirements with Economic Efficiency - 5 Cost of Purchased Energy / ML Treated Secondary and BNR WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21 $127.8 $167.7 $451.9 $433.6 $4. $5. $51.9 $47.4 $47.2 $45.7 $69.3 $53.7 $52.9 $ $5 $1 $15 $2 $25 $3 $35 $4 $45 $5 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Protect the Environment - 1 # of Regulated Tests Out of Compliance All WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21 125 163 216 22 222 Average 8.2 5.7 7.2 14.5 1.8 5 1 15 2 25 3 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Protect the Environment - 2 kg of BOD Discharged to the Environment per Capita Secondary and BNR WWTPs.21 214 213 212 211 21 2.93 2.78 2.71 3.23 6.34.95 1..95.79.96.94.95 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 1 1. 1. 1. 1. Sick Days Taken per Field Employee All WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21 18.2 22.5 21.6 22. 25.4 Average 5.8 7.8 9.1 8.1 8. 3.5 4. 5 1 15 2 25 3 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report All WWTPs Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - Total Available Field Hours / Total Paid Field Hours 2 49% 71% 7% 7% 69% 214 213 212 211 21 96% 96% 92% 1% 89% 81% 81% 81% 82% 82% 75% 79% % 2% 4% 6% 8% 1% 12% No values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 3 Total Overtime Hours / Total Paid Field Hours All WWTPs.4%.5%.5%.7% 2.1% 214 213 212 211 21 16.7% 24.2% 24.3% 25.2% 27.5% 4.6% 5.2% 4.% 5.4% 4.8%.7% 6.1% % 5% 1% 15% 2% 25% 3% Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 4 # of Field Accidents with Lost Time / 1, Field Labour Hours All WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21.11.11.41.48.48 Average.2.2.3.1.2.1.2.3.4.5.6 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report Provide a Safe and Productive Workplace - 5 # of Lost Hours Due to Field Accidents / 1, Field Labour Hours All WWTPs 214 213 212 211 21 8.7 15.7 13.9 16.5 57.7 Average 1.5 1.1.8 1.2 2.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report

WWTP MIN-MAX Results Final Report # of Odour Complaints / 1, People Served All WWTPs Have Satisfied and Informed Customers - 1 214 213 212 211 21.57.449.443.792 1.229 Average.49.3.31.33.27.44.243.2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 Negative Values - no data available National Water and Wastewater Benchmarking Initiative 216 Report